Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:23:34.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Temperature Upon the Flash-Stimulated Luminescence of the Euphausiid Thysanoessa Raschi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

P. B. Tett
Affiliation:
The Marine Station, Millport, and Department of Zoology, University of Glasgow

Extract

The flash-stimulated luminescent response (FSLR) of euphausiids is a useful tool for the investigation of their bioluminescent behaviour. This paper describes the investigation of the effects of temperature upon a series of such FSLRs produced in individuals of Thysanoessa raschi (M. Sars) by three stimulations with an electronic photofiash at 20 min intervals. The following parameters of the response were measured: responsedelay, responseduration, the sum of these two {delay + duration) and the proportion of stimulations which produced a response. Initial experiments showed that all response delays were significantly different at 10°C and at 5°C, while second andthird response delays were not different from each other. The effect of a range of temperatures from 0° to 20°C on FSLR delay and duration is described. Regression lines based on the Arrhenius equation were fitted to the results. These showed that all response parameters decreased with increasing temperature, although Q10 varied from — 7.8 in the case of thefirst response delay to — 1.3 in the case of second/third response delay. This difference was the most marked effect of the second stimulation; the third stimulation caused no additional change. Below 10°C the second delay was shorter than the first delay. The independent response parameters were found to be delay and delay + duration. Duration resulted from the interaction of these two. These results are discussed and compared with the interpretation of the results of similar experiments by Kay (1965, 1966) onMeganyctiphanes norvegica.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnes, T. C, 1937. Textbook of General Physiology, chap. 13, pp. 384–97. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Boden, B. P., Kampa, E. M. & Abbott, B. C, 1961. Photoreception of a planktonic crustacean in relation to light penetration in the sea. In Christensen, B. C. and Buchman, B. (eds.), Progress in Photobiology. Proc. yd int. photo biol. Congr., pp. 189–96. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Clarke, G. L. & Breslau, L. R., 1960. Studies of luminescent flashing in Phosphorescent Bay, Puerto Rico, and in the Gulf of Naples using a portable bathyphotometer. Bull. Inst. oceanogr. Monaco, Vol. 57, No. 1171, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Hardy, A. C. & Kay, R. H., 1964. Experimental studies of plankton luminescence. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 44, pp. 435–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. H., 1965. Light stimulated and light inhibited bioluminescence of the euphausiidMeganyctiphanes norvegica (G. O. Sars). Proc. R. Soc. B, Vol. 162, PP. 365–86.Google Scholar
Kay, R. H.J 1966. The inhibition of optically stimulated bioluminescence inMeganyctiphanes norvegica. Some Contemporary Studies in Marine Science, pp. 421–7. Ed. H., Barnes. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1960. The biology of the euphausiid crustaceanMeganyctiphanes norvegica (M. Sars). Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., B, Vol. 67, pp. 141–79.Google Scholar
Mauchline, J., 1966. The biology of Thysanoessa raschi (M. Sars), with a comparison of its diet with that ofMeganyctiphanes norvegica (M. Sars). Some Contemporary Studies in Marine Science, pp. 493510. Ed. H., Barnes. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar