Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:09:14.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clone culture studies of a new rosalinid foraminifer from Plymouth, England and Wellington, New Zealand

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. H. Hedley  and
J. St J. Wakefield
R. H. Hedley
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London, S.W. 7
J. St J. Wakefield
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London, S.W. 7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A formal description of Rosalina leei sp.nov. (Foraminifera) includes an account of the great morphological variation found among adult agamonts obtained over a period of 14 months from clone cultures. Variation in chamber number, direction of coiling, overall shape, the degree of inflation of the final chamber and suture characters are detailed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , February 1967 , pp. 121 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, Z. M., 1954. Culture methods in the study of living foraminifera. J. Palaeont., Vol. 28, pp. 404–16.Google Scholar
Cushman, J. A., 1922. Shallow water foraminifera of the Tortugas Region. Pap. Dep. mar. Biol. Carnegie Instn Wash., Vol. 17, pp. 1–85.Google Scholar
Cushman, J. A., 1925. Recent Foraminifera from British Columbia. Contr. Cushman Fdn foramin. Res., Vol. 1, pp. 38–47.Google Scholar
Delamater, E. D., 1951. A staining and dehydrating procedure for the handling of microorganisms. Stain Technol., Vol. 26, pp. 199–204.Google Scholar
Douglas, R. & Sliter, W. V., 1965. Taxonomic revision of certain Discorbacea and Orbitoidacea (Foraminiferida). Tulane Stud. zool, Vol. 3, pp. 149–64.Google Scholar
Foyn, B., 1934. Lebenzyklus, cytologie und sexualität der Chlorophycee Cladophora sunriana Kützing. Arch. Protistenk., Bd. 83, pp. 1–56.Google Scholar
Hedley, R. H., 1964. The biology of Foraminifera. Int. Rev. gen. exp. ZooL, Vol. 1, pp. 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. J., Freudenthal, H. D., Muller, W. A., Kossoy, V., Pierce, S. & Grossman, R., 1963. Growth and physiology of foraminifera in the laboratory. 3. Initial Studies of Rosalina floridana (Cushman). Micropaleontology, Vol. 9, pp. 449–66.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. Jr., & Tappen, H., 1964 a. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part C, Protista 2. Sarcodina. Chiefly ‘Thecamoebians’ and Foraminiferida. Vol. I, C1-C510: Vol. 2, C511-C900. The Geological Society of America and the University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. Jr., & Tappen, H. 1964 b. Foraminiferal classification and evolution. J. geol. Soc. India, Vol. 5, pp. 5–40.Google Scholar
Rafalko, J. S., 1946. A modified Feulgen technic for small and diffuse chromatin elements. Stain Technol., Vol. 21, pp. 91–3.Google Scholar
Reiss, Z., 1963. Reclassification of perforate foraminifera. Geol. Survey Israel Pal. Div. Jerusalem, Vol. 35, pp. 1–128.Google Scholar
Said, R., 1949. Foraminifera of the northern Red Sea. Spec. Publs Cushman Lab., No. 26, pp. 1–44.Google Scholar