Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:11:21.460Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New distribution records of the Arctic bryozoan Uschakovia gorbunovi Kluge, 1946 in the Barents and Greenland Seas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2024

Olga Yu. Evseeva
Affiliation:
Murmansk Marine Biological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (MMBI RAS), Murmansk, Russia
Alexander G. Dvoretsky*
Affiliation:
Murmansk Marine Biological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (MMBI RAS), Murmansk, Russia
*
Corresponding author: Alexander G. Dvoretsky; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The bryozoan Uschakovia gorbunovi was initially characterized as a constituent member of benthic communities of the Kara and East-Siberian Seas. The academic literature reports this species in the Barents Sea, but without accurate information on sampling locations. Also, there are no previous records of this species in the northern Greenland Sea near Svalbard. Our analysis of benthic collections obtained during the past two decades revealed the occurrence of four distribution records of Uschakovia gorbunovi within the Barents and Greenland Sea specifying its distribution: one in the northwestern part of the area and three others in the waters surrounding Svalbard. The new distribution records may be related to inadequate sampling efforts or the expansion of this Arctic species into the Barents Sea, which may be due to either natural processes such as ocean currents, or introduction by mobile benthic species such as snow crabs.

Type
Marine Record
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Introduction

Bryozoans comprise a distinct group of aquatic organisms that form colonies composed of interconnected individuals. The Bryozoa predominantly inhabit marine environments, with various species distributed across all oceans, ranging from the littoral zone to abyssal depths (Ryland, Reference Ryland2005). Bryozoans play a significant ecological role in marine ecosystems by contributing to temperate and tropical carbonate sediments (Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Lombardi and Cocito2015), serving as a food source for other marine species (Lidgard, Reference Lidgard2008), and providing three-dimensional structures, attachment surfaces, and nursery grounds for various marine organisms, some of which have commercial importance (Wood and Probert, Reference Wood and Probert2013; Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Lombardi and Cocito2015). Due to their limited mobility, bryozoans have developed diverse adaptations and life-history traits to thrive in different environmental conditions (Ryland, Reference Ryland2005). This characteristic makes them valuable indicators for assessing habitat conditions (Pagès-Escolà et al., Reference Pagès-Escolà, Hereu, Garrabou, Montero-Serra, Gori, Gómez-Gras, Figuerola and Linares2018).

Information regarding the distribution and spatial patterns of biodiversity, both for benthic organisms in general and specifically for bryozoans, is important for monitoring long-term changes in the marine environment and mitigating anthropogenic impacts on the ocean (Cusson et al., Reference Cusson, Archambault and Aitken2007; Cook et al., Reference Cook, Bock, Gordon and Weaver2018). The most comprehensive source for the diversity and distribution of Arctic bryozoans is a monograph by Kluge, originally published in Russian in 1962, and later translated into English and republished in 1975 (Kluge, Reference Kluge1962, Reference Kluge1975). Subsequent research has updated species lists and furnished new distribution records of Bryozoa in Arctic seas (Gontar and Denisenko, Reference Gontar, Denisenko and Herman1989; Denisenko, Reference Denisenko and Matishov2000, Reference Denisenko and Udodov2003, Reference Denisenko2009, Reference Denisenko2020, Reference Denisenko2022a, Reference Denisenko2022b; Gontar et al., Reference Gontar, Hop and Voronkov2001; Kukliński, Reference Kukliński2002; Kukliński and Hayward, Reference Kukliński and Hayward2004; Kuklinski and Taylor, Reference Kuklinski and Taylor2006).

Uschakovia gorbunovi is a bryozoan species belonging to the order Cheilostomatida, suborder Flustrina, superfamily Buguloidea, and family Bugulidae. It was initially described by Kluge in 1946 (Kluge, Reference Kluge and Buynitskiy1946), based on benthic surveys conducted along the continental slope of the Kara and East-Siberian Seas (on the Novosibirsk shallow water) at depths spanning from 64 to 698 m during the late 1930s. Uschakovia gorbunovi has been confirmed to exist in Arctic seas through subsequent surveys (Gontar and Denisenko, Reference Gontar, Denisenko and Herman1989; Denisenko, Reference Denisenko, Jackson and Jones2011, Reference Denisenko2022a) as well as in Iceland waters in the Greenland Sea (Micael et al., Reference Micael, Denisenko, Gíslason, Guðmundsson, Kukliński and Rodrigues2022; Denisenko, Reference Denisenko2022b). Hayward (Reference Hayward1994) recorded this species in the southeastern Faroes at depths of 610–1400 m in 1987 (Cook, Reference Cook2001). Denisenko (Reference Denisenko2022b) recently reported the occurrence of this species in the Barents Sea, but did not provide data on collection locations. Additionally, there is no information on the distribution of this species in the northern part of the Greenland Sea. New data on the distribution of this species can provide valuable insights into its ecology and expand our knowledge of the ways in which fauna formed and spread in former geological times.

The main objective of our study is to document new distribution records of Uschakovia gorbunovi in the Barents and Greenland Seas.

Materials and methods

In this study we used a dataset comprising more than 1500 benthic samples collected during 45 marine benthic surveys conducted in the Barents, Kara, and Laptev Seas over the past two decades (2003–2022). At each site three replicate samples were collected aboard research vessels at depths of 30–680 m using a Van Veen grab (0.1 m2 sampling area). The collected samples were washed through a 0.5 mm sieve and fixed with 4% neutral-buffered formalin. Alongside the benthic samples, environmental variables such as water temperature and salinity were also measured using standard devices such as CTD profilers at each sampling location.

The identification of bryozoans was undertaken using an MBS-10 stereomicroscope, following the guidelines outlined in the above mentioned monograph (Kluge, Reference Kluge1962). A total of four colonies of Uschakovia gorbunovi were found in the samples (Table 1). The first finding of this species dates back to 2005, with subsequent records spanning from 2017 to 2019 (Table 1). All colonies were attached to small pebbles.

Table 1. Characteristics of the sampling stations with records of Uschakovia gorbunovi in the study area

One bryozoan colony was photographed with a Cannon EOS DSLR camera for reference.

Results and discussion

Three colonies of Uschakovia gorbunovi were collected in Svalbard waters (two in the Barents Sea and one in the northern part of the Greenland Sea), while one was collected in the Makarov Strait, an area situated between Franz Josef Land and Novaya Zemlya in the northeastern Barents Sea (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Records of Uschakovia gorbunovi. Pink circle – initial finding by Kluge (Reference Kluge and Buynitskiy1946) in the East Siberian Sea, orange diamonds – initial findings by Kluge (Reference Kluge and Buynitskiy1946) in the Kara Sea, red triangles – present findings in the northern Barents Sea (the numbers correspond to those in Table 1).

According to the initial description by Kluge (Reference Kluge and Buynitskiy1946, Reference Kluge1962), a colony of Uschakovia gorbunovi is erect and arises from an ancestrula that is anchored by rhizoids, which then leads to the emergence of several founding zooids that exhibit the same ability to develop rhizoids. This erect, branched part of the colony develops from either one zooid or a compact sequence of linking zooids, which display an extraordinary degree of elongation. The branches of autozooids are grouped in alternating pairs and triads, before transitioning into a quadriserial configuration and subsequently undergoing bifurcation. This primary branch divides several times, creating a cluster of four to six branches. Autozooids possess a long, tubular, proximal gymnocyst that expands distally to surround an elongated opesia. Outward-facing zooids are equipped with a bipartite opesia, wherein the distal part is covered by a frontal membrane that surrounds operculum, and the proximal part is composed of the swollen bases of a pair of long, partially cuticular spines. In contrast, the inward-facing zooids show no spines, but they have an elongated opesia. Avicularia arise from the proximal gymnocyst of both zooid types; the subrostral chamber is significantly elongated and expands distally, forming a terminally hooked, acute rostrum. The presence of ovicells remains unidentified within this species.

Unlike Kluge (Reference Kluge and Buynitskiy1946), who recorded a fully developed colony (as suggested from his initial description and illustration), we were able to photograph a small colony consisting of either a young developing colony (according to its small size) or a fully developed colony with only one linking zooid (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Uschakovia gorbunovi Kluge, Reference Kluge and Buynitskiy1946 from the Barents Sea, 2017. (a) – general colony view, scale bar 5 mm, (b) – distal part of the colony, scale bar 0.5 mm, (c) – details of the colony, scale bar 0.5 mm.

Founding zooids, spines, and ancestrulae were likely missed during grab sampling – a process that may preclude successful collection of intact, delicate colonies of deep-water bryozoans with thinly calcified zooids. Unfortunately, the other three colonies found in the study area were severely damaged and also exhibited small sizes.

The length of our photographed colony was 5 mm. The lengths of the other colonies were 8 mm (No. 1), 4 mm (No. 3), and 4.5 mm (No. 4). Kluge (Reference Kluge1962) did not provide the total length of his colonies, while Cook (Reference Cook2001) described a colony with a length of 10 mm in the waters of the Faroe Islands and noted that the maximum length of the colonies from the Faroes was 15 mm. The zooids of the Barents Sea colony were yellowish in colour, with a length ranging from 0.75 to 0.87 mm and a width of 0.25 mm. These measurements coincide with the range observed by Kluge (Reference Kluge1962): 0.75–1.40 mm in length and 0.25 mm in width. Cook (Reference Cook2001) revealed autozooids lengths ranging from 0.76 to 0.83 mm.

Kluge reported that Uschakovia gorbunovi is a high-Arctic species that occurs at temperatures ranging from −0.90 to −1.40°C, while Micael et al. (Reference Micael, Denisenko, Gíslason, Guðmundsson, Kukliński and Rodrigues2022) recorded this species at −1.8 to −6.0°C. Our findings fall within this range (Table 1).

The frequency of Atlantic water inflows into high-latitude regions of the Barents Sea has been increasing (Frolova et al., Reference Frolova, Lyubina, Dikaeva, Akhmetchina and Frolov2007; Matishov et al., Reference Matishov, Moiseev, Lyubina, Zhichkin, Dzhenyuk, Karamushko and Frolova2012; Kortsch et al., Reference Kortsch, Primicerio, Fossheim, Dolgov and Aschan2015; Dvoretsky et al., Reference Dvoretsky, Vodopianova and Bulavina2023), resulting in stronger ocean currents and wind forcing (Matishov et al., Reference Matishov, Matishov and Moiseev2009, Reference Matishov, Moiseev, Lyubina, Zhichkin, Dzhenyuk, Karamushko and Frolova2012), may facilitate the range extensions of bryozoans. This phenomenon has been observed in both high and lower latitude areas of the Barents Sea over the past decade (Evseeva et al., Reference Evseeva, Ishkulova and Dvoretsky2022; Evseeva and Dvoretsky, Reference Evseeva and Dvoretsky2023, Reference Evseeva and Dvoretsky2024; Dvoretsky and Dvoretsky, Reference Dvoretsky and Dvoretsky2024). It can be hypothesized that Uschakovia gorbunovi was transported into the Barents Sea through the influx of cold Arctic waters from the Kara Sea between Franz Josef Land and Novaya Zemlya. This current then flows westward across the northern Barents Sea along the eastern slope of the Spitsbergen Bank, where it merges with the East Spitsbergen Current (Jakobsen and Ozhigin, Reference Jakobsen and Ozhigin2011). This circulation pattern provides a plausible explanation for the new distribution records of this bryozoan in the northern part of the Barents Sea. However, there emerges a question concerning the lack of early findings of Uschakovia gorbunovi in Svalbard waters, particularly since the species was discovered in the Faroe Islands based on a collection made in 1987. The bryozoan fauna in the shallow-water Svalbard area has been extensively studied (Gulliksen et al., Reference Gulliksen, Palerud, Brattegard and Sneil1999; Gontar et al., Reference Gontar, Hop and Voronkov2001; Kukliński, Reference Kukliński2002; Palerud et al., Reference Palerud, Gulliksen, Brattegard, Sneli, Vader, Prestrud, Strøm and Goldman2004). Uschakovia gorbunovi, which prefers deeper waters, was not found in collections prior to 2005, possibly due to insufficient sampling efforts in the open sea waters near the Svalbard Archipelago. Several bryozoan species have expanded their range through boat bottoms, ship hulls, and ballast water tanks (López Gappa et al., Reference López Gappa, Carranza, Gianuca and Scarabino2010; Ryland et al., Reference Ryland, Bishop, De Blauwe, El Nagar, Minchin, Wood and Yunnie2011; Loxton et al., Reference Loxton, Wood, Bishop, Porter, Spencer Jones and Nall2017; Anderson et al., Reference Anderson, Peterson and Andres2022). However, this pathway is only relevant for coastal species. In the case of the deep-water Uschakovia gorbunovi, a more likely scenario is their distribution via mobile benthic species, such as the invasive snow crab Chionocetes opilio. This species was first recorded in the Barents Sea in 1996 (Dvoretsky and Dvoretsky, Reference Dvoretsky and Dvoretsky2015), and adult snow crabs reached the Kara Sea in 2012 (Zimina, Reference Zimina2014). The migration of snow crabs in the opposite direction may have promoted the range extension of Uschakovia gorbunovi into the Barents Sea. Previous research has shown that snow crabs are suitable hosts for deep-sea bryozoans (Savoie et al., Reference Savoie, Miron and Biron2007) and that invasive crabs can contribute to the spread of their epibionts within the new area of occurrence (Dvoretsky and Dvoretsky, Reference Dvoretsky and Dvoretsky2022, Reference Dvoretsky and Dvoretsky2023).

Our study provides a basis for further monitoring of bryozoan fauna in Arctic seas under changing environmental conditions and a reference point for tracking the range expansion of bryozoans at high latitudes.

Data availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the crew aboard R/V ‘Dalnie Zelentsy’ and MMBI colleagues for support in sampling. We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Author contributions

Olga Yu. Evseeva – Conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, writing-review and editing. Alexander G. Dvoretsky – project administration, software, validation, writing-original draft.

Financial support

This study was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation.

Competing interest

None.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

References

Anderson, EJ, Peterson, MS and Andres, MJ (2022) Drifting bryozoans increase nekton diversity in the north-central Gulf of Mexico unvegetated muddy bottom seascape. Bulletin of Marine Science 98, 431450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, PL (2001) Notes on the genera Nordgaardia and Uschakovia (Bryozoa: Bugulidae). Memoirs of Museum Victoria 58, 215222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, PL, Bock, PE, Gordon, DP and Weaver, HJ (2018) Australian Bryozoa Volume 1: Biology, Ecology and Natural History. Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
Cusson, M, Archambault, P and Aitken, A (2007) Biodiversity of benthic assemblages on the Arctic continental shelf: historical data from Canada. Marine Ecology Progress Series 331, 291304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denisenko, NV (2000) Bryozoans (Bryozoa) of Yarnyshnaya Bay (East Murmansk): fauna, distribution, seasonal changes. In Matishov, GG (ed.), Current Benthos of the Barents and the Kara Seas. Apatity: KSC RAS Press, pp. 203219. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Denisenko, NV (2003) New data about fauna and ecology of bryozoans from Franz Josef Land archipelago. In Udodov, VP (ed.), Bryozoans of the Globe. Novokuznetsk: Kuzgpa Publishing House, pp. 4861. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Denisenko, NV (2009) The new species and new records of rare ctenostome bryozoans of the genus Alcyonidium in the Russian Arctic Seas. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences 313, 419426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denisenko, NV (2011) Bryozoans of the East Siberian Sea: history of research and current knowledge of diversity. In Jackson, PNW and Jones, MES (eds), Annals of Bryozoology 3: Aspects of the History of Research on Bryozoans. Dublin: International Bryozoology Association, pp. 116.Google Scholar
Denisenko, NV (2020) Species richness and the level of knowledge of the bryozoan fauna of the Arctic region. Proceedings of the Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences 324, 353363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denisenko, NV (2022a) Taxonomic structure and endemism of the bryozoan fauna of the Arctic region. Paleontological Journal 56, 774792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denisenko, NV (2022b) Species richness and distribution patterns of bryozoans of the Arctic region: list of bryozoan fauna. Annals of Bryozoology 7, 121143.Google Scholar
Dvoretsky, AG and Dvoretsky, VG (2015) Commercial fish and shellfish in the Barents Sea: have introduced crab species affected the population trajectories of commercial fish? Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 25, 297322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dvoretsky, AG and Dvoretsky, VG (2022) Epibiotic communities of common crab species in the coastal Barents Sea: biodiversity and infestation patterns. Diversity 14, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dvoretsky, AG and Dvoretsky, VG (2023) Epibionts of an introduced king crab in the Barents Sea: a second five-year study. Diversity 15, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dvoretsky, AG and Dvoretsky, VG (2024) Filling knowledge gaps in Arctic marine biodiversity: environment, plankton, and benthos of Franz Josef Land, Barents Sea. Ocean and Coastal Management 249, 106987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dvoretsky, VG, Vodopianova, VV and Bulavina, AS (2023) Effects of climate change on chlorophyll a in the Barents Sea: a long-term assessment. Biology 12, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evseeva, O and Dvoretsky, AG (2023) Shallow-water bryozoan communities in a glacier fjord of West Svalbard, Norway: species composition and effects of environmental factors. Biology 12, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evseeva, O and Dvoretsky, AG (2024) Bryozoan communities off Franz Josef Land (northern Barents Sea, Russia): distribution patterns and environmental control. Journal of Marine Systems 242, 103944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evseeva, O, Ishkulova, TG and Dvoretsky, AG (2022) Environmental drivers of an intertidal bryozoan community in the Barents Sea: a case study. Animals 12, 552.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frolova, EA, Lyubina, OS, Dikaeva, DR, Akhmetchina, OY and Frolov, AA (2007) Effect of climatic changes on the zoobenthos of the Barents Sea (on the example of several abundant species). Doklady Biological Sciences 416, 349351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gontar, VI and Denisenko, NV (1989) Arctic Ocean bryozoa. In Herman, Y (ed.), The Arctic Seas Climatology, Oceanography, Geology, and Biology. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, pp. 341371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gontar, VI, Hop, H and Voronkov, AY (2001) Diversity and distribution of Bryozoa in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard. Polish Polar Research 22, 187204.Google Scholar
Gulliksen, B, Palerud, R, Brattegard, T and Sneil, J (1999) Distribution of marine benthic macroorganisms at Svalbard (including Bear Island) and Jan Mayen. Research Report for Directorate for Nature Management 1999–4. Trondhjem Biological Station, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Hayward, PJ (1994) New species and new records of cheilostomatous Bryozoa from the Faroe Islands, collected by BIOFAR. Sarsia 79, 181206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobsen, T and Ozhigin, V (2011) The Barents Sea Ecosystem: Russian-Norwegian Cooperation in Science and Management. Trondheim: Tapir Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kluge, GA (1946) New and little-known species of Bryozoa from the arctic ocean. In Buynitskiy, VH (ed.), The Contributions of the Drifting Expedition of the Glavsevmorput on the Icebreaking Steamer “G. Sedov” 1937–1940. Moscow: Glavsevmorput Publishing House, pp. 194217. (In Russian).Google Scholar
Kluge, GA (1962) Bryozoans of Northern Seas of USSR. Leningrad: ZIN AN USSR, (In Russian).Google Scholar
Kluge, GA (1975) Bryozoa of the Northern Seas of the USSR. New Delhi: Amerind Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Kortsch, S, Primicerio, R, Fossheim, M, Dolgov, AV and Aschan, M (2015) Climate change alters the structure of arctic marine food webs due to poleward shifts of boreal generalists. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282, 20151546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kukliński, P (2002) Fauna of Bryozoa from Kongsfjorden, West Spitsbergen. Polish Polar Research 23, 193206.Google Scholar
Kukliński, P and Hayward, PJ (2004) Two new species of cheilostome Bryozoa from Svalbard. Sarsia 89, 7984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklinski, P and Taylor, PD (2006) A new genus and some cryptic species of Arctic and boreal calloporid cheilostome bryozoans. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 86, 10351046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lidgard, S (2008) Predation on marine bryozoan colonies: taxa, traits and trophic groups. Marine Ecology Progress Series 359, 117131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López Gappa, J, Carranza, A, Gianuca, NM and Scarabino, F (2010) Membraniporopsis tubigera, an invasive bryozoan in sandy beaches of southern Brazil and Uruguay. Biological Invasions 12, 977982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loxton, J, Wood, CA, Bishop, JD, Porter, JS, Spencer Jones, M and Nall, CR (2017) Distribution of the invasive bryozoan Schizoporella japonica in Great Britain and Ireland and a review of its European distribution. Biological Invasions 19, 22252235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matishov, GG, Matishov, DG and Moiseev, DV (2009) Inflow of atlantic-origin waters to the Barents Sea along glacial troughs. Oceanologia 51, 321340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matishov, G, Moiseev, D, Lyubina, O, Zhichkin, A, Dzhenyuk, S, Karamushko, O and Frolova, E (2012) Climate and cyclic hydrobiological changes of the Barents Sea from the twentieth to twenty-first centuries. Polar Biology 35, 17731790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micael, J, Denisenko, NV, Gíslason, S, Guðmundsson, G, Kukliński, P and Rodrigues, P (2022) Diversity of Bryozoa in Iceland. Polar Biology 45, 13911402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagès-Escolà, M, Hereu, B, Garrabou, J, Montero-Serra, I, Gori, A, Gómez-Gras, D, Figuerola, B and Linares, C (2018) Divergent responses to warming of two common co-occurring Mediterranean bryozoans. Scientific Reports 8, 17455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palerud, R, Gulliksen, B, Brattegard, T, Sneli, J-A and Vader, W (2004) The marine macro-organisms in Svalbard waters. In Prestrud, P, Strøm, H and Goldman, HV (eds), A Catalogue of the Terrestrial and Marine Animals of Svalbard. Tromsø: Norwegian Polar Institute, pp. 556.Google Scholar
Ryland, JS (2005) Bryozoa: an introductory overview. Denisia 19, 920.Google Scholar
Ryland, JS, Bishop, JD, De Blauwe, H, El Nagar, A, Minchin, D, Wood, CA and Yunnie, AL (2011) Alien species of Bugula (Bryozoa) along the Atlantic coasts of Europe. Aquatic Invasions 6, 1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savoie, L, Miron, J and Biron, M (2007) Fouling community of the snow crab Chionoecetes opilio in Sydney Bight, Canada: preliminary observations in relation to sampling period and depth/geographical location. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 48, 347359.Google Scholar
Taylor, PD, Lombardi, C and Cocito, S (2015) Biomineralization in bryozoans: present, past and future. Biological Reviews 90, 11181150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, ACL and Probert, PK (2013) Bryozoan-dominated benthos of Otago shelf, New Zealand: its associated fauna, environmental setting and anthropogenic threats. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 43, 231249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimina, OL (2014) Finding the snow crab Chionoecetes opilio (O. Fabricius, 1788) (Decapoda: Majidae) in the Kara Sea. Russian Journal of Marine Biology 40, 490492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of the sampling stations with records of Uschakovia gorbunovi in the study area

Figure 1

Figure 1. Records of Uschakovia gorbunovi. Pink circle – initial finding by Kluge (1946) in the East Siberian Sea, orange diamonds – initial findings by Kluge (1946) in the Kara Sea, red triangles – present findings in the northern Barents Sea (the numbers correspond to those in Table 1).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Uschakovia gorbunovi Kluge, 1946 from the Barents Sea, 2017. (a) – general colony view, scale bar 5 mm, (b) – distal part of the colony, scale bar 0.5 mm, (c) – details of the colony, scale bar 0.5 mm.