Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:43:20.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bycatch of chondrichthyans in a coastal trawl fishery on Chubut province coast and adjacent waters, Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2016

J. Ruibal Núñez ,
N. D. Bovcon ,
P. D. Cochia  and
M. E. Góngora
J. Ruibal Núñez*
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Hidrobiología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Julio A. Roca 115 1° piso, Trelew (9100), Chubut, Argentina Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina
N. D. Bovcon
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Hidrobiología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Julio A. Roca 115 1° piso, Trelew (9100), Chubut, Argentina Secretaría de Pesca de la Provincia de Chubut, Av. Libertad 279, Rawson (9103), Chubut, Argentina
P. D. Cochia
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Hidrobiología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Julio A. Roca 115 1° piso, Trelew (9100), Chubut, Argentina
M. E. Góngora
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Hidrobiología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Julio A. Roca 115 1° piso, Trelew (9100), Chubut, Argentina
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: J.R. Núñez, Laboratorio de Hidrobiología, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco, Julio A. Roca 115 1° piso, Trelew (9100), Chubut, Argentina email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chondrichthyans are usually caught incidentally in fisheries for species of high commercial value and then discarded on board or landed as by-products. On the coast of Chubut province and adjacent waters (43°00′S–44°56′S) a bottom trawl fishery has developed targeted at the Patagonian shrimp (Pleoticus muelleri) and common hake (Merluccius hubbsi). Since 2005, this fishery has been monitored by the On-board Observers Program of Chubut province (POBCh). With the aim of advancing towards an ecosystem approach, POBCh not only collects information about target species but also about all the species caught by the trawl nets of the province fisheries. From the information collected by this programme it was possible to identify and record the chondrichthyan species vulnerable to the fishing gear used by the coastal fleet that operates from Puerto Rawson. The composition of the fleet catch was characterized according to the target species during the 2005–2014 period. In the analysis of 3786 hauls, 23 species of chondrichthyans (seven species of sharks, 15 species of batoids and a single species of Holocephali) were identified. Seven species showed a frequency of occurrence greater than 10% (Callorhinchus callorynchus, Discopyge tschudii, Mustelus schmitti, Sympterygia bonapartii, Psammobatis normani, Squalus acanthias and Zearaja chilensis). Species spatial distribution was evaluated and five areas of species assemblages were established. Besides the aspects related to bycatch, these analyses have contributed to the knowledge of the chondrichthyan biodiversity in the provincial coast where the fleet operates, a region with incomplete and mostly dispersed and outdated information.

Keywords

PatagoniaSouth-west Atlantictrawl fisheriessharksskatesholocephalan
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , May 2018 , pp. 605 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baum, J.K., Myers, R.A., Kehler, D.G., Worm, B., Harley, S.J. and Doherty, P.A. (2003) Collapse and conservation of shark populations in the northwest Atlantic. Science 299, 389–392.Google Scholar
Boersma, D.P., Rebstock, G.A. and García Borboroglu, P. (2015) Marine protection is needed for Magellanic penguins in Argentina based on long-term data. Biological Conservation 182, 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovcon, N.D. and Cochia, P.D. (2007) Guía para el reconocimiento de los peces capturados por buques pesqueros monitoreados por el Programa de Observadores a Bordo. Gobierno de la Provincia del Chubut. Publicación especial de la Secretaría de Pesca, Rawson, 44 pp.Google Scholar
Bovcon, N.D., Cochia, P.D., Góngora, M.E. and Gosztonyi, A.E. (2011) New records of warm-temperate water fishes in central Patagonian coastal waters (Southwestern South Atlantic Ocean). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 27, 832–839.Google Scholar
Bovcon, N.D., Góngora, M.E., Marinao, C. and González-Zevallos, D. (2013) Composición de las capturas y descartes generados en la pesca de merluza común Merluccius hubbsi y langostino patagónico Pleoticus muelleri: un caso de estudio en la flota fresquera de altura del Golfo San Jorge, Chubut, Argentina. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 48, 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camhi, M., Fowler, S., Musick, J., Bräutigam, A. and Fordham, S. (1998) Sharks and their relatives: ecology and conservation. Occasional Paper of the IUCN Species Survival Commission 20, 1–39.Google Scholar
Carbonell, A., Alemany, F., Merella, P., Quetglas, A. and Román, E. (2003) The by-catch of sharks in the western Mediterranean (Balearic Islands) trawl fishery. Fisheries Research 61, 7–18.Google Scholar
Cedrola, P.V., González, A.M., Chiaramonte, G.E. and Pettovello, A.D. (2012) Bycatch of sharks (Elasmobranchii) in the Patagonian red shrimp Pleoticus muelleri (Bate, 1888) fishery. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales 14, 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K.R. (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Australian Journal of Ecology 18, 117–143.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Gorley, R.N. (2006) PRIMER v6.1.6. User Manual/Tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E, Plymouth Marine Laboratory.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Warwick, R.M. (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edition. Plymouth: Plymouth Marine Laboratory.Google Scholar
Compagno, L.J.V. (1990) Shark exploitation and conservation. In Pratt, H.L., Gruber, S.H. and Taniuchi, T. (eds) Elasmobranchs as living resources: advances in the biology, ecology, systematics, and the status of the fisheries. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 90. Springfield, VA: U.S. Department of Commerce, pp. 391–414.Google Scholar
Consejo Federal Pesquero (2009) Plan de Acción Nacional para la Conservación y el Manejo de Condríctios (Tiburones, Rayas y Quimeras) en la República Argentina. http://www.minagri.gov.arGoogle Scholar
Cousseau, M.B., Figueroa, D.E. and Díaz De Astarloa, J.M. (2000) Clave de identificación de las rayas del litoral marítimo de Argentina y Uruguay (Chondrichthyes, Familia Rajidae). Mar del plata: INIDEP, Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Alimentación.Google Scholar
Cousseau, M.B., Figueroa, D.E., Díaz De Astarloa, J.M., Mabragaña, E. and Lucifora, L.O. (2007) Rayas, chuchos y otros batoideos del Atlántico Suroccidental (34–55° S). Mar del Plata: Publicaciones Especiales INIDEP.Google Scholar
Crawley, M.J. (2007) The R book. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Dulvy, N.K. and Reynolds, J.D. (2002) Predicting extinction vulnerability in skates. Conservation Biology 16, 440–450.Google Scholar
Dulvy, N.K., Metcalfe, J.D., Glanville, J., Pawson, M.G. and Reynolds, J.D. (2000) Fishery stability, local extinctions and shifts in community structure in skates. Conservation Biology 14, 283–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Favero, M., Blanco, G., García, G., Copello, S., Seco Pon, J.P., Frere, E., Quintana, F., Yorio, P., Rabuffetti, F., Can, G. and Gandini, P. (2010) Seabird mortality associated with ice trawlers in the Patagonian shelf: effect of discards on the occurrence of interactions with fishing gear. Animal Conservation 14, 131–139.Google Scholar
Figueroa, D.E. (2011) Clave ilustrada de agnatos y peces cartilaginosos de Argentina y Uruguay. In Wohler, O.C., Cedrola, P. and Cousseau, M.B. (eds) Contribuciones sobre biología, pesca y comercialización de tiburones en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Consejo Federal Pesquero, pp. 25–74.Google Scholar
Flores Monsalves, H.V. (2010) Zoogeografía de los tiburones (Pisces: Chondrichthyes) del talud continental de Chile. BSc thesis. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile.Google Scholar
Fondacaro, R.R. and Ruiz, A.E. (1996) Capturas y esfuerzos en la pesquería de merluza Merluccius hubbsi del área de Isla Escondida (Patagonia): 1985–1992. Naturalia Patagónica, Ciencias Biológicas 4, 65–74.Google Scholar
Gauch, H.G. (1989) Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Góngora, M.E. (2011) Dinámica y manejo de la captura incidental de peces en la pesquería del langostino patagónico (Pleoticus muelleri). PhD thesis. Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Argentina.Google Scholar
Góngora, M.E., Bovcon, N.D. and Cochia, P.D. (2009) Ictiofauna capturada incidentalmente en la pesquería de langostino patagónico Pleoticus muelleri Bate, 1888. Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía 44, 583–593.Google Scholar
Góngora, M.E., González-Zevallos, D., Pettovello, A.D. and Mendia, L.F. (2012) Principales pesquerías del golfo San Jorge, Patagonia, Argentina. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 40, 1–11.Google Scholar
Hall, M. (1996) On bycatch. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 6, 319–352.Google Scholar
Hall, M., Alverson, D.L. and Metuzals, K. (2000) By-catch: problems and solutions. Marine Pollution Bulletin 41, 204–219.Google Scholar
Hoenig, J.M. and Gruber, S.H. (1990) Life-history patterns in the elasmobranchs: implication for fisheries management. In Pratt, H.L., Gruber, S.H. and Taniuchi, T. (eds) Elasmobranchs as living resources: advances in the biology, ecology, systematics, and the status of the fisheries. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 90. Springfield, VA: U.S. Department of Commerce, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Holden, M.J. (1974) Problems in the rational exploitation of elasmobranch populations and some suggested solutions. In Harden, J.F.R. (ed.) Sea fisheries research. London: Logos Press, pp. 117–137.Google Scholar
IUCN (2012) Directrices para el uso de los criterios de la lista roja de la IUCN a nivel regional y nacional. Versión 4.0. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org/documents/reg_guidelines_sp.pdfGoogle Scholar
IUCN (2014) The IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2014.2. Available at http://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed 20 November 2014).Google Scholar
Kelleher, K. (2008) Descartes en la pesca de captura marina mundial. FAO Documento Técnico de Pesca 470, 1–147.Google Scholar
Kruskal, J.B. (1964) Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 2, 115–129.Google Scholar
Legendre, P. and Legendre, L. (1998) Numerical ecology. Developments Environmental Modelling 20, 1–853.Google Scholar
Lucifora, L.O., Barbini, S.A., Di Giácomo, E.E., Waessle, J.A. and Figueroa, D.E. (2015) Estimating the geographic range of a threatened shark in a data-poor region: Cetorhinus maximus in the South Atlantic Ocean. Current Zoology 61, 811–826.Google Scholar
Marinao, C. and Yorio, P. (2011) Fishery discards and incidental mortality of seabirds attending coastal shrimp trawlers at Isla Escondida, Patagonia, Argentina. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 123, 709–719.Google Scholar
Massa, A.M. and Hozbor, N.M. (2003) Peces cartilaginosos de la plataforma argentina: explotación, situación y necesidades para un manejo pesquero adecuado. Frente Marítimo 19, 199–206.Google Scholar
Massa, A.M. and Hozbor, N.M. (2011) Evolución de las estimaciones de abundancia de los peces cartilaginosos demersales de mayor valor comercial del Atlántico Sudoccidental, capturados entre 34°S y 41°S, a profundidades menores de 50 m. In Wohler, O.C., Cedrola, P. and Cousseau, M.B. (eds) Contribuciones sobre biología, pesca y comercialización de tiburones en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Consejo Federal Pesquero, pp. 193–205.Google Scholar
Perier, M.R., Estalles, M., Coller, N.M., Suarez, M.N., Mora, G.J. and Di Giácomo, E.E. (2011) Chondrichthyans of the San Matías Gulf, Patagonia, Argentina. Revista Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales n.s. 13, 213–220.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team (2013) R: A language and environmental for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at http://www.R-project.orgGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, R.P., Navarro, G., Calvo, E. and del Castillo, F. (2011) La pesca y comercialización de condríctios en Argentina. Aportes de la Dirección Nacional de Planificación Pesquera para la elaboración del Plan Nacional. In Wohler, O.C., Cedrola, P. and Cousseau, M.B. (eds) Contribuciones sobre biología, pesca y comercialización de tiburones en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Consejo Federal Pesquero, pp. 151–184.Google Scholar
Stevens, J.D., Bonfil, R., Dulvyn, K. and Walkerp, A. (2000) The effects of fishing on sharks, rays, and chimaeras (chondrichthyans), and the implications for marine ecosystems. ICES Journal of Marine Science 57, 476–494.Google Scholar
Stobutzki, I.C., Miller, M.J., Heales, D.S. and Brewer, D.T. (2002) Sustainability of elasmobranch caught as bycatch in a tropical prawn (shrimp) trawl fishery. Fishery Bulletin 100, 800–821.Google Scholar
Van der Molen, S., Caille, G.M. and González, R. (1998) By-catch of sharks in Patagonian coastal trawl fisheries. Marine and Freshwater Research 49, 641–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar