Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:32:16.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soft tissue organization in some sertulariid colonial hydroids (Hydrozoa: Sertulariidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2008

S.V. Pyataeva  and
I.A. Kosevich
S.V. Pyataeva*
Affiliation:
Invertebrate Zoology Department, Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
I.A. Kosevich
Affiliation:
Invertebrate Zoology Department, Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: S.V. Pyataeva, Invertebrate Zoology Department, Faculty of Biology, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The simplified text-book view holds that hydroids' soft body is composed of a branched double-layered tube, whose wall consists of two epithelial layers (the inner gastrodermis and the outer epidermis) separated by the mesoglea. Some hydroids are characterized by large, complex colonies and likely an even more complicated inner organization. By using three species from the thecate hydroids of the family Sertulariidae we investigated the soft body structure of such hydroids. The anatomical study revealed some new features of colonial hydroids. The double layered coenosarc fills the perisarc (outer skeleton) tube only at the endings of the branched colony. More proximally, the coenosarc tube becomes narrower and a thin epidermal lining covers the inner surface of the perisarc tube. In some species the soft tissues of the shoots form a network of anastomosing canals. The canals are formed by the gastrodermal epithelium and they are embedded in epidermal tissue. In the upper part of the shoot, these canals are located at the periphery, along the inner surface of the perisarc. In more proximal regions of the stem, the whole lumen of the perisarc tube can be occupied by gastrodermal canals; the canals are enclosed in a parenchyma-like epidermal tissue. The organization of the soft tissue in these thecate hydroids is a striking example of structural complexity that does not contravene the limits of the ground plan of the phylum.

Keywords

soft tissueorganizationsertulariidscolonial hydroidsSertulariidae
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 88 , Special Issue 8: Hydrozoans , December 2008 , pp. 1703 - 1713
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allman, G.J. (1871) A monograph of the gymnoblastic or tubularian hydroids, in two parts. London: Ray Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beklemishev, V.N. (1969) Principles of comparative anatomy of invertebrates 1. Promorphology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Translated from the Russian by MacLennon J.M. and edited by Kabata Z.]Google Scholar
Beloussov, L.V. and Dorfman, Y.G. (1974) On the mechanics of growth and morphogenesis in hydroid polyps. American Zoologist 14, 719–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouillon, J. (1974) Sur la structure de Paracoryne huvey, Picard 1957 (Coelenterata, Hydrozoa, Athecata). Académie Royale de Belgique. Mémoires de la Classe des Sciences 18, 55 pp.Google Scholar
Bouillon, J. (1975) Sur la reproduction et l'écologie de Paracoryne huvei Picard (Tubularoidea–Athecata–Hydrozoa–Cnidaria). Archives de Biologie 86, 45–96.Google Scholar
Bouillon, J. and Boero, F. (2000) Phylogeny and classification of hydroidomedusae. The Hydrozoa: a new classification in the light of old knowledge. Thalassia Salentina 24, 1–296.Google Scholar
Bouillon, J., Medel, M.D., Pagès, F., Gili, J.M., Boero, F. and Gravili, C. (2004) Fauna of the Mediterranean Hydrozoa. Scientia Marina 68 (Supplement 2), 1–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, A.G., Cartwright, P., McFadden, C.S. and Schierwater, B. (2005) Phylogenetic context and basal metazoan model systems. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45, 585–594.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornelius, P.F.S. (1979) A revision of the species of Sertulariidae (Coelenterata: Hydroidea) recorded from Britain and nearby seas. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Zoology series) 34, 243–321.Google Scholar
Davis, L.V. (1971) Growth and development of colonial hydroids. In Lenhoff, H.M. and Davis, L.V. (eds) Experimental coelenterate biology. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hale, L.J. (1960) Contractility and hydroplasmic movements in the hydroid Clytia johnstoni. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 101, 339–350.Google Scholar
Huxley, J.S. and de Beer, G.R. (1923) Studies in dedifferentiation. IV. Resorption and differential inhibition in Obelia and Campanularia. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 67, 473–495.Google Scholar
Josephson, R.K. and Mackie, G.O. (1965) Multiple pacemakers and the behaviour of the hydroid Tubularia. Journal of Experimental Biology 43, 293–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsen, A.G. and Marfenin, N.N. (1984) Peremeschivanie gidroplasmy v kolonii u gidroidov na primere Dynamena pumila (L.) i nekotorykh drugikh vidov. (Hydroplasma displacement in the hydroid colony by the example of Dynamena pumila (L.) and some other species). Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii 45, 670–680. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Knight, D.P. (1970) Sclerotization of the perisarc of the calyptoblastic hydroid, Laomedea flexuosa. I. The identification and localization of dopamine in the hydroid. Tissue and Cell 2, 467–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koizumi, O. and Bode, H.R. (1986) Plasticity in the nervous system of adult hydra. I. The position-dependent expression of FMRFamide-like immunoreactivity. Developmental Biology 116, 407–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosevich, I.A. (1990) Development of stolon's and stem's internodes in hydroid genera Obelia (Campanulariidae). Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya XVI Biologiya 3, 26–32.Google Scholar
Kosevich, I.A. (2006) Mechanics of growth pulsations as the basis of growth and morphogenesis in colonial hydroids. Russian Journal of Developmental Biology 37, 90–101.Google ScholarPubMed
Kossevitch, I.A. (1999) Cell migration during growth of hydroid colony. Zhurnal Obshchei Biologii 60, 91–98.Google Scholar
Kossevitch, I.A., Herrmann, K. and Berking, S. (2001) Shaping of colony elements in Laomedea flexuosa Hinks (Hydrozoa, Thecaphora) includes a temporal and spatial control of skeleton hardening. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole 201, 417–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Letunov, V.N. and Stepanjants, S.D. (1986) Izuchenie Obelia longissima (Pallas, 1766) (Hydrozoa, Thecaphora, Campanulariidae) i osobennosti autecologii etogo vida v uslovijakh Belogo morya. (Studying of Obelia longissima (Pallas, 1766) (Hydrozoa, Thecaphora, Campanulariidae) and autecological features of this species at the White Sea). In Fedyakov, V.V. and Lukanin, V.V. (eds) Ecologicheskiye issledovaniya donnikh organizmov Belogo morya. Leningrad: Zoologicheskij Institut AN SSSR, pp. 17–29. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Marfenin, N. and Kosevich, I. (2004) Morphogenetic evolution of hydroid colony pattern. Hydrobiologia 530/531, 319–327.Google Scholar
Millonig, G. (1964) Study on the factors which influence preservation of fine structure. In Symposium on electron microscopy Rome, Italy. Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, p. 347.Google Scholar
Mironov, A.A., Komissarchik, J.J. and Mironov, V.A. (1994) Metody elektronnoj mikroscopii v biologii i meditsine (Methods of electron microscopy in biology and medicine). St Petersburg: Nauka. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Naumov, D.V. (1969) Hydroids and hydromedusae of the USSR. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translation.Google Scholar
Nutting, C.C. (1904) American hydroids. Part II. The Sertulariidae. Special Bulletin of the United States National Museum 4, 1–325.Google Scholar
Pyataeva, S.V. and Kosevich, I.A. (2008) The morphological and anatomical characteristics of the colonial hydroid Sertularia mirabilis (Sertulariidae). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 87, 3–19.Google Scholar
Saint-Hilaire, K. (1930) Morphogenetisch Untersuchungen der nichtzellularen Gebilde bei Tieren. Periderm der Hydroiden. Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Allgemeine Zoologie und Physiologie der Tiere 47, 512–622.Google Scholar
Tardent, P. (1980) A giant Tubularia (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from the waters of the San Juan Islands, Washington. Syesis 13, 17–25.Google Scholar
Thomas, M.B. and Edwards, N.C. (1991) Cnidaria: Hydrozoa. In Harrison, F.W. and Westfall, J.A. (eds) Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates. Volume 2: Placozoa, Porifera, Cnidaria, and Ctenophora. New York: Wiley-Liss, Inc, pp. 91–183.Google Scholar