Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:05:18.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Notes on an escallop (Pecten maximus) population in Holyhead harbour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. H. Baird
R. H. Baird
Affiliation:
From the Fisheries Experiment Station, Conway, Caernarvonshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The sampling of a discrete unfished population of escallops at Holyhead by diving showed that there was no influx into the area of escallops at any age or size, other than by spat settlement. The success or otherwise of the spat settlement, which was very variable, determined the age- and size-distribution of the population. Evidence is adduced that normal dredge sampling gear is very selective or, if it is made unselective, becomes too laborious to use because of the low densities of escallops. In a commercially fished population the failure to catch the smaller escallops by the sampling dredges, combined with the fishing off of the larger ones, makes the age-distribution of the population appear always to be dominated by the 2- or 3-year-old escallops. The great variability of the success of year-classes is masked by this sampling selection combined with the effects of commercial fishing.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 1966 , pp. 33 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baird, R. H., 1952. The English Channel escallop beds. Fishg News, Aberd., No. 2064, p. 9.Google Scholar
Baird, R. H., 1955. A preliminary report on a new type of commercial escallop dredge. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 20, pp. 290–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, R. H., 1957. Factors affecting the efficiency of dredges. Modern Fishing Gear of the World, 1959, pp. 222–4. London: Fishing News Books Ltd.Google Scholar
Baird, R. H., 1958. On the swimming behaviour of escallops (Pecten maximus L.). Proc. malac. Soc. Lond., Vol. 33, pp. 67–71.Google Scholar
Baird, R. H. & Gibson, F. A., 1956. Underwater observations on escallop (Pecten maximus L.) beds. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 35, pp. 555–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beverton, R. J. H. & Holt, S. J., 1956. A review of methods for estimating mortality rates in exploited fish populations with special reference to sources of bias in catch sampling. Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 140, pp. 67–83.Google Scholar
Dakin, W. J., 1909. Pecten, the edible scallop. Mem. Lanes. Sea Fish. Comm., No. 17. Also in Rep. Lanes. Sea-Fish. Labs., No. 17, pp. 231–366.Google Scholar
Dickie, L. M., 1955. Fluctuations in abundance of the giant scallop Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin) in the Digby area of the Bay of Fundy. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., Vol. 12, pp. 797–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbridge, W. S., 1953. A population study of the Tasmanian ‘commercial’ scallop, Notovola meridionalis (Tate) (Lamellibranchiata, Pectinidae). Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res., Vol. 4, pp. 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faure, L., 1956. La coquille Saint-Jaques Pecten maximus L. de la rade de Brest. Rev. Trav. Inst. Peck, mark., T. 20, pp. 119–31.Google Scholar
Gibson, F. A., 1956. Escallops Pecten maximus L. in Irish waters. Sci. Proc. R. Dubl. Soc, Vol. 27, pp. 253–70.Google Scholar
Mason, J., 1957. The age and growth of the scallop, Pecten maximus L., in Manx waters. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 473–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J., 1958. The breeding of the scallop, Pecten maximus L., in Manx waters. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 37, pp. 653–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, A. M., 1955. Underwater studies on the Tasmanian commercial scallop, Notovola meridionalis (Tate) (Lamellibranchiata Pectinidae). Aust. J. mar. Freshwat. Res., Vol. 6, pp. 392–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palenichko, Z. G., 1948. On the biology of Mytilus edulis in the White Sea. Zool. Zh., Vol. 27, pp. 411–20.Google Scholar
Posgay, J. A., 1963. Tagging as a technique in population studies of the sea scallop. Spec. Publs int. Commn NW. Atlant. Fish., No. 4, pp. 268–71.Google Scholar
Tang, S. F., 1941. The breeding of the scallop Pecten maximus (L.) with a note on the growth rate. Proc. Trans. Lpool biol. Soc, Vol. 54, pp. 9–28.Google Scholar
Walford, L. A., 1946. A new graphic method of describing the growth of animals. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 90, pp. 141–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamomota, G., 1950. Ecological note of the spawning cycle of the scallop, Pecten yessoensis (Jay) in Mutsu Bay. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ., Ser. 4, Vol. 18, pp.477–81.Google Scholar