Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T22:45:25.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Redescription and molecular characterization of Crenidens macracanthus Günther, 1874 (Pisces: Sparidae), and first record of C. indicus Day, 1873 in the eastern Indian Ocean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2020

Subal Kumar Roul*
Affiliation:
Puri Field Centre of ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Puri-752 002, Odisha, India
N. S. Jeena
Affiliation:
ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, P. B. No. 1603, Ernakulam North P. O., Cochin, Kerala682 018, India
Shubhadeep Ghosh
Affiliation:
Visakhapatnam Regional Centre of ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Visakhapatnam-530 003, Andhra Pradesh, India
Prathibha Rohit
Affiliation:
Mangalore Research Centre of ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Mangaluru-575 001, Karnataka, India
*
Author for correspondence: Subal Kumar Roul, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Crenidens macracanthus was originally described in 1874 based on a single specimen collected from Chennai (Madras), south-east coast of India. In 1875, the species was synonymized with C. indicus without citing any valid reason. Since then, no taxonomic studies have been attempted for the genus Crenidens, except in 2013 the species was resurrected from synonymy and redescribed as a valid species based on the holotype and non-type specimen. In view of the fact that C. macracanthus is a poorly known species, it is redescribed based on examination of 30 additional specimens of 105.8–162.2 mm SL, collected from Puri, Odisha, north-east coast of India (Bay of Bengal) from 2017–2019, using morphological and molecular examinations. Our study provides a detailed morphological description, first colour photographs and phylogenetic analysis using COI barcodes of the species. The study has expanded the range in several morpho-meristic characters in comparison with the type and non-type specimens described earlier. The species in fresh condition can be easily distinguished from its two congeners (C. crenidens and C. indicus) by the yellowish tip of the lower caudal-fin lobe. Our study has also extended the distribution range of C. indicus (previously known only from the north-eastern Arabian Sea) to the eastern Indian Ocean, based on examination of a preserved specimen collected from Tuticorin, Tamil Nadu.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bauchot, ML and Smith, MM (1984) Sparidae. In Fisher, W and Bianchi, G (eds), FAO Species Identification Sheets for Fisheries Purposes. Western Indian Ocean, Fishing Area 51. Rome: FAO, vol. 4, pp. 111.Google Scholar
Bogorodsky, SV, Iwatsuki, Y, Amir, SA, Mal, AO and Alpermann, TJ (2017) Morphological and molecular divergence between Crenidens crenidens (Forsskål, 1775) and C. indicus Day, 1873 (Perciformes: Sparidae) and notes on a Red Sea endemic lineage of C. crenidens. Marine Biodiversity 47, 12731285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, F (1873) The sea fishes of India and Burma. In Day, F (ed.), Report on the Sea Fish and Fisheries of India and Burma. Calcutta: Office of Superintendant of Government Printing, pp. cliiicccxxxii.Google Scholar
Hubbs, CL and Lagler, KF (1958) Fishes of the Great Lakes Region. Bloomfield Hills, MI: Bulletin of Cranbrook Institute of Science, vol. 26.Google Scholar
Iwatsuki, Y and Heemstra, PC (2010) Taxonomic review of the western Indian Ocean species of the genus Acanthopagrus Peters, 1855 (Perciformes: Sparidae), with description of a new species from Oman. Copeia 1, 123136.Google Scholar
Iwatsuki, Y and Heemstra, PC (2011) Polysteganus mascarenensis, a new sparid fish species from Mascarene Islands, Indian Ocean. Zootaxa 3018, 1320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwatsuki, Y and Maclaine, J (2013) Validity of Crenidens macracanthus Günther 1874 (Pisces: Sparidae) from Chennai (Madras), India, with taxonomic statuses of the congeners. Ichthyological Research 60, 241248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iwatsuki, Y, Akazaki, M and Taniguchi, N (2007) Review of the species of the genus Dentex (Perciformes: Sparidae) in the western Pacific defined as the D. hypselosomus complex with the description of a new species, Dentex abei and a redescription of Evynnis tumifrons. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science (Ser. A), Supplement 1, 2949.Google Scholar
Kimura, M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16, 111120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumar, S, Stecher, G and Tamura, K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33, 18701874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manilo, LG and Bogorodsky, SV (2003) Taxonomic composition, diversity and distribution of coastal fishes of the Arabian Sea. Journal of Ichthyology 43, S75S149.Google Scholar
Psomadakis, P, Thein, H, Russell, BC and Tun, MT (2020) Field Identification Guide to the Living Marine Resources of Myanmar. FAO Species Identification Guide for Fishery Purposes. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Randall, JE (1995) Coastal Fishes of Oman. Bathurst: Crowford House Publishing.Google Scholar
Sambrook, J and Russell, DW (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. New York, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Ward, RD, Zemlak, TS, Innes, BH, Last, PR and Hebert, PD (2005) DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360, 18471857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: Image

Roul et al. supplementary material

Roul et al. supplementary material

Download Roul et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 137.9 KB