Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T19:40:27.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The biology of Isancistrum subulatae n.sp., a monogenean parasitic on the squid, Alloteuthis subulata, at Plymouth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. Llewellyn
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Comparative Physiology, The University of Birmingham, P.O. Box 363, Birmingham, B TT

Extract

A new species of a monogenean Isancistrum subulatae (Gyrodactylidae) has been discovered on the arms and tentacles of the cephalopod mollusc Alloteuthis subulata at Plymouth and I. loliginis, on the gills of the same host, has been re-discovered for the first time since its original description in 1912. I. subulatae, like other gyrodactylids, is viviparous, and has been shown by experiments to transfer to new hosts by contagion. In nature such transfers probably take place during copulation of the hosts and since the parasite may occur in numbers of several thousands per host, it may thereby constitute a venereal disease.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beauchamp, P. DE 1912. hancistrum loliginis n.g. n.sp. Trematode parasite du Calmar et l'inexistence de Solencotyle chiajei Diesing. Bulletin de la Société zoologique de France, 37,9699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, F. 1966. Beiträge zur mikroskopischen anatomie und fortpflanzungsbiologie von Gyrodactylus wageneri v. Nordmann, 1832. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 28, 142174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cassie, R. M. 1954. Some uses of probability paper in the analysis of size-frequency distributions. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 5, 513–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, G. A. 1911. Sexual activities of the squid Loligo pealii (Les.). 1. Copulation, egg-laying and fertilization. Journal of Morphology, 22, 327359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Naggar, M. M. & Kearn, G. C. 1983. Glands associated with the anterior adhesive areas and body margins in the skin parasitic monogenean Entobdella soleae. International Journal for Parasitology, 13, 6781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. D. 1983. The morphology and life-cycle of the oviparous Oogyrodactylus farlowellae gen. et sp. nov. (Monogenea: Gyrodactylidea). Parasitology, 87, 405420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeckel, S. G. A. 1958. Cephalopoden. Tierwelt der Nord-und Ostsee, 37, 479–723.Google Scholar
Kritsky, D. C. 1978. The cephalic glands and associated structures in Gyrodactylus eucaliae Ikezaki and Hoffman 1957 (Monogenea: Gyrodactylidae). Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 45, 3749.Google Scholar
Kritsky, D. C. & Fritts, T. H. 1970. Monogenetic trematodes from Costa Rica with the proposal of Anacanthocotyle gen.n. (Gyrodactylidae: Isancistrinae). Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 37, 6368.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, J. 1963. Larvae and larval development of monogeneans. Advances in Parasitology, 1, 287326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Llewellyn, J. 1972. Behaviour of monogeneans. In Behavioural Aspects of Parasite Transmission (ed. Canning, E. U. and Wright, C. A.), pp. 1930. (Supplement no. 1 to the Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 51.)Google Scholar
Llewellyn, J. 1981. Biology of monogeneans (Workshop Proceedings, EMOP 3). Parasitology, 82, 64–67.Google Scholar
Lyons, K. M. 1969. Compound sensilla in monogenean skin parasites. Parasitology, 59, 625636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, S. & Caley, J. 1975. Sexual reproduction in the monogenean Diclidophora merlangi: tissue penetration by sperms. Zeitschrift fur Parasitenkunde, 45, 323334.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, E. S. 1922. Report on the Cephalopoda collected by the research steamer ‘Goldseeker’, during the years, 1903–1908. Scientific Investigations. Fishery Board of Scotland, 1921 (III), 45 PP.Google Scholar
Turk, S. M. 1973. Concordance to the Field Card for British Marine Mollusca. 66 pp. Conchological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.Google Scholar