Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:49:53.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Observations on the Effects of Temperature and Salinity Upon the Growth of Cardium Edule and Cardium Glaucum Larvae in the Laboratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Paul Kingston
Paul Kingston
Affiliation:
The Hatfield Polytechnic, Herts*
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The larvae of both Cardium edule, Linné, and Cardium glaucum, Bruguière, have been reared to metamorphosis under laboratory conditions.

Successful artificial fertilization has been shown possible, in both species, in the termperature range 10 to 20 °C. The larvae of C. edule show poor growth at 10 °C, good growth between 15 and 20 °C and erratic growth at 30 °C. C. glaucum larvae show negligible growth at 10 °C, but are able to grow well between 15 and 31 °C; limited numbers of larvae were reared to metamorphosis at 33 °C.

The optimal salinity for rearing the larvae of both cockle species was found to be between 30 and 35 ‰. Although C. glaucum larvae were slightly more tolerant of salinity extremes, both species were able to withstand a wider range of salinities than those satisfactory for growth.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 54 , Issue 2 , May 1974 , pp. 309 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ansell, A. D., 1961. Reproduction, growth and mortality of Venus striatula (Da Costa) in Kammes Bay, Millport. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 41, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayne, B. L., 1965. Growth and delay of metamorphosis of the larvae of Mytilus edulis, L. Ophelia, 2, No. 1, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyden, C. R., 1971. A comparative study of the reproductive cycles of the cockles Cerastoderma edule and Cerastoderma glaucum. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 605–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chanley, P. E., 1958. The survival of some juvenile bivalves in water of low salinity. Proceedings. National Shellfisheries Association, 48, 52–65.Google Scholar
Knudsen, M., 1901. Hydrographical Tables, 63 pp. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Kreger, D., 1940. On the ecology of Cardium edule, L. Archives néerlandaises de zoologie, 4, 151–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, I., 1957. Differences in the density and growth in a cockle population in the Dutch Wadder Sea. Archives néerlandaises de zoologie, 12, 351–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orton, J. H., 1926. On the rate of growth of Cardium edule. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 32, 85–106.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1901. Sur le degré d'eurythermine de centaines larves marines. Bulletin de l'Académie r. de Belgique. Classe des sciences, 783–832.Google Scholar
Petersen, G. Høpner, 1958. Notes on the growth and biology of the different Cardium species in Danish brackish water areas. Meddelelser fra Kommissionenfor Danmarks Fiskersi og Havunders ogelser, N.S., 2, No. 22, 1–31.Google Scholar
Russell, P. J. C., 1971. A reappraisal of the geographical distributions of the cockles, Cardium edule, L. and Cardium glaucum, Bruguière. Journal of Conchology, 27, 225–34.Google Scholar
Russell, P. J. C., 1972. Biological studies on Cardium glaucum, based on some Baltic and Mediterranean populations. Marine Biology, 16, No. 4, 290–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rygg, B., 1970. Studies on Cerastoderma edule (L.) and Cerastoderma glaucum (Poiret). Sarsia, 43, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorson, G., 1960. Reproduction and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Biological Reviews, 25, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verwey, J., 1952. On the ecology of distribution of cockle and mussel in the Dutch Waddensea, their role in sedimentation and the source of their food supply. Archives néerlandaises de zoologie, 10, 171–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walton, C. L., 1919. A contribution to the ecology of some cockle beds. Report of the Lancashire Sea-Fisheries Laboratories, No. 28.Google Scholar
Wright, F. S., 1926. A report on the cockle beds and cockle industry of England and Wales. Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food, Ser. II, 9, No. 5.Google Scholar