Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-23T18:51:27.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Influence of Current Speed, Body Size and Water Temperature On the Filtration Rate of Five Species of Bivalves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

P. R. Walne
P. R. Walne
Affiliation:
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Fisheries Experiment Station, Conway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The rate of water filtration by bivalves has long excited interest, but it has in practice proved difficult to measure in conditions where the animal is relatively free from constraint. Its estimation is important from a number of aspects: feeding studies; as an indicator of the animal's reaction to its environment; and for predicting the flow of water required for the culture of economically important species. The work reported in this paper started as part of the general programme on shellfish culture in progress at this laboratory. During the development of a suitable method for studying the water requirements it became clear that one factor, water current, had a more important influence than has been generally recognized.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , May 1972 , pp. 345 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ali, R. M. 1970. The influence of suspension density andtemperature on the filtration rate of Hiatella artica. Mar. Biol., Vol. 6, pp. 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. A. 1962. Preliminary experiments on the feeding and excretion of bivalves using Phaeodactylum labelled with 32P. J. mar.biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 42, pp. 609–23.Google Scholar
Bullivant, J. S. 1968. The rate of feeding of the Bryozoan, Zoobotryon verticillatum. N.Z. Jl mar. and Freshwat. Res., Vol. 2, pp. 111–34.Google Scholar
Chipman, W. A. & Hopkins, J. G. 1954. Water filtration by the bay scallop, Pecten irradians, as observed with the use of radioactive plankton. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 107, pp. 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, H. A. & Hepper, B. T. 1954. The use ofneutral red solution for the comparative study of filtration rates of Lamellibranchs. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 20, pp. 197–203.Google Scholar
Collier, A. 1959. Some observations on the respiration of the American oyster Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin). Publs Inst. mar. Sci. Univ. Tex., Vol. 6, pp. 92–108.Google Scholar
Coughlan, J. & Ansell, A. D. 1964. A direct method for determining the pumpingrate of siphonate bivalves. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 29, pp. 205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davids, C 1964. The influence of suspensions of micro-organisms of different concentrations on the pumping and retention of food by the mussel (Mytilus edulis L.). Neth. J. Sea Res., Vol. 2, pp. 233–49.Google Scholar
Drinnan, R. E. 1964. An apparatus for recording the water-pumping behaviour of Lamellibranchs. Neth. J. Sea Res., Vol. 2, pp. 223–32.Google Scholar
Durve, V. S. 1963. A study on the rate of filtration of the clam Meretrix casta (Chemnitz). J. mar. biol. Ass. India, Vol. 5, pp. 221–31.Google Scholar
Ghiretti, F. 1966. Respiration, pp. 175–208. In Physiology of Mollusca, Vol. 2, 645 pp., ed. K. M. Wilbur and C. M. Yonge. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harvey, H. W. 1948. The estimation of phosphate and of total phosphorus in sea water. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 27, pp. 337–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haven, D. S. & Morales-Alamo, R. 1970. Filtration of particles from suspensionby the American oyster Crassostrea virginica. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 139, pp. 248–64.Google Scholar
Helm, M. M. & Trueman, E. R. 1967. The effect of exposure on the heart rate ofthe mussel, Mytilus edulis L. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Vol. 21, pp. 171–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, N. 1967. Aspects of feeding in Ascidians. Rep. Challenger Soc, 3, No. xix,40.Google Scholar
Hopkins, A. E. 1933. Experiments on the feeding behaviour of the oyster, O. gigas. J. exp. Zool., Vol. 64, pp. 469–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, R. N. 1969. A study of feeding in Scrobicularia plana. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 49, pp. 805–23.Google Scholar
JØRgensen, C. B. 1943. On the water transport through the gills of bivalves. Ada physiol. Scand., Vol. 5, pp. 297–304.Google Scholar
JøRgensen, C. B. 1960. Efficiency of particle retention and rate of water transport in undisturbed Lamellibranchs. J. Cons.perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 26, pp. 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JØRgensen, C. B. 1966. Biology of Suspension Feeding, 357 pp. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Loosanoff, V. L. 1958. Some aspects of behavior of oysters at different temperatures. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 114, pp. 57–70.Google Scholar
Loosanoff, V. L. 1962. Effects of turbidity on some larval and adult bivalves. Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst., 14th Annual Session, pp. 80–5.Google Scholar
Loosanoff, V. L. & Engle, J. B. 1947. Effectof different concentrations of micro-organisms on the feeding of oysters (O. virginica). Fishery Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S., Vol. 51, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar
Miyauti, T. & Irie, H. 1965. Relation between pearl oysters (Pteria martensi) and the current-velocity of the environmental waters. Bull. Fac. Fish. Nagasaki Univ., No. 19, pp. 56–64.Google Scholar
Miyauti, T. & Irie, H. 1966. Supplemental report on the relation between pearloysters (Pteria mortensii) and the current velocity of environmental waters. Bull. Fac. Fish. Nagasaki Univ., No. 20, pp. 22–8.Google Scholar
Rice, T. R. & Smith, R. J. 1958. Filtering rates of the hard clam (Venus mercenaria) determined with radioactive phytoplankton. Fishery Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S., Vol. 58, pp. 73–82.Google Scholar
Sheldon, R. W. & Parsons, T. R. 1967. A practical manual on the use of the Coulter counter in marine science, 66 pp. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Coulter Electronics Sales Co.Google Scholar
Sushchenya, L. M. 1970. Food rations, metabolism and growth of crustaceans. In Marine Food Chains, pp. 127–41, ed. J. H. Steele. 552 pp. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Theede, H. 1963. Experimentelle Untersuchungen iiber dieFiltrations - leistung der Miesmuschel Mytilus edulis L. Kieler Meeresforsch., Bd. 19, pp. 20–41.Google Scholar
Walne, P. R. 1956. The biology and distribution of the slipper limpet Crepidula fornicata in Essex rivers. Fishery Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 20 (6), 50 pp.Google Scholar
Walne, P. R. 1965. Observations on the influence of foodsupply and temperature on the feeding and growth of Ostrea edulis L. Fishery Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 24 (1), 45 pp.Google Scholar
Walne, P. R. 1970. Studies on the food value of nineteengenera of algae to juvenile bivalves of the genera Ostrea, Crassostrea, Mercenaria and Mytilus. Fishery Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 26 (5), 62 pp.Google Scholar
Walne, P. R. & Dean, G. J. 1967. Studies on the introduction of the American clam (Venus (Mercenaria) mercenaria) (L.) into British waters. ICES CM. 1967/E. 6 (mimeo), 6 pp.Google Scholar
White, W. R. 1968. A method for measuring the pumping rate of mussels (Mytilusedulis (L.) Lab. Note cent. Elect, res. Lab., RD/L/N 116/68, 7 pp.Google Scholar
Winter, J. E. 1969. Uber den Einfluss der Nahrungkonzentration und anderer Faktoren auf Filtrierleistung und Nahrungsausnutzung der Muscheln Artica islandica undModiolus modiolus. Mar. Biol, Bd. 4, pp.87–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar