Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:09:10.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exposure of rotifers, crustaceans and sea urchins to produced formation waters and seawaters in the Mediterranean Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2010

L. Manfra*
Affiliation:
ISPRA Advanced Institute for environmental protection and research (ex ICRAM), Rome, Italy
E. De Nicola
Affiliation:
ILT Technology s.r.l, Lucca, Italy
C. Maggi
Affiliation:
ISPRA Advanced Institute for environmental protection and research (ex ICRAM), Rome, Italy
E. Zambianchi
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘Parthenope’, Department of Environmental Sciences, Naples, Italy
D. Caramiello
Affiliation:
Stazione Zoologica A. Dohrn, Naples, Italy
A. Toscano
Affiliation:
Stazione Zoologica A. Dohrn, Naples, Italy
D. Cianelli
Affiliation:
ISPRA Advanced Institute for environmental protection and research (ex ICRAM), Rome, Italy Università degli Studi di Napoli ‘Parthenope’, Department of Environmental Sciences, Naples, Italy
A.M. Cicero
Affiliation:
ISPRA Advanced Institute for environmental protection and research (ex ICRAM), Rome, Italy
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: L. Manfra, ISPRAVia di Casalotti 300, 00166 Rome, Italy email: [email protected]

Abstract

The toxicity of produced formation water (PFW) originating from four natural gas production platforms located in the Adriatic Sea (Italy), and of seawater samples collected near these installations is assessed by means of bioassays with Brachionus plicatilis, with the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana and with Paracentrotus lividus. The toxicological response of these specimens was evaluated in order to identify the most sensitive one, in the consumer compartment, and to design a bioassay battery specific for samples collected in the surroundings of a gas platform. Larval mortality of rotifers, larval immobilization of crustaceans, fertilization success/failure (sperm cell test) and larval (pluteus) development success/failure (embryo toxicity test) of sea urchins were taken as ecotoxicological endpoints. The PFW sampled on two platforms resulted toxic, while no toxicity was recorded in seawater samples collected in the vicinity of the platforms, even in coincidence with the PFW discharge operations. The species and bioassays employed have shown different responses to PFW: P. lividus turned out to be more sensitive than A. franciscana and B. plicatilis. In particular, the embryo toxicity test showed a higher toxicity than the sperm cell test.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

APAT IRSA-CNR (2003) Metodi analitici per le acque. Manuali e Linee guida 29 /2003, APAT IRSA-CNR, pp. 1153.Google Scholar
Arizzi Novelli, A., Argese, E., Tagliapietre, D., Bettiol, C. and Volpi Ghirardini, A. (2002) Toxicity of tributyltin and triphenyltin towards early life stages of Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21, 859864.Google Scholar
Arizzi Novelli, A., Losso, C., Ghetti, P.F. and Volpi Ghirardini, A. (2003) Toxicity of heavy metals using sperm cell and embryo toxicity bioassays with Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea): comparison with exposure concentrations in the Lagoon of Venice, Italy. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 22, 12951301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASTM (1991) Standard guide for acute toxicity tests with the rotifer Brachionus. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, E 1440, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 18.Google Scholar
ASTM (1995) Standard guide for conducting static acute toxicity tests with echinoid embryos. E 1563-95, American Society for Testing and Materials, pp. 1029–46.Google Scholar
Brendehaugh, J., Johnsen, S., Bryne, K.H., Gjose, A.L., Eide, T.H. and Aamot, E. (1992). Toxicity testing and chemical characterization of produced water—a preliminary study. In Ray, J.P. and Engelhart, F.R. (eds) Produced water technological/environmental issues and solutions. New York, Plenum Press, pp. 245256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britt, J.O. and Howard, E.B. (1983) Tissue residues of selected environmental contaminants in marine mammals. In Howard, E.B. (ed.) Pathobiology of marine mammal siseases. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 7994.Google Scholar
Capuzzo, J.M. (1987). Biological effects of petroleum hydrocarbons: assessment from experimental results. In Boesch, D.F. and Rabalais, N.N. (eds) Long-term environmental effects of offshore oil and gas development. London: Elsevier Applied Science, pp. 343410.Google Scholar
Carr, R.S. and Chapman, D.C. (1995) Comparison of methods for conducting marine and estuarine sediment porewater toxicity tests—extraction, storage, and handling techniques. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 28, 6977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cianelli, D., Manfra, L., Zambianchi, E., Maggi, C., Cappiello, A., Famiglini, G., Mannozzi, M. and Cicero, A.M. (2008) Near-field dispersion of produced formation water (PFW) in the Adriatic Sea: an integrated numerical–chemical approach. Marine Environmental Research 65, 325337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cianelli, D., Manfra, L., Zambianchi, E., Maggi, C. and Cicero, A.M. (2009). Modelling and observations of produced formation water (PFW). In Canton, K.W. (ed.) Fluid waste disposal. Hauppauge NY: Nova Science, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Damiani, G. (2002) Ecotoxicology and ecosystems health. Annali Istituto Superiore Sanità 38, 155159.Google ScholarPubMed
Daniels, C.B. and Means, J.C. (1989) Assessment of the genotoxicity of produced water discharges associated with oil and gas production using a fish embryo and larval test. Marine Environmental Research 28, 303307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinnel, P.A., Link, J.M. and Stober, Q.J. (1987) Improved methodology for a sea urchin sperm cell bioassay for marine waters. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 16, 2332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Environment Canada (1992) Biological test method: fertilization assay using Echinoids (sea urchins and sand dollars). EPS 1/RM/27, Environment Canada.Google Scholar
Fan, T.W.M., Higashi, R.M., Cherr, G.N. and Pillai, M.C. (1992). Use of noninvasive NMR spectroscopy and imaging for mussel reproduction. In Ray, J.P. and Engelhart, F.R. (eds) Produced water technological/environmental issues and solutions. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 403414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higashi, R.M., Cherr, G.N., Bergens, C.A. and Fan, T.W.M. (1992). An approach to toxicant isolation from a produced water source in the Santa Barbara Channel. In Ray, J.P. and Engelhart, F.R. (eds) Produced water technological/environmental issues and solutions. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 223233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
His, E., Beiras, R. and Seaman, M.N.L. (1999) The assessment of marine pollution: bioassays with bivalve embryos and larvae. Advances in Marine Biology 37, 1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogan, J.W. and Brauhn, J.L. (1975) Abnormal rainbow trout fry from eggs containing high residues of PCB (Aroclor 1242). Progressive Fish Culturist 37, 229230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, P.R. (1993) Effects of produced water on reproduction and early life stages of the purple sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus): field and laboratory tests. PhD thesis. University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Krause, P.R., Osenberg, C.W. and Schmitt, R.J. (1992). Effects of produced water on early life stages of a sea urchin: stage-specic responses and delayed expression. In Ray, J.P. and Engelhart, F.R. (eds) Produced water technological/environmental issues and solutions. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 431444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larsson, P., Okla, L. and Collvin, L. (1993) Reproductive status and lipid content as factors in PCB, DDT, and HCH contamination of a population of pike (Exos lucius L.). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 12, 855861.Google Scholar
Linden, O. (1976) Effects of oil on the reproduction of the amphipod Gammarus oceanicus. Ambio 5, 3637.Google Scholar
Manfra, L. (2007) Dispersione in mare delle acque di produzione e valutazione ecotossicologica degli effetti indotti. PhD thesis. Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 136 pp. Open Archive di Ateneo. www.fedoa.unina.it.Google Scholar
Manfra, L., Moltedo, G., Virno Lamberti, C., Maggi, C., Finoia, M.G., Gabellini, M., Giuliani, S., Onorati, F., Di Mento, R. and Cicero, A.M. (2007) Metal content and toxicity of produced formation water (PFW): study of the possible effects of the discharge on marine environment. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 53, 183190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mariani, L., Manfra, L., Maggi, C., Savorelli, F., Di Mento, R. and Cicero, A.M. (2004) Produced formation waters: a preliminary study on chemical characterization and acute toxicity by using fish larve Dicentrarchus labrax. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 13, 14271432.Google Scholar
Martin, M., Osborn, K.E., Billig, P. and Glickstein, N. (1981) Toxicities of ten metals to Crassostrea gigas and Mytilus edulis embryos and Cancer magister larvae. Marine Pollution Bulletin 12, 305308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OGP (2005) Fate and effects of naturally occurring substances in produced water on the marine environment. 364 February. International Association of Oil & Gas Producers, 35 pp.Google Scholar
Persoone, G., Goyvaerts, M., Janssen, C., De Coen, W. and Vangheluwe, M. (1993) Cost-effective acute hazard monitoring of polluted waters and waste dumps with the aid of toxkits. ACE 89/BE 2/D3, Commission of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, D.A. (1967) Decrease in egg shell weight in certain birds of prey. Nature 215, 208210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiff, K.C., Reish, D.J., Anderson, J.W. and Bay, S.M. (1992). A comparative evaluation of produced water toxicity. In Ray, J.P. and Engelhart, F.R. (eds) Produced water technological/environmental issues and solutions. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 199208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somerville, H.J., Bennett, D., Davenport, J.N., Holt, M.S., Lynes, A., Mahieau, A., McCourt, B., Parker, J.G., Stephenson, R.R., Watkinson, R.J. and Wilkinson, T.G. (1987) Environmental effect of produced water from North Sea oil operations. Marine Pollution Bulletin 10, 549558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stagg, R., Gore, D.J., Whale, G.F., Kirby, M.F., Blackburn, M., Bifield, S., McIntosh, A.D., Vance, I., Flynn, S.A. and Foster, A. (1995). Field evaluatin of toxic effects and dispersion of produced water discharges from North Sea oil platforms. In Reed, M. and Johnsen, S. (eds) Produced water 2. Environmental issues and mitigation technologies. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 81100.Google Scholar
Stromgren, T., Sorstrom, S.E., Schou, L., Kaarstad, I., Aunaas, T., Brakstad, O.G. and Johansen, O. (1995) Acute toxic effects of produced water in relation to chemical composition and dispersion. Marine Environmental Research 40, 147169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trieff, N.M., Romaña, L.A., Esposito, A., Oral, R., Quiniou, F., Iaccarino, M., Alcock, N., Ramanujam, V.M.S. and Pagano, G. (1995) Effluent from bauxite factory induces developmental and reproductive damage in sea urchins. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 28, 173177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US EPA (1991) Technical support document for water quality-based toxic control. 505/2-90-001, US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Volpi Ghirardini, A. and Arizzi Novelli, A. (2001) A sperm cell toxicity test procedure for the Mediterranean species Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea). Environmental Technology 22, 439445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volpi Ghirardini, A., Arizzi Novelli, A. and Tagliapietre, D. (2005) Sediment toxicity assessment in the Lagoon of Venice (Italy) using Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) fertilization and embryo bioassays. Environment International 31, 10651077.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed