Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:27:06.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Observations on Bipinnariae and Juveniles of the Starfish Genus Luidia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Douglas P. Wilson
Douglas P. Wilson
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The bipinnaria larva of the five-armed starfish Luidia sarsi Diiben and Koren is unusual among bipinnariae in being exceptionally large, and more especially in that at metamorphosis the larval body detaches from the juvenile starfish it has carried and nurtured, to continue a separate existence for a considerable time. In the closely related seven-armed Luidia ciliaris (Philippi) the larva is much smaller and the larval body is completely absorbed, as is usual with starfish larvae. In neither species does a brachiolaria stage precede metamorphosis. The bipinnaria of Luidia sarsi has been especially well described and illustrated, with a discussion of earlier observations, by Tattersall & Sheppard (1934). Recorded here are my observations on the metamorphosis of six bipinnariae of Luidia sarsi and one of Luidia ciliaris, and on the subsequent growth and habits of the young starfishes developed from them. Three of the former species metamorphosed in accordance with previous accounts, but three others differed in that the larval body was partially absorbed to a greater or lesser degree.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 58 , Issue 2 , May 1978 , pp. 467 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bury, H. 1896. The metamorphosis of echinoderms. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, 38. 45–135.Google Scholar
Delap, M. & C., 1907.Notes on the plankton of Valencia Harbour 1902–1905. Report of the Sea and Inland Fisheries of Ireland for 1905, Part II, Scientific Investigations, 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, A. 1927. Bipinnaria asterigera (Echinoderma), from the Northumberland plankton. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1927 157–171.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Th. 1921. Studies of the Development and Larval Forms of Echinoderms. 261 pp. Copenhagen: G. E. C. Gad.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strathmann, R. 1974. Introduction to function and adaptation in echinoderm larvae. Thalassia jugoslavica, 10, 321–339.Google Scholar
Tattersall, W. M. & Sheppard, E. M. 1934. Observations on the bipinnaria of the asteroid genus Luidia. In James Johnstone Memorial Volume (ed. R. J. Daniel), pp. 35–61. University Press of Liverpool.Google Scholar
Thorson, G. 1961. Length of pelagic larval life in marine bottom invertebrates as related to larval transport by ocean currents. In Oceanography (ed. M. Sears), pp. 455–474. Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science. [Publication No. 67.]Google Scholar
Wilson, D. P. 1971. Sabellaria colonies at Duckpool, North Cornwall, 1961–1970. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 509–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar