Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:03:53.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of heavy infestations of Polydora ciliata on the flesh content of Mytilus edulis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. M. L. Kent
R. M. L. Kent
Affiliation:
School of Environmental Sciences, Plymouth Polytechnic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The dry weight condition index and water content of two groups of mussels, one with heavy infestations and the other with mild infestations of Polydora ciliata, were determined over a period of 15 consecutive months. The results were seasonally variable, but for most months the heavily infested mussels had a condition index significantly lower, and a water content significantly higher, than the mildly infested mussels. This suggests that heavy infestations of P. ciliata are associated with reduced flesh content in mussels.

Further analyses of the body components of the two groups of mussels, showed that the mantle tissue of heavily infested mussels was reduced much more than the nonmantle tissue. Since the mantle is the main repository of gametes, this suggests that heavy infestations of P. ciliata might lower the fecundity of mussels.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 59 , Issue 2 , May 1979 , pp. 289 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baird, R. H., 1966. Factors affecting the growth and condition of mussels. Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, series 2, 25 (2), 33 pp.Google Scholar
Bayne, B. L., 1972. Some effects of stress in the adult on the larval development of Mytilus edulis. Nature, London, 237, 459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayne, B. L., 1973. Reproduction in bivalve molluscs under stress. In The Physiological Ecology of Estuarine Organisms (ed. Vernberg, J.), pp. 259–277. University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Bayne, B. L., 1975. Aspects of physiological condition in Mytilus edulis L., with special reference to the effects of oxygen tension and salinity. In Proceedings of the Ninth European Marine Biology Symposium, Oban, Scotland, 1974 (ed. Barnes, H.), pp. 213–238. Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Bayne, B. L., Gabbott, P. A. & Widdows, J., 1975. Some effects of stress in the adults on the eggs and larvae of Mytilus edulis L. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 675–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, J. A. & Evans, J. W., 1973. Polydora and other genera as borers in mollusk shells and other calcareous substrates. Veliger, 15, 235–249.Google Scholar
Crisp, D. J., 1971. Energy flow measurements. In Methods for the Study of Marine Benthos (ed. Holme, N. A. and Mclntyre, A. D.), pp. 197–279. Oxford: Blackwell. [IBP Handbook no. 16.]Google Scholar
Crowley, M., 1972. The parasitology of Irish mussels (Mytilus edulis). International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (CM. Papers and Reports, K: 8, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Dare, P. J. & Edwards, D. B., 1975. Seasonal changes in flesh weight and biochemical com-position of mussels (Mytilus edulis L.) in the Conway Estuary, North Wales. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 18, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daro, M. H. & Polk, P., 1973. The autecology of Polydora ciliata along the Belgian coast. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 6, 130–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, N. M. & Hillman, R. E., 1971. The effect of artificial shell damage on sex determination in oysters. Proceedings. National Shellfisheries Association, 61, 2.Google Scholar
Dethlefsen, V., 1975. The influence of Mytilicola intestinalis Steur on the meat content of Mytilus edulis L. Aquaculture, 6, 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., 1921. Résumé de nos principales connaissances pratiques sur les maladies et les ennemis de l'huître. Notes et mémoires. Office scientifique et technique des pêches maritimes, no. 7, 46 pp.Google Scholar
Dorsett, D. A., 1961. The reproduction and maintenance of Polydora ciliata (Johnst.) at Whit-stable. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 41, 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, M., 1966. Life cycle of Ostrea permallis and its relationship to the host sponge Stellatta grubii. Bulletin of Marine Science, 16, 273–301.Google Scholar
Gabbott, P. A. & Bayne, B. L., 1973. Biochemical effects of temperature and nutritive stress on Mytilus edulis L. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 53, 269–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giese, A. C., 1969. A new approach to the biochemical composition of the mollusc body. Oceanography and Marine Biology, an Annual Review, 7, 175–229.Google Scholar
Korringa, P., 1951. The shell of Ostrea edulis as a habitat. Archives neerlandises de zoologie, 10 32–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korringa, P., 1952. Recent advances in oyster biology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 27, 266–308, and 339–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lamy, E. & André, M., 1937. Annelides perforant les coquilles Mollusques. 12th International Congress of Zoology, pp. 946–968.Google Scholar
Lebour, M. V., 1907. The mussel beds of Northumberland. Northumberland Sea Fisheries Report for 1906, 21 pp.Google Scholar
Leloup, E., 1937. Contributions a l'étude de la faune beige. VIII. Les dégâts causés par le ver polychète Polydora ciliata (Johnston) dans les coquilles des bigorneaux et les huîtres. Bulletin du Musée royale d'histcire naturelle de Belgique, 13 (33), 4 Pp.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. R., 1964. Ecology of Rocky Shores. 323 pp. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loosanoff, V. L., 1957. New method for the control of several oyster enemies and competitors. Bulletin of the Fisheries Biological Laboratory, 21, 6 pp.Google Scholar
Loosanoff, V. L. & Engle, J. B., 1943. Polydora in oysters suspended in the water. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 85, 69–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mckenzie, C. L. & Shearer, L. W., 1961. Chemical control of Polydora websteri and other annelids inhabiting oyster shells. Proceedings. National Shellfisheries Association, 50, 105.Google Scholar
Mackin, J. G., 1950. The Effect of Crude Petroleum on Oysters Heavily Infected with Polydora, Cliona, and Martesia. 5 pp. Texas A. & M. Research Foundation, Project Nine. [Mimeo.]Google Scholar
Malek, E. A. & Cheng, T. C., 1974. Medical and Economic Malacology. 398 pp. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Narain, A. S., 1973. The amoebocytes of lamellibranch molluscs, with special reference to the circulating amoebocytes. Malacological Review, 6, 1–12.Google Scholar
Owen, H. M., 1957. Etiological studies on oyster mortality. II. Polydora websteri Hartman (Polychaeta: Spionidae). Bulletin of Marine Science of the Gulf and Caribbean, 7, 35–46.Google Scholar
Pillai, T. G., 1965. Annelida Polychaeta from the Phillipines and Indonesia. Ceylon Journal of Science. Biological Sciences, 5, 110–177.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. M., 1954. Handbook for Oyster-Farmers. 21 pp. C.S.I.R.O. Division of Fisheries Circular no. 3.Google Scholar
Vance, R. R., 1973. On reproductive strategies in marine benthic invertebrates. American Natura-list, 107, 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walne, P. R., 1970. The seasonal variation of meat and glycogen content of seven populations of oysters Osirea edulis L. and a review of the literature. Fishery Investigations. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, series 2, 26 (3), 35 pp.Google Scholar
Wlejsma, T. C., 1975. pH fluctuations in Mytilus edulis L. in relation to the shell movements under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. In Proceedings of the Ninth European Marine Biology Symposium, Oban, Scotland, 1974 (ed. Barnes, H.), pp. 139–149. Aberdeen University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, C. S., 1968. The influence of Polydora ciliata (Johnst.) on the degree of parasitism of Mytilus edulis L. by Mytilicola intestinalis Steur. Journal of Animal Ecology, 37, 709–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. S., 1969. The effect of Mytilicola intestinalis on the biochemical composition of mussels. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 161–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwann, A. De & Zandee, D. I., 1972. Body distribution and seasonal changes in glycogen con-tent of the common sea mussel Mytilus edulis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 43A, 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar