Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:25:39.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Spinal Nerves of the Dogfish (Scyliorhinus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

B. L. Roberts
B. L. Roberts
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge and the Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The locomotory musculature of dogfish is innervated by the segmental spinal nerves. The sensory and motor innervation of the abdominal musculature was studied in a preparation consisting of a strip of the abdominal body wall innervated by the ventral rami of the spinal nerves.

Each ventral ramus consists of two separate nerve bundles which were found to be peripheral extensions of the dorsal and ventral spinal roots. Recordings from the sensory bundles showed that there are few sensory endings in the musculature and body wall of the dogfish. It was possible to differentiate between ephemeral responses produced by cutaneous free-nerve endings and prolonged discharges which were generated by more specialized sensory endings. In some details these endings were found to be unlike either muscle spindles or tendon organs. Further, skinning experiments suggested that these mechanoreceptors lay in the skin or the very outer layers of the myotome.

Histological searching, together with physiological isolation of units, suggested that these receptors were the corpuscular endings distributed sparsely amongst subcutaneous tissue. These endings are apparently the same as those described by Wunderer (1908) in the fins of elasmobranchs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , February 1969 , pp. 51 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexandrowicz, J. S., 1951. Muscle receptor organs in abdomen of Homarus vulgaris and Palinurus vulgaris. Q. Jl microsc. Set., Vol. 92, pp. 163–200.Google Scholar
Allen, W. F., 1917. Distribution of the spinal nerves in Polistotrema and some special studies on the development of spinal nerves. J. comp. Neurol., Vol. 28, pp. 137–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelberg, B. & Emonet-Denand, F., 1967. Motor units of the first superficial lumbrical muscle of the cat. J. Neurophysiol., Vol. 30, pp. 154–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barets, A., 1956. Les récepteurs intra-musculaires des nageoires chez les sélaciens. Arch. Anat. microsc. Morph. exp., T. 45, pp. 254–60.Google Scholar
Barets, A., 1961. Contribution a l'étude des systems moteurs ‘lent’ et ‘rapide’ des muscle lateral des teleosteens. Archs. Anat. microsc. Morph. exp., T. 50, pp. 1–92.Google Scholar
Baum, J., 1900. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Muskelspindeln. Anat. Hefte, Bd. 13, PP. 249–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessou, P., Emonet-Denand, F. & Laporte, Y., 1965. Motor fibres innervating extrafusal muscle fibres in the cat. J. Physiol, Lond., Vol. 180, pp. 649–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bone, Q., 1963. Some observations upon the peripheral nervous system of the hagfish, Myxine glutinosa. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bone, Q., 1964. Patterns of muscular innervation in the lower chordates. Int. Rev. Neurobiol., Vol. 6, pp. 99–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bone, Q., 1966. On the function of the two types of myotomal muscle fibre in elasmo-branch fish. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 46, pp. 321–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braus, H. 1909. Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Segmentalstruktur der motorischen Nervenplexus. Anat. Anz., Bd. 34, pp. 529–51.Google Scholar
Campbell, B., 1946. Morphology and conduction of bipolar dorsal root ganglion cells of selachian fishes. J. NeurophysioL, Vol. 9, pp. 173–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavalie, M., 1902. Sur les terminaisons nerveuses motrices et sensitives dans les muscles striés, chez la torpille (Torpedo marmoratd). C. r. Séanc. Soc. Biol., T. 54, pp. 1279–80.Google Scholar
Ciaccio, G. V., 1891. Sur les plaques nerveuses finales dans les tendons des vertebrates. Archs ital. Biol., Vol. 14, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar
Davidoff, M., 1879. Beitrage zur vergleichenden Anatomie der hintern Gliedmasse der Fische. Morph. Jb., Bd. 5, pp. 450–520.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. C., 1964. The Physiology of Synapses. 316 pp. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernand, V. S. V. & Young, J. Z., 1951. The sizes of the nerve fibres of muscle nerves. Proc. R. Soc. B, Vol. 139, pp. 35–58.Google ScholarPubMed
Fessard, A. & Sand, A., 1937. Stretch receptors in the muscles of fishes. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 14, pp. 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fields, H. L. & Kennedy, D., 1965. Functional role of muscle receptor organs in crayfish. Nature, Lond., Vol. 206, pp. 1235–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodrich, E. S., 1906. Notes on the development, structure and origin of the median and paired fins of fish. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 50, pp. 333–82.Google Scholar
Goodrich, E. S., 1909. Vertebrata craniata. 83 pp. London: A. and C. Black.Google Scholar
Goodrich, E. S., 1930. Studies on the Structure and Development of Vertebrates. 837 PP. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J., 1933. Studies in animal locomotion. II. The relationship between waves of muscular contraction and the propulsive mechanism of the eel. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 10, pp. 386–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, J., 1950. The role of peripheral sense organs during locomotion in the vertebrates. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol., Vol. 4, pp. 112–26.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. C. L., 1967. Histological and electrophysiological investigations of the fast muscle of the teleost, Cottus bubalis. Ph.D. thesis. University of St Andrews.Google Scholar
Hunt, C. C. & Perl, E. R., 1960. Spinal reflex mechanisms concerned with skeletal muscle. Physiol. Rev., Vol. 40, pp. 538–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, J. B., 1908. Additional notes on the cranial nerves of Petromyzontia. J. comp. Neurol, Vol. 18, 569–608.Google Scholar
Katz, B., 1949. The efferent regulation of the muscle spindle in the frog. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 26, pp. 201–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirsche, W., 1948. Histolqgische Untersuchungen über das peripherische Nerven-system der Teleostier. Anat. Anz., Vol. 96, pp. 419–54.Google Scholar
Kiss, F. & Mihálik, P. V., 1928. Über die Zusammensetzung der peripherischen Nerven und den Zusammenhang zwischen Morphologie und Funktion der peripherischen Nervenfasern. Z. Anat. EntwGesch., Vol. 88, pp. 112–51.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, O. 1956. Pressure receptors in the fins of the dogfish, Scyliorhinus canicula. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 33, pp. 417–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, V. & Hines, M., 1934. Studies in the innervation of skeletal muscle. V. The limb muscles of the newt, Triturus torosus. Am. J. Anat., Vol. 54, pp. 177–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, B. H. C., 1933. Nerve endings in mammalian muscle. J. Physiol., Lond., Vol. 78, pp. 1–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matthews, P. B. C., 1964. Muscle spindles and their control. Physiol. Rev., Vol. 44, pp. 219–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merton, P. A., 1953. Speculations on the Servo-control of Movement. In The Spinal Cord. Ciba Foundation Symposium.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, P. A., 1964. Human position sense and sense of effort. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol., Vol. 18, pp. 387–400.Google ScholarPubMed
Millot, J. & Anthony, J., 1966. Anatomy of Latimeria chalumnae. Vol. II. Nervous System and Sense Organs. 131 pp. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
Moreau, A., 1860. Recherches anatomiques et physiologique sur les nerfs de sentiment et de mouvement chez les poissons. Annls Sci. nat., ser. 4, Vol. 13, pp. 380–2.Google Scholar
Mott, F. W. & Sherrington, C. S., 1895. Experiments upon the influence of sensory nerves upon movement and nutrition of the limbs. Proc. R. Soc. B, Vol. 57, pp. 481–8.Google Scholar
Müller, E., 1911. Untersuchungen über die Muskeln und Nerven der Brustflosse und der Korperwand bei Acanthias. Anat. Hefte, Bd. 43, pp. 1–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, R. W., 1961. The initiation of cutaneous nerve impulses in elasmobranch fishes. J. Physiol., Lond., Vol. 159, pp. 546–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, H. W. & Hughes, S. P., 1920. The cranial, occipital, and anterior spinal nerves of the dogfish, Squalus acanthias. J. comp. Neurol., Vol. 31, pp. 293–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, M. P. & Finlayson, L. H., 1962. The structure and topography of stretch receptors in representatives of seven orders of insects. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 103, pp. 227–42.Google Scholar
Palmgren, A., 1948. A rapid method for selective silver staining of nerve fibres and nerve endings in mounted paraffin sections. Ada zool., Stockh., Vol. 29, pp. 377–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A., 1963. The peripheral nervous system, in The Biology ofMyxine, pp. 92–123. Ed. Brodal, and Fange, . 588 pp. Oslo: Universitets-forlaget.Google Scholar
Pick, J., 1957. Sympathectomy in amphibians. J. comp. Neurol., Vol. 107, pp. 169–208.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poloumordwinoff, D., 1898. Recherches sur les terminaisons nerveuses sensitives dans les muscles stries volontaires. Trav. Soc. Sci. Arcachon, Vol. 3, pp. 73–9.Google Scholar
Porter, R., 1966. Lingual mechanoreceptors activated by muscle twitch. J. Physiol., Lond. Vol. 183, pp. 101–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayner, M. D. & Keenan, M. J., 1967. Role of red and white muscles in the swimming of the skipjack tuna. Nature, Lond., Vol. 214, pp. 392–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rijnberk, G. A. Van, 1904. Beobachtungen iiber die Pigmentation der Haut bei Scyllium catulus und canicula, und ihre Zuordnung zu der segmentalen Hautunnervation dieser Thiere. Petrus Camper ned. Bijdr. Anat., T. 3, pp. 137–73.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. L., 1965. The spinal nerves of the dogfish. Proc. physiol. Soc., 26–27 March 1965 J. Physiol., Lond., Vol. 179, pp. 23–4.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. L., 1969 a. Spontaneous rhythms in the motoneurons of spinal dogfish (Scyliorhinus canicula). J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. Vol. 49, pp. 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, B. L., 1969 b. A locomotory proprioceptor in fishes. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. (in preparation).Google Scholar
Shanthaveerappa, T. R. & Bourne, C. H., 1963. Demonstration of perineural epithelium in whale and shark peripheral nerves. Nature, Lond., Vol. 197, pp. 702–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sherrington, C. S., 1898. Decerebrate rigidity and reflex coordination of movements. J. Physiol., Lond., Vol. 22, pp. 319–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stannius, H., 1849. Das peripherische Nervensystem der Fische. Rostock.Google Scholar
Tiegs, O. W., 1953. Innervation of voluntary muscle. Physiol. Rev., Vol. 33, pp. 90–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Timofejew, D., 1896. Über eine besondere Art eingekapselten Nervenendigungen in den männlichen Geschlechtsorganen bei Saügetieren. Anat. Anz., Vol. 11, pp. 44–9.Google Scholar
Troitzky, A., 1929. Les fibres motrices et les fibres sensitives des nerfs spinaux chez Mustelus laevis. Archs Mus. natn. Hist, nat., Paris., Vol. 4, pp. 127–33.Google Scholar
Weddell, G., 1941. The pattern of cutaneous innervation in relation to cutaneous sensibility. J. Anat., Vol. 75, pp. 346–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Whitear, M., 1952. The innervation of the skin of teleost fishes. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 93, pp. 289–305.Google Scholar
Williams, P. L. & Wendell-Smith, C. P., 1960. The use of fixed and stained sections in quantitative studies of peripheral nerve. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 101, pp. 43–54.Google Scholar
Wunderer, H., 1908. Uber Terminalkorperchen der Anamnien. Arch, mikrosk. Anat., Vol. 71, pp. 504–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, J. Z., 1933 a. The preparation of isotonic solutions for use in experiments with fish. Publs Stn zool. Napoli, Vol. 12, pp. 425–31.Google Scholar
Young, J. Z., 1933 b. The autonomic nervous system of Selachians. Q. Jl microsc. Sci, Vol. 75, pp. 571–624.Google Scholar