Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T16:25:57.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reproduction of the pelagic thresher shark Alopias pelagicus in the equatorial Pacific

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2014

A.F. Romero-Caicedo
Affiliation:
Departamento Central de Investigación, Universidad Laica Eloy Alfaro de Manabí, Ciudadela Universitaria via San Mateo, Manta, Manabí, Ecuador
F. Galván-Magaña*
Affiliation:
Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Avenida I. P. N. s/n, Colonia Playa Palo de Santa Rita, Apartado Postal 592, C.P. 23000, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México
J. Martínez-Ortiz
Affiliation:
Subsecretaría de Recursos Pesqueros, Avenida 4 Calle 12-13, Manta, Manabí, Ecuador
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: F. Galván-Magaña, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Avenida I. P. N. s/n Colonia Playa Palo de Santa Rita, Apartado Postal 592, C.P. 23000, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México email: [email protected]

Abstract

The reproductive biology of the pelagic thresher shark Alopias pelagicus, was analysed based on 241 individuals (101 males and 140 females). Samples were collected from April 2005 to February 2006, from the artisanal fishery in Manta, Ecuador. Males ranged from 68 to 183 cm precaudal length (PL); females ranged from 70 to 180 cm PL. In embryos, sexual proportion was 1F:1M; while in adults the proportion was 1.4F:1M, which suggests sexual segregation in maturing individuals. We showed differences in the development of reproductive structures according to the reproductive condition, and in males the size at maturity occurs at 144.3 cm PL and in females at 151.4 cm PL. We recorded 33 pregnant females that presented one embryo in each uterus in different developmental stages. The results of this study provide information on reproduction of the species that will help to establish an appropriate fisheries management.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Braccini, J.M., Gillanders, B.M. and Walker, T.I. (2006) Determining reproductive parameters for population assessments of chondrichthyan species with asynchronous ovulation and parturition: piked spurdog (Squalus megalops) as a case study. Marine and Freshwater Research 57, 105119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cailliet, G.M. and Bedford, D.W. (1983) The biology of three pelagic sharks from California waters, and their emerging fisheries: a review. California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations Reports 24, 5769.Google Scholar
Castro, J.I. (2009) Observations on the reproductive cycles of some viviparous North American sharks. Aqua: International Journal of Ichthyology 15, 205222.Google Scholar
Chen, C.T., Liu, K.M. and Chang, Y.C. (1997) Reproductive biology of the bigeye thresher Alopias superciliosus (Lowe, 1839) (Chondrichthyes: Alopiidae) in the northwestern Pacific. Ichthyological Research 44, 227235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colonello, J.H., Lucifora, L.O. and Massa, A.M. (2007) Reproduction of the angular angel shark (Squatina guggenheim): geographic differences, reproductive cycle and sexual dimorphism. ICES Journal of Marine Science 64, 131140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demski, L.S. (1990) Elasmobranch reproductive biology: implications for captive breeding. Journal of Aquariculture and Aquatic Science 5, 912.Google Scholar
Gilmore, G.R. (1983) Observations on the embryos of the Longfin Mako, Isurus paucus, and the Bigeye Thresher Alopias superciliosus. Copeia 2, 375382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruber, S.H. and Compagno, L.J. (1981) Taxonomic status and biology of the bigeye thresher Alopias superciliosus. Fishery Bulletin 79, 628632.Google Scholar
Hazin, F.H.V., Fischer, A.F. and Broadhurst, M.K. (2006) Notes on the reproduction of Squalus megalops off northeastern Brazil. Fisheries Research 79, 251257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licandeo, R. and Cerna, F.T. (2007) Geographic variation in life-history traits of the endemic kite skate Dipturus chilensis (Batoidea: Rajidae), along its distribution in the fjords and channels of southern Chile. Journal of Fish Biology 71, 421440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, K.M., Chang, Y.T., Ni, I.H. and Jin, Ch.B. (2006) Spawning per recruit analysis of the pelagic thresher shark, Alopias pelagicus, in the eastern Taiwan waters. Fisheries Research 82, 5664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, K.M., Chen, T.C., Liao, T.H. and Joung, S.J. (1999) Age, growth, and reproduction of the pelagic thresher shark, Alopias pelagicus in the Northwestern Pacific. Copeia 1999, 6874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi-Carlson, L.A., Cortés, E., Parsons, G.R. and Manire, C.A. (2003) Latitudinal variation in life-history traits of bonnethead sharks, Sphyrna tiburo, (Carcharhiniformes: Sphyrnidae) from the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Marine and Freshwater Research 54, 875883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez-Ortíz, J., Galván-Magaña, F., Carrera-Fernández, M., Mendoza-Intriago, D., Estupiñan-Montaño, C. and Cedeño-Figueroa, L. (2007) Abundancia estacional de tiburones desembarcados en Manta—Ecuador. In Martínez-Ortíz, J. and Galván-Magañ, F. (eds) Tiburones en el Ecuador. Casos de estudio. Manta, Ecuador: EPESPO—PMRC, pp. 927.Google Scholar
Mejía-Falla, P.A., Navia, A.F. and Cortés, E. (2012) Reproductive variables of Urotrygon rogersi (Batoidea: Urotrygonidae): a species with a trianual reproductive cycle in the Eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. Journal of Fish Biology 80, 12461266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mollet, H.F., Cliff, G., Pratt, H.L. Jr and Stevens, J.D. (2000) Reproductive biology of females shorfin mako, Isurus oxyrinchus (Rafinesque, 1810) with comments on the embryonic development of lamnoids. Fishery Bulletin 98, 299318.Google Scholar
Natanson, L.J. and Cailliet, G.M. (1986) Reproduction and development of the Pacific angel shark, Squatina californica, off Santa Barbara, California. Copeia 1986, 987994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natanson, L.J. and Gervelis, B.J. (2013) The reproductive biology of the common Thresher shark in the Western North Atlantic Ocean. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142, 15461562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Otake, T. and Mizue, K. (1981) Direct evidence for oophagy in thresher shark, Alopias pelagicus. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 28, 171172.Google Scholar
Polo-Silva, C., Rendón, L. and Galván-Magaña, F. (2009) Diet description in the pelagic thresher sharks (Alopias pelagicus) and bigeye thresher shark (Alopias superciliosus) during rainy season in Ecuadorian waters. Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences 2009, 556571.Google Scholar
Pratt, H.L. and Otake, T. (1990) Recommendations for work needed to increase our knowledge of reproduction relative to fishery management. NOAA Technical Report NMFS 90, 509510.Google Scholar
White, W.T., Platell, M.E. and Potter, I.C. (2001) Relationship between reproductive biology and age composition and growth in Urolophus lobatus (Batoidea: Urolophidae). Marine Biology 138, 135147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wourms, J.P. (1977) Reproduction and development of condrichthyan fishes. American Zoologist 17, 379410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, A., Taniuchi, T. and Shimizu, M. (2000) Geographic variations in reproductive parameters of the starspotted dogfish, Mustelus manazo, from five localities in Japan and in Taiwan. Environmental Biology of Fishes 57, 221233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar