Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T21:38:32.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A first approach to stock assessment of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck, 1816) in Cantabria (Bay of Biscay)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2016

Xabier Guinda Open the ORCID record for Xabier Guinda [Opens in a new window] ,
Gorka Bidegain Open the ORCID record for Gorka Bidegain [Opens in a new window] ,
Araceli Puente Open the ORCID record for Araceli Puente [Opens in a new window]  and
José Antonio Juanes
Xabier Guinda*
Affiliation:
Environmental Hydraulics Institute, Universidad de Cantabria - Avda. Isabel Torres, 15, Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Cantabria, 39011, Santander, Spain
Gorka Bidegain
Affiliation:
Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, University of Southern Mississippi, MS, USA
Araceli Puente
Affiliation:
Environmental Hydraulics Institute, Universidad de Cantabria - Avda. Isabel Torres, 15, Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Cantabria, 39011, Santander, Spain
José Antonio Juanes
Affiliation:
Environmental Hydraulics Institute, Universidad de Cantabria - Avda. Isabel Torres, 15, Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Cantabria, 39011, Santander, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: X. Guinda, Environmental Hydraulics Institute, Universidad de Cantabria - Avda. Isabel Torres, 15, Parque Científico y Tecnológico de Cantabria, 39011, Santander, Spain email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purple sea urchin P. lividus is a marine resource greatly valued for its highly nutritious roe. The objective of this work is to analyse the spatial distribution pattern and population structure of this species in the region of Cantabria (Bay of Biscay) in order to identify the most appropriate zones for sustainable harvesting and for the establishment of adequate management strategies. Two depth ranges were studied (<5 and 5–10 m) in five coastal areas. The available stock of commercial individuals (size >55 mm) was estimated based on the density of individuals and biometric parameters. Significant differences were found among areas but not among depth ranges. Three areas showed low densities with large individuals, whereas two areas showed high densities with small individuals. Despite the average smaller size of the individuals, these high-density areas accumulated 76% of the commercial stock, making these the most suitable zones for the sustainable harvesting of P. lividus in the region. The high variability of the observed density values resulted in elevated uncertainty in the estimation of stocks. However, the high sea urchin densities together with the high percentages of commercial individuals suggest that the resource is currently underexploited. Further studies should be carried out, and precautionary measures should be adopted before opening the fishery. The suitability of many of these measures is discussed in the present work, as a necessary step in the management of the P. lividus fishery in Cantabria.

Keywords

sea urchinParacentrotus lividusdistributionpopulation structurestock assessmentmanagementsustainable harvesting
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 97 , Special Issue 3: European Marine Biology Symposium , May 2017 , pp. 561 - 570
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrew, N.L., Agatsuma, Y., Ballesteros, E., Bazhin, A.G., Creaser, E.P., Barnes, D.K.A., Botsford, L.W., Bradbury, A., Campbell, A., Dixon, J.D., Einarsson, S., Gerring, P.K., Hebert, K., Hunter, M., Hur, S.B., Johnson, C.R., Juinio-Menez, M.A., Kalvass, P., Miller, R.J., Moreno, C.A., Palleiro, J.S., Rivas, D., Robinson, S.M.L., Schroeter, S.C., Steneck, R.S., Vadas, R.L., Woodby, D.A. and Xiaoqi, Z. (2002) Status and management of world sea urchin fisheries. Oceanography and Marine Biology, Annual Review 40, 343–425.Google Scholar
Antoniadou, C. and Vafidis, D. (2009) Population structure and morphometric relationships of Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in the South Aegean Sea. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 50, 293–301.Google Scholar
Ballesteros, E. (1981) Algunos datos biométricos de Paracentrotus lividus (Lmk.), Arbacia lixula (L.) y Sphaerechinus granularis (Lmk.) (Echinodermata, Echinoidea). Oecologia Aquatica 5, 227–231.Google Scholar
Barnes, D.K.A. and Crook, A.C. (2001) Implications of temporal and spatial variability in Paracentrotus lividus populations to the associated commercial coastal fishery. Hydrobiologia 465, 95–102.Google Scholar
Berec, L., Angulo, E. and Courchamp, F. (2007) Multiple Allee effects and population management. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertocci, I., Dominguez, R., Machado, I., Freitas, C., Domínguez Godino, J., Sousa-Pinto, I., Gonçalves, M. and Gaspar, M.B. (2014) Multiple effects of harvesting on populations of the purple sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus in north Portugal. Fisheries Research 150, 60–65.Google Scholar
Bidegain, G., Guinda, X., Puente, A. and Juanes, J.A. (submitted) Facing difficulties associated to gooseneck barnacle (Pollicipes pollicipes Gmelin, 1789) population assessments.Google Scholar
Bidegain, G., Guinda, X., Sestelo, M., Roca-Pardiñas, J., Puente, A. and Juanes, J.A. (2015) Assessing the suitability of the minimum capture size and protection regimes in the gooseneck barnacle shellfishery. Ocean and Coastal Management 104, 150–158.Google Scholar
Bidegain, G., Sestelo, M., Roca-Pardiñas, J. and Juanes, J.A. (2013) Estimating a new suitable catch size for two clam species: implications for shellfishery management. Ocean and Coastal Management 71, 52–63.Google Scholar
Borja, A., Aguirrezabalaga, F., Martínez, J., Sola, J.C., García-Arberas, L. and Gorostiaga, J.M. (2004) Benthic communities, biogeography and resources management. In Borja, A. and Collins, M. (eds) Oceanography and marine environment of the Basque Country. Amsterdam: Elsevier Oceanography Series, pp. 455–492.Google Scholar
Botsford, L., Quinn, J., Wing, S. and Brittnacher, J. (1993) Rotating spatial harvest of a benthic invertebrate, the red sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus . In Kruse, G., Eggers, D.M., Marasco, R.J., Pautzke, C. and Quinn II, T.J. (eds) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Management Strategies for the Exploited Fish Populations. Anchorage, Alaska, Alaska Sea Grant College Program, Fairbanks, Alaska, 93–02, pp. 409–428.Google Scholar
Boudouresque, C.F. and Verlaque, M. (2013) Paracentrotus lividus . In Lawrence, J.M. (ed.) Sea urchins: biology and ecology. Developments in aquaculture and fisheries science, Volume 38, 3rd edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 297–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, J. and Noonburg, E.G. (2007) Poaching, enforcement, and the efficacy of marine reserves. Ecological Applications 17, 1851–1856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byrne, M. (1990) Annual reproductive cycles of the commercial sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus from an exposed intertidal and a sheltered subtidal habitat on the west coast of Ireland. Marine Biology 104, 275–289.Google Scholar
Cantabrian Government (2013) Orden GAN/35/2013, de 24 de mayo, por la que se regulan las vedas, tallas mínimas y recogida de marisco y otras especies de interés comercial, durante la temporada 2013 en la Comunidad Autónoma de Cantabria.Google Scholar
Cantabrian Government (2014) Orden GAN/30/2014, de 9 de mayo, por la que se regulan las vedas, tallas mínimas y recogida de marisco y otras especies de interés comercial, durante la temporada 2014 en la Comunidad Autónoma de Cantabria.Google Scholar
Cvitanovic, C., Hobday, A.J., van Kerkhoff, L., Wilson, S.K., Dobbs, K. and Marshall, N.A. (2015) Improving knowledge exchange among scientists and decision-makers to facilitate the adaptive governance of marine resources: a review of knowledge and research needs. Ocean and Coastal Management 112, 25–35.Google Scholar
Fernández-Boán, M. (2007) La pesquería de erizo en Galicia: análisis del caso de Porto do Son. Grupo de Recursos Marinos y Pesquerías. A Coruña: Departamento de Biología Animal, Vegetal y Ecología. Universidad de A Coruña, 73 pp.Google Scholar
Fernández-Boán, M., Fernández, L. and Freire, J. (2012) History and management strategies of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus fishery in Galicia (NW Spain). Ocean and Coastal Management 69, 265–272.Google Scholar
Filbee-Dexter, K. and Scheibling, R.E. (2014) Sea urchin barrens as alternative stable states of collapsed kelp ecosystems. Marine Ecology Progress Series 495, 1–25.Google Scholar
Fischer-Piette, E. (1955) Répartition le long des côtes septentrionales de l'Espagne des principales espèces peuplant les rochers intercotidaux. Annales de L'Institut Océanographique 31, 38–124.Google Scholar
Freeman, S.M. (2003) Size-dependent distribution, abundance and diurnal rhythmicity patterns in the short-spined sea urchin Anthocidaris crassispina . Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 58, 703–713.Google Scholar
Garmendia, J.M., Menchaca, I., Belzunce, M.J., Franco, J. and Revilla, M. (2010) Seasonal variability in gonad development in the sea urchin (Paracentrotus lividus) on the Basque coast (Southeastern Bay of Biscay). Marine Pollution Bulletin 61, 259–266.Google Scholar
GESHA (2005) Memoria de evaluación de recursos de interés marisquero en el litoral de Cantabria y desarrollo de protocolos aplicables a su gestión. Santander: Gobierno de Cantabria - Universidad de Cantabria.Google Scholar
Gianguzza, P., Chiantore, M., Bonaviri, C., Cattaneo-Vietti, R., Vielmini, I. and Riggio, S. (2006) The effects of recreational Paracentrotus lividus fishing on distribution patterns of sea urchins at Ustica Island MPA (Western Mediterranean, Italy). Fisheries Research 81, 37–44.Google Scholar
González-Irusta, J.M. (2009) Contribución al conocimiento del erizo de mar Paracentrotus lividus, (Lamarck, 1816) en el Mar Cantábrico: ciclo gonadal y dinámica de poblaciones. PhD Thesis. Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, 480 pp.Google Scholar
González-Irusta, J.M., Canteras, J.C. and Ansorena, F.J. (2008) El erizo de mar común (Paracentrotus lividus) en Cantabria. Estudio para una explotación sostenible. Locustella V, 58–67.Google Scholar
González-Irusta, J.M., Goñi de Cerio, F. and Canteras, J.C. (2010) Reproductive cycle of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus in the Cantabrian Sea (northern Spain): environmental effects. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 90, 699–709.Google Scholar
Guidetti, P., Terlizzi, A. and Boero, F. (2004) Effects of the edible sea urchin, Paracentrotus lividus, fishery along the Apulian rocky coast (SE Italy, Mediterranean Sea). Fisheries Research 66, 287–297.Google Scholar
Guinda, X., Juanes, J.A., Puente, A. and Echavarri-Erasun, B. (2012) Spatial distribution pattern analysis of subtidal macroalgae assemblages by a non-destructive rapid assessment method. Journal of Sea Research 67, 34–43.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez-Zugasti, I., Cuenca-Solana, D., Rasines del Río, P., Muñoz, E., Santamaría, S. and Morlote, J.M. (2013) The role of shellfish in hunter-gatherer societies during the Early Upper Palaeolithic: a view from El Cuco rockshelter, northern Spain. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 32, 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haya de la Sierra, D. (1990) Biología y ecología de ‘Paracentrotus lividus’ en la zona intermareal. PhD Thesis. Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
IH Cantabria (2011) Actualización de los modelos de gestión de los recursos marisqueros del litoral de Cantabria (2009–2011). Consejería de Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Biodiversidad. Gobierno de Cantabria.Google Scholar
Keesing, J.K. and Hall, K.C. (1998) Review of harvests and status of world sea urchin fisheries points to opportunities for aquaculture. Journal of Shellfish Research 17, 1597–1604.Google Scholar
Kramer, A.M., Dennis, B., Liebhold, A.M. and Drake, J. (2009) The evidence for Allee effects. Population Ecology 51, 341–354.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J.M. (1975) On the relationships between marine plants and sea urchins. Oceanography and Marine Biology, Annual Review 13, 213–286.Google Scholar
Levitan, D.R., Sewell, M.A. and Chia, F.S. (1992) How distribution and abundance influence fertilization success in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus . Ecology 73, 248–254.Google Scholar
Menchaca, I. and Bald, J. (2011) Subtidal edible sea urchin (Paracentrotus lividus) populations in the Basque Country (Northern, Spain). Facing the future exploitation, 14th International Conference on Shellfish Restoration, Stirling, Scotland, UK.Google Scholar
Menchaca, I. and Bald, J. (2012) Evaluación de la biomasa submareal de erizo de mar entre los municipios de Elantxobe y Hondarribia (Gipuzkoa, País Vasco). Informe de AZTI-Tecnalia para la Dirección de Pesca y Acuicultura del Gobierno Vasco, 105 pp.Google Scholar
Molares, J. and Freire, J. (2003) Development and perspectives for community-based management of the goose barnacle (Pollicipes pollicipes) fisheries in Galicia (NW Spain). Fisheries Research 65, 485–492.Google Scholar
Naya, I. (2007) Meta-análisis estadístico de los patrones de crecimiento del erizo Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck, 1816). DEA Thesis. Universidad de La Coruña, 58 pp.Google Scholar
Ouréns, R. (2013) Estrategia vital y dinámica poblacional del erizo Paracentrotus lividus. PhD Thesis. A Coruña, Coruña, 228 pp.Google Scholar
Ouréns, R., Fernández, L., Fernández-Boán, M., Naya, I. and Freire, J. (2013) Reproductive dynamics of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus on the Galicia coast (NW Spain): effects of habitat and population density. Marine Biology 160, 2413–2423.Google Scholar
Ouréns, R., Fernández, L. and Freire, J. (2011) Geographic, population, and seasonal patterns in the reproductive parameters of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus . Marine Biology 158, 793–804.Google Scholar
Ouréns, R., Freire, J., Vilar, J.A. and Fernández, L. (2014) Influence of habitat and population density on recruitment and spatial dynamics of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus: implications for harvest refugia. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 71, 1064–1072.Google Scholar
Ouréns, R., Naya, I. and Freire, J. (2015) Mismatch between biological, exploitation, and governance scales and ineffective management of sea urchin (Paracentrotus lividus) fisheries in Galicia. Marine Policy 51, 13–20.Google Scholar
Pais, A., Chessa, L.A., Serra, S., Meloni, G., Ruiu, A. and Manunza, B. (2006) Morphometric relationships and annual gonad index of the edible sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus from North Western Sardinia. Biologia Marina Mediterranea 13, 202–203.Google Scholar
Pais, A., Chessa, L.A., Serra, S., Ruiu, A., Meloni, G. and Donno, Y. (2007) The impact of commercial and recreational harvesting for Paracentrotus lividus on shallow rocky reef sea urchin communities in North-western Sardinia, Italy. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 73, 589–597.Google Scholar
Palacín, C., Turon, X., Ballesteros, M., Giribet, G. and López, S. (1998) Stock evaluation of three littoral echinoid species on the Catalan coast north-western Mediterranean. Pubblicazioni della Stazione Zoologica di Napoli: Marine Ecology 19, 163–177.Google Scholar
Pearse, J.S. and Arch, S.W. (1969) The aggregation behavior of Diadema (Echinodermata, Echinoidea). Micronesica 5, 165–171.Google Scholar
Perry, I.R., Walters, C.J. and Boutillier, J.A. (1999) A framework for providing scientific advice for the management of new and developing invertebrate fisheries. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 9, 125–150.Google Scholar
Ramos, E., Puente, A., Guinda, X. and Juanes, J.A. (in press) A hierarchical classification system along the NE Atlantic coast: focusing on the local scale (Cantabria, N Spain). European Journal of Phycology. doi: 10.1080/09670262.2016.1221469.Google Scholar
Ramos, E., Puente, A. and Juanes, J.A. (2016) An ecological classification of rocky shores at a regional scale: a predictive tool for management of conservation values. Marine Ecology 37, 311–328.Google Scholar
Régis, M.B., Pérès, J.M. and Gras, G. (1986) Données préliminaires sur l'exploitation de la ressource Paracentrotus lividus dans le quartier maritime de Marseille. Vie Marine 7, 41–60.Google Scholar
Riquelme, F., Bald, J., Galparsoro, I., Liria, P., Menchaca, I. and Rodríguez, J.G. (2013) Análisis de la idoneidad del hábitat del erizo de mar (Paracentrotus lividus) en el litoral de País Vasco. Revista de Investigación Marina 20, 149–163.Google Scholar
Sala, E., Ribes, M., Hereu, B., Zabala, M., Alvà, V., Coma, R. and Garrabou, J. (1998) Temporal variability in abundance of the sea urchins Paracentrotus lividus and Arbacia lixula in the northwestern Mediterranean: comparison between a marine reserve and an unprotected area. Marine Ecology Progress Series 168, 135–145.Google Scholar
Sestelo, M. and Roca-Pardiñas, J. (2011) A new approach to estimation of the length-weight relationship of Pollicipes pollicipes (Gmelin, 1789) on the Atlantic coast of Galicia (Northwest Spain): some aspects of its biology and management. Journal of Shellfish Research 30, 939–948.Google Scholar
Sauvageau, C. (1897) Note préliminaire sur les algues marines du Golfe de Gascogne. Journal de Botanique 11, 166–307.Google Scholar
Sethi, S.A. and Hilborn, R. (2008) Interactions between poaching and management policy affect marine reserves as conservation tools. Biological Conservation 141, 506–516.Google Scholar
Sousa, A., Jacinto, D., Penteado, N., Martins, P., Fernandes, J., Silva, T.S.F., Castro, J.J. and Cruz, T. (2013) Patterns of distribution and abundance of the stalked barnacle (Pollicipes pollicipes) in the central and southwest coast of continental Portugal. Journal of Sea Research 83, 187–194.Google Scholar
Sparre, P. and Venema, S.C. (1997) Introduction to tropical fish stock assessment. Part l. Manual. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, No. 306/1, Rev. 2, Rome, 420 pp.Google Scholar
Spirlet, C., Grosjean, P. and Jangoux, M. (2000) Optimization of gonad growth by manipulation of temperature and photoperiod in cultivated sea urchins, Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) (Echinodermata). Aquaculture 185, 85–99.Google Scholar
Tomas, F., Romero, J. and Turon, X. (2005) Experimental evidence that intra-specific competition in seagrass meadows reduces reproductive potential in the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck). Scientia Marina 69, 475–484.Google Scholar
Turon, X., Giribet, G., Lopez, S. and Palacin, C. (1995) Growth and population structure of Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in two contrasting habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 122, 193–204.Google Scholar
Vega Suárez, W. and Romero Kutzner, V. (2011) Patrón de distribución espacial de Paracentrotus lividus . Anales Universitarios de Etología 5, 21–30.Google Scholar