Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-02T09:54:13.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Detection of manatee feeding events by animal-borne underwater sound recorders

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2013

Mumi Kikuchi ,
Tomonari Akamatsu ,
Daniel Gonzalez-Socoloske ,
Diogo A. de Souza ,
Leon D. Olivera-Gomez  and
Vera M. F. da Silva
Mumi Kikuchi*
Affiliation:
National Research Institute of Fisheries Engineering, Fisheries Research Agency, Hasaki, Kamisu, Ibaraki 314-0408, Japan Japan Science and Technology Agency, CREST, Gobancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
Tomonari Akamatsu
Affiliation:
National Research Institute of Fisheries Engineering, Fisheries Research Agency, Hasaki, Kamisu, Ibaraki 314-0408, Japan Japan Science and Technology Agency, CREST, Gobancho, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, 102-0075, Japan
Daniel Gonzalez-Socoloske
Affiliation:
University Program in Ecology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
Diogo A. de Souza
Affiliation:
Aquatic Mammals Laboratory, National Institute of Amazonian Research, 69060-001, Manaus, Brazil
Leon D. Olivera-Gomez
Affiliation:
División Académica de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Tabasco, 86150, Mexico
Vera M. F. da Silva
Affiliation:
Aquatic Mammals Laboratory, National Institute of Amazonian Research, 69060-001, Manaus, Brazil
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: M. Kikuchi, National Research Institute of Fisheries Engineering, Fisheries Research Agency, Hasaki, Kamisu, Ibaraki 314-0408, Japan email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies of the feeding behaviour of aquatic species in their natural environment are difficult, since direct observations are rarely possible. In this study, a newly developed animal-borne underwater sound recorder (AUSOMS-mini) was applied to captive Amazonian (Trichechus inunguis) and Antillean (Trichechus manatus manatus) manatees in order to directly record their feeding sounds. Different species of aquatic plants were offered to the manatees separately. Feeding sounds were automatically extracted using a custom program developed with MATLAB. Compared to ground truth data, the program correctly detected 65–79% of the feeding events, with a 7.3% or lower false alarm rate, which suggests that this methodology is a useful recorder of manatee feeding events. All manatees foraged during both the daytime and night-time. However, manatees tended to be less active and masticated slower during the night than during the day. The manatee mastication cycle duration depended on plant species and individual. This animal-borne acoustic monitoring system could greatly increase our knowledge of manatee feeding ecology by providing the exact time, duration and number of feeding events, and potentially the plant species being fed on.

Keywords

feedingbehaviourmanateeTrichechuspassive acoustic monitoringanimal-borne
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 94 , Issue 6 , September 2014 , pp. 1139 - 1146
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

André, J., Gyuris, E. and Lawler, I.R. (2005) Comparison of the diets of sympatric dugongs and green turtles on the Orman Reefs, Torres Strait, Australia. Wildlife Research 32, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, R.D. (1998) Remotely releasable instruments for monitoring the foraging behaviour of pinnipeds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 175, 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colares, I.G. and Colares, E.P. (2002) Food plants eaten by Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis, Mammalia: Sirenia). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 45, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, S.M. and Owensmith, N. (1986) Effects of plant spinescence on large mammalian herbivores. Oecologia 68, 446–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deutsch, C.J., Bonde, R.K. and Reid, J.P. (1998) Radio-tracking manatees from land and space: tag design, implementation, and lessons learned from long-term study. Marine Technology Society Journal 32, 18–29.Google Scholar
Deutsch, C.J., Reid, J.P., Bonde, R.K., Easton, D.E., Kochman, H.I. and O'Shea, T.J. (2003) Seasonal movements, migratory behaviour, and site fidelity of West Indian manatees along the Atlantic coast of the United States. Wildlife Monographs 151, 1–77.Google Scholar
Etheridge, K., Rathbun, G.B., Powell, J.A. and Kochman, H.I. (1985) Consumption of aquatic plants by the West Indian manatee. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 23, 21–25.Google Scholar
Fitch, J.E. (1968) Fish otoliths in cetacean stomachs and their importance in interpreting feeding habits. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 25, 2561–2574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gremillet, D.J.H. and Plos, A.L. (1994) The use of stomach temperature records for the calculation of daily food intake in cormorants. Journal of Experimental Biology 189, 105–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guterres, M. and Marmontel, M. (2008) Anatomia e Morfologia de plantas aquaticas da Amazonia utlizadas como potencial alimento pelo peixe-boi amazônico Belém. Belem: Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá, 180 pp.Google Scholar
Horsburgh, J.M., Morrice, M., Lea, M.-A. and Hindell, M.A. (2008) Determining feeding events and prey encounter rates in a southern elephant seal: a method using swim speed and stomach temperature. Marine Mammal Science 24, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, A., Naito, Y., Watanuki, Y. and Shaughnessy, P.D. (1996) Diving pattern and stomach temperatures of foraging king cormorants at subantarctic Macquarie Island. Condor 98, 844–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kikuchi, M., da Silva, V.M.F., Rosas, F.C.W. and Miyazaki, N. (2010) Application of acceleration data loggers to classify the behaviour of captive Amazonian manatees (Trichechus inunguis). Coastal Marine Science 34, 24–30.Google Scholar
Marmontel, M., Reid, J., Sheppard, J.K. and Morales-Vela, B. (2012) Tagging and movement of sirenians. In Hines, E.M., Reynolds, J.E. III, Aragones, L.V., Mignucci-Giannoni, A.A. and Marmontel, M. (eds) Sirenian conservation: issues and strategies in developing countries. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida, pp. 116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, C.D., Kubilis, P.S., Huth, G.D., Edmonds, V.M., Halin, D.L. and Reep, R.L. (2000) Food-handling ability and feeding-cycle length of manatees feeding on several species of aquatic plants. Journal of Mammalogy 81, 649–658.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, H., O'Shea, T.J. and Reynolds, J.E. (2012) Ecology and conservation of the Sirenia: dugongs and manatees (Conservation Biology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ch. 4.Google Scholar
Mignucci-Giannoni, A.A., Montoya-Ospina, R.A., Jimenez-Marrero, N.M., Rodriguez-Lopez, M.A., Williams, E.H. and Bonde, R.K. (2000) Manatee mortality in Puerto Rico. Environmental Management 25, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murase, H., Tamura, T., Kiwada, H., Fujise, Y., Watanabe, H., Ohizumi, H., Yonezaki, S., Okamura, H. and Kawahara, S. (2007) Prey selection of common minke (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) and Bryde's (Balaenoptera edeni) whales in the western North Pacific in 2000 and 2001. Fisheries Oceanography 16, 186–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naito, Y. (2007) How can we observe the underwater feeding behaviour of endotherms? Polar Science 1, 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naito, Y. (2010) Fine-scale feeding behaviour of Weddell seals revealed by a mandible accelerometer. Polar Science 4, 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowacek, D.P., Casper, B.M., Wells, R.S., Nowacek, S.M. and Mann, D.A. (2003) Intraspecific and geographic variation of West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus spp.) vocalizations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114, 66–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohizumi, H., Yoshioka, M., Mori, K. and Miyazaki, N. (1998) Stomach contents of common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) in the pelagic western North Pacific. Marine Mammal Science 14, 835–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivera-Gomez, L.D. and Mellink, E. (2005) Distribution of the Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus) as a function of habitat characteristics, in Bahia de Chetumal, Mexico. Biological Conservation 121, 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrin, W.F., Warner, R.R., Fiscus, C.H. and Holts, D.B. (1973) Stomach contents of porpoise, Stenella spp., and yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares, in mixed-species aggregations. Fishery Bulletin 71, 1077–1092.Google Scholar
Rosas, F.C.W. (1994) Biology, consevation and status of the Amazonian manatee Trichechus inunguis. Mammal Review 24, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, J.P., Norberg, S.E. and Andrews, R.D. (2009) Head striking during fish capture attempts by Steller sea lions and the potential for using head surge acceleration to predict feeding behaviour. Endangered Species Research 10, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spalinger, D.E., Hanley, T.A. and Robbins, C.T. (1988) Analysis of the functional response in foraging in the Sitka black-tailed deer. Ecology 69, 1166–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, I., Naito, Y., Folkow, L.P., Miyazaki, N. and Blix, A.S. (2009) Validation of a device for accurate timing of feeding events in marine animals. Polar Biology 32, 667–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamura, T. and Fujise, Y. (2002) Geographical and seasonal changes of the prey species of minke whale in the north-western Pacific. ICES Journal of Marine Science 59, 516–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsutsumi, C., Ichikawa, K., Arai, N., Akamatsu, T., Shinke, T., Hara, T. and Adulyanukosol, K. (2006) Feeding behaviour of wild dugongs monitored by a passive acoustical method. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120, 1356–1360.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, M.C., Shao, K.T., Huang, S.L. and Chou, L.S. (2012) Food partitioning among three sympatric odontocetes (Grampus griseus, Lagenodelphis hosei, and Stenella attenuata). Marine Mammal Science 28, 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Y., Baranov, E.A., Sato, K., Naito, Y. and Miyazaki, N. (2004) Foraging tactics of Baikal seals differ between day and night. Marine Ecology Progress Series 279, 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Y., Mitani, Y., Sato, K., Cameron, M.F. and Naito, Y. (2003) Dive depths of Weddell seals in relation to vertical prey distribution as estimated by image data. Ecology Progress Series 252, 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Y. and Takahashi, A. (2013) Linking animal-borne video to accelerometers reveals prey capture variability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 2199–2204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watanuki, Y., Daunt, F., Takahashi, A., Newei, M., Wanless, S., Sat, K. and Miyazaki, N. (2008) Microhabitat use and prey capture of a bottom-feeding top predator, the European shag, shown by camera loggers. Marine Ecology Progress Series 356, 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigle, B.L., Wright, I.E., Ross, M. and Flamm, R. (2001) Movements of radio-tagged manatees in Tampa Bay and Along Florida's west coast 1991–1996. St Petersburg, FL: Florida Marine Research Institute, Technical Report no. 7, 160 pp.Google Scholar
Wilson, R.P., Cooper, J. and Plotz, J. (1992) Can we determine when marine endotherms feed? A case study with seabirds. Journal of Experimental Biology 167, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar