Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T11:15:31.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatiotemporal dynamics of the molluscan community associated with seagrass on the western equatorial Atlantic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2019

Lorraine Lopes Cavalcante Open the ORCID record for Lorraine Lopes Cavalcante [Opens in a new window] ,
Cristiane Xerez Barroso Open the ORCID record for Cristiane Xerez Barroso [Opens in a new window] ,
Pedro Bastos de Macêdo Carneiro Open the ORCID record for Pedro Bastos de Macêdo Carneiro [Opens in a new window]  and
Helena Matthews-Cascon
Lorraine Lopes Cavalcante*
Affiliation:
Icthyology Laboratory, Centro de Estudos do Mar – CEM, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Av. Beira-mar, s/n, Caixa Postal: 61, CEP: 83255-976, Pontal do Sul – Pontal do Paraná, PR, Brazil
Cristiane Xerez Barroso
Affiliation:
Graduate Program on Marine Tropical Sciences, Instituto de Ciências do Mar -LABOMAR, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Av. da Abolição, 3207, Meireles, CEP: 60165-081, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
Pedro Bastos de Macêdo Carneiro
Affiliation:
Campus Ministro Reis Velloso, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Av. São Sebastião, 2819, Bairro de Fátima, CEP: 64202-020, Parnaíba, PI, Brazil
Helena Matthews-Cascon
Affiliation:
Graduate Program on Marine Tropical Sciences, Instituto de Ciências do Mar -LABOMAR, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Av. da Abolição, 3207, Meireles, CEP: 60165-081, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil Departamento de Biologia, Centro de Ciências, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Rua Campus do Pici, s/n, Bloco 909, Pici, CEP: 60440-900, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Lorraine Lopes Cavalcante, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aimed to qualitatively and quantitatively analyse the molluscan assemblages associated with a Halodule wrightii seagrass bed in a rarely studied area within a conservation unit in north-eastern Brazil. Seasonal and spatial changes in several seagrass meadow characteristics, including sediment, were evaluated to explain temporal and spatial variations in the molluscs found there. The molluscan community differed in its structure among periods and meadows, as well as in the composition of its infaunal and epifaunal assemblages. The results of this study indicated that molluscs are affected by the particular characteristics of a seagrass meadow, especially by its location in the intertidal zone, more than by the area of the meadow. Molluscs were also affected by other characteristics of the seagrass meadow, such as above-ground biomass and shoot density. Changes in all molluscan assemblages were also mediated by differences among months and seasons in this region of the western equatorial Atlantic, but not by seasonal changes of the meadow. The studied meadow was found to be one of the densest in Brazil, which has considerable importance to its associated fauna.

Keywords

Epifaunal assemblagesHalodule wrightiiinfaunal assemblagesseagrass meadowsseasonal changestemporal changes
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 99 , Issue 6 , September 2019 , pp. 1285 - 1294
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alves, MS and Araújo, MJG (1999) Moluscos associados ao fital Halodule wrightii Ascherson na Ilha de Itamaracá – PE. Trabalhos Oceanográficos da Universidade Federal de PE 27, 91–99.Google Scholar
Arponen, H and Boström, C (2011) Responses of mobile epifauna to small-scale seagrass patchiness: is fragmentation important? Hydrobiologia 680, 1–10.Google Scholar
Arroyo, MC, Salas, C, Rueda, JL and Gofas, S (2006) Temporal changes of mollusc populations from a Zostera marina bed in southern Spain (Alboran Sea), with biogeographic considerations. Marine Ecology 27, 417–430.Google Scholar
Arruda, EP, Domanesch, IO and Amaral, ACZ (2003) Mollusc feeding guilds on sandy beaches in Sao Paulo State, Brazil. Marine Biology 143, 691–670.Google Scholar
Barbier, P, Meziane, T, Forêt, M, Tremblay, R, Robert, R and Olivier, F (2017) Nursery function of coastal temperate benthic habitats: new insight from the bivalve recruitment perspective. Journal of Sea Research 121, 11–23.Google Scholar
Barros, KVSB and Rocha-Barreira, CA (2009/2010) Caracterização da dinâmica espaço-temporal da macrofauna bentônica em um banco de Halodule wrightii Ascherson (Cymodoceaceae) por meio de estratificação. Revista Nordestina de Zoologia 4, 73–81.Google Scholar
Barros, KVDS and Rocha-Barreira, CA (2013) Responses of the molluscan fauna to environmental variations in a Halodule wrightii Ascherson ecosystem from Northeastern Brazil. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 85, 187–200.Google Scholar
Barros, KVDS, Rocha-Barreira, CA and Magalhães, KM (2013) Ecology of Brazilian seagrasses: is our current knowledge sufficient to make sound decisions about mitigating the effects of climate change? Iheringia 68, 163–178.Google Scholar
Barros, KVSB and Rocha-Barreira, CA (2014) Influence of environmental factors on a Halodule wrightii Ascherson meadow in northeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Aquatic Science and Technology 18, 31–41.Google Scholar
Beck, MW, Heck, KL Jr., Able, KW, Childers, DL, Eggleston, DB, Gillanders, BM, Halpern, B, Hays, CG, Hoshino, K, Minello, TJ, Orth, RJ, Sheridan, PF and Weinsten, MP (2001) The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates: a better understanding of the habitats that serve as nurseries for marine species and the factors that create site-specific variability in nursery quality will improve conservation and management of these areas. Bioscience 51, 633–641.Google Scholar
Bologna, PAX and Heck, KL Jr (1999) Macrofaunal associations with seagrass epiphytes: relative importance of trophic and structural characteristics. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 242, 21–39.Google Scholar
Bologna, PAX and Heck, KL Jr. (2000) Impact of seagrass habitat architecture on bivalve settlement. Estuaries 23, 449–457.Google Scholar
Bologna, PAX and Heck, KL Jr. (2002) Impact of habitat edges on density and secondary production of seagrass-associated fauna. Estuaries 25, 1033–1044.Google Scholar
Boström, C and Bonsdorff, E (1997) Community structure and spatial variation of benthic invertebrates associated with Zostera marina (L.) beds in the northern Baltic Sea. Journal of Sea Research 37, 153–166.Google Scholar
Boström, C and Bonsdorff, E (2000) Zoobenthic community establishment and habitat complexity: the importance of seagrass shoot-density, morphology and physical disturbance for faunal recruitment. Marine Ecology Progress Series 205, 123–138.Google Scholar
Boström, C, Jackson, EL and Simenstad, C (2006) Seagrass landscapes and their effects on associated fauna: a review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 68, 383–403.Google Scholar
Bowden, DA, Rowden, AA and Attrill, MJ (2001). Effect of patch size and in-patch location on the infaunal macroinvertebrate assemblages of Zostera marina seagrass beds. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 259, 133–154.Google Scholar
Burdick, DM and Kendrick, GA (2001) Standards for seagrass collection, identification and sample design. In Short, FT and Coles, RG (eds), Global Seagrass Research Methods. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 79–100.Google Scholar
Casares, FA and Creed, JC (2008) Do small seagrasses enhance density, richness, and diversity of macrofauna? Journal of Coastal Research 243, 790–797.Google Scholar
Cole, HA and Hancock, DA (1955) Odostomia as a pest of oysters and mussels. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 34, 25–31.Google Scholar
Copertino, MS, Creed, JC, Lanari, MO, Magalhães, K, Barros, K, Lana, PC, Sordo, L and Horta, PA (2016) Seagrass and submerged aquatic vegetation (VAS) habitats off the coast of Brazil: state of knowledge, conservation and main threats. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 64, 53–80.Google Scholar
Couto, ECG, Silveira, FLD and Gayana, GRAR (2003) Marine biodiversity in Brazil: the status. Gayana 67, 327–340.Google Scholar
Creed, JC (1999) Distribution, seasonal abundance and shoot size of the seagrass Halodule wrightii near its southern limit at Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Aquatic Botany 65, 47–58.Google Scholar
Creed, JC and Kinupp, M (2011) Small scale change in mollusk diversity along a depth gradient in a seagrass bed off Cabo Frio, (southeast Brazil). Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 59, 267–276.Google Scholar
Duarte, CM and Kirkman, H (2001) Methods for the measurement of seagrass abundance and depth distribution. In Short, FT and Coles, RG (eds), Global Seagrass Research Methods. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 141–153.Google Scholar
Edgar, GJ (1990) The influence of plant structure on the species richness, biomass and secondary production of macrofaunal assemblages associated with Western Australian seagrass beds. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 137, 215–240.Google Scholar
Erftemeijer, PLA and Herman, PMJ (1994) Seasonal changes in environmental variables, biomass, production and nutrients contents in two contrasting tropical intertidal seagrass beds in South Sulawesi Indonesia. Oecologia 99, 45–59.Google Scholar
Frost, MT, Rowden, AA and Attrill, MJ (1999) Effect of habitat fragmentation on the macroinvertebrate infaunal communities associated with the seagrass Zostera marina L. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 9, 255–263.Google Scholar
Gambi, MC, Conti, G and Bremec, CS (1998) Polychaete distribution, diversity and seasonality related to seagrass cover in shallow bottoms of the Tyrrhenian Sea (Italy). Scientia Marina 629, 1–17.Google Scholar
Gillanders, BM (2007) Seagrass. In Kaiser, MJ, Attrill, MJ, Jennings, S, Thomas, DN and Barnes, DKA (eds), Marine Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 457–483.Google Scholar
Gros, O, Liberge, M and Felbeck, H (2003) Interspecific infection of aposymbiotic juveniles of Codakia orbicularis by various tropical lucinid gill-endosymbionts. Marine Biology 142, 57–66.Google Scholar
Guzzi, A (org.). (2012) Biodiversidade do Delta do Parnaíba: litoral piauiense. Parnaíba: EDUFPI.Google Scholar
Heck, KL Jr, Hays, G and Orth, RJ (2003) Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows. Marine Ecology Progress Series 253, 123–136.Google Scholar
Heck, KL Jr and Valentine, JF (2006) Plant–herbivore interactions in seagrass meadows. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 330, 420–436.Google Scholar
Hemminga, MA and Duarte, CM (2000) Seagrass ecology, 1st Edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holzer, KK, Rueda, JL and McGlathery, KJ (2011 a) Caribbean seagrasses as a food source for the emerald neritid Smaragdia viridis. American Malacological Bulletin 29, 63–67.Google Scholar
Holzer, KK, Rueda, JL and McGlathery, KJ (2011 b) Differences in the feeding ecology of two seagrass-associated snails. Estuaries and Coasts 34, 1140–1149.Google Scholar
Howard, RK and Short, FT (1986) Seagrass growth and survivorship under the influence of epiphyte grazers. Aquatic Botany 24, 287–302.Google Scholar
Irlandi, EA (1994) Large- and small-scale effects of habitat structure on rates of predation: how percent coverage of seagrass affects rates of predation and siphon nipping on an infaunal bivalve. Oecologia 98, 176–183.Google Scholar
Irlandi, EA (1996) The effects of seagrass patch size and energy regime on growth of a suspension-feeding bivalve. Journal of Marine Research 54, 161–185.Google Scholar
Jensen, S and Bell, S (2001) Seagrass growth and patch dynamics: cross-scale morphological plasticity. Plant Ecology 155, 1–17.Google Scholar
Johnson, MA, Fernandez, C and Pergent, G (2002) The ecological importance of an invertebrate chemoautotrophic symbiosis to phanerogam seagrass beds. Bulletin of Marine Science 71, 1343–1351.Google Scholar
Lima, SF et al. (2001) ANASED - Programa de Análise, Classificação e Arquivamento de Parâmetros sedimentológicos. In VIII Congresso da Associação Brasileira de Estudos do Quaternário, Mariluz, IMBÉ. Boletim de Resumos - ABEQUA (01). Porto Alegre.Google Scholar
Mai, ACG and Loebmann, D (2010) Guia Ilustrado: Biodiversidade do litoral do Piauí, 1st Edn. Sorocaba: Paratodos Socoraba.Google Scholar
Marques, LV and Creed, JC (2008) Biologia e ecologia das fanerógamas marinhas do Brasil. Oecologia Brasiliensis 12, 315–331.Google Scholar
Mills, VS and Berkenbusch, K (2009) Seagrass (Zostera muelleri) patch size and spatial location influence infaunal macroinvertebrate assemblages. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 81, 123–129.Google Scholar
Nakaoka, M (2005) Plant–animal interactions in seagrass beds: ongoing and future challenges for understanding population and community dynamics. Population Ecology 47, 167–177.Google Scholar
Newell, CR, Short, F, Hoven, H, Healey, L, Panchang, V and Cheng, G (2010) The dispersal dynamics of juvenile plantigrade mussels (Mytilus edulis L.) from eelgrass (Zostera marina) meadows in Maine, USA. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 394, 45–52.Google Scholar
Oliveira, FMR and Rocha-Barreira, CA (2009) A família Epitoniidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) do norte e nordeste do Brasil. Arquivos de Ciências do Mar 42, 121–127.Google Scholar
Oksanen, J, Guillaume Blanchet, F, Friendly, M, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, Dan McGlinn, PR, Minchin, RB, O'Hara, GL, Simpson, PS, Henry, M, Stevens, H, Szoecs, E and Wagner, H (2018) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.Google Scholar
Paula, JEDA (2013) Dinâmica morfológica da planície costeira do estado do Piauí: evolução, comportamento dos processos costeiros e a variação da linha de costa (PhD thesis). Instituto de Ciências do Mar, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, BRA.Google Scholar
Peterson, BJ and Heck, KLJ (2001) Positive interactions between suspension-feeding bivalves and seagrass – a facultative mutualism. Marine Ecology Progress Series 213, 143–155.Google Scholar
Petracco, M, Camargo, RM, Tardelli, DT and Turra, A (2014) Population biology of the gastropod Olivella minuta (Gastropoda, Olividae) on two sheltered beaches in southeastern Brazil. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 150, 149–156.Google Scholar
Pimenta, AD, Absalão, RS and Myiaji, C (2009) A taxonomic review of the genera Boonea, Chrysallida, Parthenina, Ivara, Fargoa, Mumiola, Odostomella and Trabecula (Gastropoda, Pyramidellidae, Odostomiinae) from Brazil. Zootaxa 2049, 39–66.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2016) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation. https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Reusch, TBH (1998) Differing effects of eelgrass Zostera marina on recruitment and growth of associated blue mussels Mytilus edulis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 167, 149–153.Google Scholar
Reynolds, LC, Berg, P and Zieman, JC (2007) Lucinid clam influence on the biogeochemistry of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum sediments. Estuaries and Coasts 30, 482–490.Google Scholar
Rios, EC (1994) Seashells of Brazil, 2nd Edn. Rio Grande: FURG Press.Google Scholar
Rosa, LC and Bemvenuti, CE (2007) Seria a macrofauna bentônica de fundos não consolidados influenciada pelo aumento na complexidade estrutural do habitat? O caso do estuário da lagoa dos patos. Brazilian Journal of Aquatic Science and Technology 11, 51–56.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, G, Moretzsohn, F and García, EF (2009) Gastropoda (Mollusca) of the Gulf of Mexico. In Felder, DL and Camp, DK (eds) Gulf of Mexico Origin, Waters, and Biota. Volume 1, Biodiversity. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press, pp. 579–700.Google Scholar
Rueda, JL, Gofas, S, Urra, J and Salas, C (2009 a) A highly diverse molluscan assemblage associated with eelgrass beds (Zostera marina L.) in the Alboran Sea: micro-habitat preference, feeding guilds and biogeographical distribution. Scientia Marina 73, 679–700.Google Scholar
Rueda, JL, Salas, C, Urra, J and Marina, P (2009 b) Herbivory on Zostera marina by the gastropod Smaragdia viridis. Aquatic Botany 90, 253–260.Google Scholar
Sordo, L, Fournier, J, Oliveira, MO and Panizza, AC (2011) Temporal variations in morphology and biomass of vulnerable Halodule wrightii meadows at their southernmost distribution limit in the Southwestern Atlantic. Botanica Marina 54, 13–21.Google Scholar
Stoner, AW (1980) The role of seagrass biomass in the organization of benthic macrofaunal assemblages. Bulletin of Marine Science 30, 537–551.Google Scholar
Stoner, AW and Lewis, FG (1985) The influence of quantitative and qualitative aspects of habitat complexity in tropical sea-grass meadows. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 94, 19–401.Google Scholar
Suguio, K (1973) Introdução A Sedimentologia. São Paulo: Ed. Edgard Blücher – Edusp Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, JD and Glover, EA (2000) Functional anatomy, chemosymbiosis and evolution of the Lucinidae. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 177, 207–225.Google Scholar
Valentine, JF and Duffy, JE (2006) The central role of grazing in seagrass ecology. In Larkum, AWD, Orth, RJ and Duarte, CM (eds), Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation. Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 463–501.Google Scholar
Ward, JE and Langdon, CJ (1986) Effects of the ectoparasite Boonea (=Odostoma) impressa (say) (Gastropoda: Pyramidellidae) on the growth rate, filtration rate, and valve movements of the host Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 99, 163–180.Google Scholar
Webster, PJ, Rowdena, AA and Attrill, MJ (1998) Effect of shoot density on the infaunal macro-invertebrate community within a Zostera marina seagrass bed. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 47, 351–357.Google Scholar
White, ME, Ray, ENSM, Wilson, EA and Zastrow, CE (1988) Metabolic changes induced in oysters (Crassostrea virginica) by the parasitism of Boonea impressa (Gastropoda: Pyramidellidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 90A, 279–290.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cavalcante et al. supplementary material

Appendix 1

Download Cavalcante et al. supplementary material(File)
File 616.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Cavalcante et al. supplementary material

Appendix 2

Download Cavalcante et al. supplementary material(File)
File 24.2 KB