Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:11:46.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ampharetidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from Japan. Part III: the genus Amphicteis Grube, 1850 and closely related genera

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2014

Michael G. Reuscher ,
Dieter Fiege  and
Minoru Imajima
Michael G. Reuscher*
Affiliation:
Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Drive, Unit 5869, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5869, USA
Dieter Fiege
Affiliation:
Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum Frankfurt, Sektion Marine Evertebraten II, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt/M., Germany
Minoru Imajima
Affiliation:
1-4-8 Takakura, Iruma City, Sitama Prefecture 358-0021, Japan
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: M.G. Reuscher, Harte Research Institute for Gulf of Mexico Studies, Texas A&M University, Corpus Christi, 6300 Ocean Drive, Unit 5869, Corpus Christi, Texas 78412-5869, USA email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the third paper about Ampharetidae from Japan, we describe six species that belong to the ‘Amphicteis genus complex’. We divide this complex into the genera Amphicteis Grube, 1850, Paramphicteis Caullery, 1944, Phyllamphicteis Augener, 1918 and Watatsumi gen. nov. Paramphicteis is considered senior synonym of Pseudoamphicteis Hutchings, 1977 and is characterized by pinnate buccal tentacles. Watatsumi gen. nov. with its type species Watatsumi grubei sp. nov. is characterized by the lack of prostomial glandular ridges, the presence of pinnate buccal tentacles, and inconspicuous nuchal ridges. Two of the Amphicteis species are new to science, including A. spinosa sp. nov. and A. taurus sp. nov. Paramphicteis weberi (Caullery, 1944) comb. nov. was transferred from Amphicteis because we found pinnate buccal tentacles in addition to four pairs of foliose branchiae. Paramphicteis foliata (Haswell, 1883) comb. nov. was transferred from Phyllamphicteis because it has pinnate buccal tentacles. Amphicteis uncopalea Chamberlin, 1919 and Paramphicteis angustifolia (Grube, 1878) are newly recorded from Japanese waters. Amphicteis orphnius Chamberlin, 1919 is considered senior synonym of A. obscurior Chamberlin, 1919. A comprehensive table with diagnostic characters of all species of the Amphicteis complex with pinnate buccal tentacles is provided.

Keywords

AmpharetidaeAmphicteisParamphicteisPhyllamphicteisPseudoamphicteisWatatsuminew genusnew speciesnew recordtaxonomy
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 95 , Issue 5 , August 2015 , pp. 929 - 940
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annenkova, N. (1929) Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Polychaeten-Fauna der USSR. I. Fam. Pectinariidae Quatrefages (Amphictenidae Malmgren) und Ampharetidae Malmgren. Annuaire du Musée Zoologique de l'Académie des Sciences de l'URSS 30, 477–502.Google Scholar
Augener, H. (1918) Polychaeta. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Meeresfauna Westafrikas 2, 67–625.Google Scholar
Banse, K. (1979) Ampharetidae (Polychaeta) from British Columbia and Washington. Canadian Journal of Zoology 57, 1543–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caullery, M. (1944) Polychètes sédentaires de l'expédition du Siboga. Ariciidae, Spionidae, Chaetopteridae, Chlorhaemidae, Opheliidae, Oweniidae, Sabellariidae, Sternaspidae, Amphictenidae, Ampharetidae, Terebellidae. Siboga-Expeditie. Utkomsten op zoologisch, botanisch, oceanographisch en geologisch Gebied verzameld in Nederlandsch Oost-Indie 1899–1900 aan Boord H.M. Siboga onder Commando van Luitenant ter zee 1. kl. G.F. Tydeman 24, 1–204.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, R.V. (1919) The Annelida Polychaeta. Memoirs of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College 48, 1–514.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K. (1972) Benthic polychaetous annelids from deep water off western Mexico and adjacent areas in the Eastern Pacific Ocean. Allan Hancock Monographs in Marine Biology 7, 1–575.Google Scholar
Gosse, P.H. (1855) Notes on some new or little-known marine animals. The Annals & Magazine of Natural History 16, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grube, A.E. (1850) Die Familien der Anneliden. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 16, 249–364.Google Scholar
Grube, A.E. (1878) Annulata Semperiana. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Annelidenfauna der Philippinen. Memoires de L'Academie Impériale des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg 25, 1–300.Google Scholar
Hartman, O. (1965) Deep-water benthic polychaetous annelids off New England to Bermuda and other North Atlantic areas. Occasional Papers of the Allan Hancock Foundation 28, 1–378.Google Scholar
Haswell, W.A. (1883) On some new Australian tubicolous annelids. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 7, 633–638.Google Scholar
Holthe, T. (1986) Evolution, systematics, and distribution of the Polychaeta Terebellomorpha, with a catalogue of the taxa and a bibliography. Gunneria 55, 1–236.Google Scholar
Hutchings, P.A. (1977) Terebelliform Polychaeta of the families Ampharetidae, Terebellidae and Trichobranchidae from Australia, chiefly from Moreton Bay, Queensland. Records of the Australian Museum 31, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchings, P. and Rainer, S. (1979) The polychaete fauna of Careel Bay, Pittwater, New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Natural History 13, 745–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imajima, M., Reuscher, M.G. and Fiege, D. (2012) Ampharetidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from Japan. Part I: the genus Ampharete Malmgren, 1866, along with a discussion of several taxonomic characters of the family and the introduction of a new identification tool. Zootaxa 3490, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imajima, M., Reuscher, M.G. and Fiege, D. (2013) Ampharetidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from Japan. Part II: genera with elevated and modified notopodia. Zootaxa 3647, 137–166.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jirkov, I.A. (1994) Two new species of Ampharete (Polychaeta: Ampharetidae) from the North-Western Pacific with discussion of paleae as taxonomic character of Ampharetinae. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal 73, 28–32 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Jirkov, I.A. (2001) Polychaeta of the Arctic Ocean. Moskva: Yanus-K [in Russian].Google Scholar
Jirkov, I.A. (2011) Discussion of taxonomic characters and classification of Ampharetidae (Polychaeta). Italian Journal of Zoology 78(S1), 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmgren, A.J. (1866) Nordiska Hafs-Annulater. Öfversigt af Kongliga Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar 5, 355–410.Google Scholar
Parapar, J., Helgason, G.V., Jirkov, I. and Moreira, J. (2011) Taxonomy and distribution of the genus Amphicteis (Polychaeta: Ampharetidae) collected by the BIOICE project in Icelandic waters. Journal of Natural History 45, 1477–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuscher, M., Fiege, D. and Wehe, T. (2009) Four new species of Ampharetidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from Pacific hot vents and cold seeps, with a key and synoptic table of characters for all genera. Zootaxa 2191, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sars, M. (1835) Beskrivelser og Iagttagelser over nogle moerkelige eller nye i Havet ved den Bergenske Kyst levende Dyr af Polypernes, Acalephernes, Radiaternes, Annelidernes og Molluskernes classer, med en kort Oversigt over de hidtil af Forfatteren sammesteds fundne Arter og deres Forekommen. Bergen: Thorstein Hallegers Forlag hos Chr. Dahl.Google Scholar
von Marenzeller, E. (1884) Südjapanische Anneliden II. Ampharetea, Terebellacea, Sabellacea, Serpulacea. Denkschriften der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Classe der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften 49, 197–224.Google Scholar