Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:20:55.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ecology and reproductive biology of Cherbonniera utriculus and Molpadia blakei from the N.E. Atlantic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

P. A. Tyler ,
D. S. M. Billett  and
J. D. Gage
P. A. Tyler
Affiliation:
Department of Oceanography and Marine Research Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Swansea SA2 8PP
D. S. M. Billett
Affiliation:
Institute of Oceanographic Sciences, Wormley, Godalming, Surrey GU8 5UB
J. D. Gage
Affiliation:
Scottish Marine Biological Association, Dunstaffnage Marine Research Laboratory, P.O. Box 3, Oban, Argyll PA34 4AD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Molpadiida is an order of sea cucumbers identified by their stout body, the posterior region narrowing to simulate a tail and the absence of tubefeet. Typically they inhabit muddy environments from shallow water to abyssal depths. In the past the great variability in the taxonomic characters of this order has led to the formation of many genera and species (Heding, 1931, 1935), but more recently it has become apparent that many diagnostic characters change markedly during the life history of these holothurians and as a result fewer species are now recognised (Deichmann, 1940; Pawson, 1977). In a revision of the Atlantic molpadiids Deichmann (1940) recorded just three species from the north-east Atlantic (Molpadia blakei, M. musculus and Hedingia albicans) with a further three species from the Arctic Ocean and Norwegian Sea (M. arctica, M. borealis and Eupyrgus scaber). To these Sibuet (1974) added the new genus and species Cherbonniera utriculus found in the Bay of Biscay.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 67 , Issue 2 , May 1987 , pp. 385 - 397
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldred, R. G., Thurston, M. H., Rice, A. L. & Morley, D. R., 1976. An acoustically monitored opening and closing epibenthic sledge. Deep-Sea Research, 23, 167–174.Google Scholar
Billett, D. S. M. & Hansen, B., 1982. Abyssal aggregations of Kolga hyalina D & K (Echinodermata: Holothurioidea) in the N.E. Atlantic Ocean: a preliminary report. Deep-Sea Research, 29, 799–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chia, F.-S., Atwood, D. & Crawford, B., 1975. Comparative morphology of echinoderm sperm and the possible phylogenetic implications. American Zoologist, 15, 533–565.Google Scholar
Deichmann, E., 1940. Report on the holothurians collected by the Harvard-Havana Expeditions 1938 and 1939, with a revision of the Molpadonia of the Atlantic Ocean. Memorias de la Sociedad cubana de historia natural ‘‘Felipe Poey’, 14, 183–240.Google Scholar
Féral, J.-P. & Massin, C., 1982. Digestive systems: Holothuroidea. In Echinoderm Nutrition (ed. Jangoux, M. and Lawrence, J. M.), pp. 191–212. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Gage, J. D. & Tyler, P. A., 1981 a. Reappraisal of age composition, growth and survivorship of the deep-sea brittlestar Ophiura ljungmani from size structure in a sample time-series from the Rockall Trough. Marine Biology, 64, 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gage, J. D. & Tyler, P. A., 1981 b. Non-viable seasonal settlement of larvae of the upper bathyal brittlestar Ophiocten gracilis in the Rockall Trough abyssal. Marine Biology, 64, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gage, J. D., Pearson, M., Clark, M., Paterson, G. L. J. & Tyler, P. A., 1983. Echinoderms of the Rockall Trough and adjacent areas. I. Crinoidea, Asteroidea and Ophiuroidea. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Zoology), 45, 263–308.Google Scholar
Gage, J. D., Billett, D. S. M., Jensen, M. & Tyler, P. A., 1985. Echinoderms of the Rockall Trough area. 2. Echinoidea and Holothurioidea. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) (Zoology), 48, 173–213.Google Scholar
Gerould, J. H., 1896. The anatomy and histology of Caudina arenata Gould. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 29, 123–190.Google Scholar
Hansen, B., 1975. Systematics and biology of the deep-sea holothurians. I. Elasipoda. Galathea Report, 13, 262 pp.Google Scholar
Heding, S. G., 1931. On the classification of the molpadids (Preliminary notice). Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk naturhistorik Forening i Kjøbenhavn, 92, 275–284.Google Scholar
Heding, S. G., 1935. Holothurioidea. Part I. Apoda-Molpadioidea-Gephyrothurioidea. DanishIngolf Expedition, 4(9), 84pp.Google Scholar
Hessler, R. R. & Jumars, P., 1974. Abyssal community analysis from replicate box cores in the central north Pacific. Deep-Sea Research, 21, 185–209.Google Scholar
Hessler, R. R. & Sanders, H. L., 1967, Faunal diversity in the deep sea. Deep-Sea Research, 14, 65–78.Google Scholar
Hyman, L., 1955. The Invertebrates, vol. IV. Echinodermata. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Inaba, D., 1930. Notes on the development of a holothurian Caudina chilensis. Science Reports of Tôhoku Imperial University (ser. 4), 5, 215–248.Google Scholar
Khripounoff, A. & Sibuet, M., 1980. La nutrition d'echinodermes abyssaux. I. Alimentation des holothuries. Marine Biology, 60, 17–26.Google Scholar
McEuen, F. S. & Chia, F.-S., 1985. Larval development of a molpadiid holothuroid Molpadia intermedia (Ludwig, 1894) (Echinodermata). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 63, 2553–2559.Google Scholar
Merrett, N. R. & Marshall, N. B., 1981. Observations on the ecology of deep-sea bottom-living fishes collected off northwest Africa (08°-20° N). Progress in Oceanography, 9, 185–244.Google Scholar
Pawson, D. L., 1969. Holothuroidea from Chile. Report No. 46 of the Lund University Chile Expedition, 1948–1949. Sarsia, 38, 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawson, D. L., 1977. Molpadiid sea cucumbers (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea) of the southern Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Oceans. Antarctic Research Series, 26, 97–123.Google Scholar
Sibuet, M., 1974. Cherbonniera utriculus gen.nov., sp.nov., petite Holothurie (Molpadonia, Molpadiidae) des vases abyssales du Nord-Est Atlantique. Compte rendu hebdomadaire des séances de l'Académie des sciences (sér. D), 279, 1443–1445.Google Scholar
Sibuet, M., 1977. Repartition et diversité des Echinodermes (Holothurides-Astérides) en zone profonde dans le Golfe de Gascogne. Deep-Sea Research, 24, 549–563.Google Scholar
Theel, H., 1882. Report on the Holothurioidea dredged by H.M.S. Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Part I. Report of the Scientific Results of the Voyage of H.M.S. Challenger (Zoology), 4(13), 176 pp.Google Scholar
Theel, H., 1886. Report on the results of dredging by the United States coast survey steamer ‘Blake’. XXX. Report on the Holothurioidea. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College, 13(1), 21 pp.Google Scholar
Tyler, P. A. & Gage, J. D., 1980. Reproduction and growth in the deep-sea brittlestar Ophiura ljungmani (Lyman). Oceanological acta, 3, 177–185.Google Scholar
Tyler, P. A. & Gage, J. D., 1983. The reproductive biology of Ypsilothuria talismani E. Perrier (Holothuroidea: Dendrochirota) from the N.E. Atlantic. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63, 609–616.Google Scholar
Tyler, P. A. & Gage, J. D., 1984. Seasonal reproduction of Echinus affinis (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) in the Rockall Trough, N.E. Atlantic. Deep-Sea Research, 31, 387–402.Google Scholar
Tyler, P. A., Gage, J. D. & Billett, D. S. M., 1985. Life history biology of Peniagone azorica and P. diaphana (Echinodermata: Holothurioidea) from the north-east Atlantic Ocean. Marine Biology, 89, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, P. A., Muirhead, A., Billett, D. S. M. & Gage, J. D., 1985. Reproductive biology of the deep-sea holothurians Laetmogone violacea and Benthogone rosea (Elasipoda: Holothurioidea). Marine Ecology - Progress Series, 23, 269—277.Google Scholar