Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:52:24.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gregarious settlement of tubeworms at deep-sea hydrothermal vents on the Tonga–Kermadec arc, South Pacific

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Jessie Short*
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, CanadaB3H 4J1
Anna Metaxas
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, CanadaB3H 4J1
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: J. Short, Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, 1355 Oxford Street, Halifax, Nova Scotia, CanadaB3H 4J1 email: [email protected]

Abstract

Despite the importance of early life-history processes in regulating population assemblages of benthic invertebrates at hydrothermal vents, they remain poorly understood, mainly because of the inaccessibility of these habitats. Vestimentiferan tubeworms provide an excellent system to study settlement in these habitats; they inhabit tubes that remain intact for some period even after the occupants die, and thus provide a proxy for rates of settlement and post-settlement mortality. In 2007, we collected rocks supporting populations of Lamellibrachia sp. using a TV-grab, from Mussel Ridge hydrothermal vent field on Monowai Volcanic Complex, at the Tonga–Kermadec arc. Twenty-two discrete patches of similarly sized individuals and of discrete length–frequency distributions were identified and quantified. Mean length of individual tubeworms ranged from <0.5 to 6.38 cm, and abundance per patch ranged from 6.8 to 108 ind cm−2. Post-settlement mortality was ~5%. These results suggest that gregarious settlement of pulses of larvae is likely occurring by Lamellibrachia sp., a process that has not yet been described in deep-sea hydrothermal vent tubeworms. The abundance of adult tubeworms on Monowai was low, and allochthonous larval supply from neighbouring seamounts unlikely. Consequently, gregarious settlement can increase the probability of maintenance and expansion of the existing populations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Comtet, T. and Desbruyères, D. (1998) Population structure and recruitment in mytilid bivalves from the Lucky Strike and Menez Gwen hydrothermal vent fields (37°17′N and 37°50′N on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge). Marine Ecology Progress Series 163, 165177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govenar, B. and Fisher, C.R. (2007) Experimental evidence of habitat provision by aggregations of Riftia pachyptila at hydrothermal vents on the East Pacific Rise. Marine Ecology 28, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, H.L. and Scheibling, R.E. (1997) Role of early post-settlement mortality in recruitment of benthic marine invertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 155, 269301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, H.L., Metaxas, A., Jennings, R.M., Halanych, K.M. and Mullineaux, L.S. (2004) Testing biological control of colonization by vestimentiferan tubeworms at deep-sea hydrothermal vents (East Pacific Rise 9°50′N). Deep-Sea Research I 51, 225234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, K.S., Childress, J.J., Beehler, C.L. and Sakamoto, C.M. (1994) Biogeochemistry of hydrothermal vent mussel communities: the deep-sea analogue to the intertidal zone. Deep-Sea Research 41, 9931011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, N. and Metaxas, A. (2007) Influence of habitat on the reproductive biology of the deep-sea hydrothermal vent limpet Lepetodrilus fucensis (Vetigastropoda: Mollusca) from the Northeast Pacific. Marine Biology 151, 649662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, N., Metaxas, A. and Butterfield, D. (2007) Spatial and temporal patterns of colonization by deep-sea hydrothermal vent invertebrates on the Juan de Fuca Ridge, NE Pacific. Aquatic Biology 1, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullineaux, L.S., Mills, S.W. and Goldman, E. (1998) Recruitment variation during a pilot colonization study of hydrothermal vents (9°50′N, East Pacific Rise). Deep-Sea Research 45, 441464.Google Scholar
Mullineaux, L.S., Fisher, R.C., Peterson, C.H. and Schaeffer, S.W. (2000) Tubeworm succession at hydrothermal vents: use of biogenic cues to reduce habitat selection error? Oecologia 123.2, 275284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullineaux, L.S., Mills, S.W., Sweetman, A.K., Beadreau, A.H., Metaxas, A. and Hunt, H.L. (2005) Vertical, lateral and temporal structure in larval distributions at hydrothermal vents. Marine Ecology Progress Series 293, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlik, J.R., Butman, C.A. and Starczak, V.R. (1991) Hydrodynamic facilitation of gregarious settlement of a reef building tubeworm. Science New Series 251, 421424.Google Scholar
Ravaux, J., Zbinden, M., Voss-Foucart, M.F., Compère, P., Goffinet, G. and Gaill, F. (2003) Comparative degradation rates of chitinous exoskeletons from deep-sea environments. Marine Biology 143, 405412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittschof, D., Forward, R.B., Cannon, G., Welch, J.M., McClary, M., Holm, E.R., Clare, A.S., Conova, S., McKelvey, L.M., Bryan, P. and Van Dover, C. (1998) Cues and context: larval responses to physical and chemical cues. Biofouling, 12, 3144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarrazin, J. and Juniper, K.S. (1999) Biological characteristics of a hydrothermal edifice mosaic community. Marine Ecology Progress Series 185, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz-Schampera, U., Botz, R., Hannington, M., Adamson, R., Anger, V., Cormany, D., Evans, L., Gibson, H., Haase, K., Hirdes, W., Hocking, M., Juniper, K., Langley, S., Leybourne, M., Metaxas, A., Mills, R., Ostertag-Henning, C., Rauch, M., Rutkowski, J., Schmidt, M., Shepherd, K., Stevens, C., Tamburri, K., Tracey, D. and Westernstroer, U. (2007) Marine Geoscientific Research on Input and Output in the Tonga–Kermadec Subduction Zone. Cruise Report SONNE 192/2 MANGO.Google Scholar
Schwarz-Schampera, U., Botz, R., Hannington, M., Evans, L., Gibson, H., Haase, K., Hirdes, W., Hocking, M., Juniper, K., Langley, S., Leybourne, M., Metaxas, A., Ostertag-Henning, C., Rauch, M., Rutkowski, J., Schmidt, M., Shepherd, K., Stevens, C. and Tracey, D. (2008) Marine Geoscientific Research on Input and Output in the Tonga–Kermadec Subduction Zone. Status Report 2008 SONNE 192/2-MANGO.Google Scholar
Thiébaut, E., Huther, X., Shillito, B., Jollivet, D. and Gaill, F. (2002) Spatial and temporal variations of recruitment in the tube worm Riftia pachyptila on the East Pacific Rise (9°50′N and 13°N). Marine Ecology Progress Series 234, 147157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toonen, R.J. and Pawlik, J.R. (1996) Settlement of the tube worm Hydroides dianthus (Polychaeta: Serpulidae): cues for gregarious settlement. Marine Biology 126, 725733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toonen, R.J. and Pawlik, J.R. (2001) Settlement of the gregarious tube worm Hydroides dianthus (Polychaeta: Serpulidae). I. Gregarious and nongregarious settlement. Marine Ecology Progress Series 224, 103114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dover, C.L. (2000) The ecology of deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dover, C.L., Berg, C.J. and Turner, R.D. (1988) Recruitment of marine invertebrates to hard substrates at deep-sea hydrothermal vents on the East Pacific Rise and Galapagos spreading center. Deep-Sea Research 35, 18331849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar