Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:19:45.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimating the density of Pennant's swimming crab, Portumnus latipes (Pennant, 1777) in the swash zone using baited stakes and area of attraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2018

Claudia Cores ,
Miguel B. Gaspar  and
Karim Erzini
Claudia Cores*
Affiliation:
Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia (FCT), Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
Miguel B. Gaspar
Affiliation:
Center of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, I.P./IPMA, Avenida 5 de Outubro, s/n, P-8700-305 Olhão, Portugal
Karim Erzini
Affiliation:
Center of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
*
Author for correspondence: Claudia Cores, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We used a new, easy to use, highly selective, low impact and cheap method of sampling in the swash zone of a sandy beach to obtain catch per unit effort data (CPUE) for Pennant's swimming crab, Portumnus latipes (Pennant, 1777). Metal stakes baited with sardines were used to attract the crabs that were caught by hand. Crab density was estimated based on area of attraction and maximum CPUE and compared with estimates from bivalve dredges used at depths from 3 to 6.5 m. The baited stake method gave an estimate of 0.026 crabs m−2, which is comparable to bivalve dredge estimates (0.0059–0.045 crabs m−2). This approach can be used for crustaceans, gastropods and other mobile benthic organisms.

Keywords

Area of attractionbaited stakedensityPennant's swimming crabPortugalPortumnus latipes
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 99 , Issue 4 , June 2019 , pp. 887 - 890
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aedo, G and Arancibia, H (2003) Estimating attraction areas and effective fishing areas for Chilean lemon crab (Cancer porter) using traps. Fisheries Research 60, 267–272.Google Scholar
Anfuso, G and Ruiz, N (2004) Morphodynamics of mesotidal, exposed, low tide terrace beach (Faro, southern Portugal). Ciencias Marinas 30, 575–584.Google Scholar
Arena, G, Barea, L and Defeo, O (1994) Theoretical evaluation of trap capture for stock assessment. Fisheries Research 19, 348–362.Google Scholar
Carcedo, C, Fiori, S and Bremec, C (2015) Macrobenthic surf zone communities of temperate sandy beaches: spatial and temporal patterns. Marine Ecology 36, 326–336.10.1111/maec.12143Google Scholar
Chartosia, N, Kitsos, MS and Koukouras, A (2010) Seasonal diet of Portumnus latipes (Pennant, 1777) (Decapoda, Portunidae). Crustaceana 83, 1101–1113.Google Scholar
Cores, C, Gaspar, MB and Erzini, K (2017) Biology, abundance and distribution of Pennant's swimming crab, Portumnus latipes (Pennant, 1777) along the coast of Portugal. Crustaceana 90, 49–68.Google Scholar
Coston-Guarini, J, Guarini, J-M, Boehm, F, Kerkhove, T, Rivera, FC, Erzini, K, Charles, F, Deprez, T and Chauvaud, L (2018) A new probabilistic approach to estimating marine gastropod densities from baited traps. Marine Ecology 39. https://doi.org/10.1111/maec.12509.Google Scholar
Defeo, O, McLachlan, A, Schoeman, DS, Schlacher, TA, Dugan, J, Jones, A, Lastra, M and Scapini, F (2009) Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: a review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 81, 1–12.Google Scholar
Dolbeth, M, Ferreira, O, Teixeira, H, Marques, JC, Dias, JA and Pardal, MA (2007) Beach morphodynamic impact on a macrobenthic community along a subtidal depth gradient. Marine Ecology Progress Series 352, 113–124.Google Scholar
Eggers, DM, Rickard, NA, Chapman, DG and Whitney, RR (1982) A methodology for estimating area fished for baited hooks and traps along a ground line. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 39, 448–453.Google Scholar
Freitas, R, Ricardo, F, Pereira, F, Sampaio, L, Carvalho, S, Gaspar, M, Quintino, V and Rodrigues, AM (2011) Benthic habitat mapping: concerns using a combined approach (acoustic, sediment and biologic data). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 92, 598–606.Google Scholar
Janssen, G and Mulder, S (2005) Zonation of macrofauna across sandy beaches and surf zones along the Dutch coast. Oceanologia 47, 265–282.Google Scholar
Lebour, MV (1944) The larval stages of Portumnus (crustacea Brachyura) with notes on some other genera. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 26, 7–15.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A (1990) Dissipative beaches and macrofauna communities on exposed intertidal sands. Journal of Coastal Research 15, 177–212.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A and Erasmus, T (1983) Sandy beach ecology – a review. Development in Hydrobiology 19, 321–380.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A, Cockcroft, AC and Malan, DE (1984) Benthic faunal response to a high energy gradient. Marine Ecology Progress Series 16, 51–63.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A, Jaramillo, E, Donn, E and Wessels, F (1993) Sandy beach macrofauna communities and their control by the physical environment: a geographical comparison. Journal of Coastal Research 15, 27–38.Google Scholar
McQuinn, IH, Gendron, L and Himmelman, JH (1988) Area of attraction and effective area fished by a whelk (Buccinum undatum) trap under variable condition. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 45, 2054–2060.Google Scholar
Schoeman, DS, Nel, R and Soares, AG (2008) Measuring species richness on sandy beach transects: extrapolative estimators and their implications for sampling effort. Marine Ecology 29, 134–149.10.1111/j.1439-0485.2008.00223.xGoogle Scholar
Vousdoukas, MI, Almeida, LP and Ferreira, Ó (2011) Modelling storm-induced beach morphological change in a meso-tidal reflective beach using XBeach. Journal of Coastal Research 64, 1916–1920.Google Scholar