Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:56:32.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Isozyme Variation in Three Nereis Species from Five Localities in the U.K.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Javed Mustaquim
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Royal Holloway and Bedford New College (University of London), Egham, Surrey TW20 0EX

Extract

The taxonomy of marine worms belonging to family Nereidae is still in an uncertain state. There are many species, like Nereis diversicolor Müller, N. japonica Izuka and N. limnicola Johnson, which are morphologically similar but have different reproductive habits. Clark (1977) reviewed many examples of reproductive isolation without morphological differentiation in polychaetes including members of the family Nereidae. He also stressed the need for detailed study in such polychaetes where taxonomic confusion exists.

Electrophoretic techniques have contributed a great deal in solving taxonomic problems (see Avise, 1975 and Burton, 1983). All electrophoretic methods have proved useful to varying degrees in characterizing specific organisms. In particular, acrylamide gel electrophoresis has seen extensive use because it has excellent resolving power (Brewer, 1970). Studies of the electrophoretic variation of nereid isozymes have not been reported, except by Jones (1970), who examined various polychaetous annelids for the presence of certain dehydrogenases. This present report contains preliminary observations concerning the applicability of isozyme electrophoresis to the study of nereid worms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Avise, J. C., 1975. Systematic value of electrophoretic data. Systematic Zoology, 23, 465481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, G. J., 1970. An Introduction to Isozyme Techniques. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Burton, R. S., 1983. Protein polymorphisms and genetic differentiation of marine invertebrate populations. Marine Biology Letters, 4, 193206.Google Scholar
Chambers, S. M., 1978. An electrophoretically detected sibling species of Goniobasis floridensis (Mesogastropoda, Pleurooceridae). Malacologia, 17, 157162.Google Scholar
Clark, R. B., 1977. Reproduction, speciation and polychaete taxonomy. In Essays on Polychaetous Annelids, in Memory of Dr Olga Hartman (ed. Reish, D. J. and Fauchald, K.), pp. 477501. Los Angeles: Allan Hancock Foundation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Gooch, J. L. & Schopf, T. J. M., 1970. Population genetics of marine species of the phylum Ectoprocta. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 138, 138156.Google Scholar
Gooch, J. L. & Schopf, T. J. M., 1971. Genetic variation in the marine ectoproct Schizoporella errata. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 141, 235246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassle, J. F. & Grassle, J. F., 1974. Opportunistic life histories and genetic system in marine benthic polychaetes. Journal of Marine Research, 32, 253284.Google Scholar
Grassle, J. P. & Grassle, J. F., 1976. Sibling species in the marine pollution indicator Capitella (Polychaeta). Science, New York, 192, 567569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, M. L., 1970. The presence of certain dehydrogenases among polychaetous annelids as shown by disc electrophoresis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 36, 605611.Google Scholar
Marcus, N. H., 1977. Genetic variation within and between geographically separated populations of the sea urchin, Arbacia punctulata. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 153, 560576.Google Scholar
Mustaquim, J., 1988. Electrophoretic variation of isozymes in Poly dor a ciliata complex (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olive, P. J. W. & Garwood, P. R., 1981. Gametogenic cycle and population structure of Nereis (Hediste) diversicolor and Nereis (Nereis) pelagica from north-east England. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 61, 193213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, C. R. & Koen, A. L., 1968. Starch gel zone electrophoresis of enzymes. In Chromatographic and Electrophoretic Technique, vol. 2. Zone Electrophoresis (ed. Smith, I.), pp. 325364. London: William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Turner, K. & Lyerla, T. A., 1980. Electrophoretic variation in sympatric mud crabs from north inlet, South Carolina. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 159, 418427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar