Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T02:01:18.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of macroalgal morphology on marine epifaunal diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2019

Su Xuan Gan ,
Ywee Chieh Tay  and
Danwei Huang Open the ORCID record for Danwei Huang [Opens in a new window]
Su Xuan Gan
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117558, Singapore
Ywee Chieh Tay
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117558, Singapore Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore, 18 Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119227, Singapore
Danwei Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 16 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117558, Singapore Tropical Marine Science Institute, National University of Singapore, 18 Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119227, Singapore
*
Author for correspondence: Danwei Huang, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Macroalgae play important ecological roles, including as hosts for a wide range of epifauna. However, the diversity relationships between macroalgae and epifauna are poorly understood for most tropical host species and algal morphologies. This study aims to characterize and analyse the diversity of invertebrates present amongst macroalgae with three distinct morphologies (three-dimensional, filamentous and foliose) across different tropical intertidal sites in Singapore. Morphological and DNA barcoding tools were employed for epifaunal species identification, and ordination statistics and multiple linear regression were used to test the effects of algal morphology, species and site on community structure and diversity of epiphytic invertebrates. Overall, epifaunal communities were distinct among sites and algal morphologies, and diversity was affected significantly by algal morphology. In particular, filamentous macroalgae hosted the highest abundance of epifauna dominated mainly by amphipods, which were able to take advantage of the high surface area to volume ratio in filamentous algal mats as a consequence of their thinner forms. Foliose species showed a significantly negative effect on invertebrate diversity. Our findings highlight the diverse associations between intertidal macroalgae and invertebrates with high turnover between algal morphology and sites that contribute to the high biodiversity of tropical shores. Future studies should consider the effects of the host habitat, seasonality and more algal species on epifaunal diversity.

Keywords

Algal morphologybiodiversitycommunity structureDNA barcodingepifaunaintertidalSouth-east Asiatropical shores
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 99 , Issue 8 , December 2019 , pp. 1697 - 1707
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altschul, SF, Gish, W, Miller, W, Myers, EW and Lipman, DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 23, 403–410.Google Scholar
Antoniadou, C and Chintiroglou, C (2006) Trophic relationships of polychaetes associated with different algal growth forms. Helgoland Marine Research 60, 39–49.Google Scholar
Bamber, RN and Davis, MH (1982) Feeding of Achelia echinata Hodge (Pycnogonida) on marine algae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 60, 181–187.Google Scholar
Beckley, LE and McLachlan, A (1980) Studies on the littoral seaweed epifauna of St. Croix Island 2. Composition and summer standing stock. South African Journal of Zoology 15, 170–176.Google Scholar
Belton, GS, Prud'homme van Reine, WF, Huisman, JM, Draisma, SGA and D Gurgel, CF (2014) Resolving phenotypic plasticity and species designation in the morphologically challenging Caulerpa racemosa-peltata complex (Caulerpaceae, Chlorophyta). Journal of Phycology 50, 32–54.Google Scholar
Bracken, MES, Gonzalez-Dorantes, CA and Stachowicz, JJ (2007) Whole-community mutualism: associated invertebrates facilitate a dominant habitat-forming seaweed. Ecology 88, 2211–2219.Google Scholar
Bray, JR and Curtis, JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecological Monographs 27, 325–349.Google Scholar
Bruno, JF, Boyer, KE, Duffy, JE, Lee, SC and Kertesz, JS (2005) Effects of macroalgal species identity and richness on primary production in benthic marine communities. Ecology Letters 8, 1165–1174.Google Scholar
Bucklin, A, Steinke, D and Bianco-Bercial, L (2011) DNA barcoding of marine metazoa. Annual Review of Marine Science 3, 471–508.Google Scholar
Buss, LW (1979) Bryozoan overgrowth interactions – the interdependence of competition for space and food. Nature 281, 475–477.Google Scholar
Cacabelos, E, Olabarria, C, Incera, M and Troncoso, JS (2010) Effects of habitat structure and tidal height on epifaunal assemblages associated with macroalgae. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 89, 43–52.Google Scholar
Chou, LM, Huang, D, Tan, KS, Toh, TC, Goh, BPL and Tun, K (2018) Singapore. In Sheppard, CRC (ed.), World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation. Volume II: The Indian Ocean to the Pacific. London: Academic Press, pp. 539–558.Google Scholar
Christie, H, Jørgensen, NM, Norderhaug, KM and Waage-Nielsen, E (2003) Species distribution and habitat exploitation of fauna associated with kelp (Laminaria hyperborea) along the Norwegian coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 83, 687–699.Google Scholar
Christie, H, Norderhaug, KM and Fredriksen, S (2009) Macrophytes as habitat for fauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series 396, 221–233.Google Scholar
Colman, J (1940) On the faunas inhabiting intertidal seaweeds. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 24, 129–183.Google Scholar
Davenport, J, Butler, A and Cheshire, A (1999) Epifaunal composition and fractal dimensions of marine plants in relation to emersion. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 79, 351–355.Google Scholar
De Burgh, ME and Fankboner, PV (1978) A nutritional association between the bull kelp Nereocystis luetkeana and its epizooic bryozoan Membranipora membranacea. Oikos 31, 69–72.Google Scholar
Dean, RL and Connell, JH (1987) Marine invertebrates in algal succession. III. Mechanisms linking habitat complexity with diversity. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 109, 249–273.Google Scholar
DeBlois, EM and Leggett, WC (1993) Importance of biotic and abiotic regulators of abundance of the intertidal amphipod Calliopius laeviusculus (Amphipoda: Gammaridae) and assessment of the accuracy and precision of sampling methods for detecting abundance changes. Marine Biology 115, 75–83.Google Scholar
Desmond, MJ, Suárez-Jiménez, R, Nelson, WA and Hepburn, CD (2018) Epifaunal community structure within southern New Zealand kelp forests. Marine Ecology Progress Series 596, 71–81.Google Scholar
Doi, H, Matsumasa, M, Fujikawa, M, Kanou, K, Suzuki, T and Kikuchi, E (2009) Macroalgae and seagrass contribution to gastropods in sub-tropical and temperate tidal flats. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 89, 399–404.Google Scholar
Dommasnes, A (1969) On the fauna of Corallina officinalis L. in western Norway. Sarsia 38, 71–86.Google Scholar
Downes, BJ, Lake, PS, Schreiber, ESG and Glaister, A (2000) Habitat structure, resources and diversity: the separate effects of surface roughness and macroalgae on stream invertebrates. Oecologia 123, 569–581.Google Scholar
Du, G, Wu, F, Mao, Y, Guo, S, Xue, H and Bi, G (2014) DNA barcoding assessment of green macroalgae in coastal zone around Qingdao, China. Journal of Oceanic and Coastal Research 13, 97–103.Google Scholar
Duarte, C, Jaramillo, E, Contreras, H and Navarro, J (2009) Importance of macroalgae subsidy on the abundance and population biology of the amphipod Orchestoidea tuberculata (Nicolet) on sandy beaches of south central Chile. Journal of Marine Biology and Oceanography 44, 691–702.Google Scholar
Dudley, TL, Cooper, SD and Hemphill, N (1986) Effects of macroalgae on a stream invertebrate community. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 5, 93–106.Google Scholar
Edgar, GJ (1991) Artificial algae as habitats for mobile epifauna: factors affecting colonization in a Japanese Sargassum bed. Hydrobiologia 226, 111–118.Google Scholar
Edgar, RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32, 1792–1797.Google Scholar
Edwards, A (1980) Ecological studies of the kelp, Laminaria hyperborea, and its associated fauna in south-west Ireland. Ophelia 19, 47–60.Google Scholar
Finke, DL and Synder, WE (2008) Niche partitioning increases resource exploitation by diverse communities. Science 321, 1488–1490.Google Scholar
Folmer, O, Black, M, Hoeh, W, Lutz, R and Vrijenhoek, R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3, 294–299.Google Scholar
Gee, JM and Warwick, RM (1994 a) Body-size distribution in a marine metazoan community and the fractal dimensions of macroalgae. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 178, 247–259.Google Scholar
Gee, JM and Warwick, RM (1994 b) Metazoan community structure in relation to the fractal dimensions of marine macroalgae. Marine Ecology Progress Series 103, 141–150.Google Scholar
Geller, J, Meyer, C, Parker, M and Hawk, H (2013) Redesign of PCR primers for mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I for marine invertebrates and application in all-taxa biotic surveys. Molecular Ecology Resources 13, 851–861.Google Scholar
Gestoso, I, Olabarria, C and Troncoso, JS (2012) Effects of macroalgal identity on epifaunal assemblages: native species vs the invasive species Sargassum muticum. Helgoland Marine Research 66, 159–166.Google Scholar
Gestoso, I, Olabarria, C and Troncoso, JS (2014) Selection of habitat by a marine amphipod. Marine Ecology 35, 103–110.Google Scholar
Gibben, PE and Wright, JT (2006) Invasive seaweed enhances recruitment of a native bivalve: roles of refuge from predation and the habitat choice of recruits. Marine Ecology Progress Series 318, 177–185.Google Scholar
Grabowski, JH, Hughes, AR, Kimbro, DL and Dolan, MA (2005) How habitat setting influences restored oyster reef communities. Ecology 86, 1926–1935.Google Scholar
Guerra-Garcia, JM and Koonjul, MS (2005) Metaprotella sandalensis (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Caprellidae): a bioindicator of nutrient enrichment on coral reefs? A preliminary study at Mauritius island. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 104, 353–367.Google Scholar
Hacker, SD and Steneck, RS (1990) Habitat architecture and the abundance and body-size-dependent habitat selection of a phytal amphipod. Ecology 71, 2269–2285.Google Scholar
Hagerman, L (1966) The macro and microfauna associated with Fucus serratus L. with some ecological remarks. Ophelia 3, 1–43.Google Scholar
Hajibabaei, M, Singer, GAC, Hebert, PDN and Hickey, DA (2007) DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. Trends in Genetics 23, 167–172.Google Scholar
Händeler, K and Wägele, H (2007) Preliminary study on molecular phylogeny of Sacoglossa and a compilation of their food organisms. Bonner Zoologische Beiträge 55, 231–254.Google Scholar
Hayward, PJ (1980) Invertebrate epiphytes of coastal marine algae. In Price, JH, Irvine, DEG and Farnham, WF (eds), The Shore Environment, Vol. 2: Ecosystems. London: Academic Press, pp. 761–787.Google Scholar
Hebert, PDN, Ratnasingham, S and de Waard, JR (2003 a) Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 270, S96–S99.Google Scholar
Hebert, PDN, Cywinska, A, Ball, SL and deWaard, JR (2003 b) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 270, 313–321.Google Scholar
Hebert, PDN, deWaard, JR and Landry, JF (2010) DNA barcodes for 1/1000 of the animal kingdom. Biology Letters 6, 359–362.Google Scholar
Hoey, AS and Bellwood, DR (2011) Suppression of herbivory by macroalgal density: a critical feedback on coral reefs? Ecology Letters 14, 267–273.Google Scholar
Hooper, GJ and Davenport, J (2006) Epifaunal composition and fractal dimensions of intertidal marine macroalgae in relation to emersion. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 86, 1297–1304.Google Scholar
Howard, RK (1985) Measurements of short-term turnover of epifauna within seagrass beds using an in situ staining method. Marine Ecology Progress Series 22, 163–168.Google Scholar
Hughes, TP, Rodrigues, MJ, Bellwood, DR, Ceccarelli, D, Hoegh-Guldberg, O, McCook, LJ, Moltschaniwskyj, NA, Pratchett, MS, Steneck, RS and Willis, BL (2007) Phase shifts, herbivory, and the resilience of coral reefs to climate change. Current Biology 17, 360–365.Google Scholar
Hughes, TP, Graham, NAJ, Jackson, JBC, Mumby, PJ and Steneck, RS (2010) Rising to the challenge of sustaining coral reef resilience. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25, 633–642.Google Scholar
Hull, SL (1997) Seasonal changes in diversity and abundance of ostracods on four species of intertidal algae with differing structural complexity. Marine Ecology Progress Series 161, 71–82.Google Scholar
Jaafar, Z, Huang, D, Tanzil, JTI, Ow, YX and Yap, NWL (eds) (2018) The Singapore Blue Plan 2018. Singapore: Singapore Institute of Biology, 219 pp.Google Scholar
Jensen, KR (2015) Sacoglossa (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Heterobranchia) from northern coasts of Singapore. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 31, 226–249.Google Scholar
Jones, DJ (1971) Ecological studies on macroinvertebrate populations associated with polluted kelp forests in the North Sea. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen 22, 417–441.Google Scholar
Kearse, M, Moir, R, Wilson, A, Stones-Havas, S, Cheung, M, Sturrock, S, Buxton, S, Cooper, A, Markowitz, S, Duran, C, Thierer, T, Ashton, B, Meintjes, P and Drummond, A (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 28, 1647–1649.Google Scholar
Kraufvelin, P, Lindholm, A, Pedersen, MF, Kirkerud, LA and Bonsdorff, E (2010) Biomass, diversity and production of rocky shore macroalgae at two nutrient enrichment and wave action levels. Marine Biology 157, 29–47.Google Scholar
Kuffner, IB, Walters, LJ, Becerro, MA, Paul, VJ, Ritson-Williams, R and Beach, KS (2006) Inhibition of coral recruitment by macroalgae and cyanobacteria. Marine Ecology Progress Series 323, 107–117.Google Scholar
Kvist, S (2013) Barcoding in the dark?: A critical view of the sufficiency of zoological DNA barcoding databases and a plea for broader integration of taxonomic knowledge. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69, 39–45.Google Scholar
Kwong, S, Srivathsan, A and Meier, R (2012) An update on DNA barcoding: low species coverage and numerous unidentified sequences. Cladistics 28, 639–644.Google Scholar
Lahaye, R, van der Bank, M, Bogarin, D, Warner, J, Pupulin, F, Gigot, G, Maurin, O, Duthoit, S, Barraclough, TG and Savolainen, V (2008) DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105, 2923–2928.Google Scholar
Lee, JJ, Tietjen, JH, Mastropaolo, C and Rubin, H (1977) Food quality and the heterogeneous spatial distribution of meiofauna. Helgoländer Wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen 30, 272–282.Google Scholar
Lee, AC, Liao, LM and Tan, KS (2009) New records of marine algae on artificial structures and intertidal flats in coastal waters of Singapore. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 22, 5–40.Google Scholar
Lee, AC, Baula, IU, Miranda, LN and Sin, TM (2015) A Photographic Guide to the Marine Algae of Singapore. Singapore: Tropical Marine Science Institute.Google Scholar
Lee, CS, Walford, J and Goh, BPL (2012 a) The effect of benthic macroalgae on coral settlement. In Tan, K-S (ed.), Contributions to Marine Science: A Commemorative Volume Celebrating 10 Years of Research on St John's Island. Singapore: National University of Singapore, pp. 89–93.Google Scholar
Lee, Q, Yaakub, SM, Ng, NK, Erftemeijer, PLA and Todd, PA (2012 b) The crab fauna of three seagrass meadows in Singapore: a pilot study. Nature in Singapore 5, 363–368.Google Scholar
Leray, M, Yang, JY, Meyer, CP, Mills, SC, Agudelo, N, Ranwez, V, Boehm, JT and Machida, RJ (2013) A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents. Frontiers in Zoology 10, 34.Google Scholar
Lewis, FG III (1987) Crustacean epifauna of seagrass and macroalgae in Apalachee Bay, Florida, USA. Marine Biology 94, 219–229.Google Scholar
Little, C and Kitching, JA (1996) The Biology of Rocky Shores. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 240 pp.Google Scholar
Littler, MM and Littler, DS (1984) Relationships between macroalgal functional form groups and substrata stability in a subtropical rocky-intertidal system. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 74, 13–34.Google Scholar
Littler, MM, Littler, DS and Taylor, PR (1983) Evolutionary strategies in a tropical barrier reef system: functional-form groups of marine macroalgae. Journal of Phycology 19, 229–237.Google Scholar
Low, JKY and Chou, LM (2013) Sargassum in Singapore: what, where and when? In Phang, SM and Lim, PE (eds), Taxonomy of Southeast Asian Seaweeds II. Kuala Lumpur: Institute of Ocean and Earth Sciences, University of Malaya, pp. 219–235.Google Scholar
Low, JKY, Leng, CB and Chou, LM (1997) Pomacentrid population dynamics on Singapore coral reefs. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 44, 53–66.Google Scholar
Low, JKY, Fong, J, Todd, PA, Chou, LM and Bauman, AG (2019) Seasonal variation of Sargassum ilicifolium (Phaeophyceae) growth on equatorial coral reefs. Journal of Phycology 55, 289–296.Google Scholar
Martin-Smith, KM (1994) Short-term dynamics of tropical macroalgal epifauna: patterns and processes in recolonisation of Sargassum fissifolium. Marine Ecology Progress Series 110, 177–185.Google Scholar
McDonald, PS and Bingham, BL (2010) Comparing macroalgal food and habitat choice in sympatric, tube-building amphipods, Ampithoe lacertosa and Peramphithoe humeralis. Marine Biology 157, 1513–1524.Google Scholar
McKenzie, LJ, Yaakub, SM, Tan, R, Seymour, J and Yoshida, RL (2016) Seagrass habitats of Singapore: environmental drivers and key processes. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology S34, 60–77.Google Scholar
McManus, JW and Polsenberg, JF (2004) Coral-algal phase shifts on coral reefs: ecological and environmental aspects. Progress in Oceanography 60, 263–279.Google Scholar
Meier, R, Kwong, S, Vaidya, G and Ng, PKL (2006) DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Systematic Biology 55, 715–728.Google Scholar
Meier, R, Wong, W, Srivathsan, A and Foo, M (2016) $1 DNA barcodes for reconstructing complex phenomes and finding rare species in specimen-rich samples. Cladistics 32, 100–110.Google Scholar
Mieszkowska, N (2016) Intertidal indicators of climate and global change. In Letcher, TM (ed.), Climate Change (Second Edition): Observed Impacts on Planet Earth. New York, NY: Elsevier, pp. 213–229.Google Scholar
Miller, RJ, Reed, DC and Brzezinski, MA (2009) Community structure and productivity of subtidal turf and foliose algal assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 388, 1–11.Google Scholar
Moore, PG (1973) The kelp fauna of northeast Britain. II. Multivariate classification: turbidity as an ecological factor. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 13, 127–163.Google Scholar
Morse, DR, Lawton, JH, Dodson, MM and Williamson, MH (1985) Fractal dimension of vegetation and the distribution of arthropod body lengths. Nature 314, 731–733.Google Scholar
Nagy, ZT, Sonet, G, Glaw, F and Vences, M (2012) First large-scale DNA barcoding assessment of reptiles in the biodiversity hotspot of Madagascar, based on newly designed COI primers. PLoS ONE 7, e34506.Google Scholar
Nilsson, RH, Ryberg, M, Kristiansson, E, Abarenkov, K, Larsson, K-H and Kõljalg, U (2006) Taxonomic reliability of DNA sequences in public sequence databases: a fungal perspective. PLoS ONE 1, e59.Google Scholar
Noiraksar, T, Lewmanomont, K, Tan, KS and Ong, JJL (2012) Diversity of seaweeds and seagrasses of St. John's Island, Singapore. In Tan, K-S (ed.), Contributions to Marine Science: A Commemorative Volume Celebrating 10 Years of Research on St John's Island. Singapore: National University of Singapore, pp. 33–47.Google Scholar
Norderhaug, KM (2004) Use of red algae as hosts by kelp-associated amphipods. Marine Biology 144, 225–230.Google Scholar
Norderhaug, KM, Christie, H and Rinde, E (2002) Colonisation of kelp imitations by epiphyte and holdfast fauna; a study of mobility patterns. Marine Biology 141, 965–973.Google Scholar
Norderhaug, KM, Christie, H, Andersen, GS and Bekkby, T (2012) Does the diversity of kelp forest macrofauna increase with wave exposure? Journal of Sea Research 69, 36–42.Google Scholar
Norderhaug, KM, Christie, H, Rinde, E, Gundersen, H and Bekkby, T (2014) Importance of wave and current exposure to fauna communities in Laminaria hyperborea kelp forests. Marine Ecology Progress Series 502, 295–301.Google Scholar
Nyberg, CD, Thomsen, MS and Wallentinus, I (2009) Flora and fauna associated with the introduced red alga Gracilaria vermiculophylla. European Journal of Phycology 44, 395–403.Google Scholar
Oksanen, J, Blanchet, FG, Friendly, M, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, McGlinn, D, Minchin, PR, O'Hara, RB, Simpson, GL, Solymos, P, Stevens, MHH, Szoecs, E and Wagner, H (2017) vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-5.Google Scholar
Oswald, RC and Seed, R (1986) Organisation and seasonal progression within the epifaunal communities of coastal macroalgae. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 27, 29–40.Google Scholar
Paddack, MJ and Sponaugle, S (2008) Recruitment and habitat selection of newly settled Sparisoma viride to reefs with low coral cover. Marine Ecology Progress Series 369, 205–212.Google Scholar
Parker, JD, Duffy, JE and Orth, RJ (2001) Plant species diversity and composition: experimental effects on marine epifaunal assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 224, 55–67.Google Scholar
Pecl, GT, Araújo, MB, Bell, JD, Blanchard, J, Bonebrake, TC, Chen, I-C, Clark, TD, Colwell, RK, Danielsen, F, Evengård, B, Falconi, L, Ferrier, S, Frusher, S, Garcia, RA, Griffis, RB, Hobday, AJ, Janion-Scheepers, C, Jarzyna, MA, Jennings, S, Lenoir, J, Linnetved, HI, Martin, VY, McCormack, PC, McDonald, J, Mitchell, NJ, Mustonen, T, Pandolfi, JM, Pettorelli, N, Popova, E, Robinson, SA, Scheffers, BR, Shaw, JD, Sorte, CJB, Strugnell, JM, Sunday, JM, Tuanmu, M-N, Vergés, A, Villanueva, C, Wernberg, T, Wapstra, E and Williams, SE (2017) Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355, eaai9214.Google Scholar
Pereira, SG, Lima, FP, Queiroz, NC, Ribeiro, PA and Santos, AM (2006) Biogeographic patterns of intertidal macroinvertebrates and their association with macroalgae distribution along the Portuguese coast. Hydrobiologia 555, 185–192.Google Scholar
Pocklington, P and Wells, PG (1992) Polychaetes: key taxa for marine environmental quality monitoring. Marine Pollution Bulletin 24, 593–598.Google Scholar
R Core Team (2017) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Renard, JL, Sabelli, B and Taviani, M (1996) On Candinia (Sacoglossa: Juliidae), a new fossil genus of bivalved gastropods. Journal of Paleontology 70, 230–235.Google Scholar
Roff, G, Wabnitz, CC, Harborne, AR and Mumby, PJ (2013) Macroalgal associations of motile epifaunal invertebrate communities on coral reefs. Marine Ecology 34, 409–419.Google Scholar
Russ, GR (1980) Effects of predation by fishes, competition, and structural complexity of the substratum on the establishment of a marine epifaunal community. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 42, 55–69.Google Scholar
Schander, C and Willassen, E (2005) What can biological barcoding do for marine biology? Marine Biology Research 1, 79–83.Google Scholar
Schneider, FI and Mann, KH (1991) Species specific relationships of invertebrates to vegetation in a seagrass bed. I. Correlational studies. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 145, 101–117.Google Scholar
Schreider, MJ, Glasby, TM and Underwood, AJ (2003) Effects of height on the shore and complexity of habitat on abundances of amphipods on rocky shores in New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 293, 57–71.Google Scholar
Schultze, K, Janke, K, Krüß, A and Weidemann, W (1990) The macrofauna and macroflora associated with Laminaria digitata and L. hyperborea at the island of Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea). Helgoland Marine Research 44, 39–51.Google Scholar
Seed, R and O'Connor, RJ (1981) Community organization in marine algal epifaunas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12, 49–74.Google Scholar
Sin, TM, Ang, HP, Buurman, J, Lee, AC, Leong, YL, Ooi, SK, Steinberg, P and Teo, SLM (2016) The urban marine environment of Singapore. Regional Studies in Marine Science 8, 331–339.Google Scholar
Smith, JE, Shaw, M, Edwards, RA, Obura, D, Pantos, O, Sala, E, Sandin, SA, Smriga, S, Hatay, M and Rohwer, FL (2006) Indirect effects of algae on coral: algae-mediated, microbe-induced coral mortality. Ecology Letters 9, 835–845.Google Scholar
Soler-Membrives, A, Rossi, S and Munilla, T (2011) Feeding ecology of Ammothella longipes (Arthropoda: Pycnogonida) in the Mediterranean Sea: a fatty acid biomarker approach. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 92, 588–597.Google Scholar
Srivathsan, A, Sha, JC, Vogler, AP and Meier, R (2015) Comparing the effectiveness of metagenomics and metabarcoding for diet analysis of a leaf-feeding monkey (Pygathrix nemaeus). Molecular Ecology Resources 15, 250–261.Google Scholar
Steneck, RS and Dethier, MN (1994) A functional group approach to the structure of algal-dominated communities. Oikos 69, 476–498.Google Scholar
Tan, KS, Acerbi, E and Lauro, FM (2016) Marine habitats and biodiversity of Singapore's coastal waters: a review. Regional Studies in Marine Science 8, 340–352.Google Scholar
Tano, S, Eggertsen, M, Wikström, SA, Berkström, C, Buriyo, AS and Halling, C (2016) Tropical seaweed beds are important habitats for mobile invertebrate epifauna. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 183, 1–12.Google Scholar
Tay, YC, Chng, MWP, Sew, WWG, Rheindt, FE, Tun, KPP and Meier, R (2016) Beyond the Coral Triangle: high genetic diversity and near panmixia in Singapore's populations of the broadcast spawning sea star Protoreaster nodosus. Royal Society Open Science 3, 160253.Google Scholar
Taylor, RB (1998) Density, biomass and productivity of animals in four subtidal rocky reef habitats: the importance of small mobile invertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 172, 37–51.Google Scholar
Taylor, RB and Cole, RG (1994) Mobile epifauna on subtidal brown seaweeds in northeastern New Zealand. Marine Ecology Progress Series 115, 271–282.Google Scholar
Teo, LW and Wee, YC (1983) Seaweeds of Singapore. Singapore: Singapore University Press.Google Scholar
Thomaz, SM and da Cunha, ER (2010) The role of macrophytes in habitat structuring in aquatic ecosystems: methods of measurement, causes and consequences on animal assemblages’ composition and biodiversity. Acta Limnologica Brasiliensia 22, 218–236.Google Scholar
Thompsen, TE (1979) Biology and relationships of the South African sacoglossan mollusk Volvatella laguncula. Journal of Zoology 189, 339–347.Google Scholar
Trowbridge, CD (1992) Mesoherbivory: the ascoglossan sea slug Placida dendritica may contribute to the restricted distribution of its algal host. Marine Ecology Progress Series 83, 207–220.Google Scholar
Trussell, GC, Ewanchuk, PJ and Matassa, CM (2006) Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and density-mediated indirect interactions. Ecology Letters 9, 1245–1252.Google Scholar
Underwood, AJ and Kennelly, SJ (1990) Ecology of marine algae on rocky shores and subtidal reefs in temperate Australia. Hydrobiologia 192, 3–20.Google Scholar
Veiga, P, Rubal, M and Sousa-Pinto, I (2014) Structural complexity of macroalgae influences epifaunal assemblages associated with native and invasive species. Marine Environmental Research 101, 115–123.Google Scholar
Venier, LA and Fahrig, L (1996) Habitat availability causes the species abundance-distribution relationship. Oikos 76, 564–570.Google Scholar
Vergés, A, Steinberg, PD, Hay, ME, Poore, AGB, Campbell, AH, Ballesteros, E, Heck, KL Jr, Booth, DJ, Coleman, MA, Feary, DA, Figueira, W, Langlois, T, Marzinelli, EM, Mizerek, T, Mumby, PJ, Nakamura, Y, Roughan, M, Van Sebille, E, Gupta, AS, Smale, DA, Tomas, F, Wernberg, T and Wilson, SK (2014) The tropicalization of temperate marine ecosystems: climate-mediated changes in herbivory and community phase shifts. Proceedings of the Royal Society B – Biological Sciences 281, 20140846.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G (2002) Characters in context: molluscan shells and the forces that mold them. Paleobiology 28, 41–54.Google Scholar
Wang, WY, Srivathsan, A, Foo, M, Tamane, SK and Meier, R (2018) Sorting specimen-rich invertebrate samples with cost-effective NGS barcodes: validating a reverse workflow for specimen processing. Molecular Ecology Resources 18, 490–501.Google Scholar
Wernberg, T, Russell, BD, Thomsen, MS, Gurgel, CFD, Bradshaw, CJA, Poloczanska, ES and Connell, SD (2011) Seaweed communities in retreat from ocean warming. Current Biology 21, 1828–1832.Google Scholar
Wernberg, T, Bennett, S, Babcock, RC, de Bettignies, T, Cure, K, Depczynski, M, Dufois, F, Fromont, J, Fulton, CJ, Hovey, RK, Harvey, ES, Holmes, TH, Kendrick, GA, Radford, B, Santana-Garcon, J, Saunders, BJ, Smale, DA, Thomsen, MS, Tuckett, CA, Tuya, F, Vanderklift, MA and Wilson, S (2016) Climate-driven regime shift of a temperate marine ecosystem. Science 353, 169–172.Google Scholar
Will, KW and Rubinoff, D (2004) Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification. Cladistics 20, 47–55.Google Scholar
Wilson, KA, Able, KW and Heck, KL Jr (1990) Predation rates on juvenile blue crabs in estuarine nursery habitats: evidence for the importance of macroalgae (Ulva lactuca). Marine Ecology Progress Series 58, 243–251.Google Scholar
Wong, JSY, Chan, YKS, Ng, CSL, Tun, KPP, Darling, ES and Huang, D (2018) Comparing patterns of taxonomic, functional and phylogenetic diversity in reef coral communities. Coral Reefs 37, 737–750.Google Scholar
Woodin, SA (1974) Polychaete abundance patterns in a marine soft-sediment environment: the importance of biological interactions. Ecological Monographs 44, 171–187.Google Scholar
Yaakub, SM, Lim, RLF, Lim, WL and Todd, PA (2013) The diversity and distribution of seagrass in Singapore. Nature in Singapore 6, 105–111.Google Scholar
Yip, ZT, Quek, RZB, Low, JKY, Wilson, B, Bauman, AG, Chou, LM, Todd, PA and Huang, D (2018) Diversity and phylogeny of Sargassum (Fucales, Phaeophyceae) in Singapore. Phytotaxa 369, 200–210.Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Kobert, K, Flouri, T and Stamatakis, A (2014) PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired-End reAd mergeR. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 30, 614–620.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Gan et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S2

Download Gan et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 4 MB