Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:32:36.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scavenging deep demersal fishes of the Porcupine Seabight, north-east Atlantic: observations by baited camera, trap and trawl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

I.G. Priede
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen, Department of Zoology, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB9 2TN
P.M. Bagley
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen, Department of Zoology, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB9 2TN
A. Smith
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen, Department of Zoology, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB9 2TN
S. Creasey
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen, Department of Zoology, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB9 2TN
N.R. Merrett
Affiliation:
The Natural History Museum, Department of Zoology, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD

Abstract

Demersal fishes on the continental rise and slope were sampled by trawl, baited trap and a baited camera. Seventy-one different species were trawled, but only 18 species approached baits. At rise soundings (4100 m to 2250 m) Coryphaenoides (Nematonurus) armatus was dominant at baits and comprised 41·5% of the trawl catch. On the slope (<2250 m) Synaphobranchus kaupi was dominant at baits and comprised 32·7% of the trawl catch. At 1500–2501 m Antimora rostrata competed at baits and comprised 5–10% of trawl catches. At 1500–1650 m Centroscymnus coelolepis also consumed baits but was not captured by trawl. For C. (N.) armatus abundance was proportional to tarr2 (where tarr= arrival time), demonstrating that arrival time of the first fish at baits provides an estimate of population density. Maximum estimated abundance at 2897 m was 877 km-2, more than five times the abundance on the abyssal plain. Halosauropsis macrochir, Lepidion eques, Coryphaenoides guentheri, Gadiculus argenteus and Coryphaenoides rupestris were important in trawl samples but absent or rare at baits.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, J.D., Bagley, P.M. & Priede, I.G., 1992. Photographic and acoustic tracking observations of the behaviour of the grenadier Coryphaenoides (Nematonurus) armatus, the eel Synaphobranchus bathybius, and other abyssal demersal fish in the North Atlantic Ocean. Marine Biology, 112, 535544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, J.D., Priede, I.G. & Smith, K.L. Jr, 1991. Temporal change in foraging behaviour of the fish Coryphaenoides (Nematonurus) yaquinae, in the central North Pacific. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 76, 195199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagley, P.M., 1992. A code-activated transponder for the individual identification and tracking of deep-sea fish. In Wildlife telemetry: remote monitoring and tracking of animals (ed. I.G., Priede and S.M., Swift), pp. 111119. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.Google Scholar
Bagley, P.M., Priede, I.G. & Armstrong, J.D., 1990. An autonomous deep ocean vehicle for acoustic tracking of bottom living fishes. In IEE Colloquium ‘Monitoring the sea, Digest no. 182, Ref. E15/E11, pp. 211213. London: Institute of Electrical Engineers.Google Scholar
Clarke, M.R. & Merrett, N.R., 1972. The significance of squid, whale and other remains from the stomachs of bottom-living deep-sea fish. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 599603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crabtree, R.E., Carter, J. & Musick, J. A., 1991. The comparative feeding ecology of temperate and tropical deep-sea fishes from the western North Atlantic. Deep-Sea Research, 38, 12771298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, G.R., 1964. Line-fishing on the Continental Slope. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 44, 277284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, G.R., 1968. Line-fishing on the Continental Slope. II. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 48, 479483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J.D.M. & Bergstad, O.A., 1992. Species composition of demersal fish in the Rockall Trough, north-eastern Atlantic, as determined by different trawls. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 72, 213230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J.D.M. & Duncan, J.A.R., 1987. Deep-sea bottom-living fishes at two repeat stations at 2200 m and 2900 m in the Rockall Trough, northeastern Atlantic Ocean. Marine Biology, 96, 309325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, J.D.M. & Mauchline, J., 1990. Depth-related trends in diet of a deep-sea bottom-living fish assemblage of the Rockall Trough. In Trophic relationships in the marine environment (ed. M., Barnes and R.N., Gibson), pp. 439452. Aberdeen University Press. [Proceedings of the 24th European Marine Biology Symposium.]Google Scholar
Grassle, J.F. & Sanders, H.L., 1973. Life histories and the role of disturbance. Deep-Sea Research, 20, 643659.Google Scholar
Haedrich, R.L. & Henderson, N.R., 1974. Pelagic food of Coryphaenoides armatus a deep benthic rattail. Deep-Sea Research, 21, 739744.Google Scholar
Haedrich, R.L. & Merrett, N.R., 1988. Summary atlas of deep-living demersal fishes in the North Atlantic basin. Journal of Natural History, 22, 13251362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isaacs, J.D. & Schwartzlose, R.A., 1975. Active animals of the deep-sea floor. Scientific American, 233, 8491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macpherson, E., 1980. Regime alimentaire de Galeus melastomus Rafinesque, 1810 Etmopterus spinax (L., 1758) et Scymnorhinus licha (Bonnaterre, 1788) en Mediterranee occidentale. Vie et Milieu, 30, 139148.Google Scholar
Macpherson, E., 1981. Resource partitioning in a Mediterranean demersal fish community. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 4, 183193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J. & Gordon, J.D.M., 1983a. Diets of sharks and chimaeroids of the Rockall Trough, northeastern Atlantic Ocean. Marine Biology, 75, 269278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J. & Gordon, J.D.M., 1983b. Diets of clupeoid, stomiatoid and salmonoid fish of the Rockall Trough, northeastern Atlantic Ocean. Marine Biology, 77, 6778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J. & Gordon, J.D.M., 1984a. Diets and bathymetric distributions of the macrourid fish of the Rockall Trough, northeastern Atlantic Ocean. Marine Biology, 81, 107121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J. & Gordon, J.D.M., 1984b. Occurrence of stones, sediment and fish scales in stomach contents of demersal fish of the Rockall Trough. Journal of Fish Biology, 24, 357362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J. & Gordon, J.D.M., 1985. Trophic diversity in deep-sea fish. Journal of Fish Biology, 26, 527535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J. & Gordon, J.D.M., 1986. Foraging strategies of deep-sea fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 27, 277–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauchline, J. & Gordon, J.D.M., 1991. Oceanic pelagic prey of benthopelagic fish in the benthic boundary layer of a marginal oceanic region. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 74, 109115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrett, N.R., 1986. Macrouridae of the eastern North Atlantic. Fiches d'Identification du Plancton, no. 173/174/175, 14pp.Google Scholar
Merrett, N.R., 1992. Demersal ichthyofaunal distribution in the abyssal eastern North Atlantic, with special reference to Coryphaenoides (Nematonurus) armatus (Macrouridae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 72, 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrett, N.R. & Domanski, P.A., 1985. Observations on the ecology of deep-sea bottom-living fishes collected off northwest Africa. II. The Moroccan slope (27–34°N), with special reference to Synaphobranchus kaupi. Biological Oceanography, 3, 349399.Google Scholar
Merrett, N.R., Haedrich, R.L., Gordon, J.D.M. & Stehmann, M., 1991a. Deep demersal fish assemblage structure in the Porcupine Seabight (eastern North Atlantic): slope sampling by three different trawls compared. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 329358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrett, N.R., Haedrich, R.L., Gordon, J.D.M. & Stehmann, M., 1991b. Deep demersal fish assemblage structure in the Porcupine Seabight (eastern North Atlantic): results of single warp trawling at lower slope to abyssal soundings. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 359373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrett, N.R. & Marshall, N.B., 1981. Observations on the ecology of deep-sea bottom-living fishes collected off northwest Africa (08°-27°N). Progress in Oceanography, 9, 185244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearcy, W.G. & Ambler, J.W., 1974. Food habits of deep-sea macrourid fishes off the Oregon coast. Deep-sea Research, 21, 745759.Google Scholar
Priede, I.G., Bagley, P.M., Armstrong, J.D., Smith, K.L. Jr & Merrett, N.R., 1991. Direct measurement of active dispersal of food-falls by deep-sea demersal fishes. Nature, London, 351, 647649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priede, I.G., Bagley, P.M. & Smith, K.L. Jr, 1994. Seasonal change in activity of abyssal demersal scavenging grenadiers Coryphaenoides (Nematonurus) armatus at baits deployed in eastern North Pacific Ocean. Limnology & Oceanography, 39, 279288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priede, I.G., Smith, K.L. Jr & Armstrong, J.D., 1990. Foraging behaviour of abyssal grenadier fish: inferences from acoustic tagging and tracking in the North Pacific Ocean. Deep-Sea Research, 37, 81101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priede, I.G. & Watson, J.J., 1993. An evaluation of the daily egg production method for estimating biomass of Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus). Bulletin of Marine Science, 53, 891911.Google Scholar
Rice, A.L., Billett, D.S.M., Thurston, M.H. & Lampitt, R.S., 1991. The Institute of Oceanographic Sciences Biology Programme in the Porcupine Seabight: background and general introduction. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 71, 281310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenner, C.A. & Musick, J.A., 1977. Biology of the morid fish Antimora rostrata in the western North Atlantic. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 34, 23622368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar