Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:20:55.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Growth Of Balanus Balanoides (L.) and B. Crenatus Brug. Under Varying Conditions Of Submersion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

H. Barnes  and
H. T. Powell
H. Barnes
Affiliation:
The Marine Station, Millport
H. T. Powell
Affiliation:
The Marine Station, Millport
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The length, breadth, and in part the height, of individual Balanus balanoides and B. crenatus have been measured over several seasons, and the mean specific growth-rates calculated. The B. balanoides had settled at various known intertidal levels, and both species under conditions of permanent submersion.

Under all conditions, except on the highest intertidal panels, length increases rapidly subsequent to settlement and during the early summer. B. crenatus can reach its virtual maximum size (20–25 nun. rostro-carinal length) in a single growing season, under the conditions studied. Late-settled B. crenatus continue to grow further into the autumn, and begin to grow again early in the spring of the second season at the end of which the virtual maximum size is reached. The seasonal growth of both intertidal and submerged B. balanoides is similar, but the growth-rate is a function of submersion, which is, of course, dependent upon the tidal level. However, maximum growth is not reached in the first season and there is consequently relatively more growth in the second season than in B. crenatus.

The mean specific growth-rates in both species decrease with increasing size and, with permanently submerged B. crenatus, there is no suggestion that during the first spring and early summer any change in the environmental factors was effective. On the intertidal panels, the mean specific growth-rates at a given size vary with the tidal level, and this effect is most marked in the smaller barnacles.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 32 , Issue 1 , June 1953 , pp. 107 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, H. & Bagenal, T. B., 1951. Observations on Nephrops norvegicus (L.) and on an epizoic population of Balanus crenatus Brug. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 30, pp. 369–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, H. & Crisp, D. J., 1953. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Barnes, H., Crisp, D. J. & Powell, H. T., 1951. Observations on the orientation of some species of barnacles. Journ. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 20, pp. 227–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corlett, J., 1948. Rates of settlement and growth of the ‘pile fauna of the Mersey estuary. Proc. Liverpool Biol. Soc, Vol. 56, pp. 2–28.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. R., 1854. A Monograph of the Sub-Class Cirripedia. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Fuller, J. L., 1946. Season of attachment and growth of sedentary marine organisms at Lamoine, Maine. Ecology, Vol. 27, pp. 150–58.Google Scholar
Hatton, H., 1938. Essais de bionomie explicative sur quelques espèces intercotidales d'algues et d'animaux. Ann. Inst. oceanogr., N.S., T. 17, Fasc. 5, pp. 241–348.Google Scholar
Hatton, H. & Fischer-Piette, E., 1932. Observations et expériences sur le peuplement des côtes rocheuses par les Cirripèdes. Bull. Inst. océanogr. Monaco, No. 592, 15 pp.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1934. The biology of Balanus balanoides. I. Growth rate and its relation to size, season and tidal level. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 19, pp. 851–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1935a. The biology of Balanus balanoides. III. The soft parts. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 20, pp. 263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1935b. The biology of Balanus balanoides. IV. Relation to environmental factors. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. 20, pp. 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. W. & Moore, H. B., 1935. The biology of Balanus balanoides. II. Algal infection of the shell. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 20, pp. 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerat, C. M. & Reiner, E. R., 1942. The influence of surface angle and of light on the attachment of barnacles and other sedentary organisms. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. 82, pp. 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerat, C. M. & Weiss, C. M., 1946. The influence of texture and composition of surface on the attachment of sedentary marine organisms. Biol. Bull. Woods Hole, Vol. 91, pp. 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prenant, M., 1923. Hemioniscus balani Buchholz, parasite accidentel de Chthamalus stellatus Ranz. Bull. Soc. Zool. France T. 48, pp. 374–5.Google Scholar
Pyefinch, K. A., 1948. Notes on the biology of cirripedes. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc, Vol. 27, pp. 464–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runnstrom, S., 1925. Zur Biologie und Entwicklung von Balanus balanoides (Linné). Bergens Mus. Aarbok, Naturu. raekke, Nr. 5, 46 pp.Google Scholar
Topsent, E., 1911. Croissance et mort des balanes vàLuc-sur-Mer. Ann. Inst. oceanogr., T. 2, Fasc. 6, 5 pp.Google Scholar