Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T16:38:01.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Redescription and postmarsupial development of Apseudopsis latreillii (Crustacea: Tanaidacea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2012

P. Esquete*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología y Biología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad de Vigo, E-36310 Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
R.N. Bamber
Affiliation:
ARTOO Marine Biology Consultants, Ocean Quay Marina, Belvidere Road, Southampton SO14 5QY, UK
J. Moreira
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biología (Zoología), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain
J.S. Troncoso
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología y Biología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad de Vigo, E-36310 Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: P. Esquete, Departamento de Ecología y Biología Animal, Facultad de Ciencias del Mar, Universidad de Vigo, E-36310 Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain email: [email protected]

Abstract

Apseudopsis latreillii is a common tanaidacean species widely-distributed in the north-east Atlantic, but its diagnostic characters remain unspecified. Furthermore, intraspecific variation in relation to its developmental stages has not been described. Knowledge about this variation is needed owing to the difficulty of identification of the significant number of juvenile specimens within samples, particularly when sympatric with other apseudid species. Specimens from three different localities of the north-east Atlantic have been examined, and the size of 766 individuals has been measured. Study of postmarsupial development shows that the manca II is followed by two juvenile stages before reaching maturity. Males present two possible morphologies. After a preparatory stage, females pass through a sequence of copulatory instars followed by intermediate stages in which the female loses the ovisac after manca release. Characters allowing the distinction of A. latreillii specimens regardless of developmental stage are the combination of a pointed and downturned rostrum, pereonites without apophyses, three ventral spines on the pereopod 1 propodus, and one dorsodistal spine on the merus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Băcescu, M. (1961) Contribution á la connaissance des Tanaidacés de la Mediterranée Orientale-1. Les Apseudidae et Kalliapseudidae des Côtes d'Israel. Bulletin of the Research Council of Israel, Section B, Zoology I0 B, 137170.Google Scholar
Bamber, R.N. (2010) In the footsteps of Henrik Nicolaj Krøyer: the rediscovery and redescription of Leptochelia savignyi (Krøyer, 1842) sensu stricto (Crustacea: Tanaidacea: Leptocheliidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 123, 289311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamber, R.N. (2011) The marine fauna and flora of the Isles of Scilly. Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Peracarida). Journal of Natural History 45, 18011815. DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2011.560968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamber, R.N. and Sheader, M. (2005) Apseudomorph Tanaidacea (Crustacea: Malacostraca: Peracarida) from shallow waters off Sabah, Malaysia. Systematics and Biodiversity 2, 281303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bate, C. and Westwood, J.O. (1868) A history of the British sessile-eyed Crustacea. Volume 2. London: J. Van Voorst, 536 pp.Google Scholar
Błażewicz-Paszkowycz, M. (2001) Remarks on the population structure of two Antarctic peracarid crustaceans: Eudorella splendida Zimmer, 1902 (Cumacea) and Nototanais antarcticus (Hodgson, 1902) (Tanaidacea). Polish Polar Research 22, 3544.Google Scholar
Bückle-Ramírez, L.F. (1965) Untersuchungen über die Biologie von Heterotanais oerstedi Krøyer (Crustacea, Tanaidacea). Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere 55, 714782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, C. (1888) Ueber Apseudes Latreillii Edw. und die Tanaiden. Arbeiten aus den Zoologischen Instituten der Universität Wien und der Zoologischen Station in Trieste 5, 319333.Google Scholar
De-la-Ossa-Carretero, J.A., Del-Pilar-Ruso, Y., Giménez-Casalduero, F. and Sánchez-Lizaso, J.S. (2010) Sensitivity of tanaid Apseudes latreillei (Milne-Edwards) populations to sewage pollution. Marine Environmental Research 69, 309317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esquete, P., Moreira, J. and Troncoso, J.S. (2011) Peracarid assemblages of Zostera meadows in an estuarine ecosystem (O Grove inlet, NW Iberian Peninsula): spatial distribution and seasonal variation. Helgoland Marine Research 65, 445455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, L.F. (1973) New species of the genera Synapseudes and Cyclopoapseudes with notes on morphological variation, postmarsupial development, and phylogenetic relationships within the family Metapseudidae (Crustacea: Tanaidacea). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 53, 2558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardiner, L.F. (1975) The systematics, postmarsupial development and ecology of the deep-sea family Neotanaidae (Crustacea, Tanaidacea). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 170, 1265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutu, M. (2001) Appearance and reality in the knowledge of the tanaidacean crustaceans from the Mediterranean basin. Travaux du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle ‘Grigore Antipa’ 43, 5963.Google Scholar
Gutu, M. (2002) Contributions to the knowledge of the genus Apseudes Leach, 1814 (Crustacea: Tanaidacea, Apseudomorpha) from the Mediterranean basin and north African Atlantic. Travaux du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle ‘Grigore Antipa' 44, 1939.Google Scholar
Gutu, M. (2006) New apseudomorph taxa (Crustacea, Tanaidacea) of the World Ocean. Bucharest: Curtea Veche Publishing House, 318 pp.Google Scholar
Highsmith, R.C. (1983) Sex reversal and fighting behaviour: coevolved phenomena on a tanaid crustacean. Ecology 64, 719726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdich, D.M. and Jones, J.A. (1983a) The distribution and ecology of British shallow-water tanaid crustaceans (Peracarida, Tanaidacea). Journal of Natural History 17, 157183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdich, D.M. and Jones, J.A. (1983b) Tanaids. Synopsis of British fauna, new series: 27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 98 pp.Google Scholar
Johnson, S.B. and Attramadal, Y.G. (1982) Reproductive behaviour and larval development of Tanais cavolinii (Crustacea, Tanaidacea). Marine Biology 71, 1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W.S., Stevens, M. and Watling, L. (2001) Reproduction and development of marine peracaridans. Advances in Marine Biology 39, 105260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, K. (1953) The postmarsupial development of the Tanaidacea. Arkiv för Zoologi 4, 409422.Google Scholar
Lister, J.J. (1909) The introduction to Arthropoda, the crustacean and xiphosuran. 177. In Sedgwick, A (ed.) A student's text-book of zoology. Volume III. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd, 905 pp.Google Scholar
Lourido, A., Moreira, J. and Troncoso, J.S. (2008) Assemblages of peracarid crustaceans in subtidal sediments from the Ría de Aldán (Galicia, NW Spain). Helgoland Marine Research 62, 289301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messing, C.G. (1983) Postmarsupial development and growth of Pagurapseudes largoensis McSweeny (Crustacea, Tanaidacea). Journal of Crustacean Biology 3, 380408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milne-Edwards, M.H. (1828) Mémoire sur quelques crustacés noveaux. Annales des Sciences Naturelles 13, 287301.Google Scholar
Milne-Edwards, M.H. (1840) Histoire Naturelle des Crustacés. Tome 3. Paris: Librarie Encyclopédique de Roret, 638 pp.Google Scholar
Modlin, R.F. and Harris, P.A. (1989) Observations on the natural history and experiments on the reproductive strategy of Hargeria rapax (Tanaidacea). Journal of Crustacean Biology 9, 578586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreira, J., Lourido, A. and Troncoso, J.S. (2008) Diversity and distribution of peracarid crustaceans in shallow subtidal soft bottoms at the Ensenada de Baiona (Galicia, N.W. Spain). Crustaceana 81, 10691089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, A.M. and Brady, G.S. (1909) The Crustacea of Northumberland and Durham. Natural History Transactions of Northumberland and Durham, New Series 3, 252417.Google Scholar
Pennafirme, S. and Soares-Gomes, A. (2009) Population biology and reproduction of Kalliapseudes schubartii Mañé-Garzón, 1949 (Peracarida, Tanaidacea) in a tropical coastal lagoon, Itaipu, Southeastern Brazil. Crustaceana 82, 15091526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira Leite, F.P and Pereira Leite, P.E. (1997) Desenvolvimento morfológico e dos ovários de Kalliapseudes schubarti Mañé-Garzón (Crustacea, Tanaidacea) do canal de São Sebastião, São Paulo, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 14, 675683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggio, S. (1996) I Tanaidacei dei mari italiani: quadro delle conoscence. Bolletino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona 20, 583698.Google Scholar
Sars, G.O. (1882) Revision af gruppen Isopoda Chelifera. Archiv for Matematik og Naturvidenskab 7, 154.Google Scholar
Sars, G.O. (1886) On the Crustacea Isopoda of the ‘Lightning’, ‘Porcupine’ and ‘Valorous’ expeditions. In Norman, A.M. and Stebbing, M.A. (eds) Transactions of the Zoological Society of London 12, 8284.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A., Siegel, V. and Brandt, A. (2002) Postembryonic development of Apseudes heroae and Allotanais hirsutus (Tanaidacea, Crustacea) in Magellanic and sub-Antarctic waters. Antarctic Science 14, 201211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sieg, J. (1983) Tanaidacea. In Gruner, H.E. and Holthuis, L.B. (eds) Crustaceorum catalogus. The Hague, The Netherlands: SPB Academic Publishing, 552 pp.Google Scholar
Swennen, D., Duiven, P. and Spaans, A.L. (1982) Numerical density and biomass of macrobenthic animals living in the intertidal zone of Surinam, South America. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 15, 405418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar