Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:03:15.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of deep-sea bottom longlining on the Hatton Bank fish communities and benthic ecosystem, north-east Atlantic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 November 2010

P. Durán Muñoz*
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Vigo, Programa de Pesquerías Lejanas, Subida al Radiofaro 50-52, 36390 Vigo, Spain
F.J. Murillo
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Vigo, Programa de Pesquerías Lejanas, Subida al Radiofaro 50-52, 36390 Vigo, Spain
M. Sayago-Gil
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Málaga, Grupo de Geología Marina, Puerto Pesquero s/n, 29640 Fuengirola, Spain
A. Serrano
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Santander, Promontorio San Martín s/n, 39004 Santander, Spain
M. Laporta
Affiliation:
IPD Servicio de Observadores, Paseo Imperial 10-12, 28005 Madrid, Spain
I. Otero
Affiliation:
Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Vigo, Programa de Pesquerías Lejanas, Subida al Radiofaro 50-52, 36390 Vigo, Spain IPD Servicio de Observadores, Paseo Imperial 10-12, 28005 Madrid, Spain
C. Gómez
Affiliation:
IPD Servicio de Observadores, Paseo Imperial 10-12, 28005 Madrid, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: P. Durán Muñoz, Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Vigo, Programa de Pesquerías Lejanas, Subida al Radiofaro 50-52, 36390 Vigo, Spain email: [email protected]

Abstract

The effects of deep-sea bottom longlining on fish communities and the benthic ecosystem, as well as the interactions between fishing and seabirds, were studied based on data collected from a joint collaboration between the Spanish Institute of Oceanography and a longliner, carried out on the Hatton Bank area (north-east Atlantic) in 2008. A total of 38 longline sets were distributed mainly along the rugged bottom of the rocky outcrop at depths ranging from 750 to 1500 m. Deep-water sharks and lotids were predominant in the catches contributing respectively 80.4% and 13.1% in terms of weight. Deep-water sharks were predominant in the discards. By-catch of cold-water corals and small glass sponges occurred along the western flank of the Hatton Bank, while large hexactinellids were found along the eastern flank. Longlines fished the adult fraction of vulnerable deep-water sharks and lotids. High catches per unit effort values for these species were obtained in coral areas. A combination of seabird-scaring streamer lines and other measures of preventing seabird by-catch were used. Only one fulmar was captured and it survived. Data on distribution of marine litter and derelict deep-sea gillnets are also presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bañón, R., Piñeiro, C. and Casas, M. (2006) Biological aspects of deep-water sharks Centroscymnus coelolepis and Centrophorus squamosus in Galician waters (north-western Spain). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 86, 843846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barthel, D., Tendal, O.S. and Tiel, H. (1996) A wandering population of the hexactinellid sponge Pheronema carpenteri on the continental slope off Morocco, Northwest Africa. Marine Ecology 17, 603616.Google Scholar
Bavestrello, G., Cerrano, C., Zanzi, D. and Cattaneo-Vietti, R. (1997) Damage by fishing activities to the gorgonian coral Paramuricea clavata in the Ligurian Sea. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 7, 253262.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensch, A., Gianni, M., Gréboval, D., Sanders, J.S. and Hjort, A. (2008) Worldwide review of bottom fisheries in the high seas. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 522, 145 pp.Google Scholar
Bertellotti, M. and Yorio, P. (2000) Utilisation of fishery waste by kelp gulls attending coastal trawl and longline vessels in northern Patagonia, Argentina. Ornis Fennica 77, 105115.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2008) Fulmarus glacialis. In IUCN 2009. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.1. Accessed from www.iucnredlist.org 14 July 2009.Google Scholar
Bjordal, A. and Løkkeborg, S. (1996) Longlining fishing. London: Fishing News Books, 156 pp.Google Scholar
Brothers, N.P., Cooper, J. and Løkkeborg, S. (1999) The incidental catch of seabirds by longline fisheries: worldwide review and technical guidelines for mitigation. FAO Fisheries Circular No. 937, 100 pp.Google Scholar
Buhl-Mortensen, L., Vanreusel, A., Gooday, A.J., Levin, L.A., Priede, I.G., Mortensen, P.B., Gheerardyn, H., King, N.J. and Raes, M. (2010) Biological structures as a source of habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity on the deep ocean margins. Marine Ecology 31, 2150.Google Scholar
Bull, L.S. (2007) Reducing seabird bycatch in longline, trawl and gillnet fisheries. Fish and Fisheries 8, 3156.Google Scholar
Butler, M. and Gass, S. (2001) How to protect corals in Atlantic Canada. In Willison, J.H.M., Hall, J., Gass, S.E., Kenchington, E.L.R., Butler, M. and Doherty, P. (eds) Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Deep-Sea Corals, Halifax, 30 July–3 August 2000. Ecology Action Centre, Nova Scotia Museum, Pp. 156165.Google Scholar
Chuenpagdee, R., Morgan, L.E., Maxwell, S.M., Norse, E.A. and Pauly, D. (2003) Shifting gears: assessing collateral impacts of fishing methods in US waters. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1, 517524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M.R. and Koslow, J.A. (2007) Impacts of fisheries on seamounts. In Pitcher, T.J., Morato, T., Hart, P.J.B., Clark, M.R., Haggan, N. and Santos, R.S. (eds) Seamounts: ecology, fisheries and conservation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 413441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, M.W., Connolly, P.L. and Bracken, J.J. (2001) Aspects of reproduction of the deep water sharks Centroscymnus coelolepis and Centrophorus squamosus from west of Ireland and Scotland. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81, 10191029.Google Scholar
Clarke, M.W., Connolly, P.L. and Bracken, J.J. (2002) Age estimation of the exploited deepwater shark Centrophorus squamosus from the continental slopes of the Rockall Trough and Porcupine Bank. Journal of Fish Biology 60, 501514.Google Scholar
Clarke, M.W., Borges, L. and Officer, R.A. (2005) Comparisons of trawl and longline catches of deepwater elasmobranchs west and north of Ireland. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Science 35, 429442.Google Scholar
Costello, M.J., McCrea, M., Freiwald, A., Lundälv, T., Jonsson, L., Bett, B.J., van Weering, T.C.E., de Haas, H., Roberts, J.M. and Allen, D. (2005) Role of cold-water Lophelia pertusa coral reefs as fish habitat in the north-east Atlantic. In Freiwald, A. and Roberts, J.M. (eds) Cold-water corals and ecosystems. Berlin: Springer, pp. 771805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durán Muñoz, P., Sayago-Gil, M., Cristobo, J., Parra, S., Serrano, A., Díaz del Rio, V., Patrocinio, T., Sacau, M., Murillo, F.J., Palomino, D. and Fernández-Salas, L.M. (2009) Seabed mapping for selecting cold-water coral protection areas on Hatton Bank, Northeast Atlantic. ICES Journal of Marine Science 66, 20132025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EC (2004) Council Regulation (EC) No 600/2004 of 22 March 2004 laying down certain technical measures applicable to fishing activities in the area covered by the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources. Brussels. Official Journal of the European Union L 97, 1 April 2004, 15 pp.Google Scholar
EC (2007) Council Regulation (EC) No 41/2006 of 21 December 2006 fixing for 2007 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required. Brussels. Official Journal of the European Union L 15, 20 January 2007, 213 pp.Google Scholar
EC (2008a) Council Regulation (EC) No 1359/2008 of 28 November 2008 fixing for 2009 and 2010 the fishing opportunities for Community fishing vessels for certain deep-sea fish stocks. Brussels. Official Journal of the European Union L 352, 31 December 2008, 10 pp.Google Scholar
EC (2008b) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/2008 of 16 January 2008 fixing for 2008 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required. Brussels. Official Journal of the European Union L 19, 23 January 2008, 203 pp.Google Scholar
EC (2009) Council Regulation (EC) No 1288/2009 of 27 November 2009 establishing transitional technical measures from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2011. Brussels. Official Journal of the European Union L 347, 24 December 2009, 3 pp.Google Scholar
FAO (2009) International guidelines for the management of deep-sea fisheries in the high seas. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 73 pp.Google Scholar
Fosså, J.H., Mortensen, P.B. and Furevik, D.M. (2002) The deep-water coral Lophelia pertusa in Norwegian waters: distribution and fishery impacts. Hydrobiologia 471, 112.Google Scholar
Fossen, I., Cotton, C.F., Bergstad, O.A. and Dyb, J.E. (2008) Species composition and distribution patterns of fishes captured by longlines on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Deep-Sea Research II 55, 203217.Google Scholar
Furness, R.W. (2003) Impacts of fisheries on seabird communities. Scientia Marina 67, 3345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S.E. and Willison, J.H.M. (2005) An assessment of the distribution of deep-sea corals in Atlantic Canada by using both scientific and local forms of knowledge. In Freiwald, A. and Roberts, J.M. (eds) Cold-water corals and ecosystems. Berlin: Springer, pp. 223245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girard, M. and Du Buit, M.H. (1999) Reproductive biology of two deep-water sharks from the British Isles, Centroscymnus coelolepis and Centrophorus squamosus (Chondrichthyes: Squalidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 79, 923931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, E.R. and Thompson, J.T. (2009) Deposit and suspension-feeding sea cucumbers (Echinodermata) ingest plastic fragments. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 368, 2229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M.A., Alverson, D.L. and Metuzals, K.I. (2000) By-catch: problems and solutions. Marine Pollution Bulletin 41, 204219.Google Scholar
Hess, N.A., Ribic, C.A. and Vining, I. (1999) Benthic marine debris, with an emphasis on fishery-related items, surrounding Kodiak Island, Alaska, 1994–1996. Marine Pollution Bulletin 38, 885890.Google Scholar
Howell, K.L., Davies, J.S. and Narayanaswamy, B.E. (2010) Identifying deep-sea megafaunal epibenthic assemblages for use in habitat mapping and marine protected area network design. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 90, 3368.Google Scholar
Husebø, A., Nøttestand, L., Fosså, J.H., Furevik, D.M. and Jørgensen, S.B. (2002) Distribution and abundance of fish in deep-sea coral habitats, Hydrobiologia 471, 9199.Google Scholar
Hutton, I., Carlile, N. and Priddel, D. (2008) Plastic ingestion by flesh-footed (Puffinus carneipes) and wedge-tailed (P. pacificus) shearwaters. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 142, 15.Google Scholar
ICES (2008a) ICES Advice 2008. Book 9. 9.4.11. Blue ling (Molva dypterygia) in all areas. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM Papers and Reports), Copenhagen, 3 pp.Google Scholar
ICES (2008b) ICES Advice 2008. Book 9. 9.4.12. Tusk (Brosme brosme) in all areas. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM Papers and Reports), Copenhagen, 3 pp.Google Scholar
ICES (2008c) Report of the ICES–NAFO Joint Working Group on Deep-water Ecology (WGDEC). International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM Papers and Reports) CM 2008/ACOM: 45, Ref. WGECO, WGDEC, NAFO.Google Scholar
ICES (2009) Report of the ICES Working Group on the Biology and Assessment of Deep Sea Fisheries Resources (WGDEEP). International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM Papers and Reports) CM 2009/ACOM:14.Google Scholar
Krieger, K.J. (2001) Coral (Primnoa) impacted by fishing gear in the Gulf of Alaska. In Willison, J.H.M., Hall, J., Gass, S.E., Kenchington, E.L.R., Butler, M. and Doherty, P. (eds) Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Deep-Sea Corals, Halifax, 30 July–3 August 2000. Ecology Action Centre, Nova Scotia Museum, pp 106116.Google Scholar
Krieger, K.J. and Wing, B.L. (2002) Megafauna associations with deepwater corals (Primnoa spp.) in the Gulf of Alaska. Hydrobiologia 471, 8390.Google Scholar
Large, P.A., Graham, N.G., Hareide, N-R., Misund, R., Rihan, D.J., Mulligan, M.C., Randall, P.J., Peach, D.J., McMullen, P.H. and Harlay, X. (2009) Lost and abandoned nets in deep-water gillnet fisheries in the Northeast Atlantic: retrieval exercises and outcomes. ICES Journal of Marine Science 66, 323333.Google Scholar
Løkkeborg, S. (1998) Seabird bycatch and bait loss in longlining using different setting methods. ICES Journal of Marine Science 55, 145149.Google Scholar
Løkkeborg, S. (2003) Review and evaluation of three mitigation measures—bird scaring line, underwater setting and line shooter—to reduce seabird bycatch in the North Atlantic longline fishery. Fisheries Research 60, 1116.Google Scholar
Løkkeborg, S. and Robertson, G. (2002) Seabird and longline interactions: effects of a bird-scaring streamer line and line shooter on the incidental capture of northern fulmars Fulmarus glacialis. Biological Conservation 106, 359364.Google Scholar
Magnusson, J.V. and Magnusson, J. (1995) The distribution, relative abundance, and biology of the deep-sea fishes of the Icelandic slope and Reykjanes ridge. In Hopper, A.G. (ed.) Deep-water fisheries of the North Atlantic Oceanic Slope. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 161199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, J.V., Bergstad, O.A., Hareide, N.R., Magnusson, J. and Reinert, J. (1997) Ling, blue ling and tusk of the northeast Atlantic. In TemaNord, Volume 535. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, 57 pp.Google Scholar
Matsuoka, T., Nakashima, T. and Nagasawa, N. (2005) A review of ghost fishing: scientific approaches to evaluation and solutions. Fisheries Science 71, 691702.Google Scholar
McCave, I.N. and Tucholke, B.E. (1986) Deep-current controlled sedimentation in the Western North Atlantic. In Vogt, P.R. and Tucholke, B.E. (eds) The geology of North America, the Western North Atlantic Region, decade of North American Geology, Volume M. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America, pp. 451467.Google Scholar
Mortensen, P.B., Buhl-Mortensen, L., Gordon, D.C., Fader, G.B.J., McKeown, D.L., and Fenton, D.G. (2005) Effects of fisheries on deepwater gorgonian corals in the Northeast Channel, Nova Scotia. In Barnes, P.W. and Thomas, J.P. (eds) Benthic habitats and the effects of fishing, American Fisheries Society Symposium 41, Bethesda Maryland, pp. 369382.Google Scholar
Mortensen, P.B., Buhl-Mortensen, L., Gebruk, A.V. and Krylova, E.M. (2008) Occurrence of deep-water corals on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge based on MAR–ECO data. Deep-Sea Research II 55, 142152.Google Scholar
NEAFC (2006) Recommendation III. Recommendation to temporarily prohibit the use of gillnets, entangling nets and trammel nets in the NEAFC Regulatory Area. London: North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission.Google Scholar
NEAFC (2007) Recommendation IX–2007. Recommendation by the North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission at its annual meeting in November 2006 to adopt conservation and management measures by closing certain areas in the regulatory area in order to protect deep-water corals. London: North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission.Google Scholar
NEAFC (2008) Recommendation IX: 2008. Recommendation by the North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission in accordance with Article 5 of the Convention on future multilateral cooperation in North-East Atlantic Fisheries at its Annual Meeting in November 2007 to adopt conservation and management measures by closing certain areas in the regulatory area in order to protect deep-water corals. London: North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission.Google Scholar
NEAFC (2010) Recommendation VIII: 2010. Recommendation by the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission in accordance with article 5 of the convention on future multilateral cooperation in North-East Atlantic fisheries at its annual meeting in November 2009 to adopt conservation and management measures by closing certain areas on the Hatton Bank, Rockall Bank, Logachev mounds and west Rockall mounds in the regulatory area in order to protect vulnerable marine ecosystems from significant adverse impacts in 2010. London: North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission.Google Scholar
Orejas, C., Gori, A., Lo Iacono, C., Puig, P.Gili, J.M. and Dale, M.R.T. (2009) Cold-water corals in the Cap de Creus canyon, northwestern Mediterranean: spatial distribution, density and anthropogenic impact. Marine Ecology Progress Series 397, 3751.Google Scholar
OSPAR (2008) OSPAR List of Threatened and/or Declining Species and Habitats. OSPAR Convention for the protection of the marine environment of the Northeast Atlantic. Reference number 2008-06. London: OSPAR.Google Scholar
Piñeiro, C.G., Casas, M. and Bañón, R. (2001) The deep-water fisheries exploited by Spanish fleets in the Northeast Atlantic: a review of current status. Fisheries Research 51, 311320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, J.K. (2002) Deep-water Oculina coral reefs of Florida: biology, impacts, and management. Hydrobiologia 471, 4355.Google Scholar
Roberts, J.M., Henry, L.A., Long, D. and Hartley, J.P. (2008) Cold-water coral reef frameworks, megafaunal communities and evidence for coral carbonate mounds on the Hatton Bank, north-east Atlantic. Facies 54, 297316.Google Scholar
Ross, S.W. and Quattrini, A.M. (2007) The fish fauna associated with deep coral banks off the southeastern United States. Deep-Sea Research I 54, 9751007.Google Scholar
Sayago-Gil, M., Long, D., Hitchen, K., Díaz-del-Río, V., Fernández-Salas, L.M. and Durán-Muñoz, P. (2010) Evidence for current-controlled morphology along the western slope of Hatton Bank (Rockall Plateau, NE Atlantic Ocean). Geo-Marine Letters 30, 99111.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. and Correia, J.P.S. (2003) Centroscymnus coelolepis. In IUCN 2009. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.1. Accessed from www.iucnredlist.org 22 June 2009.Google Scholar
Tasker, M.L., Camphuysen, C.J., Cooper, J., Garthe, S., Montevecchi, W.A. and Blaber, S.J.M. (2000) The impacts of fishing on marine birds. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57, 531547.Google Scholar
UNGA (2006) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly. 61/105. Sustainable fisheries, including through the 1995 Agreement for the Implementation of the Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, and related instruments. Ref.: A/Res/61/105. New York: United Nations, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Weimerskirch, H., Capdeville, D. and Duhamel, G. (2000) Factors affecting the number and mortality of seabirds attending trawlers and long-liners in the Kerguelen area. Polar Biology 23, 236249.Google Scholar
White, W.T. (2003) Centrophorus squamosus. In IUCN 2009. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.1. Accessed from www.iucnredlist.org 22 June 2009.Google Scholar
Witherell, D. and Coon, C. (2001) Protecting gorgonians off Alaska from fishing impacts. In Willison, J.H.M., Hall, J., Gass, S.E., Kenchington, E.L.R., Butler, M. and Doherty, P. (eds) Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Deep-Sea Corals, Halifax, 30 July–3 August 2000. Ecology Action Centre, Nova Scotia Museum, pp. 117125.Google Scholar