Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:26:51.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human impacts on residency behaviour of spangled emperor, Lethrinus nebulosus, in a marine protected area, as determined by acoustic telemetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2008

Olivier Chateau  and
Laurent Wantiez
Olivier Chateau
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Insulaire du Vivant et de l'Environnement, University of New Caledonia, Aquarium des Lagons, BP R4, 98851 Noumea cedex, New Caledonia
Laurent Wantiez*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire Insulaire du Vivant et de l'Environnement, University of New Caledonia, Aquarium des Lagons, BP R4, 98851 Noumea cedex, New Caledonia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Laurent Wantiez Laboratoire Insulaire du Vivant et de l'EnvironnementUniversity of New Caledonia, Aquarium des Lagons BP R4, 98851 Noumea cedex, New Caledonia email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The residency behaviour of six specimens of spangled emperor, Lethrinus nebulosus, was studied by acoustic telemetry in the mooring area (3–6 m depth) of a marine protected area (MPA) in New Caledonia. The 3 smaller fish (34–49 cm FL) remained within the study site less than 6 hours. The 3 larger individuals (51–54 cm FL) were regularly detected within the study site during the survey (6.5 months). These fish followed similar diurnal patterns of detection. They use the study site as a resting area during the day and migrate each night to feeding grounds after sunset. However, their presence was higher when wind speed was low (<10 knots) during weekends and school holidays. These links reflect a possible impact of human feeding activity. Consequently, management policies should include measures to control feeding activities within MPAs to maintain marine communities in a state unaltered by human activities.

Keywords

Human impactsresidency behaviourspangled emperorLethrinus nebulosusmarine protected areaacoustic telemetry
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 88 , Issue 4 , August 2008 , pp. 825 - 829
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carpenter, K.E. and Niem, V.H. (2001) The living marine resources of the Western Central Pacific. Volume 5. Bony fishes part 3 (Menidae to Pomacentridae). Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Chateau, O. and Wantiez, L. (2007) Site fidelity and activity patterns of a humphead wrasse, Cheilinus undulatus (Labridae), as determined by acoustic telemetry. Environmental Biology of Fishes 80, 503–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, R.G. (1994) Abundance, size structure, and diver-oriented behaviour of three large benthic carnivorous fishes in a marine reserve in northeastern New Zealand. Biological Conservation 70, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durville, P. and Collet, A. (2001) Clove oil used as an anaesthetic with juvenile tropical marine fish. South Pacific Commission Live Reef Fish Information Bulletin 9, 17–19.Google Scholar
Egretaud, C. (1992) Etude de la biologie générale, et plus particulièrement du régime alimentaire de Lethrinus nebulosus du lagon d'Ouvéa (Nouvelle Calédonie). Mémoire Stage Science de la Vie Biologie Marine Mémoire de Stage, ORSTOM Nouméa, 102 pp.Google Scholar
Halpern, B. (2003) The impact of marine reserves: do reserves work and does reserve size matter? Ecological Applications 13, 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heupel, M.R., Semmens, J.M. and Hobday, A.J. (2006) Automated acoustic tracking of aquatic animals: scales, design and development of listening station arrays. Marine and Freshwater Research 57, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loubens, G. (1980) Biologie de quelques espèces de poissons du lagon néo-calédonie. II. Sexualité et reproduction. Cahier de l'Indo-Pacifique 2, 41–72.Google Scholar
Milazzo, M., Chemello, R., Badalamenti, F., Camarda, R. and Riggio, S. (2002) The impact of human recreational activities in marine protected areas: what lessons should be learnt in the Mediterranean Sea? Marine Ecology 23s1, 280–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milazzo, M., Badalamenti, F., Vega Fernández, T. and Chemello, R. (2005) Effect of fish feeding by snorkellers on the density and size distribution of fishes in a Mediterranean marine protected area. Marine Biology 146, 1213–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, M. (1995) Swim with the rays: a guide to Stingray City, Grand Cayman Colorado: Blueline Press.Google Scholar
Newsome, D., Lewis, A. and Moncrieff, D. (2004) Impacts and risks associated with developing, but unsupervised, stingray tourism at Hamelin Bay, Western Australia. International Journal of Tourism Research 6, 305–323.Google Scholar
Parsons, D.M., Babcock, R.C., Hankin, T.J., Willis, T.J., Aitken, J.P., O'Dor, R.K. and Jackson, G.D. (2003) Snapper Pagrus auratus (Sparidae) home range dynamics: acoustic tagging studies in a marine reserve. Marine Ecology Progress Series 262, 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, J.E. (2005) Reef and shore fishes of the South Pacific: New Caledonia to Tahiti and the Pitcairn islands Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Russ, G. (2002) Yet another review of marine reserves as reef fishery management tools. In Sale, P.F. (ed.) Coral reef fishes, dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. San Diego: Academic Press Publishers, pp. 421–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarramégna, S. (2000) Contribution à l'étude des réserves marines du lagon sud-ouest de Nouvelle-Calédonie. PhD Thesis, University of New Caledonia, Noumea, New Caledonia.Google Scholar
Sutherland, W.J. (1996) From individual behaviour to population ecology Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sweatman, H.P.A. (1996) Impact of tourist pontoons on fish assemblages on the Great Barrier Reef Technical report, CRC Reef Research Centre, Townsville, no. 5, 54 pp.Google Scholar
Wagner, G.N. and Cooke, S.J. (2005) Methodological approaches and opinions of researchers involved in the surgical implantation of telemetry transmitters in fish. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 17, 160–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherbee, B.M., Holland, K.N., Meyer, C.G. and Lowe, C.G. (2004) Use of a marine reserve in Kaneohe Bay, Hawaii by the giant trevally, Caranx ignobilis. Fisheries Research 67, 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Mc.B.D. and Russ, G.R. (1994) Review of data on fishes of commercial and recreational fishing interest in the Great Barrier Reef. Research publication, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Townsville, no. 33, 103 pp.Google Scholar