Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T19:29:01.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluating the effects of reserve closure on algae, invertebrate and fish assemblages at a temperate South Australian marine reserve

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 May 2009

David R. Currie*
Affiliation:
South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), PO Box 120, Henley Beach 5022, Adelaide, South Australia
Shirley J. Sorokin
Affiliation:
South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), PO Box 120, Henley Beach 5022, Adelaide, South Australia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: D.R. Currie, South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), PO Box 120, Henley Beach 5022, Adelaide, South Australia email: [email protected]

Abstract

Differences in the reef biota between the Point Labatt Marine Reserve and adjacent unprotected reference areas were examined following an 18-year period of protection from fishing. Quantitative measures of fish, invertebrates and algae were obtained by divers at 16 depth-stratified locations inside and outside the reserve, and the significance of differences examined using a combination of univariate (ANOVA) and multivariate (MDS) analyses. Strong depth-related differences in the composition and abundance of algae and invertebrates were observed, both inside and outside the reserve. These community differences were most pronounced in shallow near-shore waters (<10 m depth), and were largely due to variations in the abundance of a small group of species with widespread distributions. Spatial patterns in fish were not closely related to depth, and it appears that trophic linkages between fish and the underlying algal and invertebrate assemblages at Point Labatt are either weak or occur at spatial scales larger than that covered in this study. No significant reserve-related differences were detected in the abundance, diversity or community structures of algae, invertebrates and fish examined in this study. In many cases this is because the biological attributes measured were highly variable in space, and required more intensive sampling regimes to improve statistical precision. This study emphasizes the need for more robust survey designs and their timely implementation in marine conservation planning processes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agardy, T. (2000) Information needs for marine protected areas: scientific and societal. Bulletin of Marine Science 66, 875888.Google Scholar
Alcala, A.C. and Russ, G.R. (1990) A direct test of the effects of protective management on abundance and yield of tropical marine resources. Journal du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 46, 4047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, R.C., Kelly, S., Shears, N.T., Walker, J.W. and Willis, T.J. (1999) Changes in community structure in temperate marine reserves. Marine Ecology Progress Series 189, 125134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, N.S., Edgar, G.J., Buxton, C.D. and Haddon, M. (2007) Changes in fish assemblages following 10 years of protection in Tasmanian marine protected areas. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 345, 141157.Google Scholar
Bray, J.R. and Curtis, J.T. (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27, 325349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, M.H. and Raimondi, P.T. (1999) Marine protected areas as a precautionary approach to management. Californian Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigation Report 40, 7176.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18, 117143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Gorley, R.N. (2001) PRIMER v5 users manual/tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Cole, R.G. (1994) Abundance, size-structure, and diver-oriented behaviour of three large benthic carnivorous fishes in a marine reserve in north-eastern New Zealand. Biological Conservation 70, 9399.Google Scholar
Cole, R.G., Ayling, T.M. and Creese, R.G. (1990) Effects of marine reserve protection at Goat Island, northern New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 24, 197210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayton, P.K., Thrush, S.F., Agardy, M.T. and Hofman, R.J. (1995) Environmental effects of marine fishing. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 5, 205232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayton, P.K., Sala, E., Tegner, M.J. and Thrush, S. (2000) Marine reserves: parks, baselines and fishery enhancement. Bulletin of Marine Science 66, 617634.Google Scholar
Department of Environment and Natural Resources (1995) Point Labatt conservation park management plan. Adelaide: Department of Environment and Natural Resources, National Parks and Wildlife Service, 19 pp.Google Scholar
Deysher, L.E. and Norton, T.A. (1982) Dispersal and colonisation in Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 56, 197–195.Google Scholar
Edgar, G.D. and Barrett, N.S. (1999) Effects of the declaration of marine reserves on Tasmanian reef fishes, invertebrates and plants. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 242, 107144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estes, J.A. and Duggins, D.O. (1995) Sea otters and kelp forests in Alaska: generality and variation in a community ecological paradigm. Ecological Monographs 65, 75100.Google Scholar
Government of South Australia (2004) Blueprint for the South Australian representative system of marine protected areas. Adelaide: Department for Environment and Heritage, Government of South Australia.Google Scholar
Guidetti, P., Verginella, L., Viva, C., Odorico, R. and Boero, F. (2005) Protection effects on fish assemblages, and comparison of two visual-census techniques in shallow artificial rocky habitats in the northern Adriatic Sea. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 85, 247255.Google Scholar
Harman, N., Harvey, E.S. and Kendrick, G.A. (2003) Differences in fish assemblages from different reef habitats at Hamelin Bay, south-western Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 54, 177184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlbert, S.H. (1987) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54, 187211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, J.P. (2004) The ecosystem effects of abalone fishing: a review. Marine and Freshwater Research 55, 545552.Google Scholar
Jones, G.P. (1992) Interactions between herbivorous fishes and macro-algae on a temperate rocky reef. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 159, 217235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnane, A., Ward, T.M., McGarvey, R., Xiao, Y. and Feenstra, J. (2005) Northern zone rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) fishery 2003/04. Adelaide: South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), 104 pp.Google Scholar
Mayfield, S., Foureur, B.L. and Ward, T.M. (2004) Western zone abalone (Haliotis laevigata and H. rubra) fishery. Adelaide: South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences), 97 pp.Google Scholar
McClanahan, T.R. and Mangi, S. (2000) Spillover of exploitable fishes from a marine park and its effect on the adjacent fishery. Ecological Applications 10, 17921805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormick, M.J. and Choat, J.H. (1987) Estimating total abundance of a large temperate-reef fish using visual strip-transects. Marine Biology 96, 469478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, J., Goldsworthy, S.D., Shaughnessy, P.D. and McIntosh, R. (2005) Understanding the impediments to the growth of Australian sea lion populations. Adelaide: South Australian Research and Development Institute (Aquatic Sciences).Google Scholar
Mosquera, I., Cote, I.M., Jennings, S. and Reynolds, J.D. (2000) Conservation benefits of marine reserves for fish populations. Animal Conservation 4, 321332.Google Scholar
Paddack, M.J. and Estes, J.A. (2000) Kelp forest fish populations in marine reserves and adjacent exploited areas of central California. Ecological Applications 10, 855870.Google Scholar
Roberts, C.M., Bohnsack, J.A., Gell, F., Hawkins, J.P. and Goodridge, R. (2001) Effects of marine reserves on adjacent fisheries. Science 294, 19201923.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers-Bennett, L., Haaker, P.L., Karpov, K.A. and Kushner, D.A. (2002) Using spatially explicit data to evaluate marine protected areas for abalone in southern California. Conservation Biology 16, 13081317.Google Scholar
Russ, G.A. and Alcala, A.C. (1996) Marine reserves: rates and patterns of recovery and decline of large predatory fish. Ecological Applications 6, 947961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samoilys, M.A. and Carlos, G. (2000) Determining methods of underwater visual census for estimating the abundance of coral reef fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes 57, 289302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shears, N.T. and Babcock, R.C. (2002) Marine reserves demonstrate top-down control of community structure on temperate reefs. Oecologia 132, 131142.Google Scholar
Stewart, R.R., Noyce, T. and Possingham, H.P. (2003) Opportunity costs of ad hoc marine reserve design decisions: an example from South Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 253, 2538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart-Oaten, A., Murdoch, W.M. and Parker, K.R. (1986) Environmental impact assessment: ‘Pseudoreplication’ in time? Ecology 67, 929940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tegner, M.J. and Dayton, P.K. (2000) Ecosystem effects of fishing in kelp forest communities. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57, 579589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A.J. (1993) The mechanics of spatially replicated sampling programmes to detect environmental impacts in a variable world. Australian Journal of Ecology 18, 99116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar