Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-20T18:57:23.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of flow velocity on fitness-related behaviours of the sea urchin Mesocentrotus nudus: new information on stock enhancement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2020

Dongtao Shi ,
Donghong Yin ,
Yang Chen ,
Jiangnan Sun ,
Mingfang Yang ,
Yaqing Chang  and
Chong Zhao Open the ORCID record for Chong Zhao [Opens in a new window]
Dongtao Shi
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mariculture & Stock Enhancement in North China's Sea, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian, 116023, China
Donghong Yin
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mariculture & Stock Enhancement in North China's Sea, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian, 116023, China
Yang Chen
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mariculture & Stock Enhancement in North China's Sea, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian, 116023, China
Jiangnan Sun
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mariculture & Stock Enhancement in North China's Sea, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian, 116023, China
Mingfang Yang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mariculture & Stock Enhancement in North China's Sea, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian, 116023, China
Yaqing Chang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mariculture & Stock Enhancement in North China's Sea, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian, 116023, China
Chong Zhao*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mariculture & Stock Enhancement in North China's Sea, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Dalian Ocean University, Dalian, 116023, China
*
Author for correspondence: Chong Zhao, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of flow velocity on the fitness-related behaviours of Mesocentrotus nudus remain largely unknown, greatly hampering the efficiency of stock enhancement. To explore the appropriate velocities for stock enhancement, we investigated dislodgement and immobilization velocities up to 90 cm s−1. The experimental results showed that M. nudus (test diameter of ~30 mm) were dislodged at 73.50 ± 7.7 cm s−1 and that M. nudus movement occurred only when the flow velocity was less than 33.40 ± 2.7 cm s−1. Three flow velocities less than 33.40 ± 2.7 cm s−1 (2, 10 and 20 cm s−1) were subsequently used to study the effects of flow velocities on covering behaviour and the righting response time of M. nudus. The downstream movement velocity of M. nudus was significantly larger than that upstream at 2 cm s−1 (P = 0.016) and 10 cm s−1 (P = 0.008), but not at 20 cm s−1 (P = 0.222). The righting response time of M. nudus was significantly longer at 20 cm s−1 than that at 2 cm s−1 (P = 0.015). The present study indicates that a flow velocity less than 20 cm s−1, preferably 2–10 cm s−1, is probably appropriate for the stock enhancement of M. nudus. Notably, the current study is a laboratory investigation without considering the hydrographic complexity in the field. Further studies should be carried out to investigate the long-term effects of water flow on feeding and growth of M. nudus both in the laboratory and the field.

Keywords

Behaviourflow velocityMesocentrotus nudusstock enhancement
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 100 , Issue 6 , September 2020 , pp. 963 - 967
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally to this work.

References

Agatsuma, Y (2013) Strongylocentrotus nudus. In Lawrence, JM (ed.), Sea Urchins: Biology and Ecology, 3rd Edn. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 449–460.10.1016/B978-0-12-396491-5.00029-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agatsuma, Y (2020) Stock enhancement of regular sea urchins. In Lawrence, JM (ed.), Sea Urchins: Biology and Ecology, 4th Edn. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 299–313.10.1016/B978-0-12-819570-3.00017-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agatsuma, Y and Kawai, T (1997) Seasonal migration of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus nudus in Oshoro Bay of southwestern Hokkaido, Japan. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 63, 557–562.10.2331/suisan.63.557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Challener, R and McClintock, J (2017) In situ measurements of righting behaviour in the common sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus: the importance of body size, substrate type, and covering material. Aquatic Biology 26, 33–40.10.3354/ab00669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cirino, P, Ciaravolo, M, Paglialonga, A and Toscano, A (2017) Long-term maintenance of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus in culture. Aquaculture Reports 7, 27–33.10.1016/j.aqrep.2017.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen-Rengifo, M, Moureaux, C, Dubois, P and Flammang, P (2017) Attachment capacity of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus in a range of seawater velocities in relation to test morphology and tube foot mechanical properties. Marine Biology 164, 79.10.1007/s00227-017-3114-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crook, AC (2003) Individual variation in the covering behaviour of the shallow water sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus. Marine Ecology 24, 275–287.10.1046/j.1439-0485.2003.00846.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, J, Zheng, D, Sun, J, Hu, F, Yu, Y, Zhao, C and Chang, Y (2020) Effects of water temperature on survival, behaviours and growth of the sea urchin Mesocentrotus nudus: new insights into the stock enhancement. Aquaculture 519, 734873.10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, CP, Drolet, D, Deschênes, I and Himmelman, JH (2007) Multiple factors explain the covering behaviour in the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis. Animal Behaviour 73, 979–986.10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.11.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen, NT (1994) Is righting response a useful indicator of functional well-being in the green sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis? In Bruno, D (ed.), Echinoderms Through Time. Rotterdam: Balkema, pp. 693–698.Google Scholar
James, DW (2000) Diet, movement, and covering behaviour of the sea urchin Toxopneustes roseus in rhodolith beds in the Gulf of California, México. Marine Biology 137, 913–923.10.1007/s002270000423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawamata, S (1998) Effect of wave-induced oscillatory flow on grazing by a subtidal sea urchin Strongylocentrotus nudus (A. Agassiz). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 224, 31–48.10.1016/S0022-0981(97)00165-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauzon-Guay, J-S and Scheibling, RE (2007) Seasonal variation in movement, aggregation and destructive grazing of the green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) in relation to wave action and sea temperature. Marine Biology 151, 2109–2118.10.1007/s00227-007-0668-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, JM (1975) The effect of temperature-salinity combinations on the functional well-being of adult Lytechinus variegatus (Lamarck) (Echinodermata, Echinoidea). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 18, 271–275.10.1016/0022-0981(75)90111-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, JM (1976) Covering response in sea urchins. Nature 262, 490–491.10.1038/262490a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, JM (1996) Mass mortality of echinoderms from abiotic. In Jangoux, M (ed.), Echinoderm Studies, vol. 5. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 103–137.Google Scholar
Lees, DC and Carter, GA (1972) The covering response to surge, sunlight, and ultraviolet light in Lytechinus anamesus (Echinoidea). Ecology 53, 1127–1133.10.2307/1935425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ling, SD, Kriegisch, N, Woolley, B and Reeves, SE (2019) Density-dependent feedbacks, hysteresis, and demography of overgrazing sea urchins. Ecology 100, e02577.10.1002/ecy.2577CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morse, BL and Hunt, HL (2013) Effect of unidirectional water currents on displacement behaviour of the green sea urchin Strongylocentrous droebachiensis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 93, 1923–1928.Google Scholar
Rahman, MA, Arshad, A and Yusoff, FM (2014) Sea urchins (Echinodermata: Echinoidea): their biology, culture and bioactive compounds. In International Conference on Agricultural, Ecological and Medical Sciences (AEMS-2014) 3–4 July 2014 London (UK). International Institute of Chemical, Biological & Environmental Engineering.Google Scholar
Santos, R and Flammang, P (2007) Intra- and interspecific variation of attachment strength in sea urchins. Marine Ecology Progress Series 332, 129–142.10.3354/meps332129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, R and Flammang, P (2008) Estimation of the attachment strength of the shingle sea urchin, Colobocentrotus atratus, and comparison with three sympatric echinoids. Marine Biology 154, 37–49.10.1007/s00227-007-0895-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, DT and Gray, IE (1962) Studies on factors affecting the local distribution of two sea urchins, Arbacia punctulata and Lytechinus variegatus. Ecology 43, 309.10.2307/1931986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaki, H, Kusaka, K, Fukuda, M, Arai, S and Muraoka, D (2009) Undaria pinnatifida habitat loss in relation to sea urchin grazing and water flow conditions, and their restoration effort in Ogatsu Bay, Japan. Journal of Water and Environment Technology 7, 201–213.10.2965/jwet.2009.201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamaki, H, Muraoka, D and Inoue, T (2018) Effect of water flow on grazing by the sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus nudus) in the presence of refuge habitat. Journal of Water and Environment Technology 16, 30–39.10.2965/jwet.17-010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuya, F, Cisneros-Aguirre, J, Ortega-Borges, L and Haroun, RJ (2007) Bathymetric segregation of sea urchins on reefs of the Canarian Archipelago: role of flow-induced forces. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 73, 481–488.10.1016/j.ecss.2007.02.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Q, Wu, H, Fang, J and Wang, S (2006) Stock enhancement and sea ranching: practices at Zhangzidao Island in the northern Yellow Sea. In Third International Symposium on Stock Enhancement and Sea Ranching, Seattle, WA, pp. 18–21.Google Scholar
Willoughby, L (2018) News feature: can predators have a big impact on carbon emissions calculations? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 115, 2260–2263.10.1073/pnas.1802169115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, B (2019) Observation and analysis of sea currents in the sea area of Changshan Island in Dalian, China. Scientific and Technological Innovation 11, 8–10. (In Chinese).Google Scholar