Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:54:40.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a whole-animal method for the histochemical localization of enzymes under field conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. J. Southward  and
Eve C. Southward
A. J. Southward
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
Eve C. Southward
Affiliation:
The Plymouth Laboratory
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Various enzymes have been successfully localized in whole specimens of several groups of marine animals up to 5 mm body thickness. With certain exceptions the animals are fixed for a short time and then incubated in media modified from those designed for sections. After incubation the specimens are stored in fixative or buffer for later serial sectioning back at the laboratory.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , June 1968 , pp. 323 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adams, C. W. M. (ed.), 1965. Neurohistochemistry. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 753 pp.Google Scholar
Adams, C. W. M. & Tuqan, N. A., 1960. The histochemical demonstration of protease by a gelatin-silver film substrate. J. Histochem. Cytochem. Vol. 9, pp. 469–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. R., 1944. The structure and chemical composition of the Golgi element. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 85, pp. 1–71.Google Scholar
Burstone, M. A., 1962. Enzyme Histochemistry and its Application to the Study of Neoplasms. 621 pp. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Burstone, M. S. & Folk, J. E., 1956. Histochemical determination of aminopeptidase. J. Histochem. Cytochem., Vol. 4, pp. 217–26.Google Scholar
Evans, G. W., Whinney, C. L. & Tsou, K. C., 1966. A new histochemical method for acid phosphatase by the use of 5-iodoindoxyl phosphate. J. Histochem. Cytochem., Vol. 14, pp. 171–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flitney, F. W., 1966. The time course of the fixation of albumin for formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, acrolein and other higher aldehydes. J. R. microsc. Soc., Vol. 85, pp. 353–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germino, N. I. & Gerrard, G., 1967. Fresh water invertebrates studied in toto with techniques for cellular enzymes. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., Vol. 20, pp. 653–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glenner, C. G., Cohen, L. A. & Folk, J. E., 1965. The enzymatic hydrolysis of amino acid β-naphthylamides. I. Preparation of amino acid and dipeptide β-naphthylamides. J. Histochem. Cytochem., Vol. 13, pp. 57–64.Google Scholar
Glenner, G. G., Hopsu, V. K. & Cohen, L. A., 1964. New substrates of trypsin and trypsin-like enzymes. J. Histochem. Cytochem., Vol. 12, pp. 545–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halton, D. W. & Jennings, J. B., 1964. Demonstration of the nervous system in the monogenetic trematode Diplozoon paradoxum Nordmann by the indoxyl method for esterases. Nature, Lond., Vol. 202, p. 510.Google Scholar
Hess, R. & Pearse, A. G. E., 1958. The histochemistry of indoxylesterase of rat kidney, with special reference to its cathepsin-like activity. Brit. J. exp. Path., Vol. 39, pp. 292–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Holt, S. J. & Withers, R. F. J., 1952. Cytochemical localization of esterases using indoxyl derivatives. Nature, Lond., Vol. 170, pp. 1012–1014.Google Scholar
Holt, S. J. & Withers, R. F. J., 1958. Studies in enzyme cytochemistry. V. An appraisal of indigogenic reactions for esterase localisation. Proc. R. Soc. B, Vol. 148, pp. 520–32.Google Scholar
Hopsu, V. K. & Pontinen, J., 1964. The motor end plate reaction with naphthol AS Є-aminocaproate. J. Histochem. Cytochem., Vol. 12, pp. 853–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jennings, J. B., 1962a. A histochemical study of digestion and digestive enzymes in the rhynchocoelan Lineus ruber (O. F. Muller). Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 122, pp. 63–72.Google Scholar
Jennings, J. B., 1962b. Further studies on feeding and digestion in triclad turbellaria. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab. Woods Hole, Vol. 123, pp. 571–81.Google Scholar
Jennings, J. B. & Van Der Lande, V. M., 1967. Histochemical and bacteriological studies on digestion in nine species of leeches (Annelida: Hirudinea). Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab. Woods Hole, Vol. 133, pp. 166–83.Google Scholar
Jervis, H. R., 1965. Demonstration of alkaline phosphatase in gross specimens of small intestine. Stain Techn., Vol. 40, pp. 219–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lagunoff, D. & Benditt, E. P., 1964. Benzoylsalicylanilide ester substrates of proteolytic enzymes. Kinetic and histochemical studies. I. Chymotrypsin. Biochemistry, Vol. 3, pp. 1427–31.Google Scholar
Lake, B. D., 1966. The histochemistry of phosphatases: the use of lead acetate instead of lead nitrate. Jl R. microsc. Soc., Vol. 85, pp. 73–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. L., 1964. Esterase enzymes in two free-living nematodes. Proc. helminthol. Soc. Wash., Vol. 31, pp. 285–8.Google Scholar
Lewis, P. R., 1958. A simultaneous coupling azo dye technique suitable for whole mounts. Q. Jl microscop. Sci., Vol. 99, pp. 67–71.Google Scholar
Lillie, R. D., 1965. Histopathologic Technic and Practical Histochemistry. 715 pp. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J. C., 1963. Histochemical demonstration of the activation of rat acetylcholinesterase by sodium cacodylate and cacodylic acid using the thioacetic method. Jl R. microscop. Soc., Vol. 82, pp. 95–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miles, A. E. W. & Linder, J. E., 1952. Polyethylene glycols as histological embedding media. Jl R. microsc. Soc., Vol. 72, pp. 199–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monis, B., Wasserkrug, H. & Seligman, A. M., 1965. Comparison of fixatives and substrates for aminopeptidase. J. Histochem. Cytochem., Vol. 13, pp. 503–9.Google Scholar
Nachlas, M. M., Crawford, D. T. & Seligman, A. M., 1957. The histochemical demonstration of leucine aminopeptidase. J. Histochem. Cytochem., Vol. 5, pp. 264–78.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. G. E., 1960. Histochemistry. Theoretical and Applied, 2nd ed. 998 pp. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Riekinnen, P. J. & Hopsu, V. K., 1965. Studies in the salivary glands. II. Hydrolysis of chromogenic ester substrates. Ann. Med. exp. Biol. Fenniae, Vol. 43, pp. 15–22.Google Scholar
Sabatini, D. D., Bensch, K. G. & Barnett, R. J., 1963. Cytochemistry and electron microscopy. The preservation of cellular ultrastructure and enzymatic activity by aldehyde fixation. J. Cell Biol., Vol. 17, pp. 19–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabatini, D. D., Miller, F. & Barnett, R. J., 1963. Aldehyde fixation for morphological and enzyme histochemical studies with the electron microscope. J. Histochem. Cytochem., Vol. 12, pp. 57–71.Google Scholar
Southward, E. C. & Southward, A. J., 1966. A preliminary account of the general and enzyme histochemistry of Siboglinum atlanticum and other Pogonophora. J. mar. biol. Assoc. U.K., Vol. 46, pp. 579–616.Google Scholar
Ushakov, B., 1964. Thermostability of cells and proteins of poikilotherms and its significance in speciation. Physiol. Rev., Vol. 44, pp. 518–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanha-Perttula, T., 1966. Esterases of the rat adenohypophysis. Cellular localization and activity in relation to secretory activity. Acta Physiol. scand., Vol. 69, suppl. 283, 104 pp.Google Scholar
Vanha-Perttula, T. P. J. & Hopsu, V. K., 1965. Esterolytic and proteolytic enzymes of the rat adenohypophysis. II. Chromatographic fractionation and characterization of enzyme activity hydrolysing leucyl β-naphthylamide. Ann. Med. exp. Biol. fenniae, Vol. 43, pp. 32–9.Google Scholar
Vanha-Perttula, T. P. J. & Hopsu, V. K., 1966. The ovarial enzymes hydrolysing L-leucyl and DL-alanyl β-naphthylamide. Histochemie, Bd. 6, pp. 34–45.Google ScholarPubMed
Vanha-Perttula, T., Hopsu, V. K., Sonninen, V. & Glenner, G. G., 1965. Cathepsin C activity as related to some histochemical substrates. Histochemie, Bd. 5, pp. 170–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wachstein, M. & Meisel, E., 1957. Histochemistry of hepatic phosphatases at physiologic pH. Amer. J. clin. Path., Vol. 27, pp. 13–23.Google Scholar
Wachstein, M., Meisel, E. & Falcon, C., 1961. Histochemistry of thiolacetic acid esterase: a comparison with non-specific esterase, with special regard to the effect of fixatives and inhibitors on intracellular localization. J. Histochem. Cytochem., Vol. 9, pp. 325–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B., 1958. The distribution of esterase in the nervous system and other tissues of the insect Rhodnius prolixus. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 99, pp. 441–50.Google Scholar