Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T18:08:04.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Individual home ranges of Tursiops truncatus and their overlap with ranges of Stenella frontalis and fishermen in Aragua, Venezuela, South Caribbean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2020

Sergio E. Cobarrubia-Russo*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Ecosistemas y Cambio Global, Centro de Ecología, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC), Apartado Postal 20632, 1020-A Caracas, Venezuela
Guillermo R. Barreto-Esnal
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Manejo y Conservación de Fauna Silvestre, Departamento de Biología de Organismos, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Apartado 89000, 1080-A Caracas, Venezuela
Alimar E. Molero-Lizarraga
Affiliation:
Unidad de Diversidad Biológica, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC), 1020-A Caracas, Venezuela
Miguel A. Mariani-Di Lena
Affiliation:
Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Aragua, Venezuela
*
Author for correspondence: Sergio Cobarrubia-Russo, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

Abstract

The coast of Aragua is a home of bottlenose dolphins (BND), Atlantic spotted dolphins (ASD) and fishermen (FIS) from four towns. A photo-identification study was carried out on BND to estimate their home ranges. From 2004 to 2008, 100 field surveys were carried out along 30 km of coastline (92.12 km2). In each sighting of BND, information regarding date, time, latitude/longitude and photographs were registered (ASD and FIS were registered without photography). The data were analysed using a Geographic Information System to estimate Minimum Convex Polygon (MCP) and Fixed Kernel (FK) at 95%. The home ranges of BND were estimated for seven individuals. This included three females (29–31 sightings) with estimated areas ranging from 33.90–39.90 km2 with MCP (36.79–43.31% of the study area) and from 80.47–101.31 km2 with FK (109.97–104.26%). For the remaining four dolphins (14–20 sightings) the estimated areas ranged from 9.67–22.34 km2 (MCP), the predominant depth of these home ranges varied from 51–100 m (χ2 = 24.5, df = 2, P = 4.785 × 10−6). For the pods of ASD the estimated area ranged 75.23 km2 with MCP (81.66%) and 119.86 km2 with FK (130.11%) with predominant depths of 101–200 m (χ2 = 24.5, df = 2, P = 4.785 × 10−6). The area used by FIS ranged 93.27 km2 by MCP and 228.49 km2 by FK. Finally, the overlap area of BND, ASD and FIS ranged 24.75 km2 (26.86%). We point out this locality presents important oceanographic and ecological aspects which deserve to be the subject of application of management plans for the conservation of its habitat and species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acevedo, R (2007) Potential geographical distribution of seven species of marine cetaceans reported in Venezuela, Southeast Caribbean. Acta Zoologica Sinica 53, 853864.Google Scholar
Anderson, DJ (1982) The home range, a new nonparametric estimation technique. Ecology 63, 103112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, MR, DeNicola, AJ, Beissinger, SR and Swihart, RK (1996) Effects of parturition on home ranges and social affiliations of female white-tailed deer. Journal of Wildlife Management 60, 899909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolaños-Jiménez, J, Castro-Pérez, G, Herrera-Trujillo, O, Oviedo, L, Palacios, D, Sánchez-Criollo, L, Puerto, MF, Sifontes, L, Silva-Hernández, MG and Villarroel-Marín, A (2013) The presence of long-beaked common dolphins (Delphinus spp.) off Central-Western Venezuela. ANARTIA 25, 3246.Google Scholar
Börger, L, Franconi, N, Ferretti, N, Meschi, F, DeMichele, G, Gantz, A and Coulson, T (2006) An integrated approach to identify spatio-temporal and individual-level determinants of animal home range size. American Naturalist 168, 471485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, WH (1943) Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 24, 346352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, GN and Spencer, SR (1985) Assessment of space-use patterns in the hispid cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus). Oecologia 68, 133139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, DK (1955). Evidence of home range of an Atlantic bottlenose dolphin. Journal of Mammalogy 36, 304305.Google Scholar
Cobarrubia-Russo, S (2010) Ecología y comportamiento del delfín nariz de botella Tursiops truncatus en la costa del Estado Aragua (MSc thesis). Simón Bolívar University, Caracas, Venezuela.Google Scholar
Cobarrubia-Russo, S, Barreto, G, Quintero-Torres, E, Molero-Lizarraga, A and Xianyan, W (2018) Occurrence, abundance, range, and residence patterns of Tursiops truncatus on the coast of Aragua, Venezuela. Mammal Research 64, 289297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C (1861) On the Origin of Species, 3rd Edn. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Díaz-López, B and Bernal-Shirai, JA (2007) Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) presence and incidental capture in a marine fish farm on the north-eastern coast of Sardinia (Italy). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 87, 113117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Díaz-López, B and Bernal-Shirai, JA (2008) Marine aquaculture and bottlenose dolphins’ (Tursiops truncatus) social structure. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62, 887894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, KR and Chapman, JA (1980) Harmonic mean measure of animal activity areas. Ecology 61, 10401044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Don, WH (1949) Calculation of size of home range. Journal of Mammalogy 30, 118.Google Scholar
Flores, PAC and Bazzalo, M (2004) Home ranges and movement patterns of the marine Tucuxi dolphin, Sotalia fluviatilis, in Baía Norte, southern Brazil. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Mammals 3, 3752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fury, CA and Harrison, PL (2008) Abundance, site fidelity and range patterns of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in two Australian subtropical estuaries. Marine and Freshwater Research 59, 10151027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowans, S, Würsig, B and Karczmarski, L (2008) The social structure and strategies of delphinids: predictions based on an ecological framework. Advances in Marine Biology 53, 197267.Google Scholar
Gruber, JA (1981) Ecology of the Atlantic bottlenosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) in the Pass Cavallo area of Matagorda Bay, Texas (MSc thesis). Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
Gubbins, K (2002) Use of home ranges by resident bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in a South Carolina estuary. Journal of Mammalogy 83, 178187.Google Scholar
Hillman, GR, Kehtarnavaz, N, Wursig, B, Araabi, BN, Gailey, G, Weller, D, Mandava, S and Tagare, H (2002) 'Finscan', a computer system for photographic identification of marine animals. Second Joint EMBS–BMES Conference Proceedings 2, 10651066.Google Scholar
Ingram, SN and Rogan, E (2002) Identifying critical areas and habitat preferences of bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus. Marine Ecology Progress Series 244, 247255.Google Scholar
Irvine, AB, Scott, MD, Wells, RS and Kaufman, JH (1981) Movements and activities of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus in Sarasota, Florida. Fishery Bulletin (USA) 79, 671688.Google Scholar
Jenrich, RI and Turner, FB (1969) Measurement of non-circular home range. Journal of Theoretical Biology 22, 221237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kie, J, Matthiopoulos, J, Fieberg, J, Powell, R, Cagnacci, F, Mitchell, M, Gaillard, J-M and Moorcroft, P (2010) The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 365, 22212231.Google Scholar
Mares, MA, Willig, MR and Bitar, NA (1980) Home range size in eastern chipmunks, Tamias stratus, as a function of number of captures: statistical biases of inadequate sampling. Journal of Mammalogy 61, 661669.Google Scholar
Maxwell, SM, Breed, GA, Nickel, BA, Makanga-Bahouna, J, Pemo-Makaya, E, Parnell, RJ, Formia, A, Gouessono, S, Brendan, JG, Costa, DP, Witt, MJ and Coyne, M (2011) Using satellite tracking to optimize protection of long-lived marine species: olive ridley sea turtle conservation in Central Africa. PLoS ONE 6, e19905.Google ScholarPubMed
Mohr, CO (1947) Table of equivalent populations of North American mammals. American Midland Naturalist Journal 37, 223249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molero-Lizarraga, A (2013) Uso de hábitat del delfín común Delphinus sp. en el Parque Nacional Mochima (MSc thesis). Tropical Zoology Institute – Central University of Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela.Google Scholar
Nekolny, SR, Denny, M, Biedenbach, G, Howells, EM, Wendy, M, Mazzoil, M, Durden, WN, Moreland, L, Lambert, JD and Gibson, QA (2017) Effects of study area size on home range estimates of common bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus. Current Zoology 63, 693701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Novoa, D, Mendoza, J, Marcano, L and Cárdenas, J (1998). El Atlas Pesquero Marítimo de Venezuela. MAC SARPA. VENCEP.Google Scholar
Perrin, WF (2008) Atlantic spotted dolphin Stenella frontalis. In Würsig, B, Perrin, W, Würsig, B and Thewissen, JGM (eds), Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 5456.Google Scholar
Perrin, WF, Caldwell, DK and Caldwell, MC (1994). Atlantic spotted dolphin Stenella frontalis (G. Cuvier, 1829). In Ridgway, SH and Harrison, R (eds), Handbook of Marine Mammals. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 173190.Google Scholar
Peters, R (1978) Communication, cognitive mapping, and strategy in wolves and hominids. In Hall, RL and Sharp, HS (eds), Wolf and Man: Evolution in Parallel. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 95108.Google Scholar
Powell, RA (2000) Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. In Pearl, MC, Boitani, L and Fuller, TK (eds), Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp. 65110.Google Scholar
Powell, RA and Mitchell, MS (2012) What is a home range? Journal of Mammalogy 93, 948958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayment, W, Dawson, S, Slooten, E, Bräger, S, Fresne, SD and Webster, T. (2009) Kernel density estimates of alongshore home range of Hector's dolphins at Banks Peninsula, New Zealand. Marine Mammal Science 25, 537556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, RR, Stewart, BS, Clapham, PJ and Powell, J (2008). Atlantic spotted dolphin. In Stewart, RR, Clapham, BS and Powell, J (eds), Guide to Marine Mammals of the World. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, pp. 370373.Google Scholar
Saayman, GS and Tayler, CK (1973) Social organization of inshore dolphins (Tursiops truncatus and sousa) in the Indian Ocean. Journal of Mammalogy 54, 993996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuel, MD, Pierce, DJ and Garton, EO (1985) Identifying areas of concentrated use within the home range. Journal of Animal Ecology 54, 711719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, TW (1981) An empirically based estimate of home range. Theoretical Population Biology 20, 281325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seaman, DE and Powell, RA (1996) An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77, 20752085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seminoff, JA, Resendiz, A and Nichols, WJ (2002) Home range of green turtles Chelonia mydas at a coastal foraging area in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Marine Ecology Progress Series 242, 253265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seton, ET (1909) Life-histories of Northern Animals: An Account of the Mammals of Manitoba. New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shane, SH (1990) Behavior and ecology of the bottlenose dolphin at Sanibel Island, Florida. In Leatherwood, S and Reeves, RR (eds), The Bottlenose Dolphin. London: Academic Press, pp. 245266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, BW (1986) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Spencer, WD (2012) Home ranges and the value of spatial information. Journal of Mammalogy 93, 929947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprogis, KR, Raudino, HC, Rankin, R, MacLeod, CD and Bejder, L (2016) Home range size of adult Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) in a coastal and estuarine system is habitat and sex-specific. Marine Mammal Science 32, 287308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Winkle, W (1975) Comparison of several probabilistic homerange models. Journal of Wildlife Management 39, 118123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wearmouth, VJ and Sims, DW (2008) Sexual segregation in marine fish, reptiles, birds and mammals: behaviour patterns, mechanisms and conservation implications. Advances in Marine Biology 54, 107170.Google ScholarPubMed
Wells, RS and Scott, MD (2002) Bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus and T. aduncus. In Perrin, WF, Wursig, B and Thewissen, JGM (eds), Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 122128.Google Scholar
Welsh, JQ, Goatley, CHR and Bellwood, DR (2013) The ontogeny of home ranges: evidence from coral reef fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 280. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, GC and Garrott, RA (1990) Home range estimation. In White, GC and Garrott, RA (eds), Analysis of Wildlife Radio-Tracking Data. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 145182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B, Thompson, PM and Hammond, PS (1997) Habitat use by bottlenose dolphins: seasonal distribution and stratified movement patterns in the Moray Firth, Scotland. Journal of Applied Ecology 34, 13651374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worton, BJ (1987) A review of models of home range for animal movement. Ecological Modelling 38, 277298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worton, BJ (1989) Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70, 164168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worton, BJ (1995) A convex hull-based estimator of home-range size. Biometrics 51, 12061215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Würsig, B and Würsig, M (1977) The photographic determination of pod size, composition, and stability of coastal porpoises (Tursiops truncatus). Science (New York, N.Y.) 198, 755756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar