Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:29:23.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Direct development in a Nudibranch, Cadlina laevis, with a discussion of developmental processes in Opisthobranchia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

T. E. Thompson
T. E. Thompson
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, University of Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Cadlina laevis (L.) is the first British species of nudibranch shown to possess direct development. The embryo leaves the egg-capsule approximately 50 days (at 10° C) after oviposition, and resembles the adult in the general form of the body. Sufficient food reserves remain to sustain life and apparent growth for more than 1 week of benthic life. A vestigial veliger phase is passed through within the egg-capsule. The shell, velum, mantle, and metapodium-rudiment resemble transitorily those organs of opisthobranch veliger larvae, but certain veliger structures (larval kidney, velar locomotor and pedal cilia) are vestigial in Cadlina, and others are altogether absent (operculum, larval retractor muscle, subvelar ridges, metapodial mucus-gland, pedal sensory cilia, and nephrocysts).

In the Opisthobranchia three distinct development types can be recognized. Type 1 includes those species which possess planktotrophic veliger larvae. Type 2 comprises the species which have lecithotrophic larvae (in the sense employed by Ockelmann, 1965). Type 3 species have direct development, in which many veliger structures may be briefly recapitulated before hatching. Species of type 3 possess eggs of the largest sizes, species of type 2 in general have smaller eggs, while species of type 1 possess the smallest eggs. There is a positive correlation between egg size and the length of the embryonic period, and an inverse correlation between both and batch size. Within any development-type, the largest species tend to produce larger eggs in greater numbers. Within any species, the largest individuals tend to produce more eggs than do the smaller individuals; egg size varies little through the geographical range.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , February 1967 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alder, J. & Hancock, A., 1845–55. A Monograph of the British Nudibranchiate Mollusca. 369 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Allen, E. J. & Nelson, E. W., 1911. On the artificial culture of marine organisms. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 8, pp. 421–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baba, K., 1937. Contributions to the knowledge of a nudibranch Okadaia elegans Baba. Jap. J. Zool., Vol. 7, pp. 147–90.Google Scholar
Baba, K. & Hamatani, I., 1959. The direct development in Runcina setoensis Baba (Opisthobranchia—Cephalaspidea). Publs Seto mar. biol. Lab., Vol. 7, pp. 281–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrentz, A., 1931. Trekk av Lamellidoris muricatas biologi og av dens generasjonsorganers bygning. Nyt Mag. Naturvid., Vol. 70, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Colgan, N., 1911. Clare Island Survey, part 22, marine Mollusca. Proc. Roy. Ir. Acad., Vol. 31, Sect. 2, pp. 1–36.Google Scholar
Colgan, N., 1912. Notes on the development of Actaeonia, showing that A. corrugata of Alder and Hancock is but an immature stage of their Cenia (Actaeonia) Cocksii. Ir. Nat., Vol. 21, pp. 225–31.Google Scholar
Colgan, N., 1914. The opisthobranch fauna of the shores and shallow waters of County Dublin. Ir. Nat., Vol. 23, 161–204.Google Scholar
Costello, D. P., Davidson, M. E., Eggers, A., Fox, M. H. & Henley, C, 1957. Methods for Obtaining and Handling Marine Eggs and Embryos. 247 pp. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass.Google Scholar
Eales, N. B., 1921. Aplysia. L.M.B.C. Mem., No. 24, 84 pp.Google Scholar
Gascoigne, T., 1956. Feeding and reproduction in the Limapontiidae. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 63, pp. 129–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gohar, H. A. F. & Abul-Ela, I. A., 1957 a. The development of Berthellina citrina (Mollusca, Opisthobranchiata). Publs mar. biol. Stn Ghardaqa, No. 9, pp. 69–84.Google Scholar
Gohar, H. A. F. & Abul-Ela, I. A., 1957 b. The development of three chromodorids. Publs. mar. biol. Stn Ghardaqa, No. 9, pp. 203–28.Google Scholar
Gohar, H. A. F. & Abul-Ela, I. A. 1959. On the biology and development of three nudibranchs (from the Red Sea). Publs mar. biol. Stn Ghardaqa, No. 10, pp. 41–62.Google Scholar
Hadfield, M. G., 1963. The biology of nudibranch larvae. Oikos, Vol. 14, pp. 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haefelfinger, H.-R., 1962. Quelques faits concernant le nutrition chez Favorinus branchialis (Rathke 1806) et Stiliger vesiculosus (Deshayes 1864), deux mollusques opisthobranches. Communs Ass. Gén. Suisse Zool., March 1962, pp. 311–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamatani, I., 1960 a. Notes on veligers of Japanese opisthobranchs (I). Publs Seto mar. biol. Lab., Vol. 8, pp. 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamatani, I., 1960 b. Notes on veligers of Japanese opisthobranchs (2). Publs Seto mar. biol. Lab., Vol. 8, pp. 307–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamatani, I., 1961 a. Notes on veligers of Japanese opisthobranchs (3). Publs Seto mar. biol. Lab., Vol. 9, pp. 67–79.Google Scholar
Hamatani, I., 1961 b. Notes on veligers of Japanese opisthobranchs (4). Pubh Seto mar. biol. Lab., Vol. 9, pp. 353–61.Google Scholar
Hand, C. & Steinberg, J., 1955. On the occurrence of the nudibranch Alderia modesta (Lovén, 1844) on the central California coast. Nautilus, Vol. 69, pp. 22–8.Google Scholar
Kawaguti, S., 1959. Formation of the bivalve shell in a gastropod, Tamanovalva limax. Proc. Japan Acad., Vol. 35, pp. 607–11.Google Scholar
Kawaguti, S. & Yamasu, T., 1960. Spawning habits of a bivalved gastropod, Tamanovalva limax. Biol. J. Okayama Univ., Vol. 6, pp. 133–49.Google Scholar
Kawaguti, S. & Yamasu, T., 1961. Self-fertilization in the bivalved gastropod with special reference to the reproductive organs. Biol. J. Okayama Univ., Vol. 7, pp. 213–24.Google Scholar
Macginitie, G. E., 1934. The egg-laying activities of the sea hare Tethys californicus (Cooper). Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 67, pp. 300–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, E., 1953. Three Brazilian sand-Opisthobranchia. Bol. Fac. Filos. Ciênc. Univ. S. Paulo (Zool.), Vol. 164, pp. 165–203.Google Scholar
Mcgowan, J. A. & Pratt, I., 1954. The reproductive system and early embryology of the nudibranch Archidoris montereyensis (Cooper). Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. Harv. Vol. 3, pp. 261–76, pls. 1, 2.Google Scholar
Meyer, H. A. & Mobius, K., 1865. Fauna der Kieler Bucht. Vol. 1 Die Hinterkeimer oder Opisthobranchia, 88 pp., 26 pls. Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Mileikovsky, S. A., 1958. The development and seasonal variations in the numbers of larvae of the White Sea Limapontia capitata (Müll.) and Tergipes despectus Johnston (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia). Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Vol. 120, pp. 1366–9.Google Scholar
Mileikovsky, S. A., 1960. About the range of dispersal of pelagic larvae of bottom invertebrates with marine currents. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Vol. 135.Google Scholar
Naville, A., 1926. Notes sur les eolidiens. Un eolidien d'eau saumâtre. Origine des nématocystes. Zooxanthelles et homochromie. Revue Suisse Zool., T. 33, pp. 25189.Google Scholar
Nordmann, A., 1846. Essai d'une monographic du Tergipes edwardsii. Ann. Sci. nat., Sér. 3 Zool., T. 5, pp. 109–60.Google Scholar
Ockelmann, K. W., 1958. The zoology of East Greenland marine Lamellibranchiata. Meddr Gronland, Bd. 122, No. 4, pp. 1–256.Google Scholar
Ockelmann, K. W., 1965. Developmental types in marine bivalves and their distribution along the atlantic coast of Europe. Proc. First Europ. Malac. Congr. (1962), PP. 25–35.Google Scholar
O'donoghue, C. H. & O'donoghue, E., 1922. Notes on the nudibranchiate Mollusca from the Vancouver Island region II. The spawn of certain species. Trans.R. can. Inst., Vol. 14, pp. 131–43.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1899. La condensation embryogenique chez un nudibranche. Trav. Stn zool. Wimereux, T. 7, pp. 513–21.Google Scholar
Pelseneer, P., 1935. Essai d'ethologie zoologique d'après l'étude des Mollusques. Mém. Acad. r. Belg. cl. Sci., No. 1. 622 pp.Google Scholar
Rao, K. V., 1937. Structure, habits and early development of a new species of Stiliger Ehrenberg. Rec. Indian Mus., Vol. 34, pp. 435–64, pls. VII-IX.Google Scholar
Rao, K. V., 1962. Development and life history of a nudibranchiate gastropod Cuthona adyarensis Rao. J. mar. biol. Ass. India, Vol. 3, pp. 186–97.Google Scholar
Rao, K. V. & Alagarswami, K., 1960. An account of the structure and early development of a new species of a nudibranchiate gastropod, Eolidina {Eolidina) mannarensis. J. mar. biol. Ass. India, Vol. 2, pp. 6–16.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, E., 1944. Faunistic and biological notes on marine invertebrates. I. The eggs and larvae of Brachystomia rissoides (Hani.), Eulimella nitidissima (Mont.), Retusa truncatula (Brug.) and Embletonia pallida (Alder & Hancock), (Gastropoda marina). Videnskab. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren. Kbh., Bd. 107, pp. 207–33.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, E., 1951. Faunistic and biological notes on marine invertebrates. II. The eggs and larvae of some Danish marine gastropods. Videnskab. Meddr dansk naturh. Foren. Kbh., Bd. 113, pp. 202–49.Google Scholar
Rees, C. B., 1950. The identification and classification of lamellibranch larvae. Hull Bull. mar. Ecol., Vol. 3, pp. 73–104.Google Scholar
Risbec, J., 1928. Contribution à 1'étude des nudibranches Néo-Calédoniens. Faune Colon.fr. T. 2, pp. 1–328.Google Scholar
Roginsky, I. S., 1962. The egg-masses of nudibranchs of the White Sea. Biol. White Sea, Vol. 1, pp. 201–14.Google Scholar
Saunders, A. M. C. & Poole, M., 1910. The development of Aplysia punctata. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 55, pp. 497–539.Google Scholar
Schultze, M. S., 1849. Ueber die Entwicklung des Tergipes lacinulatus. Arch. Naturgesch., Bd. 15, pp. 268–79.Google Scholar
Tardy, J., 1962 a. Observations et expériences sur la métamorphose et la croissance de Capellinia exigua (Aid. et. H.) (Mollusque, Nudibranche). C. r. hebd. Seanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 254, pp. 2242–4.Google Scholar
Tardy, J., 1962 b. Cycle biologique et metamorphose d'Eolidina alderi (Gastéropode, Nudibranche). C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 255, pp. 3250–2.Google Scholar
Tardy, J., 1964. Observations sur le développement de Tergipes despectus (Gastéropode, Nudibranches). C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 258, pp. 1635–7.Google Scholar
Tchang, Si, 1931 a. Un nouveau cas de condensation embryogenique chez un nudibranche (Doridopsis limbata Cuvier). C. r. hebd. Seanc. Acad. Sci., Paris, T. 192, pp. 302–4.Google Scholar
Tchang, si, 1931 b. Contribution à 1'étude des mollusques opisthobranches de la cote provencale. Théses de la Faculté des Sciences de I’ Université de Lyon, pp. 5–211.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1958 a. The natural history, embryology, larval biology and postlarval development of Adalaria proximo (Alder and Hancock) (Gastropoda Opisthobranchia). Phil. Trans. R. Soc, B, Vol. 242, pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1958 b. The influence of temperature on spawning in Adalaria proxima (A. & H.) (Gastropoda Nudibranchia). Oikos, Vol. 9, pp. 246–52.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1959. Feeding in nudibranch larvae. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 38, 239–48.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1961 a. The importance of the larval shell in the classification of the Sacoglossa and the Acoela (Gastropoda Opisthobranchia). Proc. malac. Soc. Lond., Vol. 34, pp. 233–8.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1961 b. The structure and mode of functioning of the reproductive organs of Tritonia hombergi (Gastropoda Opisthobranchia). Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 102, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Thompson, T. E., 1962. Studies on the ontogeny of Tritonia hombergi Cuvier (Gastropoda Opisthobranchia). Phil. Trans. R. Soc, B, Vol. 245, pp. 171–218.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1935. Studies on the egg-capsules and development of Arctic marine prosobranchs. Meddr Gronland, Bd. 100, pp. 405–630.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1940. Studies on the egg masses and larval development of Gastropoda from the Iranian Gulf. Dan. scient. Invest. Iran, Vol. 2, pp. 159–238.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1944. Marine Gastropoda Prosobranchiata. Meddr Gronland, Bd. 121, no. 13, pp. 1–181.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates, with special reference to the planktonic larvae in the Sound (Øresund). Meddr Kommn. Havunders., Ser. Plankt., Bd. 4, No. 1. 523 pp.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1950. Reproduction and larval ecology of marine bottom invertebrates. Biol. Rev., Vol. 25, pp. 1–45.Google Scholar
Vannucci, M. & Hosoe, E. K., 1953. Sôbre Embletonia mediterranea (Costa), nudibrânquio de regiĂo lagunar de Cananéia. Boln Inn. esp. Oceanogr., T. 4, pp. 103–20.Google Scholar
Vayssiére, A., 1900. Note sur un nouveau cas de condensation embryogénique observé chez le Pelta coronata, type de tectibranche. Zool. Anz., Bd. 23, pp. 286–8.Google Scholar
Vestergaard, K. & Thorson, G., 1938. Über den laich und die larven von Duvaucelia plebeja, Polycera quadrilineata, Eubranchus pallidus and Limapontia capitata (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchiata). Zool. Anz., Bd. 124, pp. 129–38.Google Scholar