Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:46:19.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement of the Adhesion of the Podia in the Asteroid Asterias Rubens (Echinodermata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Patrick Flammang  and
Graham Walker
Patrick Flammang
Affiliation:
Marine Biology Laboratory, University of Mons-Hainaut, B-7000 Mons, Belgium.
Graham Walker
Affiliation:
School of Ocean Sciences, University of Wales Bangor, Menai Bridge, Gwynedd, LL59 5EY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The adhesion of single podia of Asterias rubens (Echinodermata) was tested under different conditions in order to determine those factors which have an effect on the adhesive forces. In common with many other marine organisms, the adhesion of the podia is sensitive to surface properties of the substratum. The effect of immersion and emersion on tenacity (force per unit area) has been tested. Working with the asteroids completely immersed in sea-water appears to be the best technique to measure the adhesive forces of the podia. The mean tenacity of the podia of A. rubens on glass underwater is 1·98×105 Nm−2.

The measurement of the adhesion strength of marine invertebrates and of its variation under different conditions may give clues to how marine bioadhesives function. Adhesive forces have usually been measured in invertebrates using either permanent or transitory adhesion, but only rarely recorded in animals using temporary adhesion (for review see Walker, 1987).

Of all macrobenthic organisms, echinoderms have exploited temporary adhesion most efficiently. In echinoderms, adhesive systems are usually associated with the podia and are involved in locomotion, attachment, feeding, or burrowing (Flammang, 1996). The paucity of information regarding the adhesive strength of echinoderm podia is due possibly to the fact that these animals possess a multitude of podia that are not all attached at the same time, making it difficult to evaluate the exact number of podia involved in adhesion at any precise instant in time. For example, maximum detachment forces involving many podia have been measured for several asteroid species. Feder (1955) measured up to 4 kg (39·64 N) in Pisaster ochraceus, Lavoie (1956) over 3 kg (29·43 N) in Asterias forbesi, and Christensen (1957) 5 kg (49·05 N) in Evasterias troscheli. Unfortunately, the number of podia adhering to the substratum was not estimated in any of these studies. It is not possible, therefore, to calculate tenacity (adhesive force per unit of surface area) which makes comparisons impossible either between these different asteroids or with other marine invertebrates (see Walker, 1987). Tenacity has been considered in only one study (Paine, 1926) where the mean adhesive force using single podia of the asteroid A. vulgaris was 17·2 g (0·17 N), giving, when divided by a mean measurement of the surface area of the podial discs, a tenacity of 1·25×105 N m2.

Type
Short Communications
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 77 , Issue 4 , November 1997 , pp. 1251 - 1254
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Christensen, A.M., 1957. The feeding behaviour of the seastar Evasterias troscheli. Limnology and Oceanography, 2, 180–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feder, H.M., 1955. On the methods used by the starfish Pisaster ochraceus in opening three types of bivalve molluscs. Ecology, 36, 764—767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flammang, P., 1996. Adhesion in echinoderms. In Echinoderm studies, vol. 5 (ed. M., Jangoux and J.M., Lawrence), pp. 1–60. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Flammang, P., Demeulenaere, S. & Jangoux, M., 1994. The role of podial secretions in adhesion in two species of sea stars (Echinodermata). Biological Bulletin. Marine biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 187, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavoie, M.E., 1956. How sea stars open bivalves. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 111, 114–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, V.L., 1926. Adhesion of the tube feet in starfishes. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 5, 361–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, L.A. & Hermans, Co., 1985. Adhesive interactions between the tube feet of a starfish, Leptasterias hexactis, and substrata. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 169, 675–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, G., 1987. Marine organisms and their adhesion. In Synthetic adhesives and sealants (ed. W.C., Wake), pp. 112–135. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Yule, A.B. & Walker, G., 1984. The temporary adhesion of barnacle cyprids: effects of some differing surface characteristics. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 64, 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yule, A.B. & Walker, G., 1987. Adhesion in barnacles. In Crustacean issues. Vol. 5. Biology of barnacles (ed. A.J., Southward), pp. 389–402. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar