Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:28:27.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of some physico-chemical variables on wild fish richness beneath sea-cage fish farms in the Aegean Sea, Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2020

Okan Akyol ,
Aytaç Özgül ,
F. Ozan Düzbastılar ,
Halil Şen ,
José M. Ortiz de Urbina  and
Tevfik Ceyhan Open the ORCID record for Tevfik Ceyhan [Opens in a new window]
Okan Akyol
Affiliation:
Ege University Faculty of Fisheries, 35100, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
Aytaç Özgül
Affiliation:
Ege University Faculty of Fisheries, 35100, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
F. Ozan Düzbastılar
Affiliation:
Ege University Faculty of Fisheries, 35100, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
Halil Şen
Affiliation:
Ege University Faculty of Fisheries, 35100, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
José M. Ortiz de Urbina
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Fuengirola, Malaga, Spain
Tevfik Ceyhan*
Affiliation:
Ege University Faculty of Fisheries, 35100, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
*
Author for correspondence: Tevfik Ceyhan, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aims to determine the relationship between physico-chemical variables on a seasonal basis and wild fish assemblages beneath sea-cage fish farms. Assemblages of wild fish were counted monthly on two separate days at each of six fish farms between August 2015 and July 2017, by six rapid visual counts (RVC) in 5 minutes with scuba by two divers. Seawater samples were simultaneously taken by a Nansen bottle during the RVC from the fish farm barge. SST (°C), salinity (ppm), dissolved oxygen (mg l−1) and pH were measured by YSI multiparameter, while Secchi disk was also used for light transmittance. Wild fish species richness went up with increasing temperature and salinity in the Izmir region, however, this stopped at about 26°C and about 39 ppm. Wild fish richness increased when the DO was at a level of 7 mg l−1 and the pH at about 7.9 in Izmir. Between 10 and 20 m, light transmittance showed greater wild fish species richness in Izmir region. In contrast, the wild fish species richness of the Muğla region fluctuated more. In terms of wild fish species richness, these fluctuations increased with salinity and DO, while they decreased with SST, pH and light transmittance. However, the range of variation of the recorded physico-chemical variables is rather narrow. The results of the correlation matrix indicate that the relationship between wild fish species richness and pH and SST was statistically significant in Izmir region (P < 0.05).

Keywords

Aquaculturedissolved oxygenfish communityIzmirlight transmittanceMuğlapHsalinitytemperature
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 100 , Issue 7 , November 2020 , pp. 1171 - 1179
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aksu, M and Kocataş, A (2007) Environmental effects of three fish farms in Izmir Bay (Aegean Sea, Turkey) on water column and sediment. Rapp. Comm. Int. Mer Médit. 38, 414.Google Scholar
Arechavala-Lopez, P, Sanchez-Jerez, P, Bayle-Sempere, J, Fernanez-Jover, D, Martinez-Rubio, L, Lopez-Jimenez, JA and Martinez-Lopez, FJ (2011) Direct interaction between wild fish aggregations at fish farms and fisheries activity at fishing grounds: a case study with Boops boops. Aquaculture Research 42, 996–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacher, K, Gordoa, A and Sagué, O (2012) Spatial and temporal extension of wild fish aggregations at Sparus aurata and Thunnus thynnus farms in the North-western Mediterranean. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 2, 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatnagar, A and Devi, P (2013) Water quality guidelines for the management of pond fish culture. International Journal of Environmental Sciences 3, 1980–2009.Google Scholar
Bilecenoğlu, M (2015) Aegean Sea ichthyofauna. In Katağan, T, Tokaç, A, Beşiktepe, Ş and Öztürk, B (eds), The Aegean Sea: Marine Biodiversity, Fisheries, Conservation and Governance. İstanbul: Turkish Marine Research Foundation (TUDAV), pp. 249–254.Google Scholar
Boyd, CE and Tucker, CS (1998) Pond Aquaculture Water Quality Management. Cambridge, MA: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dastagir, G, Narejo, NT and Jalbani, S (2014) Physico-chemical parameters and their variations in relation to fish production in Zhob River, Balochistan. Pakistan Journal of Analytical & Environmental Chemistry 15, 77–81.Google Scholar
Dempster, T, Sanchez-Jerez, P, Bayle-Sempere J, T, Giménez-Casalduero, F and Valle, C (2002) Attraction of wild fish to sea-cage fish farms in the South-western Mediterranean Sea: spatial and short term temporal variability. Marine Ecology Progress Series 242, 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, T, Sanchez-Jerez, P, Bayle-Sempere, J and Kingsford, M (2004) Extensive aggregations of wild fish at coastal sea-cage farms. Hydrobiologia 525, 245–248.Google Scholar
Dempster, T, Fernandez-Jover, D, Sanchez-Jerez, P, Tuya, F, Bayle-Sempere, J, Boyra, A and Haroun R, J (2005) Vertical variability of wild fish assemblages around sea-cage fish farms: implications for management. Marine Ecology Progress Series 304, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Jover, D, Sanchez-Jerez, P, Bayle-Sempere J, T, Vale, C and Dempster, T (2008) Seasonal patterns and diets of wild fish assemblages associated with Mediterranean coastal fish farms. ICES Journal of Marine Science 65, 1153–1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gürses, RK, Büyükateş, Y, Yiğit, M, Ergün, S, Ateş, AS and Özdilek, HG (2019) Potential environmental impacts of tuna cage farming in the Aegean Sea. Aquatic Research 2(2), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlbert, SH (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52, 577–586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Izdar, E, Muezzinoglu, A and Cihangir, B (2015) Oceanographic and pollution monitoring studies at the eighties in the Aegean Sea. In Katağan, T, Tokaç, A, Beşiktepe, Ş and Öztürk, B (eds), The Aegean Sea Marine Biodiversity, Fisheries, Conservation and Governance. İstanbul: Turkish Marine Research Foundation (TUDAV), pp. 537–547.Google Scholar
Kadak, AE and Aras, S (2017) The effects of water temperature on other water properties. Menba Journal of Fisheries Faculty 3, 30–35. (In Turkish)Google Scholar
Karakassis, I, Tsapakis, M, Hatziyanni, E and Pitta, P (2001) Diel variation of nutrients and chlorophyll in sea bream and sea bass cages in the Mediterranean. Fresenium Environmental Bulletin 10(3), 278–283.Google Scholar
Kaymakci Basaran, A, Aksu, M and Egemen, O (2010) Impacts of the fish farms on the water column nutrient concentrations and accumulation of heavy metals in the sediments in the Eastern Aegean Sea (Turkey). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 162, 439–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocataş, A and Bilecik, N (1992) Aegean Sea and its living resources. T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı, Su Ürünleri Araştırma Enstitüsü, Bodrum. Publication no. 7. (In Turkish)Google Scholar
La Rosa, T, Mirto, S, Favaloro, E, Savona, B, Sara, G, Danovaro, R and Mazzola, A (2002) Impact on the water column biogeochemistry of a Mediterranean mussel and fish farm. Water Research 36, 713–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machias, A, Karakassis, I, Labropoulou, M, Somarakis, S, Papadopoulou, KN and Papaconstantinou, C (2004) Changes in wild fish assemblages after the establishment of a fish farming zone in an oligotrophic marine ecosystem. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 60, 771–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machias, A, Giannoulaki, M, Somarakis, S, Maravelias, CD, Neofitou, C, Koutsoubas, D, Papadopoulou, KN and Karakassis, I (2006) Fish farming effects on local fisheries landings in oligotrophic seas. Aquaculture 261, 809–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neofitou, N and Klaoudatos, S (2008) Effects of fish farming on the water column nutrient concentration in a semi-enclosed gulf of the Eastern Mediterranean. Aquaculture Research 39, 482–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oğuz, T (2015) Interaction of the Aegean Sea with the Turkish Straits system in terms of flow and water mass characteristics. In Katağan, T, Tokaç, A, Beşiktepe, Ş and Öztürk, B (eds), The Aegean Sea: Marine Biodiversity, Fisheries, Conservation and Governance. İstanbul: Turkish Marine Research Foundation (TUDAV), pp. 40–54.Google Scholar
Oppedal, F, Dempster, T and Stien, LH (2011) Environmental drivers of Atlantic salmon behaviour in sea-cages: a review. Aquaculture 311, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, OM, Telfer, TC, del Campo Barquin, LM and Ross, LG (2003) Water quality requirements for marine fish cage site selection in Tenerife (Canary Islands): predictive modelling and analysis using GIS. Aquaculture 224, 51–68.Google Scholar
Pitta, P, Karakassis, I, Tsapakis, M and Zivanovic, S (1999) Natural vs mariculture induced variability in nutrients and plankton in the Eastern Mediterranean. Hydrobiologia 391, 181–194.Google Scholar
Pitta, P, Apostolaki, E, Tsagaraki, T, Tsapakis, M and Karakassis, I (2006) Fish farming effects on chemical and microbial variables of the water column: a spatio-temporal study along the Mediterranean Sea. Hydrobiologia 563, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, C, Black, KD, Hargrave, BT and Morris, JA Jr (2015) Marine cage culture and the environment: effects on water quality and primary production. Aquaculture Environment Interactions 6, 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Roubeix, V, Daufresne, M, Argillier, C, Dublon, J, Maire, A, Nicolas, D, Raymond, JC and Danis, PA (2017) Physico-chemical thresholds in the distribution of fish species among French lakes. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems 418, 41.Google Scholar
Segvic Bubic, T, Grubisic, L, Ticina, V and Katavic, I (2011) Temporal and spatial variability of pelagic wild fish assemblages around Atlantic bluefin tuna Thunnus thynnus farms in the eastern Adriatic Sea. Journal of Fish Biology 78, 78–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, N, Shelton, JL, Brian, E, Haggard, BE and Thomforde, HK (2013) Interpretation of Water Analysis Reports for Fish Culture. Stoneville, MS: Southern Regional Aquaculture Center, No. 4606, 1–9 pp.Google Scholar
Svobodová, Z, Lloyd, R, Máchová, J and Vykusová, B (1993) Water Quality and Fish Health. EIFAC Technical Paper. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Valle, C, Bayle-Sempere, JT, Dempster, T, Sanchez-Jerez, P and Gimenez-Casalduero, F (2007) Temporal variability of wild fish assemblages associated with a sea-cage fish farm in the South-western Mediterranean Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 72, 299–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas-Machuca, SC, Ponce-Palafox, JT, Arredondo-Figueroa, JL, Chavez-Ortiz, EA and Vernon-Carter, EJ (2008) Physico-chemical water parameters variation in the floating cages of snappers (Lutjanus peru and L. guttulatus) farmed in tropical sea. Revista Mexicana de Ingenieria Quimica 7, 237–242.Google Scholar
Wu, RSS, Shin, PKS, MacKay, DW, Mollowney, M and Johnson, D (1999) Management of marine fish farming in the sub-tropical environment: a modelling approach. Aquaculture 174, 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar