Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T17:16:03.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The settlement behaviour of the larvae of Sabellaria alveolata (L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Douglas P. Wilson
Douglas P. Wilson
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Using larvae reared from artificial fertilizations in the laboratory, often for several months, many experiments have been made on factors promoting settlement of Sabellaria alveolata (L.). When at last able to metamorphose after many weeks of pelagic development, the larvae of this species crawl actively over any solid surfaces with which they happen to make contact, seeking indicative characters distinctive of their normal adult environment. If these are not found at once the larvae are able to postpone metamorphosis for weeks if necessary, remaining in a developmental state able both to swim and to crawl. If delayed too long in reaching a favourable environment some may metamorphose in the absence of normal environmental stimuli, others often become incapable of metamorphosing normally and do so abnormally, or they may die without metamorphosing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , June 1968 , pp. 387 - 435
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cole, H. A. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1949. The setting behaviour of larvae of the European flat oyster Ostrea edulis L., and its influence on methods of cultivation and spat collection. Fish. Invest., Ser. 2, Vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J., 1955. The behaviour of barnacle cyprids in relation to water movement over a surface. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 32, pp. 569–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D. J., 1961. Territorial behaviour in barnacle settlement. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 38, pp. 429–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Barnes, H., 1954. The orientation and distribution of barnacles at settlement with particular reference to surface contour. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 23, pp. 142–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Meadows, P. S., 1962. The chemical basis of gregariousness in cirripedes. Proc. Roy. Soc. B, Vol. 156, pp. 500–20.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Meadows, P. S., 1963. Adsorbed layers: the stimulus to settlement in barnacles. Proc. Roy. Soc. B, Vol. 158, pp. 364–87.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Ryland, J. S., 1960. Influence of filming and of surface texture on the settlement of marine organisms. Nature, Lond., Vol. 185, p. 119.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J. & Williams, G. B., 1960. Effect of extracts from fucoids in promoting settlement of epiphytic polyzoa. Nature, Lond., Vol. 188, pp. 1206–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duerden, J. E., 1902. Aggregated colonies in madreporarian corals. Am. Nat., Vol. 36, pp. 461–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmondson, C. H., 1929. Growth of Hawaiian corals. Bull. Bernice P. Bishop Mus., No. 58, pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Gee, J. M., 1965. Chemical stimulation of settlement in larvae of Spirorbis rupestris (Serpulidae). Animal Behaviour, Vol. 13, pp. 181–6.Google Scholar
Gee, J. M. & Knight-Jones, E. W., 1962. The morphology and larval behaviour of a new species of Spirorbis (Serpulidae). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 42, pp. 641–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J. S., 1966. The attractive factor of intertidal sands to Protodrilus symbioticus. J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K., Vol. 46, pp. 627–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W., 1951. Gregariousness and some other aspects of the setting behaviour of Spirorbis. J. mar. biol. Ass. U. K. Vol. 30, pp. 201–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W., 1953a. Decreased discrimination during setting after prolonged planktonic life in larvae of Spirorbis borealis (Serpulidae). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 32, pp. 337–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W., 1953b. Laboratory experiments on gregariousness during setting in Balanus balanoides and other barnacles. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 30, pp. 584–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W., 1955. The gregarious setting reaction of barnacles as a measure of systematic affinity. Nature, Lond., Vol. 174, p. 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W. & Crisp, D. J., 1953. Gregariousness in barnacles in relation to the fouling of ships and to anti-fouling research. Nature, Lond., Vol. 171, p. 1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W. & Moyse, J., 1961. Intraspecific competition in sedentary marine animals. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol., No. 15, Mechanisms in Biological Competition, pp. 72–95.Google Scholar
Knight-Jones, E. W. & Stevenson, J. P., 1950. Gregariousness during settlement in the barnacle Elminius modestus Darwin. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 29, pp. 281–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, A., 1916. The development of Alcyonium digitatum with some notes on the early colony formation. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 62, pp. 43–94Google Scholar
Meadows, P. S. & Anderson, J. G., 1966. Micro-organisms attached to marine and freshwater sand grains. Nature, Lond., Vol. 212, pp. 1059–60.Google Scholar
Meadows, P. S. & Anderson, J. G., 1968. Micro-organisms attached to marine sand grains. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 48, pp. 161–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, P. S. & Williams, G. B., 1963. Settlement of Spirorbis borealis Daudin larvae on surfaces bearing films of micro-organisms. Nature, Lond., Vol. 198, pp. 610–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, T. C., 1924. The attachment of oyster larvae. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 46, pp. 143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyefinch, K. A., 1948. Notes on the biology of cirripedes. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 27, pp. 464–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryland, J. S., 1959. Experiments on the selection of algal substrates by polyzoan larvae. J. exp. Biol. Vol. 36, pp. 613–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheltema, R. S., 1961. Metamorphosis of the veliger larvae of Nassarius obsoletus (Gastropoda) in response to bottom sediment. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 120, pp. 92–109.Google Scholar
Silva, P. H. D. H. De, 1962. Experiments on choice of substrata by Spirorbis larvae (Serpulidae). J. exp. Biol., Vol. 39, pp. 483–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1958. The natural history, embryology, larval biology and postlarval development of Adalaria proximo (Alder and Hancock) (Gastropoda Ophisthobranchia). Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Ser. B, Vol. 242, pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1962. Studies on the ontogeny of Tritonia hombergi Cuvier (Gastropoda Opisthobranchia). Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Ser. B, Vol. 245, pp. 171–218.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1964. Grazing and the life cycles of British nudibranchs. Brit. Ecol. Soc. Symp. No. 4: Grazing in Terrestrial and Marine Environments, pp. 275–97. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates, with special reference to the planktonic larvae in the Sound (Øresund). Meddr Kommn. Danm. Fisk.-og Havunders. Ser. Plankton, Bd. 4, No. 1, pp. 1–523.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1950. Reproductive and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Biol. Rev., Vol. 25, pp. 1–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visscher, J. P., 1928. Reactions of the cyprid larvae of barnacles at the time of attachment. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 54, pp. 327–35.Google Scholar
Vovelle, J., 1965. Le tube de Sabellaria alveolata (L.) annélide polychète Hermellidae et son ciment. Étude écologique, expérimentale, histologique et histochemique. Arch. Zool. exp. gén., T. 106, pp. 1–187.Google Scholar
Walton Smith, F. G., 1946. Effect of water currents upon the attachment and growth of barnacles. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 90, pp. 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. B., 1964. The effect of extracts of Fucus serratus in promoting the settlement of larvae of Spirorbis borealis (Polychaeta). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 44, pp. 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1929. The larvae of the British sabellarians. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 15, pp. 221–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1932. On the mitraria larva of Owenia fusiformis Delle Chiaje. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Ser. B, Vol. 221, pp. 231–334.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1952. The influence of the nature of the substratum on the metamorphosis of the larvae of marine animals, especially the larvae of Ophelia bicornis Savigny. Ann. Inst. océanogr. Monaco, T. 27, pp. 49–156.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1953. The settlement of Ophelia bicornis Savigny larvae. The 1952 experiments. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 32, pp. 209–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1955. The role of micro-organisms in the settlement of Ophelia bicornis Savigny. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 34, pp. 531–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1958. Some problems in larval ecology related to the localized distribution of bottom animals. Pp. 87–103 in Perspective in Marine Biology. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1968. Some aspects of the development of eggs and larvae of Sabellaria alveolata (L.) J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 48, pp. 367–85.Google Scholar