Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:31:58.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of morphodynamics and across-shore physical gradients on benthic macroinfauna on two sandy beaches in south-eastern Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2014

Joaquim N.S. Santos
Affiliation:
Instituto Federal do Norte de Minas Gerais—IFNMG, Fazenda Meio Pé da Serra, s/n°. BR 367, km 278, Caixa Postal 11, CEP 39600-000, Araçuaí, MG, Brasil
Rafaela de S. Gomes
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia de Peixes, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, BR 465, km 7, CEP 23890-000 Seropédica, RJ, Brasil
Ruan Managna Vasconcellos
Affiliation:
Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Espírito Santo–IFES, Campus Colatina. Avenida Arino Gomes Leal, 1700, Bairro Santa Margarida, CEP 29.700-660, Colatina, ES, Brasil
Débora de Souza Silva
Affiliation:
Instituto Federal do Norte de Minas Gerais—IFNMG, Fazenda Meio Pé da Serra, s/n°. BR 367, km 278, Caixa Postal 11, CEP 39600-000, Araçuaí, MG, Brasil
Francisco Gerson Araújo*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Ecologia de Peixes, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, BR 465, km 7, CEP 23890-000 Seropédica, RJ, Brasil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: F.G. Araújo, Laboratório de Ecologia de Peixes, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, BR 465, km 7, CEP 23890-000 Seropédica, RJ, Brasil email: [email protected]

Abstract

We examined the benthic macroinfauna at three strata during two seasons (winter and summer) on two sandy beaches (dissipative and reflective) in south-eastern Brazil. The hypothesis raised is that effects of morphodynamics and zonation determine the structure of macroinfauna, with dissipative beaches having comparatively higher species richness and density than the reflective beaches. Flamengo beach (dissipative) had higher species richness but lower density compared to Grumari beach (reflective). A high dissimilarity in assemblage structure (91.75%) was detected between the two beaches. Zonation in the occurrence of macroinfauna was detected for the two beaches in the two examined seasons. At Grumari beach, Emerita brasiliensis occurred mainly in stratum 1 (intertidal swept zone) while Saccocirus sp. occurred in stratum 2 (infralittoral at 0.5 m depth), whereas at Flamengo beach E. brasiliensis and Enoploides sp. had the highest density in stratum 1 (intertidal swept zone) whereas Scolelepis goodbodyi and Donax uncinata dominated in stratum 3 (infralittoral at 1.0 m depth). Scolelepis goodbodyi, Dispio uncinata, Enoploides sp., Nematoda and Trileptium sp. were associated with higher a Dean parameter and content of organic matter at Flamengo beach. In contrast, Hastula sp., Donax sp., Pisionidens indica, Hemipodus californiensis, Saccocirus sp. and Phyllodocidae were associated with the higher wave period and grain size of Grumari beach. The hypothesis that macroinfauna structure differs between the beaches and strata was confirmed, with the dissipative beaches having comparatively higher richness but lower density than the reflective beaches.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barros, F., Borzone, C.A. and Rosso, S. (2001) Macroinfauna of six beaches near Guaratiba bay, Southern Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 44, 351364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borzone, C.A., Melo, S.G., Rezende, K.V., Vale, R. and Krul, R. (2003) Macrobenthic intertidal communities from wave to tide dominated beach environments. A case study in two Brazilian beaches. Journal of Coastal Research 35, 472480.Google Scholar
Borzone, C.A., Souza, J.R.B. and Soares, A.G. (1996) Morphodynamic influence on the structure of inter and subtidal macrofaunal communities of subtropical sandy beaches. Revista Chilena de História Natural 69, 565577.Google Scholar
Brazeiro, A. and Defeo, O. (1996) Macroinfauna zonation in macrotidal sandy beaches: is it possible to identify patterns in such variable environments? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 42, 523536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A.C. and McLachlan, A. (1990) Ecology of sandy shores. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Camargo, M.G. (2006) SYSGRAN: Um sistema de código aberto para análises granulométricas do sedimento. Revista Brasileira de Geociências 36, 371378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, R.S., Veloso, V.G. and Caetano, C.H.S. (2003) Life history of Emerita brasiliensis (Decapoda: Hippidae) on two beaches with different morphodynamic characteristics. Journal of Coastal Research 35, 392401.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. (2001) Changes in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. 2nd editionPlymouth: Primer E.Google Scholar
Defeo, O. and Cardoso, R.S. (2002) Macroecology of population dynamics and life history traits of the mole crab Emerita brasiliensis in Atlantic sandy beaches of South America. Marine Ecology Progress Series 239, 169179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, O. and McLachlan, A. (2005) Patterns, processes and regulatory mechanisms in sandy beach macrofauna: a multi scale analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 295, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, O., McLachlan, A., Shoeman, D.S., Schilancher, A., Dugan, J., Jones, A., Lastra, M. and Scapini, F. (2009) Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: a review. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 81, 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defeo, O., Ortiz, E. and Castilla, J.C. (1992) Growth mortality and recruitment of the yellow clam Mesodesma mactroides on Uruguayan beaches. Marine Biology 114, 429437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dexter, D.M. (1992) Sandy beach community structure: the role of exposure and latitude. Journal of Biogeography 19, 5966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Domenico, M., Lana, P.C. and Garraffoni, A.R.S. (2009) Distribution patterns of interstitial polychaetes in sandy beaches of southern Brazil. Marine Ecology 30, 4762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, R.S.R. and Soares-Gomes, A. (2006) Community structure of macrobenthos in two tropical sandy beaches with different morphodynamic features, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Marine Ecology 27, 160169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleeger, J.W. and Decho, A.W. (1987) Spatial variability of interstitial meiofauna: a review. Stygologia 3, 3548.Google Scholar
Frattini, C.T.A. and Kalckman, R.E. (1967) Correlação entre alguns métodos de determinação do carbono. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 2, 259261.Google Scholar
Gianuca, N.M. (1985) The ecology of a sandy beach in Southern Brazil. PhD thesis. University of Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R.J., Matthews, M.D. and Link, D.A. (1971) The relationship between sphere size and settling velocity. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 41, 718.Google Scholar
Giere, O. (1993) Meiobenthology, the microscopic fauna in aquatic sediments. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Hill, G.M. and Hunter, R.E. (1976) Interaction of biological and geological process in the beach and nearshore, northern Padre Island, Texas. In Davis, R.A. Jr and Ethington, R.L. (eds) Beach and nearshores sedimentation. Tulsa, OK: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, pp. 169187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D.W.T., Cooper, J.A.G. and Rio, L.D. (2005) Geological control of beach morphodynamic state. Marine Geology 216, 297314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaramillo, E. (1987) Sandy beach macroinfauna from the Chilean coast: zonation patterns and zoogeography. Vie et Milieu 37, 165174.Google Scholar
Knott, D.M., Calder, D.R. and VanDolah, R.F. (1983) Macrobenthos of sandy beach and nearshore environments at Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, U.S.A. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 16, 573590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leber, K.M. (1982) Seasonality of macroinvertebrates on a temperate, high wave energy sandy beach. Bulletin of Marine Science 32, 8698.Google Scholar
Maria, T.F., Paiva, P., Vanreusel, A. and Esteves, A.M. (2013) The relationship between sandy beach nematodes and environmental characteristics in two Brazilian sandy beaches (Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 85, 25270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArdle, S. and McLachlan, A. (1992) Sand beach ecology: swash factors relevant to the macrofauna. Journal of Coastal Research 8, 398407.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A. (1990) Dissipative beaches and macrofauna communities on exposed intertidal sands. Journal of Coastal Research 6, 5771.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A. and Jaramillo, E. (1995) Zonation on sandy beaches. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 33, 305335.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A., Jaramillo, E., Donn, T.E. and Wessels, F. (1993) Sandy beach macrofauna communities and their control by the physical environment: a geographical comparison. Journal of Coastal Research 15, 2738.Google Scholar
Neves, L.P., Da Silva, P.R. and Bemvenuti, C.E. (2007) Zonation of benthic macrofauna on Cassino Beach, southern most Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Oceanography 55, 293307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petracco, M., Veloso, V.G. and Cardoso, R.S. (2003) Population dynamics and secondary production of Emerita brasiliensis (Crustacea: Hippidae) at Prainha beach, Brazil. Marine Ecology 24, 231245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez, J.G., Lopez, J. and Jaramillo, E. (2001) Estructura comunitaria de la meiofauna intermareal en un gradiente de tipos morfodinámicos de playas arenosas en el sur de Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural 74, 885897.Google Scholar
Salvat, B. (1964) Les conditions hydrodynamiques interstitielles des sediments meubles intertidaux et la repartition verticale de la faune endogée. Cahiers de Recherche de l'Académie de Science de Paris 259, 4356.Google Scholar
Short, A.D. and Wright, L.D. (1983) Physical variability of sandy beaches. In McLachlan, A. and Erasmus, T. (eds) Sandy beaches as ecosystems. 1st International Symposium on Sandy Beaches, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 17–21 January 1983. The Hague: W. Junk, pp. 133144.Google Scholar
Souza, J.R.B. and Gianuca, N.M. (1995) Zonation and seasonal variation of the intertidal macrofauna on a sandy beach of Paraná State, Brazil. Scientia Marina 59, 103111.Google Scholar
StatSoft Inc. (2007) STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 8.0. Available at: www.statsoft.com (accessed 9 January 2014).Google Scholar
Suguio, K. (1973) Introdução a sedimentologia. São Paulo: EDUSP.Google Scholar
Ter Braak, C.F.J. and Šmilauer, P. (2002) CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Ithaca, NY: Microcomputer Power.Google Scholar
Vasconcellos, R.M., Araújo, F.G., Santos, J.N.S. and Silva, M.A. (2011) Diel seasonality in fish biodiversity in a sandy beach in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 91, 13371344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veloso, V.G., Silva, E.S., Caetano, C.H.S. and Cardoso, R.S. (2006) Comparisons between the macroinfauna of urbanized and protected beaches in Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Biological Conservation 27, 510515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veloso, V.G., Caetano, C.H.S. and Cardoso, R.S. (2003) Composition, structure and zonation of intertidal macroinfauna in relation to physical factors in microtidal sandy beaches in Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Scientia Marina 67, 393402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veloso, V.G. and Cardoso, R.S. (1999) Population biology of the mole crab Emerita brasiliensis (Decapoda: Hippidae) at Fora beach, Brazil. Journal of Crustacean Biology 19, 147153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veloso, V.G., Cardoso, R.S. and Fonseca, D.B. (1997) Spatio-temporal characterization of intertidal macrofauna community at Prainha Beach, State of Rio de Janeiro. Oecologia Brasiliensis 3, 213225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villora-Moreno, S. (1997) Environmental heterogeneity and the biodiversity of interstitial polychaeta. Bulletin of Marine Science 60, 494501.Google Scholar
Walkey, A. and Black, J.A. (1943) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and proposed modification of the chronic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 2938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar