Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:50:38.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Behavioural responses of the copepods Calanus helgolandicus and Temora longicornis to dinoflagellate diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Catherine W. Gill
Affiliation:
Centre d'Etudes d'Oceanographie et de Biologie Marine, CNRS, Station Biologique, 29211 Roscoff, France
Roger P. Harris
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth PL1 2PB

Extract

Activity patterns of the first maxillae of Calanus helgolandicus and Temora longicornis, restrained in a flow-through system, were investigated using a micro-impedance electrode technique. Copepods were exposed to four dinoflagellate species of similar cell size with filtered sea water and the diatom Thalassiosira weissfloggi as controls. In short-term transition experiments the beat frequency of the maxilla changed rapidly with the introduction and removal of cells from the surrounding medium. Similarly the introduction of cell-free algal homogenate, filtered through a 0·2 µm membrane, produced elevated beat frequencies, evidence consistent with chemosensory food detection. During 24 h exposure experiments frequencies for Calanus on all dinoflagellate diets were lower than for the diatom, and in the case of Scrippsiella trochoidea did not differ significantly from the seawater controls. In Temora, frequencies when feeding on dinoflagellates, except Prorocentrum micans, were lower than on the diatom. With Scrippsiella trochoidea and Gonyaulax tamarensis beat frequencies were the same as those for the sea-water controls. Significant depression of frequency below that observed in filtered sea water was shown for both copepods when presented with the bloom-forming, Gyrodinium aureolum. Differences in beat frequency in response to dinoflagellate diets are mirrored by other aspects of feeding activity, gut contents, egg production and mortality.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, D. M., Kulis, D. M., Orphanos, J. A. & Ceurvels, A. R., 1982. Distribution of the toxic dinoflagellate Gonyaulax tamarensis in the southern New England region. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science, 14, 447458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, J. C., 1983. Deformation of the active space in the low Reynolds number feeding current of calanoid copepods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science, 40, 12931302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buskey, E. J., 1984. Swimming pattern as an indicator of the roles of copepod sensory systems in the recognition of food. Marine Biology, 79, 165175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, T. & Carpenter, E. J., 1985. Blooms of the dinoflagellate Gyrodinium aureolum in a Long Island estuary: box model analysis of bloom maintenance. Marine Biology, 89, 8393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagg, M. J. & Wyman, K. D., 1983. Natural ingestion rates of the copepods Neocalanus plumchrus and N. cristatus calculated from gut contents. Marine Ecology – Progress Series, 13, 3746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaghay, P. & Small, L., 1979. Food selection capabilities of the estuarine copepod Acartia clausi. Marine Biology, 52, 137146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiedler, P. C., 1982. Zooplankton avoidance and reduced grazing responses to Gymnodinium splendens (Dinophyceae). Limnology and Oceanography, 27, 961965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogg, G. E., 1966. The extracellular products of algae. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 4, 195212.Google Scholar
Frost, B. W., 1977. Feeding behaviour of Calanus pacificus in mixtures of food particles. Limnology and Oceanography, 22, 472–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, B. W., Landry, M. R. & Hassett, R. P., 1983. Feeding behaviour of large calanoid copepods Neocalanus cristatus and N. plumchrus from the subarctic Pacific Ocean. Deep-Sea Research, 30, 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. W., 1986. Suspected mechano- and chemo-sensory structures of Temora longicornis Müller (Copepoda: Calanoida). Marine Biology, 93, 449457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. W., 1987. Recording the beat patterns of the second antennae of calanoid copepods, with a micro-impedance technique. Hydrobiologia, 148, 7378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. W. & Crisp, D. J., 1985. The effect of size and temperature on the frequency of limb beat of Temora longicornis Müller (Crustacea: Copepoda). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 86, 185196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, C. W. & Poulet, S. A., 1986. Utilization of a computerized micro-impedance system for studying the activity of copepod appendages. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 101, 193198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, M. M., Hepper, B. T., Spencer, B. E. & Walne, P. R., 1974. Lugworm mortalities and a bloom of Gyrodinium aureolum Hulbert in the eastern Irish Sea, autumn 1971. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 857869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holligan, P. M., 1985. Marine dinoflagellate blooms – growth strategies and environmental exploitation. In Toxic Dinoflagellates (ed. Anderson, D. M., White, A. W. and Baden, D. G.), pp. 133139. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Holligan, P. M., Viollier, M., Dupouy, C. & Aiken, J., 1983. Satellite studies on the distributions of chlorophyll and dinoflagellate blooms in the western English Channel. Continental Shelf Research, 2, 8196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntley, M. E., 1982. Yellow water in La Jolla bay, California, July 1980. II. Suppression of zooplankton grazing. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 63, 8191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntley, M. E., Barthel, K.-G. & Star, J. L., 1983. Particle rejection by Calanus pacificus: discrimination between similarly sized particles. Marine Biology, 74, 151160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntley, M., Sykes, P., Rohan, S. & Marin, V., 1986. Chemically-mediated rejection of dinoflagellate prey by the copepod Calanus pacificus and Paracalanus parvus: mechanism, occurrence and significance. Marine Ecology – Progress Series, 28, 105120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, J. D., 1986. The relationship between Gonyaulax tamarensis cell toxin levels and copepod ingestion rates. In Toxic Dinoflagellates (ed. Anderson, D. M., White, A. W. and Baden, D. G.), pp. 413418. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Jones, K. J., Ayres, P., Bullock, A. M., Roberts, R. J. & Tett, P., 1982. A red tide of Gyrodinium aureolum in sea lochs of the Firth of Clyde and associated mortality of pond-reared salmon. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 62, 771782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeblich, A. R. III & Loeblich, L. A., 1979. The systematics of Gonyaulax with special reference to the toxic species. In Toxic Dinoflagellate Blooms (ed. Taylor, D. and Seliger, H. H.), pp. 235238. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Paffenhöfer, G.-A., 1970. Cultivation of Calanus helgolandicus under controlled conditions. Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 20, 346359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paffenhöfer, G.-A. & Van Sant, K. B., 1985. The feeding response of a marine planktonic copepod to quantity and quality of particles. Marine Ecology - Progress Series, 27, 5565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paffenhöfer, G.-A., Strickler, J. R. & Alcaraz, M., 1982. Suspension-feeding by herbivorous calanoid copepods: a cinematographic study. Marine Biology, 67, 193199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partensky, F. & Sournia, A., 1986. Le dinoflagellé Gyrodinium cf. aureolum dans le plancton de l'Atlantique nord: identification, écologie, toxicité. Cryptogamie Algologie, 7, 251275.Google Scholar
Poulet, S. A. & Marsot, P., 1978. Chemosensory grazing by marine calanoid copepods (Arthropoda: Crustacea). Science, New York, 200, 14031405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulet, S. A. & Marsot, P., 1980. Chemosensory feeding and food-gathering by omnivorous marine copepods. In Evolution and Ecology of Zooplankton Communities (ed. Kerfoot, W. C.), pp. 198218. New England: University Press.Google Scholar
Poulet, S. A., Samain, J. F. & Moal, J., 1986. Chemoreception, nutrition and food requirements among copepods. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Copepoda (ed. Schriever, G., Schminke, H. K., Shih, C. -t.), pp. 426442. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada.Google Scholar
Price, H. J. & Paffenhöfer, G.-A., 1984. Effects of feeding experience in the copepod Eucalanus pileatus: a cinematographic study. Marine Biology, 84, 3540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H. J. & Paffenhöfer, G.-A., 1985. Perception of food availability by calanoid copepods. Archiv für Hydrobiologie (Beihefte Ergebnisse der Limnologie), 21, 115124.Google Scholar
Price, H. J. & Paffenhöfer, G.-A., 1986. Effects of concentration on the feeding of a marine copepod in algal monocultures and mixtures. Journal of Plankton Research, 8, 119128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, H. J., Paffenhöfer, G.-A. & Strickler, J. R., 1983. Modes of cell capture in calanoid copepods. Limnology and Oceanography, 28, 116123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, B. C. & Ache, B. W., 1979. Olfaction: responses of a decapod crustacean are enhanced by flicking. Science, New York, 205, 204206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sykes, P. F. & Huntley, M. E., 1987. Acute physiological reactions of Calanus pacificus to selected dinoflagellates: direct observations. Marine Biology, 94, 1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Alstyne, K. L., 1986. Effects of phytoplankton taste and smell on feeding behaviour of the copepod Centropages hamatus. Marine Ecology – Progress Series, 34, 187190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yule, A. B. & Crisp, D. J., 1983. A study of feeding behaviour in Temora longicornis (Miiller) (Crustacea: Copepoda). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 71, 271282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar