Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T15:22:38.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Contribution to the Quantitative Study of Plankton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

E. J. Allen
Affiliation:
Director of the Plymouth Laboratory.

Extract

The well-known work of Hensen (1887) was the first serious attempt to determine the actual number of individual plankton organisms in sea-water. Hensen's method consisted in straining a vertical column of water through a net of fine-meshed bolting silk having 6,000 to 6,500 meshes per square centimetre, the average length of the side of a mesh being 50 µ. A carefully measured sample of the organisms retained by the net was taken and the number of organisms in it counted. From this, since the area of the mouth of the net and the distance through which it was drawn were known, the number of organisms in a unit volume (1 litre) of water could be calculated, with the help of a coefficient of filtration for the particular pattern of net employed, which was determined experimentally. Many small organisms, however, escaped through the meshes of the net, and Lohmann (1902, 1908) made a special study of these by filtering through hard filter paper or closely woven taffeta silk, by an examination of the filtering apparatus in the “houses” of Appendicularians, and finally, for the quantitative estimation of the smallest organisms of all, by subjecting samples of sea-water to the action of a centrifuge making 1,400 revolutions per minute for a period of 7 minutes. The use of the centrifuge has been continued by Gran (1915) and by Lebour (1917). For the full literature of the subject the reader is referred to Gran (1915) and Lohmann (1911).In the course of my work on the cultivation of plankton diatoms (1910, 1911) I became convinced that even the quantitative method based on the use of the centrifuge fell very far short of giving the total number of organisms actually present in a sample of sea-water, and the results recorded in the present paper show that this is certainly the case.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1919

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature

1910. Allen, E. J., and Nelson, E. W.On the Artificial Culture of Marine Plankton Organisms. Jour. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. VIII, p. 421. (Also in Quart. Jour. Micr. Sci., Vol. LV, p. 361.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1914. Allen, E. J.On the Culture of the Plankton Diatom (Thalassiosira gravida) Cleve in Artificial Sea-water. Jour. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. X., p. 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1915. Gran, H. H. The Plankton Production in the North European Waters in the Spring of 1912. Bulletin Planktonique, 1912. Cons. Internat. pour l'explor. de la Mer. [Note.—This paper gives a full Bibliography of the subject.]Google Scholar
1887. Hensen, V. Ueber die Bestimmung des Planktons. 5ter Bericht Komm. Wiss. Untersuch. deutsch. Meere., Kiel. Jahre, 1882–86.Google Scholar
1917. Lebour, Marie V.The Microplankton of Plymouth Sound. Jour. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XI, p. 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1902. Lohmann, H. Neue Untersuchungen über den Reichtum des Meeres an Plankton. Wissensch. Meeresunters. Kiel. Bd. 7.Google Scholar
1908. Lohmann, H. Untersuchungen zur Feststellung des vollständigen Gehaltes des Meeres an Plankton. Wissensch. Meeresunters. Kiel. 10.Google Scholar
1911. Lohmann, H. Ueber das Nannoplankton und die Zentrifugierung kleinster Wasserproben zur Gewinnung desselben in lebenden Zustande. Internat. Revue Hydrobiol. u. Hydrographie IV, p. 1.Google Scholar