Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T12:41:18.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The preliminary assessment of abundance and composition of marine beach debris in the northern Persian Gulf, Bandar Abbas City, Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2016

Jaleh Sarafraz ,
Mahdi Rajabizadeh  and
Ehsan Kamrani
Jaleh Sarafraz*
Affiliation:
Ghent University, Marine Biology, Krijgslaan 281 Campus Sterre – S8 B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
Mahdi Rajabizadeh
Affiliation:
Institute of Science and High Technology and Environmental Sciences, Graduate University of Advanced Technology, Kerman, Iran Ghent University, Evolutionary Morphology of Vertebrates, K.L. Ledeganckstraat 35, B-9000, Gent, Belgium
Ehsan Kamrani
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Biology, Faculty of Marine Sciences and Technologies, Hormozgan University, Bandar Abbas, Iran
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:J. Sarafraz, Ghent University, Marine Biology, Krijgslaan 281 Campus Sterre – S8 B-9000 Ghent, Belgium email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Marine debris is a major challenge threatening ocean and coastal environment with no easy solution in coming years. The problem is totally manmade and extendeds to coastal areas around the world. The accumulation of marine debris is largely due to lack of awareness and environmental education among the public reinforced with mismanagement of municipal litter in coastal cities. Iran has about 2415 km of coastlines in the north and south of the country that suffer severely from a marine debris problem. Despite the great scale of the problem that leads to the shutdown of some beaches to beachgoers, there are no documented data on the abundance, composition and sources of marine debris dispersed on beaches. With the cooperation of marine biology student volunteers, we surveyed beaches at two scales, 100 m and 1 km searching for litter in varying ranges. The results revealed that the most common items are made of plastic/polystyrene. Tourism and recreational activities are responsible for more than 90% of litter production on the study beach. Fisheries and aquaculture are the second source of most abundant marine litter found on the beach with considerable distance from tourism activities. We conclude that lack of education about the consequences of marine litter is the main reason for marine debris at the study beach. Another reason is related to rapid construction of coastal areas and development of coastal cities with no proper infrastructure to manage municipal littering.

Keywords

marine beach debrisassessmentthe Persian GulfBandar Abbas city
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 96 , Issue 1: Oceans and Human Health , February 2016 , pp. 131 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrady, A.L. (2011) Microplastics in the marine environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 62, 1596–1605.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barnes, D.K.A. (2005) Remote islands reveal rapid rise of southern hemisphere sea debris. Directions in Science 5, 915–921.Google ScholarPubMed
Barnes, D.K., Galgani, F., Thompson, R.C. and Barlaz, M. (2009) Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 1985–1998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Browne, M.A., Dissanayake, A., Galloway, T.S. and Lowe, D.M. (2008) Ingested microscopic plastic translocates to the circulatory system of the mussel, Mytilus edulis. Environmental Science and Technology 42, 5026–5031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, A., Adler, E., Barbière, J., Cohen, Y., Evans, S., Jarayabhand, S. and Westphalen, G. (2009) UNEP/IOC Guidelines on survey and monitoring of marine litter. UNEP Regional Seas Reports and Studies No. 186, IOC 41.Google Scholar
Cole, M., Webb, H., Lindeque, P.K., Fileman, E.S., Halsband, C. and Galloway, T.S. (2014) Isolation of microplastics in biota-rich seawater samples and marine organisms. Scientific Reports 4, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Debrot, A.O., Meesters, H.W.G., Bron, P.S. and de León, R. (2013) Marine debris in mangroves and on the seabed: largely-neglected litter problems. Marine Pollution Bulletin 1, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derraik, J.G. (2002) The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Marine Pollution Bulletin 44, 842–852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Edyvane, K.S., Dalgetty, A., Hone, P.W., Higham, J.S. and Wace, N.M. (2004) Long-term marine litter monitoring in the remote Great Australian Bight, South Australia. Marine Pollution Bulletin 48, 1060–1075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, C., Burton, H., Fitch, S., Schulz, M. and van den Hoff, J. (2013) Daily accumulation rates of marine debris on sub-Antarctic island beaches. Marine Pollution Bulletin 66, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fisher, W.B. (ed.) (1968) The land of Iran. Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hidalgo-Ruz, V. and Thiel, M. (2013) Distribution and abundance of small plastic debris on beaches in the SE Pacific (Chile): a study supported by a citizen science project. Marine Environmental Research 87, 12–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ivar do Sul, J.A. and Costa, M.F. (2014) The present and future of microplastic pollution in the marine environment. Environmental Pollution 185, 352–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laist, D.W. (1997) Impacts of marine debris: entanglement of marine life in marine debris including a comprehensive list of species with entanglement and ingestion records. In Coe, J.M. and Rogers, D.B. (eds) Marine Debris. New York, NY: Springer, pp. 99–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C.J. (2008) Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: a rapidly increasing, long-term threat. Environmental Research 108, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C.J., Moore, S.L., Leecaster, M.K. and Weisberg, S.B. (2001a) A comparison of plastic and plankton in the North Pacific central gyre. Marine Pollution Bulletin 42, 1297–1300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, E., Lyday, S., Roletto, J., Litle, K., Parrish, J.K., Nevins, H. and Kell, S. (2009) Entanglements of marine mammals and seabirds in central California and the north-west coast of the United States 2001–2005. Marine Pollution Bulletin 58, 1045–1051.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, S.L., Gregorio, D., Carreon, M., Weisberg, S.B. and Leecaster, M.K. (2001b) Composition and distribution of beach debris in Orange County, California. Marine Pollution Bulletin 42, 241–245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
OSPAR (2007b) OSPAR pilot project on monitoring marine beach litter. Monitoring of marine litter in the OSPAR region. Publication No. 306/2007. ISBN 978-1-905859-45-0.Google Scholar
Ramos, J.A., Barletta, M., Costa, M.F. (2012) Ingestion of nylon threads by Gerreidae while using a tropical estuary as foraging grounds. Aquatic Biology 17, 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rios, L.M., Moore, C. and Jones, P.R. (2007) Persistent organic pollutants carried by synthetic polymers in the ocean environment. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54, 1230–1237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, P.G., Moore, C.J., van Franeker, J.A. and Moloney, C.L. (2009) Monitoring the abundance of plastic debris in the marine environment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 1999–2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheavly, S.B. and Register, K.M. (2007) Marine debris & plastics: environmental concerns, sources, impacts and solutions. Journal of Polymers and the Environment 15, 301–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, C., Al-Husiani, M., Al-Jamali, F., Al-Yamani, F., Baldwin, R., Bishop, J. and Zainal, K. (2010) The Gulf: a young sea in decline. Marine Pollution Bulletin 60, 13–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teuten, E.L., Saquing, J.M., Knappe, D.R., Barlaz, M.A., Jonsson, S., Björn, A. and Takada, H. (2009) Transport and release of chemicals from plastics to the environment and to wildlife. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 2027–2045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiel, M., Hinojosa, I.A., Miranda, L., Pantoja, J.F., Rivadeneira, M.M. and Vásquez, N. (2013) Anthropogenic marine debris in the coastal environment: a multi-year comparison between coastal waters and local shores. Marine Pollution Bulletin 71, 307–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, R.C., Moore, C.J., Vom Saal, F.S. and Swan, S.H. (2009) Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 364, 2153–2166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
UNEP (2009) Marine litter: a global challenge. Prepared by Jeftic, Ljubomir, Sheavly, Seba, and Adler, Ellik; edited by Meith, Nikki. Nairobi: UNEP.Google Scholar
Van Franeker, J.A., Blaize, C., Danielsen, J., Fairclough, K., Gollan, J., Guse, N. and Turner, D.M. (2011) Monitoring plastic ingestion by the northern fulmar Fulmarus glacialis in the North Sea. Environmental Pollution 159, 2609–2615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed