Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:33:32.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Biology of Purpura Lapillus. I. Shell Variation in Relation to Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Hilary B. Moore
Hilary B. Moore
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Laboratory, Plymouth.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

By examination of samples of Purpura lapillus from the whole of their European range, it appears that the species can exhibit quite as wide variation within a relatively small region such as that studied in the Dorset-Devon-Cornwall area, as it can over its whole geographic range. Population samples were taken from seventy-six localities, mostly in the south-west of England, and covering a wide range of environmental conditions, and the variations in these shells were studied in relation to two primary environmental factors, degree of exposure to wave-action and diet.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , November 1936 , pp. 61 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agersborg, H. P. K. 1929. Factors in the Evolution of the Prosobranchiate Mollusc Thais lapillus. The Nautilus, Vol. XLIII, No. 2, pp. 45–49.Google Scholar
Colton, H. S. 1916. On Some Varieties of Thais lapillus in the Mount Desert Region. A Study of Individual Ecology. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, Vol. LXVIII, pp. 440–454.Google Scholar
Cooke, A. H. 1895. Mollusc, in Camb. Nat. Hist., Vol. III. London, Macmillan and Co., pp. 1–459.Google Scholar
Cooke, A. H. 1915. The Geographical Distribution of Purpura lapillus (L.). Proc. Malac. Soc., Vol. XI, pp. 192–209.Google Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1916. Notes on the Species of the American Sub-genus Nucella inhabiting the North-west Coast of America and adjacent Regions. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus., Vol. 49, pp. 557–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flattely, F. W., and Walton, C. L. 1922. The Biology of the Sea Shore. London, Sidgwick and Jackson, pp. 1–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B. 1934. On Ledging in Shells at Port Erin. Proc. Malac. Soc., Vol. XXI, pp. 213–222.Google Scholar
Moore, H. B. 1935. The Biology of Balanus balanoides. IV. Relation to Environmental Factors. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XX, No. 2, pp. 279–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ökland, F. 1933. Literal Studien an der Skagerrakküste Norwegens: die Verbreitung von Purpura lapillus, Patella vulgata und den Littorina-Arten in Tromö. Zoogeographica, Bd. I, He. 4, pp. 579–601.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P. 1935. Essai d'Éthologie Zoologique d'après l'Étude des Mollusques. Acad. Roy. de Belg., Cl. Sci., Pub. de la Fond. A. de Potter, No. 1, pp. 1–662.Google Scholar
Rothschild, M. 1936. Gigantism and Variation in Peringia ulvœ Pennant 1777, caused by Infection with Larval Trematodes. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., N.S., Vol. XX, No. 3, pp. 537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schott, G. 1912. Geographie des Atlantisches Ozeans. Hamburg, C. Boyson, pp. 1–330.Google Scholar
Thompson, D'A. W. 1917. On Growth and Form. Camb. Univ. Press, pp. 1–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesenburg-Lund, C. 1934. Contributions to the Development of the Trematoda Digenea. Pt. II. The Biology of the Freshwater Cercariæ in Danish Freshwaters. Mém. de l'Acad. Roy. de Sci. et des Lettres de Denmark. Copenhagen, Sec. Sci., Sér. 9, T. 5, No. 3, pp. 1–223.Google Scholar
Wilkins, G. L. 1934. The Coloration of Nucella lapillus (L.). Journ. Conchology, Vol. XX, No. 2, pp. 61–64.Google Scholar