Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:05:07.259Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A new deep-sea species of Chloeia (Polychaeta: Amphinomidae) from southern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2010

Rômulo Barroso*
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Zoologia, IB, CCS, Bl.A, SS 108, Ilha do Fundão, 21941-590, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil
Paulo Cesar Paiva
Affiliation:
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Zoologia, IB, CCS, Bl.A, SS 108, Ilha do Fundão, 21941-590, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: R. Barroso, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Zoologia, IB, CCS, Bl.A, SS 108, Ilha do Fundão, 21941-590, Rio de Janeiro-RJ, Brazil email: [email protected]

Abstract

A new species of Chloeia (Annelida: Amphinomidae) is described from deep water (750–1045 m) off southern Brazil. Chloeia kudenovi sp. nov. differ from previously described species by the extremely elongated neuropodial cirri of the second chaetiger, number and position of noto- and neuroaciculae and lack of body pigmentation. This study provides additional data on the morphological diversity of the genus.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amaral, A.C.Z. and Nonato, E.F. (1994) Anelídeos Poliquetos da Costa Brasileira. 5. Pisionidae, Chrysopetalidae, Amphinomidae e Euphrosinidae. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 11, 361390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, B. (1968) Contributions toward a monograph of the species of anelides belonging to the Amphinomacea with a list of the known species and a description of several new species belonging to the group contained in the national collection of the British Museum, to which is appended a short account of two hitherto nondescript annulose animals of a larval character. Journal of the Zoological Society of London 10, 215246.Google Scholar
Day, J.H. (1967) A monograph on the Polychaeta of Southern Africa. I. Errantia. Publication No. 656. London: British Museum (Natural History), 458 pp.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K. (1977) Polychaetes from intertidal areas in Panama, with a review of previous shallow-water records. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 221, 181.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P. (1923) Polychètes errantes. Faune de France, Volume 5. Paris: Librairie de la Faculté des Sciences Paul Lechevalier, 488 pp.Google Scholar
Fauvel, P. (1953) Annelida, Polychaeta. The fauna of India, including Pakistan, Ceylon, Burma and Malaya. Allahabad: The Indian Press, 507 pp.Google Scholar
Gathof, J.M. (1984) Family Amphinomidae. In Uebelacker, J.M and Johnson, P.G. (eds) Taxonomic guide to the polychaetes of the Northern Gulf of the Mexico, Volume 5. Mobile, AL: Barry A. Vittor and Associates, Inc., pp. 37.137.12.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1959) Catalogue of the polychaetous annelids of the world. Part I. Allan Hancock Foundation Publications. Occasional Paper 23, 1353.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1968) Atlas of the errantiate polychaetous annelids from California. University of Southern California, Los Angeles: Allan Hancock Foundation, 828 pp.Google Scholar
Horst, R. (1910) On the genus Chloeia with some new species from Malay Archipelago, partly collected by the Siboga-Expedition. Notes from the Leyden Museum 33, 169175.Google Scholar
Horst, R. (1912) Polychaeta errantia of the Siboga-Expedition. Part 1. Amphinomidae. Siboga-Expeditie Leyden 24a, 143.Google Scholar
Kirkegaard, J.B. (2001) Deep sea polychaetes from north-west Africa, including a description of a new species of Neopolynoe (Polynoidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81, 391397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudenov, J.D. (1991) A new family and genus of the order Amphinomida (Polychaeta) from the Galapagos hydrothermal vents. Ophelia Supplement 5, 111120.Google Scholar
Kudenov, J.D. (1995) Amphinomidae Lamarck, 1818. In Blake, J.A., Hilbig, B. and Scott, P.H. (eds) Taxonomic atlas of the benthic fauna of the Santa Maria Basin and Western Santa Barbara Channel. Voume 5. Santa Barbara, CA: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, pp. 1377.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J.B. (1818) Histoire Naturelle des Animaux Sans Vertébres. Paris: Deterville Libraire, Verdicre Libraire 5, pp. 411612.Google Scholar
McIntosh, W.C. (1885) Report on the annelida polychaeta collected by the H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Report on the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876 under the command of the Captain George S. Nares, R.N., F.R.S. and the Late Captain Frank Tourle Thomson, R.N. Zoology 12, 1554.Google Scholar
Monro, C.C.A. (1933) The polychaeta errantia collected by Dr. C. Crossland at Colon, in the Panama region and the Galapagos Islands during the expedition of the S.Y. ‘St. George’. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monro, C.C.A. (1937) Polychaeta. The John Murray Expedition 1933–34 Scientific Reports, British Museum (Natural History) 4, 243321.Google Scholar
Nonato, E.F. and Luna, J.A.C. (1970) Anelídeos poliquetas do nordeste do Brasil : I. - poliquetas bentônicos da costa de Alagoas e Sergipe. Boletim do Instituto Oceanográfico de São Paulo 19, 57130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probert, P.K. and Grove, S.L. (1998) Macrobenthic assemblages of the continental shelf and upper slope off the west coast of South Island, New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 28, 259280.Google Scholar
Wiklund, H., Nygren, A., Pleijel, F. and Sundberg, P. (2008) The phylogenetic relationships between Amphinomidae, Archinomidae and Euphrosinidae (Amphinomida: Aciculata: Polychaeta), inferred from molecular data. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 88, 509513.Google Scholar