Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:49:27.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution and abundance of post-larvae and juvenile pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus paulensis (Pérez Farfante, 1967) in a subtropical estuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2018

Vinicius Mendes Ruas Open the ORCID record for Vinicius Mendes Ruas [Opens in a new window] ,
Marie-Christine Rufener  and
Fernando D'Incao
Vinicius Mendes Ruas*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Oceanografia Biológica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
Marie-Christine Rufener
Affiliation:
Instituto de Matemática, Estatística e Físicas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
Fernando D'Incao
Affiliation:
Instituto de Oceanografia Biológica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Vinicius Mendes Ruas, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The spatial and temporal variability in the relative abundance of the post-larvae (PL) and juvenile (JU) stages of the pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus paulensis was investigated in the estuary of Lagoa dos Patos, southern Brazil. This analysis enabled the identification of differential distribution patterns. Pink shrimp abundance was studied to understand what factors influence the occupation of the estuary. Monthly samples were taken with a trawl net at 12 sites in the estuary from September 2010 to January 2013. Comparisons were made between protected and unprotected sites. Both PL and JU had a wide distribution in the estuary. The temperature was not a significant variable for explaining abundance variability. The abundance of PL increased with salinity and influenced PL entry to the estuary. The highest abundances of PL were found in unprotected areas and protected sites at the mouth of the estuary, while juveniles were unevenly distributed with higher abundance in protected areas. Recruitment period of PL in the estuary was October to March, and of juveniles was November to February. We suggest that the preservation of unprotected shallow waters and protected areas at the mouth of the estuary are key to further recruitment of the species in the estuary.

Keywords

Fishery resourceLagoa dos PatosPenaeidaerecruitment
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 99 , Issue 4 , June 2019 , pp. 923 - 932
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adnan, AN, Loneragan, NR and Connolly, RM (2002) Variability of, and the influence of environmental factors on, the recruitment of postlarval and juvenile Penaeus merguiensis in the Matang mangroves of Malaysia. Marine Biology 141, 241–251.Google Scholar
Akaike, H (1973) Information theory and extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Petran, BN and Csàaki, F (eds), Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest: Akadèemiai Kiadi, pp. 267–281.Google Scholar
Asmus, ML (1998) A planície costeira e a Lagoa dos Patos. In Seeliger, U, Odebrecht, C and Castelo, JP (eds), Os ecossistemas costeiro e marinho do extremo sul do Brasil. Rio Grande, RS: Ecoscientia, pp. 9–12.Google Scholar
Benedet, RA, Dolci, D and D'Incao, F (2010) Descrição técnica e modo de operação das artes de pesca artesanais do camarão-rosa no estuário da Lagoa dos Patos, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. 2010. Atlântica 32, 5–24.Google Scholar
Boesch, FB and Turner, RE (1984) Dependence of fishery species on salt marshes: the role of food and refuge. Estuaries 7, 460–468.Google Scholar
Branco, JO and Verani, JR (1998) Estudo populacional do camarão-rosa Penaeus paulensis Pérez Farfante (Natantia, Penaeidae) na Lagoa da Conceição, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 15, 353–364.Google Scholar
Burnham, PK and Anderson, DR (2002) Modes Selection and Multi-Model Inference: A Practical Information–Theoretic Approach. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Calazans, D (1993) Key to the larvae and decapodids of genera of the infraorder Penaeidea from the southern Brazilian coast. Nauplius 1, 45–62.Google Scholar
Cházaro-Olvera, S, Winfield, I and Coria-Olvera, V (2009) Transport of Farfantepenaeus aztecus postlarvae in three lagoon-system inlets in the southwestern Gulf of Mexico. Crustaceana 82, 425–437.Google Scholar
Copertino, M and Seeliger, U (2010) Habitats de Ruppia maritima e de macroalgas. In Seeliger, U and Odebrecht, C (eds), O estuário da Lagoa dos Patos: um século de transformações. Rio Grande, RS: FURG, pp. 91–98.Google Scholar
Costa, RC, Lopes, M, Castilho, AL, Fransozo, A and Simões, SM (2008) Abundance and distribution of juvenile pink shrimps Farfantepenaeus spp. in a mangrove estuary and adjacent bay on the northern shore of São Paulo State, southeastern Brazil. Invertebrate Reproduction and Development 52, 51–58.Google Scholar
D'Incao, F (1991) Pesca e biologia da Penaeus paulensis na Lagoa dos patos, RS. Atlântica 13, 159–169.Google Scholar
D'Incao, F (1999) Subordem Dendrobranchiata. In Buckup, L and Bond-Buckup, G (eds), Os Crustáceos do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: Universidade/UFRGS, pp. 271–299.Google Scholar
D'Incao, F and Dumont, LFC (2010) A comunidade de crustáceos decápodes. In Seeliger, U and Odebrecht, C (eds), O estuário da Lagoa dos Patos: um século de transformações. Rio Grande, RS: FURG, pp. 117–122.Google Scholar
D'Incao, F, Valentini, H and Rodrigues, LF (2002) Avaliação da pesca de camarões nas regiões sudeste e sul do Brasil. Atlântica 24, 103–116.Google Scholar
Fernandes, EH, Dyer, KR and Moller, OO (2005) Spatial gradients in the flow of Southern Patos Lagoon. Journal of Coastal Research 20, 102–112.Google Scholar
Fernandes, EHL, Monteiro, IO and Moller, OO (2007) On the dynamics of Mangueira Bay – Patos Lagoon (Brazil). Journal of Coastal Research 47, 96–106.Google Scholar
Ferreira, NC and Freire, AS (2009) Spatio-temporal variation of the pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus paulensis (Crustacea, Decapoda, Penaeidae) associated to the seasonal overture of the sandbar in a subtropical lagoon. Iheringia 99, 390–396.Google Scholar
Garcia, S and Le Reste, L (1981) Life cycles, dynamics, exploitation and management of coastal penaeid shrimp stocks. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 203, 1–215.Google Scholar
Gianuca, D, Gianuca, AT and Vooren, CM (2012) Abundance, breeding and food of the little blue heron Egretta caerulea (Aves, Ardeidae) in the Patos Lagoon estuary, a recently colonized area in southern Brazil. Iheringia 102, 19–25.Google Scholar
Guisan, A, Edwards, TC Jr and Hastie, T (2002) Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecological Modelling 157, 89–100.Google Scholar
Haywood, MDE, Vance, DJ and Loneragan, NR (1995) Seagrass and algal beds as nursery habitats for tiger prawns (Penaeus semisulcatus and P. esculentus) in a tropical Australian estuary. Marine Biology 122, 213–223.Google Scholar
Hothorn, T, Bretz, F and Westfall, P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometric Journal 50, 346–363.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, P, Bemvenuti, CE and Hereu, CM (2009) Feeding of Farfantepenaeus paulensis (Pérez-Farfante, 1967) (Crustacea: Penaeidae) inside and outside experimental pen-culture in southern Brazil. Pan-American Journal of Aquatic Sciences 4, 39–51.Google Scholar
Kalikoski, DC and Vasconcellos, M (2013) Estudo das condições técnicas, econômicas e ambientais da pesca de pequena escala no estuário da Lagoa dos Patos, Brasil: uma metodologia de avaliação. FAO, Circular de Pesca e Aquicultura, Roma, No. 1075.Google Scholar
Kjerfve, B (1986) Comparative oceanography of coastal lagoons. In Wolfe, DA (ed.), Estuarine Variability. New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 63–81.Google Scholar
Lhomme, F (1992) Recruitment of postlarvae of the shrimp Penaeus-subtilis (Perez Farfante, 1967) in two estuaries of French-Guiana. Annales de I'Institut Océanographique 68, 169–178.Google Scholar
Lindén, A and Mäntyniemi, S (2011) Using the negative binomial distribution to model overdispersion in ecological count data. Ecology 92, 1414–1421.Google Scholar
Lüchmann, KH, Freire, AS, Ferreira, NC, Daura-Jorge, FG and Marques, MRF (2008) Spatial and temporal variations in abundance and biomass of panaeid shrimps in the subtropical Conceição Lagoon, southern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 88, 293–299.Google Scholar
Martins, IM, Dias, JM, Fernandes, EH and Muelbert, JH (2007) Numerical modelling of fish eggs dispersion at the Patos Lagoon estuary – Brazil. Journal of Marine Systems 68, 537–555.Google Scholar
McCullagh, P and Nelder, JA (1989) Generalized Linear Models. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Mohan, R, Selvam, V and Azariah, J (1995) Temporal distribution and abundance of shrimp postlarvae and juveniles in the mangroves of Muthupet, Tamilnadu, India. Hydrobiologia 295, 183–191.Google Scholar
Möller, OO, Castelo, JP and Vaz, NA (2009) The effect of river discharge and winds on the interannual variability of the pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus paulensis production in Patos Lagoon. Estuaries and Coasts 32, 787–796.Google Scholar
Nelder, JA and Wedderburn, RWM (1972) Generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 135, 370–384.Google Scholar
Noleto-Filho, EM, Pucciarelli, P and Dumont, LFC (2017) Spatial and temporal variation in juvenile size distribution of the pink shrimp (Penaeus paulensis) in the Patos Lagoon Estuary, Brazil. Marine Biology Research 13, 62–73.Google Scholar
Pereira, N and D'Incao, F (2012) Relationship between rainfall, pink shrimp harvest (Farfantepenaeus paulensis) and adult stock, associated with El Niño and La Niña phenomena in Patos Lagoon, southern Brazil. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 92, 1451–1456.Google Scholar
Pérez-Castañeda, R and Defeo, O (2001) Population variability of four sympatric Penaeid shrimps (Farfantepenaeus spp.) in a tropical coastal lagoon of Mexico. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 52, 631–641.Google Scholar
Pérez-Castañeda, R and Defeo, O (2004) Spatial distribution and structure along ecological gradients: penaeid shrimps in a tropical estuarine habitat of Mexico. Marine Ecology Progress Series 273, 173–185.Google Scholar
Pérez-Castañeda, R, Blanco-Martínez, Z, Sánchez-Martinez, JG, Rábago-Castro, JL, Aguirre-Guzmán, G and Vásquez-Sauceda, ML (2010) Distribution of Farfantepenaeus aztecus and F. dourarum on submerged aquatic vegetation habitats along a subtropical coastal lagoon (Laguna Madre, Mexico). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of United Kingdom 90, 445–452.Google Scholar
Pezzuto, PR and Benincà, EM (2015) Challenges in licensing the industrial double-rig trawl fisheries in Brazil. Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research 43, 496–513.Google Scholar
Renfro, WC (1963) Small beam net for sampling postlarval shrimp. Circular United States Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Service 161, 86–87.Google Scholar
Rozas, LP and Minello, TJ (1997) Estimating densities of small fishes and decapod crustaceans in shallow estuarine habitats: a river of sampling design with focus on gear selection. Estuaries 20, 199–213.Google Scholar
Ruas, VM, Dumont, LF and D'Incao, F (2011) Avaliação do tamanho de captura e estimativa da abundância do camarão-rosa Farfantepenaeus paulensis (Pérez Farfante 1967) no entorno da Ilha dos Marinheiros, estuário da Lagoa dos Patos, RS, Brasil. Atlântica 33, 161–172.Google Scholar
Ruas, VM, Rodrigues, MA, Dumont, LF and D'Incao, F (2014) Habitat selection of the pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus paulensis and the blue crab Callinectes sapidus in an estuary in southern Brazil: influence of salinity and submerged seagrass meadows. Nauplius 22, 113–125.Google Scholar
Sánchez, AJ (1997) Habitat preference of Penaeus duorarum Burkenroad (Crustacea: Decapoda) in a tropical coastal lagoon, southwest Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 217, 107–117.Google Scholar
Saoud, P and Davis, DA (2003) Salinity tolerance of brown shrimp Farfantepenaeus aztecus as it relates to postlarval and juvenile survival, distribution, and growth in estuaries. Estuaries 26, 970–974.Google Scholar
Staples, DJ (1980) Ecology of juvenile and adolescent banana prawns, Penaeus merguiensis, in a mangrove estuary and adjacent off-shore area of the Gulf of Carpentaria. I. immigration and settlement of postlarvae. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 31, 635–652.Google Scholar
Teodoro, SSA, Terossi, M, Costa, RC and Mantelatto, FL (2015) Genetic homogeneity in the commercial pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus paulensis revealed by COI barcoding gene. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 166, 124–130.Google Scholar
Tsuzuki, MY, Cavalli, RO and Bianchini, A (2000) The effects of temperature, age, and acclimation to salinity on the survival of Farfantepenaeus paulensis postlarvae. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 31, 459–468.Google Scholar
Vance, DJ, Haywood, MDE, Heales, DS, Kenyon, RA and Loneragan, NR (1998) Seasonal and annual variation in abundance of postlarval and juvenile banana prawns Penaeus merguiensis and environmental variation in two estuaries in tropical northeastern Australia: a six year study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 163, 21–36.Google Scholar
Venables, WN and Dichmont, CM (2004) GLMs, GAMs and GLMMs: an overview of theory for applications in fisheries research. Fisheries Research 70, 319–337.Google Scholar
Venables, WN and Ripley, BD (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th Edn. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Young, PC and Carpenter, SM (1977) Recruitment of postlarval Penaeid prawns to nursery areas in Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia. Journal of Marine Freshwater Research 28, 745–773.Google Scholar
Zeleis, A, Kleiber, C and Jackman, S (2008) Regression models for count data in R. Journal of Statistical Software 27, 1–25.Google Scholar