Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:25:23.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recruitment and zonation in a sub-Antarctic rocky intertidal community

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2016

Jessica Natalia Curelovich ,
Gustavo Alejandro Lovrich ,
Gerardo Rubén Cueto  and
Javier Angel Calcagno
Jessica Natalia Curelovich
Affiliation:
Centro de Estudios Biomédicos, Biotecnológicos, Ambientales y Diagnóstico (CEBBAD), Universidad Maimónides, Hidalgo 775, C1405BWE, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina
Gustavo Alejandro Lovrich
Affiliation:
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina Centro Austral de Investigaciones Científicas, Bernardo Houssay 200, C9410CAB, Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina
Gerardo Rubén Cueto
Affiliation:
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Universitaria, Pabellón II, 4° piso, C1428EHA, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Javier Angel Calcagno*
Affiliation:
Centro de Estudios Biomédicos, Biotecnológicos, Ambientales y Diagnóstico (CEBBAD), Universidad Maimónides, Hidalgo 775, C1405BWE, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: J.A. Calcagno Centro de Estudios Biomédicos, Biotecnológicos, Ambientales y Diagnóstico (CEBBAD), Universidad Maimónides, Hidalgo 775, C1405BWE, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study presents for the first time the factors governing the recruitment in a rocky intertidal community of the Beagle Channel, Tierra del Fuego (54°51′S 68°29′W), Argentina. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of grazers and predators, free substrate availability and crustose coralline algae on the recruitment of the main sessile components of the intertidal: Notochthamalus scabrosus, Notobalanus flosculus, Mytilus chilensis, Perumytilus purpuratus and Aulacomya atra at three intertidal levels. For barnacles, the probability of recruitment was higher with grazers, while the contrary was observed for bivalves. The number of N. flosculus recruits was higher with increased substrate availability, while N. scabrosus recruited more with reduced free substrate in the first sampling. Mussel recruitment was higher with reduced free substrate. The highest probability of recruitment of N. scabrosus was observed at the upper level. Notably, this probability and the recruits per plot were higher at the mid level under uncaged-ORP treatment than expected for the mid level. The probability of bivalve and N. flosculus recruitment was higher at upper and lower levels, respectively. At the lower level, barnacle recruitment was higher on bare rock than on crustose coralline algae. Our results suggest that grazers increase the probability of barnacle recruitment, while the presence of sessile organisms enhances the density of mussel recruits. Almost no recruitment of bivalves was observed in ORPs over one year, showing that the secondary succession is slow in this environment.

Keywords

barnaclesBeagle Channelsubstrate availabilitygrazersmusselssuccession
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 98 , Issue 2 , March 2018 , pp. 411 - 422
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arribas, L.P., Donnarumma, L., Palomo, M.G. and Scrosati, R.A. (2014) Intertidal mussels as ecosystem engineers: their associated invertebrate biodiversity under contrasting wave exposures. Marine Biodiversity 44, 203–211.Google Scholar
Beermann, A.J., Ellrich, J.A., Molis, M. and Scrosati, R.A. (2013) Effects of seaweed canopies and adult barnacles on barnacle recruitment: the interplay of positive and negative influences. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 448, 162–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertness, M.D. (1989) Intraspecific competition and facilitation in a northern acorn barnacle population. Ecology 70, 257–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertness, M.D. and Leonard, G.H. (1997) The role of positive interactions in communities: lessons from intertidal habitats. Ecology 78, 1976–1989.Google Scholar
Bertness, M.D., Leonard, G.H., Levine, J.M., Schmidt, P.R. and Ingraham, A.O. (1999) Testing the relative contribution of positive and negative interactions in rocky intertidal communities. Ecology 80, 2711–2726.Google Scholar
Bertness, M.D., Silliman, B.R., Bazterrica, M.C., Reyna, M., Hildago, F. and Crain, C.M. (2006) The community structure of western Atlantic Patagonian rocky shores. Ecological Monographs 76, 439–460.Google Scholar
Borthagaray, A.I. and Carranza, A. (2007) Mussels as ecosystem engineers: their contribution to species richness in a rocky littoral community. Acta Oecolica 31, 243–250.Google Scholar
Bracewell, S.A., Robinson, L.A., Firth, L.B. and Knights, A.M. (2013) Predicting free-space occupancy on novel artificial structures by an invasive intertidal barnacle using a removal experiment. PLoS ONE 8, e74457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074457.Google Scholar
Bujalesky, G. (2007) Coastal geomorphology and evolution of Tierra del Fuego (Southern Argentina). Geologica Acta 5, 337–362.Google Scholar
Buschbaum, C. (2000) Direct and indirect effects of Littorina littorea (L.) on barnacles growing on mussel beds in the Wadden Sea. Hydrobiologia 440, 119–128.Google Scholar
Buschbaum, C. (2002) Predation on barnacles of intertidal and subtidal mussel beds in the Wadden Sea. Helgoland Marine Research 56, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calcagno, J.A., Curelovich, J.N., Fernandez, V.M., Thatje, S. and Lovrich, G.A. (2012) Effects of physical disturbance on a sub-Antarctic middle intertidal bivalve assemblage. Marine Biology Research 8, 937–953.Google Scholar
Calcagno, J.A., López Gappa, J. and Tablado, A. (1998) Population dynamics of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite in an intertidal area affected by sewage pollution. Journal of Crustacean Biology 18, 128–137.Google Scholar
Calcagno, J.A. and Luquet, C.M. (1997) Influence of desiccation tolerance on the ecology of Balanus amphitrite Darwin, 1854 (Crustacea, Cirripedia). Nauplius 5, 9–15.Google Scholar
Chan, B.K.K. and Williams, G.A. (2003) The impact of physical stress and molluscan grazing on the settlement and recruitment of Tetraclita species (Cirripedia: Balanomorpha) on a tropical shore. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 284, 1–23.Google Scholar
Connell, J.H. (1961a) The influence of interspecific competition and other factors on the distribution of the barnacle Chthamalus stellatus . Ecology 42, 710–723.Google Scholar
Connell, J.H. (1961b) Effects of competition, predation by Thais lapillus and other factors on natural populations of the barnacles Balanus balanoides . Ecological Monographs 31, 61–104.Google Scholar
Connell, J.H. (1985) The consequences of variation in initial settlement vs post-settlement mortality in rocky intertidal communities. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 93, 11–15.Google Scholar
Crain, C.M. and Bertness, M.D. (2006) Ecosystem engineering across environmental gradients: implications for conservation and management. BioScience 56, 211–218.Google Scholar
Curelovich, J. (2013) Mecanismos Reguladores de la Estructura y Dinámica de la Comunidad Intermareal Rocosa de Ensenada Zaratiegui, Tierra del Fuego . PhD thesis. University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
Curelovich, J., Lovrich, G.A. and Calcagno, J.A. (2009) New locality for Notochthamalus scabrosus (Crustacea, Cirripedia): Bahía Lapataia, Beagle Channel, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. Anales del Instituto de la Patagonia 37, 47–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayton, P.K. (1971) Competition, disturbance, and community organization: the provision and subsequent utilization of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecological Monographs 41, 351–389.Google Scholar
Dungan, M.L. (1986) Three-way interactions: barnacles, limpets and algae in a sonoran desert rocky intertidal zone. American Naturalist 127, 292–316.Google Scholar
Durán, L.R. and Castilla, J.C. (1989) Variation and persistent of the middle rocky intertidal community of central Chile, with and without human harvesting. Marine Biology 103, 555–562.Google Scholar
Flach, E.C. (2003) The separate and combined effects of epibenthic predation and presence of macro-infauna on the recruitment success of bivalves in shallow soft-bottom areas on the Swedish west coast. Journal of Sea Research 49, 59–67.Google Scholar
Gaines, S. and Roughgarden, J. (1985) Larval settlement rate: a leading determinant of structure in an ecological community of the marine intertidal zone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 82, 3707–3711.Google Scholar
Hayworth, A.M. and Quinn, J.F. (1990) Temperature of limpets in the rocky intertidal zone: effects of caging and substratum. Limnology and Oceanography 35, 967–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo, F., Silliman, B., Bazterrica, M. and Bertness, M. (2007) Predation on the rocky shores of Patagonia, Argentina. Estuaries and Coasts 30, 886–894.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S.R., Norton, T.A. and Hawkins, S.J. (1999) Settlement and post-settlement interactions between Semibalanus balanoides (L.) (Crustacea: Cirripedia) and three species of fucoid canopy algae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 236, 49–67.Google Scholar
Jernakoff, P. (1985) The effect of overgrowth by algae on the survival of the intertidal barnacle Tesseropora rosea Krauss. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 94, 89–97.Google Scholar
Jones, C.G., Lawton, J.H. and Shachak, M. (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69, 373–386.Google Scholar
Leslie, H.M. (2005) Positive intraspecific effects trump negative effects in high-density barnacle aggregations. Ecology 86, 2716–2725.Google Scholar
Lively, C.M. and Raimondi, P.T. (1987) Desiccation, predation and mussel-barnacle interactions in the northern Gulf of California. Oecologia 74, 304–309.Google Scholar
MacPherson, E.A. and Scrosati, R. (2008) Population structure of the barnacle, Semibalanus balanoides (Cirripedia, Thoracica), across intertidal environmental stress gradients in northern Nova Scotia, Canada. Crustaceana 81, 725–736.Google Scholar
McGrath, D., King, P.A. and Gosling, E.M. (1988) Evidence for the direct settlement of Mytilus edulis larvae on adult mussel beds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 47, 103–106.Google Scholar
Menge, B.A. (1976) Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: role of predation, competition and environmental heterogeneity. Ecological Monographs 46, 355–393.Google Scholar
Menge, B.A. (2000a) Top-down and bottom-up community regulation in marine rocky intertidal habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 250, 257–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menge, B.A. (2000b) Recruitment vs post recruitment processes as determinants of barnacle population abundance. Ecological Monographs 70, 265–288.Google Scholar
Menge, B.A. and Sutherland, J.P. (1987) Community regulation: variation in disturbance, and predation in relation to environmental stress and recruitment. American Zoologist 130, 730–757.Google Scholar
Miller, L.P. and Gaylord, B. (2007) Barriers to flow: the effects of experimental cage structures on water velocities in high-energy subtidal and intertidal environments. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 344, 215–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minchinton, T.E. and Scheibling, R.E. (1991) The influence of larval supply and settlement on the population structure of barnacles. Ecology 72, 1867–1879.Google Scholar
Minchinton, T.E. and Scheibling, R.E. (1993) Free space availability and larval substratum selection as determinants of barnacle population structure in a developing rocky intertidal community. Marine Ecology Progress Series 95, 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morriconi, E.R. and Calvo, J. (1993) Influencia ambiental en el crecimiento alométrico de la valva de Nacella (Patinigera) deaurata (Gmelin, 1791) en el Canal Beagle. Malacologia 35, 1–6.Google Scholar
Navarrete, S.A. (1996) Variable predation: effects of whelks on a mid-intertidal successional community. Ecological Monographs 66, 301–321.Google Scholar
Navarrete, S.A. and Castilla, J.C. (1990) Barnacle walls as mediators of intertidal mussel recruitment: effects of patch size on the utilization of space. Marine Ecology Progress Series 63, 113–119.Google Scholar
Navarrete, S.A. and Castilla, J.C. (2003) Experimental determination of predation intensity in an intertidal predator guild: dominant versus subordinate prey. Oikos 100, 251–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarrete, S.A., Wieters, E.A., Broitman, B.R. and Castilla, J.C. (2005) Scales of benthic-pelagic coupling and the intensity of species interactions: from recruitment limitation to top-down control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102, 18046–18051.Google Scholar
Pawlik, R.J. (1992) Chemical ecology of the settlement of benthic marine invertebrates. Oceanography and Marine Biology 30, 273–335.Google Scholar
Petes, L.E., Menge, B.A. and Murphy, G.D. (2007) Environmental stress decreases survival, growth, and reproduction in New Zealand mussels. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 351, 83–91.Google Scholar
Petraitis, P.S. (1983) Grazing patterns of the periwinkle and their effect on sessile intertidal organisms. Ecology 64, 522–533.Google Scholar
Pineda, J. (1994) Spatial and temporal patterns in barnacle settlement rate along a southern California rocky shore. Marine Ecology Progress Series 107, 125–138.Google Scholar
Power, A.M., McCrann, K., McGrath, D., O'Riordan, R.M., Simkanin, C. and Myers, A.A. (2011) Physiological tolerance predicts species composition at different scales in a barnacle guild. Marine Biology 158, 2149–2160.Google Scholar
Power, A.M., Myers, A.A., O'Riordan, R.M., McGrath, D. and Delany, J. (2001) An investigation into rock surface wetness as a parameter contributing to the distribution of the intertidal barnacles Chthamalus stellatus and Chthamalus montagui . Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 52, 349–356.Google Scholar
Raimondi, P.T. (1990) Patterns, mechanisms, consequences of variability in settlement and recruitment of an intertidal barnacle. Ecological Monographs 60, 283–309.Google Scholar
Rius, M. and McQuaid, C.D. (2009) Facilitation and competition between invasive and indigenous mussels over a gradient of physical stress. Basic and Applied Ecology 10, 607–613.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, S.E., Ojeda, F.P. and Inestrosa, N.C. (1993) Settlement of benthic marine invertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 97, 193–207.Google Scholar
Roughgarden, J., Gaines, S. and Possingham, H. (1988) Recruitment dynamics in complex life cycles. Science 241, 1460–1466.Google Scholar
Sánchez, V. and Zaixso, H.E. (1995) Secuencias de recolonización mesolitoral en una costa rocosa del Golfo San José (Chubut, Argentina). Naturalia Patagónica, Ciencias Biológicas 3, 57–83.Google Scholar
Schiel, D.R. (2004) The structure and replenishment of rocky shore intertidal communities and biogeographic comparisons. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 300, 309–342.Google Scholar
Schmidt, G.H. and Warner, G.F. (1984) Effects of caging on the development of a sessile epifaunal community. Marine Ecology Progress Series 15, 251–263.Google Scholar
Scrosati, R.A. (2013) Patchy mussel dominance on ice-scoured rocky shores in Atlantic Canada. Marine Biodiversity 43, 251–252.Google Scholar
Silliman, B.R., Bertness, M.D., Altieri, A.H., Griffin, J.N., Bazterrica, M.C., Hidalgo, F.J., Crain, C.M., Alteiri, A. and Reyna, M.V. (2011) Whole-community facilitation regulates biodiversity on Patagonian rockyshores. PLoS ONE 6, e24502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024502.Google Scholar
Skaug, H., Fournier, D., Nielsen, A., Magnusson, A. and Bolker, B. (2013) Generalized linear mixed models using AD Model Builder. R package version 0.7.7. Available at http://glmmadmb.r-forge.r-project.org Google Scholar
Skinner, L.F. and Coutinho, R. (2005) Effect of microhabitat distribution and substrate roughness on barnacle Tetraclita stalactifera (Lamarck, 1818) settlement. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 48, 109–113.Google Scholar
Tamaki, A. (1985) Inhibition of larval recruitment of Armandia sp. (Polychaeta: Opheliidae) by established adults of Pseudopolydora paucibranchiata (Okuda) (Polychaeta: Spionidae) on an intertidal sand flat. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 87, 67–82.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (1980) The effect of grazing by gastropods and physical factors on the upper limits of distribution of intertidal macroalgae. Oecologia 46, 201–213.Google Scholar
Underwood, A.J. and Denley, E.J. (1984) Paradigms, explanations, and generalizations in models for the structure of intertidal communities on rocky shores. In Simberloff, D., Strong, D.R., Abele, L. and Thistle, A.R. (eds) Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 151–180.Google Scholar
Wethey, D.S. (1983) Geographic limits and local zonation: the barnacles Semibalanus (Balanus) and Chthamalus in New England. Biological Bulletin 165, 330–341.Google Scholar
Wethey, D.S. (1984) Sun and shade mediate competition in the barnacles Chthamalus and Semibalanus: a field experiment. Biological Bulletin 167, 176–185.Google Scholar
Zaixso, H., Vidal, A. and Lizarralde, Z.I. (1994) Recolonización en un poblamiento de mitílidos del mesolitoral inferior del Golfo San José (Chubut, Argentina). Naturalia Patagónica, Ciencias Biológicas 2, 71–81.Google Scholar
Zuur, A.F., Ieno, E.N., Walker, N.J., Saveliev, A.A. and Smith, G. (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar