Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:37:52.732Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Value of indicators for assessing recent mating in brachyuran crabs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2005

Céline Duluc
Affiliation:
Direction des Invertébrés et de la Biologie Expérimentale, Institut Maurice-Lamontagne, Pêches et Océans Canada, 850 route de la Mer, CP 1000 Mont-Joli (Québec), G5H 3Z4, Canada Institut des Sciences de la Mer de Rimouski (ISMER), Université du Québec à Rimouski, 300 avenue des Ursulines, Rimouski (Québec), G5L 3A1, Canada
Bernard Sainte-Marie
Affiliation:
Direction des Invertébrés et de la Biologie Expérimentale, Institut Maurice-Lamontagne, Pêches et Océans Canada, 850 route de la Mer, CP 1000 Mont-Joli (Québec), G5H 3Z4, Canada
Jean-Claude Brêthes
Affiliation:
Institut des Sciences de la Mer de Rimouski (ISMER), Université du Québec à Rimouski, 300 avenue des Ursulines, Rimouski (Québec), G5L 3A1, Canada

Abstract

Methods for assessing the occurrence and recency of mating are important for the management and conservation of exploited brachyuran crabs. Using multiparous females of the snow crab Chionoecetes opilio, we evaluated by experiment the efficacy of three indicators of recent mating: a white deposit in the spermathecae, extended mate-guarding, and fresh grasping marks on the female pereiopods. This was done by contrasting sperm counts between the left and the right spermatheca of females that were exposed to males with the right gonopod ablated, at treatment sex ratios of 20[female]:3[male ] or 50[female]:3[male ]. We expected that sperm reserves would be balanced between the two spermathecae of non-mated females and larger in the right than in the left spermatheca of mated females. Although no mating indicator was infallible, the presence of a white deposit was the most accurate because it maximized the median difference of sperm counts between the two spermathecae for the group of presumably mated females and minimized it for the group of presumably non-mated females. The use of grasping marks overestimated the mating frequency and resulted in the misclassification of a large proportion of females. Extended mate-guarding was a slightly better mating indicator than grasping marks, but it is not practical for field studies. Classification errors associated with each indicator can be explained mostly by female and male behaviours and may vary in magnitude with sociosexual context.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2005 Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)