Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:42:22.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Notes on the biology of Sertularia argentea L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

D. A. Hancock
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex
R. E. Drinnan
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex
W. N. Harris
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Burnham-on-Crouch, Essex

Extract

A fishery has developed in recent years in this country for certain hydroids collectively termed ‘white weed’. The hydroids, particularly Sertularia and, more recently, Hydrallmania, are raked up from the sea-bed, processed, dyed and used, largely in the United States of America, for decorative purposes. Fishing for white weed is not new, for it was practised in Germany between the wars. German scientists, notably von Reitzenstein (1913), Pax (1928), and Thiel (1938), examined various aspects of the fishery, and of biology of the hydroids concerned.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beneden, E. Van, 1866. Recherches sur la faune littorale de Belgique, Polypes. Mém. Acad. R. Belg. Cl. Sci., T. 36.Google Scholar
Broch, H., 1918. Hydroida (Part II). Dan. Ingolf-Exped., Vol. 5, pp. 1205.Google Scholar
Broch, H., 1928. Hydrozoa I. Tierwelt N.- u. Ostsee, Teil 3b, pp. 1–100 (Lief. 13).Google Scholar
Browne, E. T., 1907. A new method for growing hydroids in small aquaria by means of a continuous current tube. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 8, pp. 3743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichelbaum, E., 1912. Die Seemoosfischerei an der Kuste von Ostfriesland. Abh. dtsch. Seefisch Ver., Bd. 12, pp. 5394.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. & Solander, D., 1786. The Natural History of many Curious and Uncommon Zoophytes collected from various parts of the Globe, 208 pp. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goette, A., 1907. Vergleichende Entwicklungsgeschichte der Geschlechtsindividuen der Hydropolypen. Z. wiss. Zool., Bd. 87, pp. 1335.Google Scholar
Haddow, A. J., 1936. The growth of Sertularia. Rep. Scot. mar. biol. Ass., 1936–7, pp. 89.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. J., 1944. Caprellidea. 27 pp. London: Linnean Society.Google Scholar
Hincks, T., 1868. A History of the British Hydroid Zoophytes. 2 vols. London: John van Voorst.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, O. D., 1925. The food of the bottom fauna of the Plymouth fishing grounds. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 13, pp. 560–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramp, P. L., 1938. Marine Hydrozoa. Hydroids. The Zoology of Iceland, Vol. 2, 82 pp.Google Scholar
Leloup, E., 1938. Quelques Hydraires des Côtes orientale et occidentale. Mém. Mus. Hist. nat. Belg., T. 14, pp. 19.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1758. Systema Naturae. 10th ed. Lipsaiae.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C., 1767. Systema Naturae. 12th ed. Holmiae.Google Scholar
Mclean, Fraser C., 1944. Hydroids of the Atlantic Coast of North America. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mistakidis, M. N. The biology of Pandalus montagui Leach. (In the Press.)Google Scholar
Nutting, C. C., 1904. American Hydroids. Part II. The Sertularüdae. Smithsonian Inst. U.S. Nat. Mus.Google Scholar
Ferdinand, Pax, 1928. Seemoos. Rohstoffed. Tierreichs, Lief. I, pp. 929, 10text-figs.Google Scholar
Reitzenstein, E. Von, 1913. Das Seemoos und das Korallenmoos, ihre Fischerei, ihre Lebens. Abh. dtsch. SeefischVer., Bd. 12, pp. 150.Google Scholar
Teissier, G., 1923. Recherches sur Dynamena pumila (L.). Trav. Sta. biol. Roscoff, T. 1, pp. 159.Google Scholar
Thiel, M. E., 1938. Naturgeschichte des Seemooses. Handb. Seefisch. Nordeurop., Bd. 3, 34 pp.Google Scholar