Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T09:19:02.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Three new species of remosiid siphonophore (Siphonophora: Physonectae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2009

P.R. Pugh  and
S.H.D. Haddock
P.R. Pugh*
Affiliation:
National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK
S.H.D. Haddock
Affiliation:
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 7700 Sandholt Road, Moss Landing, California 95039, USA
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: P.R. Pugh, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three new species belonging to the family Resomiidae (Siphonophora: Physonectae) are described from material mainly collected by ROVs in the vicinity of Monterey Bay, California, USA, with some additional submersible-collected specimens from The Bahamas. Although these species, Resomia ornicephala, R. persica, and R. dunni, show some differences from those previously described, particularly in the shape of the nectophores, they have all been placed in the genus Resomia. They retain the basic characteristic of having two forms of tentilla on the same tentacle, the more proximal form, with a spirally coiled cnidoband, becoming reconfigured into the more distal form, usually with a zigzagged cnidoband, although in one of the new species the zigzagging of the cnidoband is less well-defined.

Keywords

deep-seaCnidariataxonomyResomiafluorescence
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 90 , Special Issue 6: In Honour of Sir Frederick Stratten Russell, FRS , September 2010 , pp. 1119 - 1143
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chun, C. (1891) Die Canarischen Siphonophoren. I. Stephanophyes superba und die Familie der Stephanophyiden. Abhandlungen herausgegeben von der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 16, 553–627, 7 pls.Google Scholar
Dunn, C.W. (2005) The colony-level evolution and development of the Siphonophora. PhD thesis. Yale University, 264 pp.Google Scholar
Dunn, C.W., Pugh, P.R. and Haddock, S.H.D. (2005a) Molecular phylogenetics of the Siphonophora (Cnidaria), with implications for the evolution of functional specialization. Systematic Biology 54, 916–935.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, C.W., Pugh, P.R. and Haddock, S.H.D. (2005b) Marrus claudanielis, a new species of deep-sea physonect siphonophore (Siphonophora, Physonectae). Bulletin of Marine Science 76, 699–714.Google Scholar
Haddock, S.H.D., Dunn, C.W., Pugh, P.R. and Schnitzler, C.E. (2005) Bioluminescent and red-fluorescent lures in a deep-sea siphonophore. Science 309, 263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pugh, P.R. (1989) Gelatinous zooplankton—the forgotten fauna. Progress in Underwater Science 14, 67–78.Google Scholar
Pugh, P.R. (2001) A review of the genus Erenna Bedot, 1904 (Siphonophora, Physonectae). Bulletin of the Natural History Museum, London (Zoology Series) 67, 169–182.Google Scholar
Pugh, P.R. (2006) The taxonomic status of the genus Moseria (Siphonophora, Physonectae). Zootaxa 1343, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, J.E. (1980) Influence of siphonophore behavior upon their natural diets: evidence for aggressive mimicry. Science. New York 209, 1045–1047.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robison, B.H., Reisenbichler, K.R., Sherlock, R.E., Silguer, J.M.B. and Chavez, F.P. (1998) Seasonal abundance of the siphonophore, Nanomia bijuga, in Monterey Bay. Deep-Sea Research 45, 1741–1751.Google Scholar
Totton, A.K. (1965) A synopsis of the Siphonophora. London: British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar