Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T09:20:16.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors influencing temporal variation of a Sargassum filipendula (Phaeophyta: Fucales) bed in a subtropical shore

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

G.B. Jacobucci ,
M.O. Tanaka  and
F.P.P. Leite
G.B. Jacobucci*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, 38402-902, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil Instituto Costa Brasilis—Desenvolvimento Sócio Ambiental, Caixa Postal 32, 11680-970, Ubatuba, SP, Brazil
M.O. Tanaka
Affiliation:
Departamento de Hidrobiologia, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 13565-905, São Carlos, SP, Brazil
F.P.P. Leite
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: G.B. Jacobucci, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, 38402-902, Uberlândia, MG, Brazil email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the present study, we evaluate the influence of biotic and abiotic factors on temporal fluctuations of Sargassum filipendula in a subtropical shore. Monthly algal samples, abiotic components, amphipod grazer density, and epiphyte biomass were obtained from a Sargassum bed in south-eastern Brazil. Density of S. filipendula fronds decreased during the sampling period, whereas dry mass was more constant, although with a noticeable reduction in the warmer months. Hypnea musciformis was the most frequent epiphyte on S. filipendula, occurring in all sampling periods, although with significant temporal variation. Sargassum filipendula density and dry mass were both influenced by epiphyte dry mass, temperature, and amphipod grazers. Sargassum filipendula biomass negatively influenced total epiphyte biomass, whereas H. musciformis biomass was positively influenced by phosphate, nitrite, and S. filipendula density and negatively influenced by S. filipendula dry mass and amphipod grazer abundance. Algal temporal fluctuations can be related to local abiotic and biotic factors, but the variation observed for S. filipendula and its epiphytes suggest that these factors have quite distinct effects for these algae.

Keywords

temporal variationSargassum filipendulasubtropical shoresouth-eastern Brazil
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 89 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 315 - 321
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ateweberhan, M., Bruggemann, J.H. and Breeman, A.M. (2005) Seasonal dynamics of Sargassum ilicifolium (Phaeophyta) on a shallow reef flat in the southern Red Sea (Eritrea). Marine Ecology Progress Series 292, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, K., Walters, L., Borgeas, H., Smith, C., Coyer, J. and Vroom, P. (2003) The impact of Dictyota spp. on Halimeda populations of Conch Reef, Florida Keys. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 297, 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berchez, F.A.S. and Oliveira, E.C. de (1990) Maricultural assays with the carrageenophyte Hypnea musciformis in São Paulo, Brazil. In de Oliveira, E.C. and Kautsky, I. (eds) Workshop—cultivation of seaweeds in Latin America. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo, pp. 89–94.Google Scholar
Borowitzka, M.A. and Lethbridge, R.C. (1989) Seagrass epiphytes. In Larkum, A.W.D., McComb, A.J. and Sheppard, S.A. (eds) Biology of seagrasses: a treatise on the biology of seagrasses with special reference to the Australian region. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 458–499.Google Scholar
Borum, J. (1987) Dynamics of epiphyton on eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) leaves: relative roles of algal growth, herbivory and substratum turnover. Limnology and Oceanography 32, 986–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buschmann, A.H. and Gomez, P. (1993) Interaction mechanisms between Gracilaria chilensis (Rhodophyta, Gigartinales) and epiphytes. Hydrobiologia 261, 345–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Antonio, C. (1985) Epiphytes on the rocky intertidal alga, Rhodomela larix (Turner) C. Agardh: negative effects on the host and food for herbivores? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 86, 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diaz-Pulido, G. and McCook, L.J. (2003) Relative roles of herbivory and nutrients in the recruitment of coral-reef seaweeds. Ecology 84, 2026–2033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J.E. and Hay, M.E. (2000) Strong impacts of grazing amphipods on the organization of a benthic community. Ecological Monographs 70, 237–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffy, J.E., Macdonald, K.S., Rhode, J.M. and Parker, J.D. (2001) Grazer diversity, functional redundancy, and productivity in seagrass beds: an experimental test. Ecology 82, 2417–2434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eston, V.R. and Bussab, W.O. (1990) An experimental analysis of ecological dominance in rocky subtidal macroalgal community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 136, 170–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faccini, A.L. and Berchez, F.A.S. (2000) Management of natural beds and standing stock evaluation of Hypnea musciformis (Gigartinales, Rhodophyta) in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Applied Phycology 12, 101–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, A.E., Clesceri, L.S. and Eaton, A.D. (1992) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 18th edition. Washington: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
Hall, M.O. and Bell, S.S. (1988) Response of motile epifauna to complexity of epiphytic algae on seagrass blades. Journal of Marine Research 46, 613–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, M.E. (1981) Herbivory, algal distribution and the maintenance of between-habitat diversity on a tropical fringing reef. American Naturalist 118, 520–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, M.E. (1986) Associational plant defenses and the maintenance of species diversity: turning competitors into accomplices. American Naturalist 128, 617–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jernakoff, P., Brearley, A. and Nielsen, J. (1996) Factors affecting grazer–epiphyte interactions in temperate seagrass meadows. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 34, 109–162.Google Scholar
Korpinen, S., Jormalainen, V. and Honkanen, T. (2007) Effects of nutrients, herbivory, and depth on the macroalgal community in the rocky sublittoral. Ecology 88, 839–852.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leite, F.P.P. and Turra, A. (2003) Temporal variation in Sargassum biomass, Hypnea epiphytism and associated fauna. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 46, 665–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littler, M.M. and Littler, D.S. (1999) Blade abandonment/proliferation: a novel mechanism for rapid epiphyte control in marine macrophytes. Ecology 80, 1736–1746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littler, M.M., Murray, S.N. and Arnold, K.E. (1979) Seasonal variation in net photosynthetic performance and cover of intertidal macrophytes. Aquatic Botany 7, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Smith, K.M. (1993) Abundance of mobile epifauna: the role of habitat complexity and predation by fishes. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 174, 243–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlathery, K.J., Sundbäck, K. and Anderson, I.C. (2007) Eutrophication in shallow coastal bays and lagoons: the role of plants in the coastal filter. Marine Ecology Progress Series 348, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, K.A. and Wetzel, R.L. (2000) Seasonal variations in eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) responses to nutrient enrichment and reduced light availability in experimental ecosystems. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 244, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, K.A., Wetzel, R.L. and Orth, R.J. (1997) Seasonal pulses of turbidity and their relations to eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) survival in an estuary. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 215, 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neckles, H.A., Koepfler, E.T., Haas, L.W., Wetzel, R.L. and Orth, R.J. (1994) Dynamics of epiphytic photoautotrophs and heterotrophs in Zostera marina (eelgrass) microcosm: responses to nutrient enrichment and grazing. Estuaries 17, 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paula, E.J. and Oliveira Filho, E.C. de (1980) Phenology of two populations of Sargassum cymosum (Phaeophyta–Fucales) of São Paulo State coast, Brazil. Boletim de Botânica 8, 21–39.Google Scholar
Prince, J.S. (1974) The ecology of Sargassum filipendula. I. Effect of temperature and photoperiod on growth and reproduction. Journal of Phycology 10 (Supplement), 10.Google Scholar
Reis, R.P., Leal, M.C.R., Yoneshigue-Valentin, Y. and Belluco, F. (2003) Efeito de fatores bióticos no crescimento de Hypnea musciformis (Rodophyta - Gigartinales). Acta Botanica Brasilica 17, 279–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schenkman, R.P.F. (1989) Hypnea musciformis (Rhodophyta): ecological influence on growth. Journal of Phycology 25, 192–196.Google Scholar
Széchy, M.T.M. and Paula, E.J. (1997) Macroalgas epífitas em Sargassum (Phaeophyta–Fucales) do litoral dos estados do Rio de Janeiro e São Paulo, Brasil. Leandra 12, 1–10.Google Scholar
Széchy, M.T.M., Galliez, M. and Marconi, M.I. (2006) Quantitative variables applied to phenological studies of Sargassum vulgare C. Agardh (Phaeophyceae–Fucales) from Ilha Grande Bay, State of Rio de Janeiro. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 29, 27–37.Google Scholar
Tanaka, M.O. and Leite, F.P.P. (2003) Spatial scaling in the distribution of macrofauna associated with Sargassum stenophyllum (Mertens) Martius: analyses of faunal groups, gammarid life habits, and assemblage structure. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 293, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, M.S., Wernberg, T., Staehr, P.A. and Pedersen, M.F. (2006) Spatio-temporal distribution patterns of the invasive macroalga Sargassum muticum within a Danish Sargassum-bed. Helgoland Marine Research 60, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomas, F., Turon, X. and Romero, J. (2005) Effects of herbivores on a Posidonia oceanica seagrass meadow: importance of epiphytes. Marine Ecology Progress Series 287, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viejo, R.M. and Aberg, P. (2003) Temporal and spatial variation in the density of mobile epifauna and grazing damage on the seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum. Marine Biology 142, 1229–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1999) Biostatistical analysis. 4th edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar