Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:09:57.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Not all that clear cut: intraspecific morphological variability in Squalus blainville (Risso, 1827) and implications for identification of the species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2015

Juan José Bonello*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida MSD2080, Malta
Leanne Bonnici
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida MSD2080, Malta
Alice Ferrari
Affiliation:
Department of Biological, Geological & Environmental Sciences (BiGeA), University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Alessia Cariani
Affiliation:
Department of Biological, Geological & Environmental Sciences (BiGeA), University of Bologna, via Selmi 3, 40126 Bologna, Italy
Patrick J. Schembri
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida MSD2080, Malta
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: J.J. Bonello, Department of Biology, University of Malta, Msida MSD2080, Malta email: [email protected]

Abstract

Of the three species of the genus Squalus that occur in the Mediterranean Sea, S. blainville and S. megalops are very difficult to distinguish. This study assesses the variability in morphological features that have been used to differentiate between these species. Squalus were collected from stations within the 25-nautical mile Fisheries Management Zone around the Maltese Islands; 349 specimens were dissected and categorized into male and female, mature and immature, and individuals were randomly selected from each category to make up a sample of 169 specimens. For each individual, total length and first dorsal fin parameters were measured, and morphology of denticles isolated from the laterodorsal area, of the upper and lower teeth and of the chondrocranium was analysed. The first dorsal spine was shorter that the fin base in 93% of the specimens, which is typical of S. megalops; this character was not related to either gender or maturity. Chondrocrania with one lateral process (typical of S. blainville) and two lateral processes (typical of S. megalops) were present. Teeth from the same individuals showed morphological features that overlap between S. blainville and S. megalops. Both unicuspid (typical of S. megalops) and tricuspid denticles (typical of S. blainville) were observed on the same individuals. Twelve specimens (six having one and six having two lateral chondrocranial processes) were analysed genetically by sequencing of the mtDNA marker Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit I (COI). All resulted to be S. blainville showing that intraspecific variability in supposedly diagnostic morphological features is large enough to render these unreliable to tell apart these two species, especially in the field.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abiadh, A., Chetoui, M., Lamine-Cheniti, T., Capanna, E. and Colangelo, P. (2010) Molecular phylogenetics of the genus Gerbillus (Rodentia, Gerbillinae): implications for systematics, taxonomy and chromosomal evolution. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 56, 513518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bigelow, H.B. and Schroeder, W.C. (1957) A study of the sharks of the suborder Squaloidea. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 117, 1150.Google Scholar
Bookstein, F.L. (1997) Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis 1, 225243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradai, M., Saidi, B. and Enajjar, S. (2012) Elasmobranchs of the Mediterranean and Black Sea: status, ecology and biology. General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM) Studies and Reviews, No. 91. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, p. 103.Google Scholar
Chen, C., Taniuchi, T. and Nose, Y. (1979) Blainville's dogfish, Squalus blainville, from Japan, with notes on S. mitsukurii and S. japonicus . Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 26, 2642.Google Scholar
Compagno, L.J.V. (1984) Squaliformes – Dogfish sharks. In Fischer, W. and Nauen, C. (eds) FAO Species Catalogue. Volume 4. Sharks of the World. An annotated and illustrated catalogue of shark species known to date. Part 1 – Hexanchiformes to Lamniformes. Rome: FAO Fish Synopses, p. 249.Google Scholar
Doyle, J.J. and Doyle, J.L. (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochemistry Bulletin 19, 1115.Google Scholar
Ebert, D.A. and Stehman, M.F. (2013) Sharks, batoids, and chimaeras of the North Atlantic. FAO Species Catalogue for Fishery Purposes 7 (Rome). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, pp. 5666.Google Scholar
Ebert, D.A., White, W.T., Goldman, K.J., Compagno, L.J.V., Engel, T.S.D. and Ward, R.D. (2010) Resurrection and redescription of Squalus suckleyi (Girard, 1854) from the North Pacific, with comments on the Squalus acanthias subgroup (Squaliformes: Squalidae). Zootaxa 40, 2240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2015) Fisheries and Aquaculture Department. Aquatic Species Fact Sheets. http://www.fao.org/fishery/species/search/en.Google Scholar
Farré, M., Tuset, V.M., Maynou, F., Recasens, L. and Lombarte, A. (2013) Geometric morphology as an alternative for measuring the diversity of fish assemblages. Ecological Indicators 29, 159166.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferdous, S. and Armbruster, J.W. (2012) ACSI II Guide to Geometric Morphometrics in MorphoJ. Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 35 pp. http://www.auburn.edu/~armbrjw/gmguide.pdf.Google Scholar
Garrick, J.A.F. (1960) Studies on New Zealand Elasmobranchii. Part XII. The species of Squalus from New Zealand and Australia; and a general account and key to the New Zealand Squalidae. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 88, 519557.Google Scholar
Garrick, J.A.F. (1961) A note on the spelling of the specific name of the immaculate spiny dogfish, Squalus blainvillei (Risso 1826). Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 88, 843.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, M. (1968) Anatomical preparations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kendall, D.G. (1977) The diffusion of shape author. Advances in Applied Probability 9, 428430.Google Scholar
Klingenberg, C.P. (2011) MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources 11, 353357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knudsen, J.W. (1966) Biological techniques; collecting, preserving, and illustrating plants and animals. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Landi, M., Dimech, M., Arculeo, M., Biondo, G., Martins, R., Carneiro, M., Carvhalho, G.R., Lo Brutto, S. and Costa, F.O. (2014) DNA barcoding for species assignment: the case of Mediterranean marine fishes. PLoS ONE 9, e106135. 5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Last, P., White, W., Pogonosk, J., Gledhill, D., Yearsley, G., Ward, R. and Pogonosk, J. (2007) Part 1 – Application of a rapid taxonomic approach to the genus Squalus . In Last, P., White, W. and Pogonoski, J. (eds) Descriptions of new dogfishes of the genus Squalus (Squaloidea–Squalidae) . Aspendale: CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, pp. 19.Google Scholar
Lo Brutto, S., Curatolo, T., Calvaruso, C. and Galil, B.S. (2013) Geometric morphometry supports a taxonomic revision of the Mediterranean Bathyporeia guilliamsoniana (Spence Bate, 1857) (Amphipoda, Bathyporeiidae). Crustaceana 86, 820828.Google Scholar
Marouani, S., Chaâba, R., Kadri, H., Saidi, B., Bouain, A., Maltagliati, F., Last, P., Séret, B. and Nejmeddine Bradai, M. (2012) Taxonomic research on Squalus megalops (Macleay, 1881) and Squalus blainvillei (Risso, 1827) (Chondrichthyes: Squalidae) in Tunisian waters (central Mediterranean Sea). Scientia Marina 76, 97109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MEDITS (2013) International bottom trawl survey in the Mediterranean. Instruction manual Version 7. MEDITS Working Group, 120 pp. http://www.sibm.it/MEDITS%202011/docs/Medits_Handbook_2013_version_7_25092013.pdf.Google Scholar
Muñoz-Chápuli, R. and Ramos, F. (1989) Morphological comparison of Squalus blainvillei and S. megalops in the Eastern Atlantic, with notes on the genus. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology 36, 621.Google Scholar
Nieto, A., Ralph, G.M., Comeros-Raynal, M.T., Kemp, J., García Criado, M., Allen, D.J., Dulvy, N.K., Walls, R.H.L., Russell, B., Pollard, D., García, S., Craig, M., Collette, B.B., Pollom, R., Biscoito, M., Labbish Chao, N., Abella, A., Afonso, P., Álvarez, H., Carpenter, K.E., Clò, S., Cook, R., Costa, M.J., Delgado, J., Dureuil, M., Ellis, J.R., Farrell, E.D., Fernandes, P., Florin, A-B., Fordham, S., Fowler, S., Gil de Sola, L., Gil Herrera, J., Goodpaster, A., Harvey, M., Heessen, H., Herler, J., Jung, A., Karmovskaya, E., Keskin, C., Knudsen, S.W., Kobyliansky, S., Kovačić, M., Lawson, J.M., Lorance, P., McCully Phillips, S., Munroe, T., Nedreaas, K., Nielsen, J., Papaconstantinou, C., Polidoro, B., Pollock, C.M., Rijnsdorp, A.D., Sayer, C., Scott, J., Serena, F., Smith-Vaniz, W.F., Soldo, A., Stump, E. and Williams, J.T. (2015) European red list of marine fishes. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 84 pp. doi: 10.2779/082723.Google Scholar
Ragonese, S., Vitale, S., Dimech, M. and Mazzola, S. (2013) Abundances of demersal sharks and chimaera from 1994–2009 scientific surveys in the central Mediterranean Sea. PLoS ONE 8, e74865.Google Scholar
Saitou, N. and Nei, M. (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4, 406425.Google Scholar
Serena, F. (2005) FAO Species identification guide for Fishery Purposes. Field identification guide to the sharks and rays of the Mediterranean and Black Sea. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 124 pp.Google Scholar
Song, H., Buhay, J.E., Whiting, M.F. and Crandall, K.A. (2008) Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105, 1348613491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamura, K., Stecher, G., Peterson, D., Filipski, A. and Kumar, S. (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, 27252729.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. and Gibson, T.J. (1994) CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22, 46734680.Google Scholar
Ward, R.D., Holmes, B.H., Zemlak, T.S. and Smith, P.J. (2007) Part 12 – DNA barcoding discriminates spurdogs of the genus Squalus . In Last, P., White, W. and Pogonoski, J. (eds) Descriptions of new dogfishes of the genus Squalus (Squaloidea–Squalidae) . Aspendale: CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, pp. 117130.Google Scholar
Ward, R.D., Zemlak, T.S., Innes, B.H., Last, P.R. and Hebert, P.D.N. (2005) DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences 360, 18471857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, W., Yearsley, G. and Last, P. (2007) Part 11 – Clarification of the status of Squalus tasmaniensis and a diagnosis of Squalus acanthias from Australia, including a key to the Indo–Australasian species of Squalus . In Last, P., White, W. and Pogonoski, J. (eds) Descriptions of new dogfishes of the genus Squalus (Squaloidea–Squalidae). Aspendale: CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, pp. 109115.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Bonello supplementary material

Supplementary Table A

Download Bonello supplementary material(File)
File 21.8 KB